Title: Universal Service Fund USF
1Universal Service Fund(USF)
- MIEM Technology Conference
- November 15, 2001
2USF Life Cycle
3USF Life Cycle
- Inception (the Act, the Order, and the Fund)
- Infancy (that first year)
- Toddlerhood (years 2 and 3)
- Preschool (CIPA and where we are now)
- Kindergarten (crossing the threshold)
- Elementary School (the future)
- The Bell Rings (footnotes)
4Inception
5Inception
- Telecommunications Act of 1996
- Directed the FCC to adopt a Universal Service
Order - Designed to ensure that all eligible schools and
libraries have affordable access to modern
telecommunications and information services - 2.25 billion annually is available to provide
eligible schools and libraries with discounts for
authorized services (the E-rate)
6Inception, cont.
- Supported by the Universal Service Fund
- Established by the FCC to provide for affordable
access to specified telecommunications services
for all communities, regardless of location or
economic strata - The Universal Service Fund (USF) is administered
by the not-for-profit Universal Service
Administrative Company (USAC) under the direction
of the FCC - The Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of USAC
administers the Schools and Libraries Program
7Infancy
8Infancy(USF Year 1)
- Program Parameters Defined
- Level of Discounts
- 20 to 90 percent, depending on
- Economic need (percentage of students eligible
for the National School Lunch Program - NSLP) and - Location (urban or rural)
- Urban or Ruralis based on definitions adopted
by the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services Office of Rural Health Policy
9Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- U.S. Office of Management and Budgets
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) method is
used to designate schools and libraries as urban
or rural - Discount percentages for Michigan schools and
libraries based on October 2000 NSLP data are
provided on the MIN web site at
www.state.mi.us/cio/min
10Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
11Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Eligible Services
- Basic local and long distance telephone services
- Internet access services
- Acquisition and installation of equipment to
provide internal connections
12Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- SLDs Eligible Services List
- Basic Telephone Service is allowed, but a Burglar
or Fire Alarm Telephone Line is not allowed - E-mail Service and Account Fees are allowed, but
Filtering Service is not allowed - Hubs are allowed, but Asbestos Removal is not
allowed
13Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Funding Rules of Priority
- Priority 1 Telecommunications services and
Internet access - Priority 2 Internal connections
- Eligible Entities
- Schools
- Libraries
- Consortia
14Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Eligible Schools
- Public schools
- Non-public schools
- Private Parochial
- Charter schools
- Intermediate units
- Ineligible Schools
- Home school programs
- Higher education
- Private vocational skills schools (proprietary)
- Eligible Libraries
- Public libraries
- Private libraries
- Research libraries (that make services publicly
available that are not part of higher
education) - Ineligible Libraries
- Academic libraries (unless their budget is
completely independent)
15Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Technology Plans
- Required if school or library applies for other
than basic local and long distance telephone
services - Purpose is to ensure that the school or library
has the ability to use the discounted services
once they are purchased - Tech plans should cover a three-year period
- Should specify how schools and libraries plan to
integrate the use of technology into their
curricula and programs
16Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Helpful information for writing technology plans
in Michigan - Schools
www.techplan.org - Libraries www.libraryofmichigan.org/services/usft
ech plan.html
17Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Application Forms
- Three key forms
- FCC Form 470 (Description of Services Requested
and Certification - FCC Form 471 (Services Ordered and Certification)
- FCC Form 486 (Receipt of Service Confirmation)
- Reimbursement Forms
- Discounts on bills (FCC Form 474), or
- Reimbursements (FCC Form 472 - BEAR Form)
18Infancy, cont.
How Discounts Work
100
You get 55
(existing) bills
in discounts
you would pay
You apply for discounts
K
The vendors bill
drops by 55
Vendor
Vendor invoices SLD/SLD
gets 55
approves invoice
from SLD!
You now only
owe 45
J
12
12
12
19How Reimbursements Work
100
You get 55
(existing) bills
in discounts
you would pay
You apply for discounts
K
You pay 100 of
bill
Vendor
SLD approves
sends
paperwork/sends check to
you 55!
vendor
You apply for
reimbursement
J
9/19/00
-
-
13
20Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Application Process
- Develop a technology plan
- Submit FCC Form 470
- Provide for a 28-day competitive bidding period
- Select service provider/sign contracts
- Submit FCC Form 471 inside the application window
- Survive the SLDs data entry process
- Receive and review your Form 471 RAL
21Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Receive and review your FCDL
- Assure technology plan approval
- Receive services
- File Form 486
- Retain records (for at least 5 years!)
