Jennifer Colville - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Jennifer Colville

Description:

Capacity: the ability of individuals, organisations, and societies to perform ... assessments are being used by senior management for re-profiling or retrenchment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: ronal179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jennifer Colville


1
Workshop Introduction to Capacity Assessments
and Capacity Development Strategies UNDP
Capacity Assessment Methodology
  • Jennifer Colville
  • Almaty, Kazakhstan
  • November 2007

2
UNDP Definitions Related to Capacity
Capacity the ability of individuals,
organisations, and societies to perform
functions, solve problems, and set and achieve
objectives in a sustainable manner.
Capacity Development the process through which
the abilities to do so are obtained,
strengthened, adapted and maintained over time.
3
UNDP Definitions Related to Capacity
Capacity Assessment An analysis of current
capacities against desired future capacities
this assessment generates an understanding of
capacity assets and needs which in turn leads to
the formulation of capacity development
strategies
4
Capacity Development Process
5
Capacity Assessment Key Design Questions
  • Capacity for Whom?
  • Capacity for What?
  • Capacity for Why?

6
UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework
Technical Capacities Functional Capacities
(within a Sector/Theme Context)
Core Issues
Points of Entry
7
UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework
Points of Entry
  • Individual repository of knowledge and skills
    the building blocks of organizations the target
    of individual performance assessments, the
    responsibility of organizations
  • Organizational provides framework for
    individuals to connect and achieve goals beyond
    individual capacities collective manifestation
    of individual capacities, e.g., Ministries,
    Departments, Districts, NGOs
  • Enabling Environment provides the enabling
    environment, e.g., ethos, incentives/constraints,
    policy frameworks, interaction of groups/
    networks/organizations, by which individuals and
    organizations are able to function, e.g.,
    legal/judicial environment, financial management
    environment

Points of Entry
Example Enabling Environment
8
UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework
Capacities
Functional Capacities
  • Technical Capacities Associated with particular
    areas of professional expertise or knowledge
    (e.g., agricultural extension, health, education)
  • Functional Capacities Activities associated
    with the formulation, implementation and
    evaluation of policy, programmes and projects
    relevant in all situations irrespective of
    sector/organization
  • Engage with Stakeholders
  • Assess a Situation and Define a Vision and
    Mandate
  • Formulate Policies and Strategies
  • Budget, Manage and Implement
  • Monitor and Evaluate

Example Capacity to Monitor and Evaluate as a
Driver of Design
9
UNDP Capacity Assessment Framework
Core Issues
Institutional Development ensuring effectively
functioning national/local institutions for
societal, economic, and human development (e.g.,
mission and strategy, business processes, human
resources, physical resources) Leadership
fostering good leadership maximizes capacity
investments Knowledge CD is underpinned by
knowledge or what people know Mutual
Accountability efficient, responsive,
transparent and accountable public administration
key to sustainable development
Core Issues
Example Institutional Development Core Issues as
a Driver of Design
10
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
11
Mobilize and Design Key Activities
  • Clarify objectives and expectations with primary
    clients, e.g.,
  • In-depth analytical analysis of functional
    capacities, often used to define training
    requirements, or
  • Catalytic exercise to build consensus and move to
    action
  • Identify and engage national/local stakeholders
    throughout the process to ensure ongoing success
  • National and municipal stakeholders
  • Links between national and local levels
  • Adapt capacity assessment framework to local
    needs
  • Define the scale and scope of the capacity
    assessment by selecting point of entry, core
    issue(s) and functional capacity(ies)
  • Review existing sources and knowledge

12
Mobilize and Design Key Activities (continued)
  • Determine how the assessment will be conducted
  • Self-assessment vs. interviews
  • Number of municipalities, number of ministries
  • Level within municipalities
  • Pilot exercises
  • Team
  • Location
  • Cost the capacity assessment exercise, based on
  • Team composition
  • Duration
  • Depth of analysis

