Title: Global, Regional, and Urban Climate Effects of Air Pollutants
1Global, Regional, and Urban Climate Effects of
Air Pollutants
- Mark Z. Jacobson
- Dept. of Civil Environmental Engineering
- Stanford University
2Modeled CO2(g) and Modeled v Measured Ocean pH
1751-2003
CO2(g) mixing ratio (ppmv)
Surface ocean pH
Data from Friedli et al. (1986) and Keeling and
Whorf (2003)
3Modeled Ocean Profiles 2004 2104 Under SRES A1B
Emission Scenario
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
4Effect of CO2(g) on Atmospheric Acids
Mixing ratio (ppbv)
5(No Transcript)
6Comparison of ff BC Climate Responses
- 1. Jacobson (JGR 107, D19, 2002). Size resolved
(1 distribution) multi-component aerosols,
size-resolved cloud formation on aerosols,
size-resolved treatment of first and part of
second indirect effects, climatological snow/ice
albedo, emissions of Cooke et al. (1999), 2-D
ocean module, many feedbacks. - Fossil fuel BCOM 0.3 K (5-y average)
- 0.35 K (last year)
- Range of all simulations (0.15 to 0.5)
- 2. Ibid. (JGR 2004, in press). Same as (1) but
treated first and second indirect effects,
calculated snow/ice albedo, used early Bond et
al. (2004) inventory. - Fossil fuel biofuel BCOM 0.27 K (10-y avg.
snow contrib. 0.06 K) - 3. Ibid. Recent results. Same as (2) but used
most recent Bond et al (2004) emission,, used two
distributions (emitted ffbf BCOM and emitted
other heterocoagulated BC) and 10 layers of
energy diffusion to deep ocean. - Fossil fuel biofuel BCOM 0.29 K (6-y avg.)
7Ten-Year-Avg. Globally-Averaged Temperature
Profile Differences
8Temperature Changes Due to Eliminating Emission
of Anthropogenic CO2, CH4, and f.f. BCOM
Cooling (K) after eliminating anthropogenic
emission
9Observed and Modeled Temp. Diff. w-w/o GHG and
Aerosols
(January only
Schneider and Held (2001)
Latitude (degrees)
(4 y an. avg.)
10Modeled (4 y avg.) Temp. Diff. w-w/o Anth. GHG
alone
Latitude (degrees)
11Modeled (4 y avg.) and Radiosonde Vertical Temp.
(K) dif. w-w/o GHG and Aerosols
300-100 mb 9-16 km 100-30 mb 16-24 km
12Feb. Aug. California Column BC Dif. w-w/o Anth.
Aer.
13Column POM Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
14Column SOM Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
15Column S(VI) Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
16Column NO3- Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
17Column NH4 Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
18Column Aerosol LWC Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
19Column Total Aerosol Dif. w-w/o Anth. Aer.
20Aerosol 550 nm Optical Depth Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
21Cloud 550 nm Optical Depth Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
22Cloud 550 nm Scattering Optical Depth Profile Dif.
23Down-Up Surface Solar Radiation Dif. w-w/o
Anth.Aer.
24Down-Up Surface Thermal-IR Radiation Dif. w-w/o
Anth.Aer.
25Irradiance Profile Dif. Over California
26Near-surface Temperature Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
27Zonal Temp. Profile Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
28Temperature Profile Dif. Over California
29Near-surface RH Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
30Zonal RH Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
31Cloud LWC Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
32Cloud Liquid and Ice Profile Dif. Over California
33Modeled vs. Measured Feb. 1999 Precipitation
34Modeled Feb. 1999 vs. Measured Feb. Clim. Prec.
Data courtesy of Guido Franco
35Precipitation Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
36Baseline BC in precipitation
37SCAB Column Total Aerosol Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
38SCAB Aerosol Optical Depth Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
39SCAB Cloud Optical Depth Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
40Cloud 550 nm Scattering Optical Depth Profile Dif.
41SCAB Down-Up Surface Solar Radiation Dif. w-w/o
Anth.Aer.
42SCAB Downward UV Radiation Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
43SCAB Near-Surface OH Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
44SCAB Down-Up Surface Thermal-IR Radiation Dif.
w-w/o Anth.Aer.
45Irradiance Profile Dif. Over SCAB
46SCAB Near-Surface Temperature Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
47Temperature Profile Dif. Over SCAB
48SCAB Baseline Precipitation
49SCAB Precipitation Dif. w-w/o Anth.Aer.
50Summary
- Globally-averaged surface ocean pH may have
decreased from about 8.25 to 8.14 from 1751 to
2004 Under the SREAS A1B emission scenario, pH
may decrease to 7.85 in 2100, for an increase in
the hydrogen ion by a factor of 2.5 since 1751.
Ocean acidification may increase concentrations
of atmospheric acids and decrease those of bases,
although the magnitude is uncertain. - Three global simulation results suggest a warming
due to ffbf BC of 0.25 to 0.3 K in the 5- to
10-year average with a range of 0.15 K to 0.5 K - Maximum warming and cooling due to anthropogenic
GHGs and aerosols exceed those of GHGs alone.
Aerosols act on top of GHGs to enhance extreme
warm and cool climate conditions. - Modeled aerosol particles and gas-phase
precursors appear to decrease precipitation in
mountainous regions and increase it beyond the
mountains, cool surface-air temperatures,
slightly increase atmospheric temperatures,
reduce solar and UV radiation and OH, and
increase thermal-IR radiation to the surface in
California.