Neutrino and AntiNeutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Neutrino and AntiNeutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement

Description:

In the Quark Sector, CP is violated. Then, also in the Lepton Sector? Leptogenesys ... CP Measurement is a final goal of flavor physics. Dec. 13, 2001 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: neutri5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neutrino and AntiNeutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement


1
Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP
Phase Measurement
NuInt01, _at_ KEK (Tsukuba), Dec. 13, 2001
  • Yoshihisa OBAYASHI
  • (KEK-IPNS)

2
Introduction
  • MNS Matrix
  • WHY CP ?
  • In the Quark Sector, CP is violated.
  • Then, also in the Lepton Sector? ? Leptogenesys
  • CP Measurement is a final goal of flavor physics

3
CP Phase Measurement
  • In the case of conventional (super) beam,
  • cf NuFact
  • Oscillation Probability P(nmgne)

4
Assumed Scenario on n physics 2010
  • nm ? nt oscillation is established by Atmn, LBLn
  • sin22q23 1.0
  • Dm223 3 x 10-3eV2
  • LMA solution is established by Soln, KamLAND
  • sin22q12 0.8
  • Dm212 5 x 10-5eV2
  • Finite q13 is found by JHF1 (, Atmn)
  • sin22q13 0.03
  • MiniBooNE excluded LSND result
  • (Still) Unknown parameters
  • CP phase d and sign of Dm2

5
nm?ne oscillation probability
295km
Solid lines w/ matter, Dashed lines w/o matter
  • Asymmetry can be seen at oscillation maximum
    0.7GeV

6
JHF-Kamioka n Experiments
JHF
Kamioka
295km
Tokai
KEK
SK
Hyper-K
  • Phase I 2007(?)201x
  • 1MW 50GeV PS ? 22.5kt detector
    (Super-Kamiokande)
  • nm?nx disapp., nm?ne app., NC measurement
  • Phase II 201x(?)202y(??)
  • 4MW 50GeV PS ? 1Mt detector (Hyper-Kamiokande)
  • CPV search, Proton Decay, . . .

7
Beams
Far Det.
Decay Pipe
Target
Horns
q
  • Off Axis Beam
  • Switch and by changing polarity of horn
    magnets
  • Neutrino Flux is almost the same between and
    beams

8
Cross Sections
  • Quasi elastic interactions dominate below 1GeV

9
Expected Neutrino Events (w/o osc.)
  • of events _at_ far det.
  • is factor 3 smaller than
  • Running time of beam need to be longer
  • Wrong sign contribution is 3x310 times large
    for beam
  • Cause fake CP asymmetry

10
Selection for ne appearance search
  • Select ne CCqe interactions
  • Vertex is in the fiducial volume
  • Single EM shower ring
  • No decay electron observed
  • Evis gt 100MeV ( reject NC elastic )
  • Tight e/p0 separation
  • see next slide
  • Reconstructed En cut
  • 0.4 lt En(GeV) lt 1.2

11
Tight e/p0 separation
  • cosqne g from p0 tend to have a forward peak
  • E(g2)/E(g1g2) Large for BG
  • Likelihood diff. between 1-ring and 2-rings
  • Invariant mass Small for ne

12
Expected Signal Backgrounds
  • By the present tools,
  • BG level is 5x larger than expected CP
    asymmetry.
  • We need to achieve 5 precision of BG
    subtraction if we want to see 3s effect.
  • 90 of nm BG (5060 of total BG) are from p0
  • Dm122 5x10-5eV2
  • Dm232 3x10-3eV2
  • sin22q13 0.03
  • sin22q23 1
  • sin22q12 0.8
  • d 45 deg
  • 5 x 1021 pot x 450 kt (nm)
  • 1.83 x 1022 x 450 kt pot ( )
  • Off axis 2deg beam
  • No matter effect considered

13
Cross Section ( Efficiency) Difference
  • We want to know
  • Observable
  • Then Asymmetry Parameter
  • Only the difference of rs,re between neutrino and
    anti neutrino appear in the asymmetry

14
Cross Section Difference
  • CCqe cross section ratio of ne/nm
  • Difference between neutrino and anti-neutrino is
    at most 5 within the energy window

5
15
CP Measurement
  • Matter effect becomes larger for large q13
  • Black circles represent 3s contour for phase 2 of
    JHF running

16
BG subtraction vs Sensitivity
(3s)
  • Sensitivity strongly depends on systematic
    uncertainty of BG subtraction.
  • If BG sys. 2
  • sin22q130.01?sindgt0.55(33o)
  • large q13?sindgt0.25(14o)
  • Sensitivity improves with better BG rejection
  • Better BG rejection and smaller uncertainty in BG
    subtraction are strongly preferred in the CP
    measurement

17
Items for the Improvement of Sensitivity
  • 90 of nm BG are from p0
  • Improve the hardware (Hyper-K)
  • Timing resolution, Light scattering and
    reflection, Segment . . .
  • Improve the software
  • Reconstruction algorithm, . . .
  • Measure NC p0 rate_at_ Front detector
  • Energy scan with Narrow Band Beam
  • 50 of BG are from ne
  • Measure ne/nm ratio _at_ Front detector
  • Narrower energy window
  • Improvement of energy resolution
  • 50 of BG are from high energy tail of beam
  • Tune the beam line and reduce HE tail
  • Measurement of wrong sign contamination
  • Magnetized detector?
  • Recoiled neutron detector?

18
Conclusion
  • Phase 2 of JHF-Kamioka experiment aims at
    measuring CP violation
  • Better BG rejection and smaller uncertainty in BG
    subtraction are strongly preferred in the CP
    measurement
  • Let's Complete MNS matrix!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com