13
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Mobilize and
Design
Functional Capacities
Assess a Situation Create a Vision and Mandate
Formulate Policies Strategies
Budget, Manage Implement
Monitor Evaluate
Engage with Stakeholders
Individual
Points of Entry
Orgl
Enabling Environment
Institutional Development
Leadership
Core Issues
Knowledge
Mutual Accountability Mechanisms
Technical capacities complement the functional
capacities.
14
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Mobilize and
Design
15
Mobilize and Design Design Considerations
  • Once a point of entry has been determined, use
    either a core issue(s) or a cross-cutting
    functional capacity(ies) as the primary driver of
    the assessment
  • Select one cross-section to all 100
    cross-sections it is not necessarily suggested
    that the entire framework is used in any given
    assessment
  • Go into more depth on any given cross-section,
    e.g., split Budget, Manage Implement into
    three sub-capacities
  • Customize according to how much time is allotted
    for a given project one week assessment or a
    three-month assessment

It is incumbent upon a capacity assessment team
to design the framework to suit local needs.
16
Country Case Study Scoping a Capacity Assessment
Functional Capacities
Engage in Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue
Analyze a Situation Create a Vision
Formulate Policy Strategy
Budget, Manage Implement
Monitor Evaluate
Points of Entry
Individual
Enabling Environmt
Orgl
Leadership
Policy Legal Framework
Mutual Accountability Mechanisms
Public Engagement
Core Issues
Human Resources
Financial Resources
Physical Resources
Environmental Resources
Technical capacities complement the functional
capacities.
17
Country Case Study Scoping a Capacity Assessment
Functional Capacities
Engage in Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue
Analyze a Situation Create a Vision
Formulate Policy Strategy
Budget, Manage Implement
Monitor Evaluate
Points of Entry
Individual
Enabling Environmt
Orgl
Leadership
Policy Legal Framework
Mutual Accountability Mechanisms
Public Engagement
Core Issues
Human Resources
Financial Resources
Physical Resources
Environmental Resources
Technical capacities complement the functional
capacities.
18
Decentralization Scope of Capacity Assessment
and Development
Functional Capacities (within a Sector/Theme
Context)
Plan Budget
Monitor Evaluate
Implement
Leadership
Policy Legal Framework
Mutual Accountability Mechanisms
Scoping Issues
Public Engagement
Human Resources
Financial Resources
Physical Resources
Points of Entry
Environmental Resources
Orgl
Enabling Environmt
19
Ministry of Water Scoping Map
Functional Capacities (Capacity for What?)
Implementation Capacities
Analyze a Situation and Create a Vision Formulate
Policy and Strategy
Entities (Capacity for Whom?) Ministry of
Water Project Management Unit Urban Water Supply
Urban Water Boards Town Water Supply Regional
Water Boards Rural Water Supply Water User
Associations
Programme/ Project Management
Info and Comms Tech
Procurement
Financial Management
Human Res. Mgmt
Engage in Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue
Monitor Evaluate
20
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
21
Sources of Information
  • Self-assessment
  • Interviews with stakeholders
  • Government partners
  • Beneficiaries
  • CSOs
  • Donors
  • Triangulate results in consensus-building sessions

22
Quantitative Data vs. Qualitative Information
Quantitative Data
Qualitative Information
  • Advantages
  • May be seen as more legitimate than the
    qualitative element
  • Easier to compare capacity levels across
    different core issues and functional capacities
  • Disadvantages
  • May be used for comparison purposes that are not
    valid
  • Advantages
  • Provides context for qualitative element
  • Creates repository of institutional memory
  • Disadvantages
  • More difficult to compare capacity levels across
    core issues and cross-cutting capacities

23
Capacity Assessment Worksheet Sample 1
24
Capacity Assessment Users Guide
  • Contents
  • Overview and Key Operational Considerations
  • Assess Capacity Assets and Needs
  • Define Capacity Development Strategies and
    Actions
  • Questions and Indicators by Core Issue
  • Annexes

A step-by-step guide to conducting a capacity
assessment Includes instructions for conducting a
capacity assessment and specifically for using
the supporting tool Includes illustrative
questions and indicators for each cross-section
of the framework (cross section of point of
entry, core issue and functional capacity)
25
Capacity Assessment Supporting Tool
An excel spreadsheet to support a capacity
assessment, including separate worksheets for
each step of the assessment and an overall
summary
26
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
27
Summarize and Interpret Results
28
Considerations in Conducting a Capacity Assessment
  • Assessment fatigue
  • Skepticism about value and validity of results
    emerging from a capacity assessment
  • Suspicion that capacity assessments are being
    used by senior management for re-profiling or
    retrenchment
  • Disconnect between capacity assessment and
    formulation of capacity development strategies
    basing strategy formulation on guesstimates of
    capacity gaps
  • Facilitation level too much may lead to
    coached outcomes too little may result in a
    wish list of capacity development strategies

