All that is solid melts into air - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

All that is solid melts into air

Description:

'during an acute episode, antipsychotic drugs are necessary' (NICE, 2002) ... with regard to global psychopathology, composite' outcome, and living alone or with peers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: timca2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: All that is solid melts into air


1
All that is solid melts into air
  • Soteria and other Minimal Medication Approaches
    to the Treatment of Psychosis
  • Tim Calton Lecturer in Psychiatry - UoN

2
Aims
  • The View from Now
  • Historical overview
  • The Soteria paradigm
  • Other approaches
  • Choice and Capacity

3
The View from Now solid evidence?
  • during an acute episode, antipsychotic drugs are
    necessary (NICE, 2002)
  • cognitive behavioural therapyand family
    interventions should be available..
  • Neuroleptics produce statistically significant
    improvements in schizophrenia symptoms (Davis,
    1976)
  • Neuroleptics prevent relapse (Davis et al, 1980)
  • Neuroleptics reduce Duration of Untreated
    Psychosis (Loebel et al, 1992)

4
Counterpoint
  • Two-thirds of people hospitalised in
    enlightened settings make good social
    recoveries (Bleuler, 1968 Ciompi, 1980)
  • Two-thirds of back ward patients from Vermont
    State Hospital were living successfully in the
    community 30 years after discharge. Most had
    stopped taking neuroleptic medication (Harding et
    al, 1987)
  • People diagnosed with good prognosis
    schizophrenia may be more likely to return to
    hospital (and return sooner) if treated with
    neuroleptic medication (Rosen et al, 1968)

5
A case in point
  • Rapaport et al (1978)
  • 80 young males with Dx of schizophrenia randomly
    assigned to CPZ or placebo on admission
  • Post-discharge treated with or without active
    medication depending on condition and concordance
  • Antipsychotics are not the treatment of
    choiceif one is interested in long-term clinical
    improvement

6
Other issues
  • Non-concordance is a major problem with all
    neuroleptic medication (Oehl et al, 2000)
  • Non-response (treatment resistance) is
    relatively common (Brown Herz, 1989)
  • Aversion to medication oriented services may
    prolong DUP (Warner, 2005)
  • Side-effects from all types of neuroleptics are a
    major cause of distress and complications
    (Tardive Dyskinesia - Llorca et al, 2002
    Extra-pyramidal side-effects - Geddes et al,
    2000)
  • Neuroleptics can kill (neuroleptic malignant
    syndrome - Jeste Naimark, 1997 heart
    irregularities - Zarate Patel, 2001)

7
Conclusion
  • Although some individuals may experience a net
    benefit, an objective overall cost-benefit
    analysis would likely be negative or at best
    neutral if side-effects, drug-drug interactions,
    deaths, effects of concurrently prescribed
    anticholinergics, and psychosocial consequences
    were weighed accurately.
  • The psychosocial consequences of neuroleptics
    include stigmatization, induction of a passive
    attitude towards ones disorder, dependency on
    government programmes for medication, and
    difficulty driving vehicles or finding
    employment. (Read et al, 2004, p110)

8
Historical overview
  • Gheel
  • Moral treatment
  • The Retreat
  • Kingsley Hall
  • Villa 21

9
Psychosis in the Developing World
  • US spending on treatment of schizophrenia in 1990
    16 billion (Norquist et al, 1996) 0.3 of
    GDP
  • Psychiatric care a low priority in most
    developing countries
  • International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia (WHO,
    1979), Determinants of Outcome in Severe Mental
    Disorders (Jablensky et al, 1992)
  • Revealed that the outcome for people experiencing
    psychosis in developing countries was
    substantially better than in the developed world
  • Authors concluded that differences in
    socio-cultural factors had the greatest
    explanatory power for this finding

10
The Soteria Paradigm
11
Soteria In Detail
  • People aged 15-32 with a diagnosis of
    first-episode schizophrenia, not married, and
    no more than one previous hospitalisation of less
    than 4 weeks
  • Small, community-based therapeutic milieu where
    majority of staff non-medically trained
  • No or low dose antipsychotic medication (no
    coercion)
  • Phenomenological relational style (being
    with) requires unconditional acceptance of the
    experience of others as valid and understandable
    within the historical context of each persons
    life, even when it cannot be consensually
    validated
  • Preservation of personal power, social networks,
    and communal responsibilities emphasis on the
    interpersonal
  • Most importantly, the atmosphere must be imbued
    with hope (Mosher, 2004)

