Title: The State of M
1The State of MA in the Federal Market
October 15, 2004Presented by Paul
Serotkin2004 Government Contractors
ConferenceMaryland Association of Certified
Public Accountants, inc.
2Today..
- MA Environment - Federal
- MA as Strategic Tool
- Creating ValueDeal PricingDeal
StructureBuyer/Seller Mistakes
3Minuteman Ventures LLC
- Investment Bank focused entirely on Federal and
Defense services, solutions and technology market - Immersed in small-to-mid tier federal MA market
every day - Team consists on former owners, CEOs, senior
executives in small-to-mid tier federal sector -
- Investment Banking for Entrepreneurial
Companies
4- MA Environment Federal Services
5Why an Active MA Market in Federal/Defense
Services
- Sector Rotation Defense in vogue today, a
result of post 9/11 world - Public Federal IT companies have approximately
20bn in capital for MA - Industry awash in capital -2bn raised from IPO
and debt offerings since 2002 internal cash flow
very strong - Private company MA multiples at close to
historic highs - Federal government outsourcing - aging of the
workforce, technology changes, and the need to
use military personnel for active engagements. - Substantial outsourced amounts going to under
100m firms - Companies valued on 20-25 top-line growth, but
government outsourcing growth under 10 - Mid-tier buyers able to compete with larger firms
on price, MA integration, benefits, culture
mid-tier suing MA to fend off contract bundling,
set aside programs - Well-positioned firms (intel, security, C4ISR,
biodefense, network-centric warfare) yield MA
premium - Uncertainty in market GWAC restructuring, small
business recertification, performance-based
contracts, Base closure - Private equity helps to lubricate MA market
6Seller Transaction Profile Defense/Federal IT
- Mostly smaller companies 8 of 10 with revenue
under 50m
lt20m
50m 100m
100m 250m
20m - 50m
250m - 500m
500m
7Buyer Transaction Profile Defense/Federal IT
(By Acquirer Size)
- Major SIs very active
- Smaller companies selectively transacting deals
- Mid-sized buyers using MA to add strategic
pieces
50m-100m
100m-250m
lt 50m
500m
250m-500m
8Large Corporate Buyers Tier 1
9Mid-Tier Buyers Tier 2
10Mid-Tier Buyers Tier 3
11Mid-Tier Buyers Tier 4
12 13Mid-Tier Federal/Defense Services Buyers Two
Tiers
- Profile 150-500m firms
- Publicly traded, several having completed IPO in
last two years - Federal Government is largest if only customer
- Valued by capital markets on basis of top line
20-25 growth - See path to become 1bn companies
- Typically have primary MA role on staff
- Cash flow strong, considerable debt capacity,
prospect of secondary offering
14Mid-Tier Federal/Defense Services Buyers Two
Tiers
- Profile 50-150m firms
- Privately held
- Federal Government is largest if only customer
- Experienced organic growth and may have
successfully integrated previous acquisitions - Some backed by private equity
- Serial entrepreneurs reinvesting Lau, Paravant,
BTG - PEG interest growing, new players emerging
e.g., Arlington Capital, Paladin Capital - See path to become 200m-1bn companies
- Are growing or want to grow faster than
government technology market - Deploying outside advisor to support MA
initiative - Internal part-time use of senior executive for
MA
15Who the Mid-Tier is Acquiring the
Federal/Defense Services Universe
- Closely held, few shareholders, with perhaps an
ESOP - Geographically strong in two, possibly three
locations - Mainly serving two, perhaps three customers at
the services branch level, with diversified
contract base within that customer set - Broad services System engineering/integration,
training/ simulation, network services, legacy
migration, DB maintenance, logistics, modeling,
application development, PM/acquisition support,
base ops, facilities management - Usually at least five years old, many times 15
years duration - Founder often involved, at least in ownership, if
not operations - May have some SBSA/8a work remaining, or weaning