- Appeal (if denied for invalid reason)
- Pay your share
- Prepare for the next funding year
22Infancy, cont.(USF Year 1)
- Year 1 of the USF program
- January 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999
- 30,120 applications received
- 25,785 applications funded
- 1.66 billion funded in 10 waves (to 70 level)
- Michigan received 58.5 million
- Michigan ranked 7th in nation for funding
- Approximately 36.55 per student (Michigan)
23Toddlerhood
24Toddlerhood(USF Years 2 3)
- Year 2 of the USF program
- July 1, 1999 - June 30, 2000
- 32,000 applications received
- 2.435 billion requested
- 2.125 billion funded in 21 waves (to 20)
- Michigan received 80.06 million
- Michigan ranked 8th in nation for funding
- Approximately 50.04 per student (Michigan)
25Toddlerhood, cont.(USF Years 2 3)
- Year 2 Twist
- Many below the 70 discount level did not even
apply in Year 2 because applications were
approved in Year 1 only down to the 70 level - As a result, all approved applications were
funded in Year 2, even those received outside the
filing window (Year 2 Out-of-the-Window
applications)
26Toddlerhood, cont.(USF Years 2 3)
- Year 3 of the USF program
- July 1, 2000 - June 30, 2001 (Yellow)
- gt36,000 applications received
- 4.72 billion requested
- 2.12 billion funded in 29 waves (to 82 level)
- Michigan received 53.48 million
- Michigan ranked 10th in nation for funding
- Approximately 33.43 per student (Michigan)
27Toddlerhood, cont.(USF Years 2 3)
- Year 3 Twist
- 79 percent of applications submitted
electronically - Four appeal funding waves so far
28Toddlerhood, cont.(USF Years 2 3)
- Top 10 states at the end of Funding Year 3
- 1. California 937.8 M
- 2. New York 663.2 M
- 3. Texas 433.8 M
- 4. Illinois 361.6 M
- 5. Georgia 211.1 M
- 6. Florida 194.4 M
- 7. Michigan 192.0 M
- 8. Puerto Rico 191.6 M
- 9. Pennsylvania 186.2 M
- 10. Ohio 163.9 M
Cumulative Totals Years 1 - 3
29Preschool
30Preschool(USF Year 4)
- Year 4 of the USF program
- July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 (Pink)
- 37,188 applications received
- 5.78 billion requested
- 1.63 billion funded so far in 7 waves (to 90
level) - Michigan has received 67.98 million so far
- Michigan ranks 7th in nation for funding
31Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Approximately 39.99 per student
- Michigan collaborated with MiCTA to establish a
statewide contract for Telecommunications
Services and Internet Access - Resulted in statewide Form 470 246270000298415
- Good for three years (USF funding years 4, 5 and
6) - Listing of eligible USF contracts at www.micta.org
32Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Year 4 Twist
- 84 percent of applications submitted
electronically - CIPA - Childrens Internet Protection Act
- Applicant now must certify compliance with CIPA
if seeking E-rate funds for Internet access,
internal connections, or non-basic telephone
services - Compliance with CIPA includes...
33Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Internet Safety Policy
- Must address procedures the district or library
will follow to - protect minors from access to inappropriate
matter on the Internet and World Wide Web - ensure the safety and security of minors when
using electronic mail, chat rooms, and other
forms of direct electronic communications
34Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- address the unauthorized access, including
so-called hacking and other unlawful activities
by minors online - address the unauthorized disclosure, use, and
dissemination of personal identification
information regarding minors - restrict minors access to materials harmful to
minors
35Preschool, cont. (USF Year 4)
- Technology protection measure (filtering)
- Required for any computers with Internet access
- Must protect against access to visual depictions
that are - obscene
- pornography
- harmful to minors
36Preschool, cont. (USF Year 4)
- Enforcement methods
- Identify how the district or library will enforce
the Internet safety measures during use of any
computers with Internet access by minors
37Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Monitoring
- For schools only - must include monitoring the
online activities of minors - Libraries are NOT required to monitor the online
activities of minors - CIPA and N-CIPA do NOT require schools or
libraries to track Internet use by identifiable
users
38Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- New Form 479 added to the process
- Billed Entity must collect a completed and signed
Form 479 from all consortia members before can
file the Form 486 - Billed Entity not responsible for accuracy of the
Forms 479 - Entire consortium will not be penalized due to
the non-compliance of an individual member(s)
39Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- The Administrative Authority certifies on the
Form 479 that recipients under its administrative
authority - a) have complied with CIPA or
- b) are undertaking actions to comply with CIPA
for the next funding year, or - c) CIPA does not apply because discount services
being received are for telecom services only.
40Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- The Billed Entity certifies on the revised Form
486 that the recipients of service - a) have complied with the requirements of CIPA
or - b) are undertaking actions to comply with CIPA
for the next funding year or - c) CIPA does not apply because discount services
are for telecom services only.
41Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- ALA and ACLU lawsuits challenge the applicability
of CIPA to libraries - the two cases have been consolidated by the court
and will be heard together - trial date set for February 14, 2002
42Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- No lawsuits from schools
- Perhaps because schools have much greater
flexibility restricting free speech under the
concept of educational suitability and in
loco parentis - Also, schools are considered limited use
facilities whereas libraries are more of an open
forum
43Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Form 486 filing deadlines
- 10/28/2001 if your services started before then
or if you received an FCDL before that date - Within 120 days after receipt of an FCDL or the
start of services, whichever occurs later (and if
these events occur after 10/28/2001) - Refer to the CIPA Compliance Calculator
developed by Funds For Learning at
www.fundsforlearning.com
44Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Form 486 filing deadlines
- SLD in the midst of a huge processing backlog for
Year 4 Forms 486 - New Jersey post office delays not helping matters
45Preschool, cont.(USF Year 4)
- Pink Postcard Dilemma
- The SLD rejected several hundred Year 4 Form 471
applications erroneously - Michigan applicants received a total of 134 Pink
Postcard rejections - About 60 percent of these were legitimate
rejections 40 percent sent in error - SLD has given second chance to only 8 Michigan
Pink Postcard recipients
46Kindergarten
47Kindergarten(USF Year 5)
- Year 5 of the USF program
- July 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003 (Blue)
- Form 471 application window is Noon, Monday,
November 5, 2001 through 1159PM Thursday,
January 17, 2002 - CIPA compliance must be in place by July 1, 2002
if you certified that you were attempting to
comply with CIPA in Year 4
48Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- Michigan collaborated with MiCTA once again to
establish a statewide master contract for
Internal Connections - Will result in a statewide Form 470
- Contracts will be good for three years (USF
funding years 5, 6 and 7) - Contracts will be posted to MiCTA web site as
soon as they become finalized
49Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- Form modifications
- Form 500
- Being updated due to CIPA requirements
- Cannot be used to change the Service Start Date
to a date earlier than what is on the Form 486
Notification Letter
50Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- New Notification Letters
- Form 486 Notification Letter
- Currently under development at the SLD to confirm
receipt of your Form 486 - Form 500 Notification Letter
- Currently under development at the SLD to confirm
receipt of your Form 500
51Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- SPIN changes, thanks to the Copan ruling
- Change is allowed under state local procurement
laws - Change is allowed under terms of contract
- Original Service Provider (SP) has been notified
of the intent to make change
52Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- Product and Service Substitutions
- 1-to-1 changes no longer required
- Does not have to be initiated by the SP
- Same functionality now more broadly interpreted
53Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- E-certification
- SLD to have operational for Year 5 Form 471
window opening - Will require applicant to apply for User ID and
PIN - PINs assigned only to those individuals who have
hand-signed Forms 471 and 486 that have been data
entered at SLD - User ID and PIN will reside with the person,
not an entity
54Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- Forms to have E-cert capability
- 470 - Services Requested
- 471 - Services Ordered
- 486 - Services Confirmed
- 500 - Service Change
- 472 (BEAR) - Applicant Invoice
- Refer to SLDs E-certification Update
presentation on MIN and Merit web sites
55Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- FCC Deadline Extensions
- Deadline for delivery and installation of
non-recurring services is the Sept. 30 that
follows the June 30 close of the relevant funding
year - Non-recurring services may be delivered through
Sept. 30 of the following calendar year if
certain decisions (e.g., FCDL SP change
approved ) are issued after March 1
56Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- A few things made easier
- Item 21 Attachments
- May be sent to the SLD after the January 17, 2002
Year 5 Form 471 postmark deadline, so long as