12
Soteria the evidence
  • Systematic review (Calton et al, 2007)
  • 3 RCTs (2 from US, 1 from Switzerland) 223
    patients follow-up at 6 weeks and 2 years
  • At least as effective as conventional treatment
    at 6 weeks (24 took medication as opposed to
    100 of control group)
  • At two years there were significant advantages
    for Soteria with regard to global
    psychopathology, composite outcome, and living
    alone or with peers
  • 43 used no neuroleptics at all (drug free
    responders)
  • Soteria Berne showed that these results could be
    achieved at 10-20 lower overall cost than
    conventional treatment

13
Conclusion
  • The apparent comparable efficacy between Soteria
    and TAU suggests that there are few or no
    disbenefits to being treated in a setting with
    low or no use of neuroleptic medication when
    supported by non-medically trained staff
  • The Soteria paradigm seems more likely than
    standard treatment to approximate the supportive
    and collectivist socio-cultural context often
    suggested as responsible for better developing
    country outcomes

14
Other approaches (1)
  • Carpenter et al (1977)
  • 49 people diagnosed with good-prognosis
    schizophrenia, a record of adequate prior work
    and social functioning, and a short history of
    illness, were arbitrarily assigned to be treated
    with or without medication
  • Antipsychotic medication may make some
    schizophrenic patients more vulnerable to future
    relapse than would be the case in the natural
    course of their illness

15
Other approaches (2)
  • Lehtinen at al (2000)
  • 106 people admitted for treatment of a
    first-episode of psychosis (excluding affective
    psychoses) in Finland
  • At half of the centres patients received only
    minimal doses of medication, and nearly half
    received no neuroleptic medication at all over
    the two-year study period
  • At 5 year follow-up 37 of experimental
    participants had still not used medication,
    whilst 88 had not been hospitalised (68 TAU)

16
Other approaches (3)
  • The Parachute Project Cullberg et al (2002)
  • An extension of Need-Adapted treatment with an
    emphasis on minimising doses of neuroleptic
    medication
  • Compared a group of people experiencing
    first-episode psychosis (n253) with prospective
    (n64) and historical (n71) controls
  • 1 year follow-up showed experimental group had
    fewer inpatient bed days than controls and
    received lower doses of antipsychotic medication

17
Other Approaches (4)
  • The Open Dialogue Approach Seikkula et al
    (2003)
  • Part of Need-Adapted model aims to treat
    psychotic people at home
  • Treatment involves mobilising the persons social
    network and starts within 24 hours of first
    contact
  • Emphasises continuity of care and an active
    attempt to generate dialogue to construct a
    meaningful narrative of the experiences
  • Compared to a TAU group, Open Dialogue treated
    people were hospitalised for fewer days, family
    meetings happened more frequently, and
    neuroleptic medication was used in fewer cases.

18
Conclusion
  • Neuroleptic medication may well not be necessary
    for every person either experiencing psychosis or
    diagnosed with (first episode) schizophrenia
  • There are many good reasons for considering
    alternative approaches to helping people in this
    context

19
Choice and Capacity
  • Patient choice central to UK governmental
    healthcare reforms (DoH, 2003)
  • An adult has the capacity to decide whether to
    consent to, or refuse, proposed medical
    intervention, unless it is shown that that they
    lack said capacity (GMC, 1998)
  • Unless you have been diagnosed with a mental
    disorder and are detained under the Mental Health
    Act
  • 75 of people diagnosed with schizophrenia
    understand information and make decisions similar
    to comparison groups around issues of consent
  • It is yet to be demonstrated whether patient
    choice will be fully embraced by psychiatry
    (British Journal of Psychiatry editorial July
    2007)

20
Where is Hope?
21
ANY QUESTIONS?
  • tim.calton_at_nottingham.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com