themselves from these programs - Little, if any, outside ownership, or equity
investment from third parties - Under 100m in revenue, often under 50m
16Acquisitions by Federal Mid-Tier Buyers Increasing
of deals by mid-tier buyers
Jan-July 03 (49 deals)
Jan-July 04 (39 deals)
17How Mid-tier Acquirers Compete in MA with Tier 1
Primes
- High cultural appeal of the Mid-tier
- Entrepreneurship
- Ready access to the acquirer CEO, senior execs
- Acquirer CEO likely to have experienced many
growth company situations - Seller owners, employees retain sense of
criticality in acquiring company - Benefits can be just as strong as Tier 1
- Lenders educated on government MA, very
comfortable with mid-tier - Cost of debt capital still low
- Not as needed to finance internal growth, bankers
eager to finance MA - Mid-tier companies gain immediate cleared
employees, market share, customer
penetration/extension, key technical/managerial
personnel - As Tier 1 firms grow, less likely to find
smaller, truly strategic MA fits, leaving more
opportunity for the mid-tier - Private equity gravitates to mid-tier firms as a
platform in the federal sector - Strong case for buy v. make
18Representative Mid-Tier Buyers
19-
- Creating and Defining Value
- Deal Pricing
- Deal Structure
- Buyer/Seller Mistakes
20MA Valuation Size/Specialty Matters
21The Value Table 10 Leading Factors in
Determining Defense Company Value
- Contract Alignment with the Mission de Jour
- Cleared Employees
- Recaptured Business
- Prime Contract Awards
- Small Business Set Aside (SBSA) Awards
- Weak Alignment - 1Strong Alignment - 10
- 0-20 Employees Cleared - 120-60 Cleared 60
or Over Cleared - 10 - 0-20 Recompete Revenue - 120-50 Recompete 50
or Over Recompete - 10 - 0-20 Prime Contract Revenue - 120-70
Prime 70 or Over Prime - 10 - 70-100 SBSA Revenue - 130-70 SBSA 30 or
Under SBSA - 10
22The Value Table 10 Leading Factors in
Determining Defense Company Value (contd)
- 1-3 years - 14-6 years 7-10 years - 10
- 60 revenue from 1 contract - 125-60 less
than 25 - 10 - 50-100 rev. from 8(a) - 115-50 from 8(a) Less
than 15 from 8(a) - 10 - Lightly regarded management - 1Highly regarded
management - 10 - 0-7 compounded ann rev. growth - 18-15
growth 15 growth - 10
- Time in Business
- Contract Concentration
- 8a Revenue
- Competent Management
- Sustained Revenue Growth
23Common Deal Feature Earn-Outs
- Single-event Based
- Contract award or renewal (including migration to
FO) - Successful claim, litigation, or collection
- Performance Based
- Most frequently used metrics include revenues,
gross profits, and net profits - Occasional factors include employee retention
rates, contract awards, and backlog - Agreement Provision Implications
- Maintain entity as separate subsidiary or
division - Limits and control over overhead and parent
charges
24Common Mistakes for Acquirers
- Paying too much
- Going after deals that are too big
- Lack of correct priorities and balance in the
process - Typical Process
- 20 searching, 20 due diligence, 50
negotiations, 10 integration - Recommended Process
- 10 searching, 30 due diligence, 20
negotiations, 40 integration - (Courtesy Michael Solley, President, NCI
Information Systems)
25Common Mistakes by Sellers
- Owners believe their company is better than all
the others and expect a better-than-market value - Sellers think they deserve public company
valuations without preparing the company to meet
the same standards - Sellers are not exactly sure what they want to do
- Seeking advice too late and then getting in a
hurry - Management has cut investments to increase EBIT,
but still argues that their growth rates are
going to increase
26Recap
- Federal/Defense MA Market remains robust for
under 100m defense companies - Buyers come from all size firms Mid-tier firms
stepping up - Market factors favor consolidation continuing for
some period
27Contact Data
- Paul Serotkin
- President
- Minuteman Ventures LLC
- 781 750 8065
- 703 894 1270
- 781 254 7267 mobile
- paulserotkin_at_minutemanventures.com
- www.minutemanventures.com