29
Capacity Assessment Lessons in Application
  • Adapt to the context leverage the capacity
    assessment framework as a point of departure for
    a capacity assessment it is flexible and needs
    to be adapted by the assessment team to suit its
    specific needs/context
  • Ensure appropriate team composition (team leader
    mix of content, process, cross-cutting thematic
    experts national and international consultants)
  • Build enough time into the workplan for
    identifying stakeholders, designing approach,
    building consensus, translating materials, etc.
  • Simultaneously manage the political/strategic
    level and the tactical level
  • Understand that capacity assessment is a set of
    activities, not a solution
  • Leave prioritization of investment until after
    the assessment of capacities has been completed
  • Consider capacity assessment as a dynamic,
    ongoing process not a one-time event

30
Capacity Assessment Expected Results
  • Leads to insights regarding existing capacity
    assets, needs and priorities
  • Informs the formulation of capacity development
    strategies
  • Does not necessarily generate surprises
  • Can help confirm priorities and build consensus ?
    moving forward off of a common platform

31
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Benefits
  • Provides a structure for discussion about the
    scale and scope of the capacity assessment
    exercise and about expectations of the capacity
    development effort more generally
  • Provides a comprehensive view of the issues that
    could be addressed in a capacity assessment
  • Makes sense of complex development situations,
    when it is not always obvious where best to
    intervene to promote capacity development
  • Brings rigor and a systematic method for
    assessing existing capacity assets and needs
  • Can generate / capture quantitative as well as
    qualitative data to support the development of a
    capacity development action plan
  • Provides content for functional capacities along
    points of entry and core issues

32
Other Assessment Approaches
  • MDG Needs Assessment, the what and the how,
    incorporating capacity into costing methodology
  • HACT, piece of national implementation capacity
    scope, w/o the conditionality
  • Risk Assessment, e.g., for implementing partners
  • Systems Assessment, e.g., public financial
    management
  • Functional Review
  • SWOT, historically envisioned for competitive
    positioning, evolved for use in development
    context
  • Organizational Design, e.g., organizational
    structure, culture
  • Business Process Reengineering, e.g., identifying
    process bottlenecks
  • Training Needs Assessment, at the individual
    level
  • Performance Assessment, of individuals

33
Spectrum of Capacity Assessment Support
Examples
  • Familiarization / Sensitization Exercises
  • RBA, RBEC and RBLAC, 2.5-day workshops on
    capacity assessment and capacity development
    strategies
  • Brazil, 1-day workshop for UNCT, followed by 2
    days UNDP/Government/Consultants
  • Ethiopia, part of two-week training session
    (planned)
  • Pakistan, 2-day workshop for UNDP CO
  • Training Exercises
  • Johannesburg, 2.5-day training for Regional
    Service Center staff
  • Panama, 2.5-day training for UNDP CO staff and
    regional consultants
  • Brazil, 2.5-day for 15 national consultants
  • Initial Scoping
  • Brazil, 2.5 days of scoping as input into
    local-level capacity development programme
  • Malawi, 6 days of scoping preceding actual
    capacity assessment
  • Liberia, 7 days of scoping as input into national
    capacity development programme
  • Capacity Assessment and Capacity Development
    Strategy Formulation
  • Vietnam, 4 week-long assessments (1 national and
    3 provincial)
  • Kosovo, 1 week-long assessment (5-6
    municipalities)

34
Spectrum of Capacity Assessment Support
Examples (continued)
  • Capacity Assessment Adaptations
  • Procurement
  • Aid Effectiveness
  • Local-Level Development
  • Trade
  • Environment (NCSA and SEA)
  • Post-Conflict

