Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural Diversity, and Agricultural Survival - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural Diversity, and Agricultural Survival

Description:

Center for Conservation Innovation. World ... interested in food and fiber? ... Key siting issues are protection of riparian areas, slopes and watershed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: agAu
Learn more at: http://www.ag.auburn.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural Diversity, and Agricultural Survival


1
Environmental Responsibility, Agricultural
Diversity, and Agricultural Survival
  • Jason W. Clay
  • Center for Conservation Innovation
  • World Wildlife FundUS
  • Third Annual Butler/Cunningham Conference
  • Montgomery, Alabama
  • November 8, 2004

2
Why are environmentalists interested in food and
fiber?
  • Agriculture is the largest threat to biodiversity
    on the planetuses half of all habitable land
  • It is the most polluting industry in most
    countries, 70 of water used by humans, and most
    chemicals.
  • Most biodiversity is in areas of use
  • Most biodiversity and biomass is in the soil
  • Production is largely extractive90 of farmers
    have net soil loss. In US 6 bushels of soil to
    produce 1 bushel of grain 2 kilos of wild fish
    to make 1 kilo of salmon

3
The context for this interest
  • Consolidation and integration of marketslonger
    market chains, but fewer players
  • Declining prices to producersonly the efficient
    or the protected will survive
  • Increasing use of producer contracts to reduce
    corporate risksresidues, product safety, and
    traceability
  • Increasing consumer interest in product and
    product testingless in production processes
  • Increasing numbers of certification programs
    (Organic, FSC, MSC, Eurepgap)
  • Increasing role of retailers as watchdogs

4
The new license to operate
  • In the past, was obey the law, now obey the law
    in consumer country or market
  • Was do no harm or no net loss (driven both by
    government and buyers), now it is do good and
    beyond compliance
  • Was scale or equity, now both scale and equity
  • In a global economy, the issue is about price
  • Comparative advantage and efficiency of
    production are driving producers around the world
  • Reduce water use
  • Reduce other input use (pesticides, fertilizer,
    energy)
  • Build the soilits cheaper than buying inputs

5
Opportunities to reduce impacts through
partnerships with the private sector
  • Identify the most serious impacts
  • Habitat conversion, soil degradation, input use,
    effluents
  • Be strategicsome crops have more impacts than
    others
  • Be strategicsome buyers have more influence than
    others. Todays price is tomorrows premium
  • Focus on howbetter, not best, management
    practices. Todays BMP is tomorrows norm
  • Work with producers to reduce impacts and
    increase profits and make sure they are in
    business in 25-50 years
  • Develop commodity specific BMP-based investment,
    buyer and insurer screens
  • Identify the key commodities and impacts in AL to
    target

6
Zoning and Regulations to Minimize Impacts from
Agriculture
  • Not all land is created equalor is equally good
    for production
  • Siting can cause up to 90 of subsequent impacts
  • Key siting issues are protection of riparian
    areas, slopes and watershed
  • Siting and zoning issues are crop specific
  • Better practices cannot correct impacts
  • New crops often have little known impactsthe
    future will be about new crops in AL and
    elsewhere
  • The only thing worse than the environmental
    impact of failed operations is the economic
    waste.

7
Marginal Lands
  • Most environmental impacts result from farming
    the wrong land
  • Our research shows that virtually any farmer
    anywhere in the world can abandon 5-15 of their
    land and increase total production
  • This is true for many crops in many areas
  • Abandoning marginal areas disproportionately
    reduces input use and increases producer net
    profits
  • More importantly, it reduces environmental
    impacts by up to 50
  • How would this kind of thinking change land use
    in AL

8
Degraded Lands
  • Agriculture is expanding globally at 0.25 to
    0.5/year
  • In the past, much land was degraded and abandoned
  • With new production techniques much of this land
    can be brought back into production
  • In Brazil, farmers are finding that they make
    more money growing soil than they do growing soy
    beans
  • Through no-till, crop sequencing and crop
    rotation, they can increase organic matter from
    0.5 to 3 in 5-6 years
  • They reduce water, pesticide, fertilizer use and
    soil erosion by 50 and pollutants in effluent by
    90
  • Does AL have the potential to rehabilitate
    degraded land and if so, what would it be used
    for?