they are received by the SLD within a reasonable
timeframe, and so long as the applicant filed
electronically and certified by January 17, 2002 - Keep in mind - the SLD cannot process your Form
471 application until it receives your Item 21
Attachment
57Kindergarten, cont.(USF Year 5)
- Kindergarten Math
- Discounts received on items of 500,000 or more
must be amortized over three (3) years - If on-premise equipment costs gt67 of funding
amount requested to acquire services, then SLD
will likely reject the application because it
looks like a purchase was made up front - 500,000 one-time 60,000 recurring 560,000
- 500,000/560,000 89 which is gt 67
58Elementary School
59Elementary School(USF Year 6 and Beyond)
- Notice for Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) for Year 6
- Was supposed to have been released by the FCC
back in August 2001 - No sign of it yet
- Laundry list of changes has been compiled by
state E-rate coordinators around the nation
60Elementary School, cont.(USF Year 6 and Beyond)
- A few proposed responses to the NPRM
- Have the SLD fill in the blank when the
information is obvious and is located in another
section of the application form - Change the appeal filing deadline to a postmark
date (as opposed to a received date), and
extend it to 90 days after the RAL or FCDL date
instead of only 30 days - Simplify the application process...
61Application Process Flowchart
62Elementary School, cont.(USF Year 6 and Beyond)
- Block Grants
- Still in favor by many
- No sign of any legislative action yet
- No decline yet in the number of schools and
libraries applying for E-rate funds, even with an
horrific application process - Would likely mean less money overall, but a
simpler means by which to apply for and receive
that lesser amount
63The Bell Rings
64The Bell Rings(USF Footnotes)
- Top Denial Reasons
- Form 470 not posted for service type requested
- Form 470 not filed for new services requested
- Failure to meet 28-day Form 470 posting
requirement (competitive bidding) - Signed certification form not received by SLD
- No technology plan in place (when required)
- Discount below the funding threshold
65The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Number of applications has steadily increased
over the life of the USF program
66The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Total discount dollars funded to applicants
reached program cap in Years 2 and 3
67The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Stumbling blocks to avoid
- Use most recent version of the forms and
instructions - Read the instructions carefully!
- Always check the SLDs Eligible Services List
(ESL) - Watch dates and deadlines - dont leave
everything until the last minute
68The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Stumbling blocks to avoid
- Dont combine multiple applications - mail
applications or their attachments separately
(remember the Year 4 Pink Postcards!) - Make sure you have a current, approved technology
plan (plans must be re-approved every three
years)
69The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Stumbling blocks to avoid
- Avoid red words or phrases
- Wide Area Network
- WAN
- Modem
- Own
- Monitor
- Internet2
70The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Stumbling blocks to avoid
- Keep complete records of everything (for 5
years!) - Keep a log or journal of both written and verbal
correspondence with the SLD or FCC - Phone calls
- Application form submissions
- Inquiries and responses (via e-mail and fax)
71The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Stumbling blocks to avoid
- Review RALs and FCDLs carefully to make sure they
are accurate - Report corrections immediately to the SLD (and
document) - Use only approved methods to increase your
discount percentage - Feeder schools, projections based on Title I
programs, or non-random surveys are NOT allowed
72The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- High connection rates attributed to the E-rate
program - New York Times, October 28, 2001 - latest
statistical report compiled by Quality Education
Data indicates that - 97 of Americas public schools are now connected
to the Internet - 84 of public school classrooms are online
- Average ratio of students-per-computer is 5-to-1
73The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Michigan schools and libraries have benefited
from the E-rate program to the tune of 260
million over the past 4 years - Not an easy way to earn a buck, but there are
definitely to try and go after
74The Bell Rings, cont.(USF Footnotes)
- Resources to go to for assistance
- www.sl.universalservice.org
- www.state.mi.us/cio/min
- www.merit.edu
- www.micta.org
- http//www.dpi.state.wi.us/dlcl/pld/cipafaq.html
- Ask your E-rate Training Coordinator
75Schools Out!(Questions?)
- Laurie Taylor
- Michigan Information Network
- 517.241.1642
- taylorL4_at_state.mi.us