35
Capacity Development Website www.capacity.undp.or
g
Resources Tools
36
UNDP Capacity Development Resources
  • Theoretical and Case Study Publications
  • Capacity for Development New Solutions to Old
    Problems
  • Developing Capacity through Technical Cooperation
  • Ownership, Leadership, and Transformation Can We
    Do Better for Capacity Development?
  • Policy and Practice Notes
  • Supporting Capacity Development The UNDP
    Approach
  • Practice Note on Capacity Development
  • Practice Note on Capacity Assessment
  • Practice Notes and Concept Notes on the Capacity
    Development Response Strategies
  • Managing Change in Public Sector Organisations
  • Incentive Systems Incentives, Motivation and
    Development Performance
  • Leadership Capacities
  • Education, Training and Learning
  • Mutual Accountability Mechanisms
    Accountability, Voice and Responsiveness
  • Mutual Accountability Mechanisms Accountability,
    voice and Responsiveness
  • Multi-Stakeholder Engagement Process
  • Practice Notes on the Applications
  • Capacity Development for Localizing the MDGs
  • Capacity Development during Periods of Transition

37
UNDP Capacity Development Resources (cont.)
  • Resource Guides and Tools
  • UNDP Capacity Assessment Users Guide and
    Supporting Tool
  • UNDP Guidelines on Direct Budget Support, SWAps
    Basket Funds
  • Guide on Leadership for Human Development
  • Toolkit on Localising the MDGs
  • Toolkit on Private Sector Development
  • UNDP-LEAD Leadership Modules
  • CD Resource Catalogue On Measuring Capacities An
    Illustrative Guide to Benchmarks and Indicators
  • A CD Guide on Applying a Human Rights-Based
    Approach
  • CSO Capacity Assessment Tools
  • CD Expert Rosters
  • Database of external consultants, organisations,
    and agencies with CD expertise
  • Sub-communities of practice, i.e., leadership,
    strategic planning
  • UNDP-Wide expert roster http//www.capacity.undp.
    org/roster
  • CD Websites/Knowledge Spaces
  • External Website www.capacity.undp.org
  • Internal Workspace http//content.undp.org/go/top
    ics/capacity/
  • Capacity Development Network capacity-net_at_groups.
    undp.org
  • Capacity.Org http//www.capacity.org

38
Capacity Development Workspace
http//content.undp.org/go/topics/capacity/
CD Strategies
39
  • Working Groups

40
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
41
Mobilize and Design Key Activities
  • Clarify objectives and expectations with primary
    clients
  • Identify and engage national/local stakeholders
    throughout the process to ensure ongoing success
  • Adapt capacity assessment framework to local
    needs
  • Determine how the assessment will be conducted
    (self-assessment, interviews team, location)
  • Cost the capacity assessment exercise (based on
    team composition, duration and depth)

42
Working Groups
  • Determine scope of capacity assessment
  • Point of Entry
  • Functional Capacities
  • Core Issues
  • Define approach self-assessment, interviews,
    etc.
  • Present to plenary

43
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
44
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Conduct
Capacity Assessment
45
Capacity Assessment Questions and Indicators
46
Capacity Assessment Worksheet Sample 1
47
Capacity Assessment Worksheet Sample 2
48
Defining Capacity Levels Considerations
  • Adjust definition of each capacity level as the
    context dictates
  • Ensure consensus on what each capacity level
    means
  • Determine how to assign levels or how will the
    questions be answered
  • Identify appropriate indicators
  • Find data, e.g., from policy documents, reports,
    statistics, interviews, observable practices
  • Determine what will be done with results will
    they be used to compare across entities (e.g.,
    ministries, districts, communities)
  • Determine whether qualitative information will be
    captured as well

49
Defining Capacity Levels Options
50
Defining Capacity Levels Option 1
51
Defining Capacity Levels Option 2 P3M3
Project Management Maturity Levels

52
Instructions for Using the Supporting Tool
Supporting Tool Extract Draft
53
  • Working Groups
  • Split into two working groups
  • Develop questions for two functional capacities
  • Present to plenary

54
Developing Assessment Questions
  • Working Group 1
  • Formulate plans and budget (annual and three-year
    planning and budgeting)
  • Working Group 2
  • Monitor and evaluate (process for seeking
    feedback from beneficiaries)
  • Working Group 3
  • Assess a situation (process for collecting
    accurate and disaggregated data to define target
    beneficiary groups for social assistance
    methodology to assess forecasting)
  • Core Issues
  • Leadership
  • Human Resource Management