9
Subsidies and Market Barriers
  • Subsidies are often the biggest barrier to the
    adoption of better practices
  • Subsidies quite possibly result in more
    environmental impacts than any other single
    policyand the impacts reverberate throughout the
    world
  • In the US, subsidies have increased the value of
    land (where subsidized crops can be grown) by
    25-50 making producers less competitive on
    global markets
  • Direct crop production payments and export
    subsidies will be restricted under the WTO

10
Payments for Environmental Services
  • Emphasis is likely to shift from direct subsidy
    payments to payments for environmental services
  • Reduced erosion,
  • Increased soil carbon/carbon sequestration,
  • Water/watershed protection, etc.
  • The biggest gains would probably be on more
    marginal lands not the best agricultural land,
    similar to CRP
  • If this occurred AL might be in a position to
    take advantage of this situation

11
Better Management Practices (BMPs)
  • Only a few activities cause 60-80 of the
    environmental impacts of most concern
  • Identify BMPs that already address those concerns
  • Most BMPs pay for themselves, often in 2-3 years
  • Adapt BMPs to different scale/intensity
    production
  • Develop low-cost BMPs
  • There are no best management practices only
    better onesand better is far better than worse
  • What crops and impacts are of most concern in AL?

12
Social BMPs
  • Many BMPs address social and equity issues
  • Shrimp producers with worker incentive programs
    can be 4 times more profitable than those that
    dont
  • Brazilians are exploring a wide range of programs
    that increase profits and improve worker welfare
  • Education programs can reduce worker turnover by
    80 and pay for themselves within a year
  • Unilevers soy sourcing program increases the
    price paid to producers by 15 and reduces
    Unilevers costs
  • To date, these programs have been about
    production costs and efficiency, but there is
    marketing potential too
  • What can AL do along these lines?

13
Certification and Ecolabels
  • Rapid increase in the number of certification
    programs, but only organic is sustained without
    subsidies
  • Few programs can back up what they claim or imply
  • Very few programs have measurable standards or
    can measure progress against a baseline
  • No programs test for product quality or residues
  • Wisconsin potatoes are a useful contrast
  • Comparison of cotton production impacts (organic,
    IPM, GM, conventional, hybrids) to see which use
    the most toxic chemicals and which impact soil
    and water
  • Ecolabels should be evaluated by their ability to
    measure a reduction in key impacts for each
    product certified
  • Is AL taking advantage of certification programs?

14
Entrepreneurs
  • Food production is largely an inherited
    occupation.
  • Most farmers are born into itvery few choose it
  • This is not a likely scenario for innovation and
    cross fertilization of ideas from other sectors
  • One university trains entrepreneursEARTH in
    Costa Rica
  • Within 3 years, each graduate has created 10 jobs
  • What rural areas need are graduates that make
    jobs, not take them
  • What could AL do to create more entrepreneurs?

15
What does all this mean for Alabama?
  • Fewer farmers but more people living in rural
    areas
  • Most of those moving to and living in rural areas
    are poor
  • Shifts of ag subsidies to payments for
    environmental services could benefit AL
  • AL farmers are marginal, they cannot compete in
    most commodities and need to focus on specialty
    items
  • Should also focus on local markets, quality of
    food, longer growing seasons, etc.
  • In the past, a farmer producer 2-3 main cash
    crops in their lifetime. Now they will be
    producing 10-12. Its a different ballgame.
  • Are AL farmers being prepared for this?

16
Closing thoughts
  • Producing food and fiber in the future will be
    about managing change, not protecting the past
  • It will be about how to think, not what to think
  • It will be about learning, but learning much
    fastertoday it takes 8 years to disseminate
    BMPs, by that point many are obsolete
  • There are no entitlements to farm, however, and
    there will be fewer farmers each year
  • However, more people will be living in rural
    areas each year, and they can farm new outputs
    (e.g. services)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com