Title: Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural Diversity, and Agricultural Survival
1Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural
Diversity, and Agricultural Survival
- Jason W. Clay
- Center for Conservation Innovation
- World Wildlife FundUS
- Third Annual Butler/Cunningham Conference
- Montgomery, Alabama
- November 8, 2004
2Why are environmentalists interested in food and
fiber?
- Agriculture is the largest threat to biodiversity
on the planetuses half of all habitable land - It is the most polluting industry in most
countries, 70 of water used by humans, and most
chemicals. - Most biodiversity is in areas of use
- Most biodiversity and biomass is in the soil
- Production is largely extractive90 of farmers
have net soil loss. In US 6 bushels of soil to
produce 1 bushel of grain 2 kilos of wild fish
to make 1 kilo of salmon
3The context for this interest
- Consolidation and integration of marketslonger
market chains, but fewer players - Declining prices to producersonly the efficient
or the protected will survive - Increasing use of producer contracts to reduce
corporate risksresidues, product safety, and
traceability - Increasing consumer interest in product and
product testingless in production processes - Increasing numbers of certification programs
(Organic, FSC, MSC, Eurepgap) - Increasing role of retailers as watchdogs
4The new license to operate
- In the past, was obey the law, now obey the law
in consumer country or market - Was do no harm or no net loss (driven both by
government and buyers), now it is do good and
beyond compliance - Was scale or equity, now both scale and equity
- In a global economy, the issue is about price
- Comparative advantage and efficiency of
production are driving producers around the world - Reduce water use
- Reduce other input use (pesticides, fertilizer,
energy) - Build the soilits cheaper than buying inputs
5Opportunities to reduce impacts through
partnerships with the private sector
- Identify the most serious impacts
- Habitat conversion, soil degradation, input use,
effluents - Be strategicsome crops have more impacts than
others - Be strategicsome buyers have more influence than
others. Todays price is tomorrows premium - Focus on howbetter, not best, management
practices. Todays BMP is tomorrows norm - Work with producers to reduce impacts and
increase profits and make sure they are in
business in 25-50 years - Develop commodity specific BMP-based investment,
buyer and insurer screens - Identify the key commodities and impacts in AL to
target
6Zoning and Regulations to Minimize Impacts from
Agriculture
- Not all land is created equalor is equally good
for production - Siting can cause up to 90 of subsequent impacts
- Key siting issues are protection of riparian
areas, slopes and watershed - Siting and zoning issues are crop specific
- Better practices cannot correct impacts
- New crops often have little known impactsthe
future will be about new crops in AL and
elsewhere - The only thing worse than the environmental
impact of failed operations is the economic
waste.
7Marginal Lands
- Most environmental impacts result from farming
the wrong land - Our research shows that virtually any farmer
anywhere in the world can abandon 5-15 of their
land and increase total production - This is true for many crops in many areas
- Abandoning marginal areas disproportionately
reduces input use and increases producer net
profits - More importantly, it reduces environmental
impacts by up to 50 - How would this kind of thinking change land use
in AL
8Degraded Lands
- Agriculture is expanding globally at 0.25 to
0.5/year - In the past, much land was degraded and abandoned
- With new production techniques much of this land
can be brought back into production - In Brazil, farmers are finding that they make
more money growing soil than they do growing soy
beans - Through no-till, crop sequencing and crop
rotation, they can increase organic matter from
0.5 to 3 in 5-6 years - They reduce water, pesticide, fertilizer use and
soil erosion by 50 and pollutants in effluent by
90 - Does AL have the potential to rehabilitate
degraded land and if so, what would it be used
for?
9Subsidies and Market Barriers
- Subsidies are often the biggest barrier to the
adoption of better practices - Subsidies quite possibly result in more
environmental impacts than any other single
policyand the impacts reverberate throughout the
world - In the US, subsidies have increased the value of
land (where subsidized crops can be grown) by
25-50 making producers less competitive on
global markets - Direct crop production payments and export
subsidies will be restricted under the WTO
10Payments for Environmental Services
- Emphasis is likely to shift from direct subsidy
payments to payments for environmental services - Reduced erosion,
- Increased soil carbon/carbon sequestration,
- Water/watershed protection, etc.
- The biggest gains would probably be on more
marginal lands not the best agricultural land,
similar to CRP - If this occurred AL might be in a position to
take advantage of this situation
11Better Management Practices (BMPs)
- Only a few activities cause 60-80 of the
environmental impacts of most concern - Identify BMPs that already address those concerns
- Most BMPs pay for themselves, often in 2-3 years
- Adapt BMPs to different scale/intensity
production - Develop low-cost BMPs
- There are no best management practices only
better onesand better is far better than worse - What crops and impacts are of most concern in AL?
12Social BMPs
- Many BMPs address social and equity issues
- Shrimp producers with worker incentive programs
can be 4 times more profitable than those that
dont - Brazilians are exploring a wide range of programs
that increase profits and improve worker welfare - Education programs can reduce worker turnover by
80 and pay for themselves within a year - Unilevers soy sourcing program increases the
price paid to producers by 15 and reduces
Unilevers costs - To date, these programs have been about
production costs and efficiency, but there is
marketing potential too - What can AL do along these lines?
13Certification and Ecolabels
- Rapid increase in the number of certification
programs, but only organic is sustained without
subsidies - Few programs can back up what they claim or imply
- Very few programs have measurable standards or
can measure progress against a baseline - No programs test for product quality or residues
- Wisconsin potatoes are a useful contrast
- Comparison of cotton production impacts (organic,
IPM, GM, conventional, hybrids) to see which use
the most toxic chemicals and which impact soil
and water - Ecolabels should be evaluated by their ability to
measure a reduction in key impacts for each
product certified - Is AL taking advantage of certification programs?
14Entrepreneurs
- Food production is largely an inherited
occupation. - Most farmers are born into itvery few choose it
- This is not a likely scenario for innovation and
cross fertilization of ideas from other sectors - One university trains entrepreneursEARTH in
Costa Rica - Within 3 years, each graduate has created 10 jobs
- What rural areas need are graduates that make
jobs, not take them - What could AL do to create more entrepreneurs?
15What does all this mean for Alabama?
- Fewer farmers but more people living in rural
areas - Most of those moving to and living in rural areas
are poor - Shifts of ag subsidies to payments for
environmental services could benefit AL - AL farmers are marginal, they cannot compete in
most commodities and need to focus on specialty
items - Should also focus on local markets, quality of
food, longer growing seasons, etc. - In the past, a farmer producer 2-3 main cash
crops in their lifetime. Now they will be
producing 10-12. Its a different ballgame. - Are AL farmers being prepared for this?
16Closing thoughts
- Producing food and fiber in the future will be
about managing change, not protecting the past - It will be about how to think, not what to think
- It will be about learning, but learning much
fastertoday it takes 8 years to disseminate
BMPs, by that point many are obsolete - There are no entitlements to farm, however, and
there will be fewer farmers each year - However, more people will be living in rural
areas each year, and they can farm new outputs
(e.g. services)