55
Assess Capacity Assets and Needs Key Activities
56
Summarize and Interpret Results
57
Illustration Interpreting the Results
Gap between Level of Current and Desired
Capacities
  • Gap between current and desired state of
    leadership capacities is relatively large across
    all capacities assessed
  • Gap on knowledge is less significant

Gap between Level of Current and Desired
Capacities
  • Gap in capacity to budget may need improvement
  • However, gaps in capacity to manage and implement
    are relatively small

58
Preliminary Results of Capacity Assessment
Capacities
ILLUSTRATIVE
59
Capacity Development Process
60
Formulation of 10-Year National Capacity
Development Strategy and Action Plan Project
Steps
STEP 4 Formulation of CD Strategy and Action
Plan
STEP 1 Project Launch
STEP 2 Conduct Capacity Assessment
STEP 3 Analysis of Results

JAN
FEB
AUG
SEPT
OCT
DEC
NOV
Project Inception Meeting (30 Aug)
  • Broad consultations for formulation of Strategy
    Action Plan
  • Develop assessment instrument (checklist) for
    each priority area

3 Preliminary Findings (mid Nov)
10Yr National Capacity Development Strategy and
Action Plan
Capacity Assessment Instruments
  • Share preliminary findings
  • Discuss and confirm approach for formulation of
    National CD Strategy and Action Plan
  • Refine findings
  • Gather additional inputs

Analysis of Capacity Assessments
5 Final Conference Endorsement of CD Strategy
(end Feb)
2 Assessment Kickoff Meeting (end Oct)
  • Launch self-assessment for each Pillar
  • Set up project coordination structure
  • Mobilize human and financial resources
  • Confirm priorities areas for assessment initiate
    worksheets for each area
  • Begin stocktaking of existing/ongoing assessments

4 Validation of Findings and Discussion of CD
Strategies (end Nov)
  • Conduct self-assessments
  • Gather additional inputs
  • Prepare preliminary results
  • Further detail action plan
  • Begin to implement quick hit initiatives
  • Share final analysis
  • Refine capacity development options
  • Review process for developing plan

Stocktaking of Assessments
Capacity Assessments
Capacity Assessment Worksheets
1 Project Launch Workshop (end Sept)
  • Launch project with confirmed scope
  • Review inputs to date

61
Capacity Assessment Users Guide
  • Contents
  • Overview and Key Operational Considerations
  • Assess Capacity Assets and Needs
  • Define Capacity Development Strategies and
    Actions
  • Questions and Indicators by Core Issue
  • Annexes

A step-by-step guide to conducting a capacity
assessment Includes instructions for conducting a
capacity assessment and specifically for using
the supporting tool Includes illustrative
questions and indicators for each cross-section
of the framework (cross section of point of
entry, core issue and functional capacity)
62
Articulating Capacity Assessment Questions
Considerations
  • Begin by leveraging questions in the Users Guide
  • Adapt questions to assessment objectives modify,
    add to, delete questions as necessary

Request Illustration 1 Visioning and
Strategic Planning
During the process of developing the UNDAF, a
perceived gap in national-level visioning and
strategic planning has been identified.
63
Summarize and Interpret Results
The assessment team compares the assessment
results against the desired level of capacity, as
determined during the Mobilize and Design phase.
This comparison helps the team determine the
level of improvement required, which in turn will
provide direction in terms of which areas to
focus capacity development strategies
  • Summarize results
  • Compare against desired level of capacity
  • Interpret findings

64
  • RBA, Joburg, Accra, Nairobi
  • RBEC, Bratislava
  • RLBAC, Panama, Santiago
  • RBAP, Pakistan
  • RBEC, Kazakhstan
  • RBLAC, Chile, Brazil,
  • RBAP, Vietnam
  • RLBAC, Brazil
  • RBAP, Pakistan
  • RBEC, Kazakhstan
  • RBLAC, Brazil
  • RBA, Accra
  • RBEC, Bratislava
  • RLBAC, Panama, Santiago, Brazil
  • RBA, Accra, Nairobi
  • RBLAC, Santiago
  • RLBAC, Brazil
  • RBA, Malawi, Liberia
  • RBLAC, Brazil
  • RBAP, Vietnam
  • RBEC, Kosovo, Kazakhstan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com