Competitiveness in Telecommunications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Competitiveness in Telecommunications

Description:

Long distance oligopoly. VoIP (internet telephony) competitive ... Oligopoly. Joint ownership with landline horizontal integration. Issues: Universal Service ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: keithb65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competitiveness in Telecommunications


1
Competitiveness in Telecommunications
  • Keith Bernard
  • TMG

2
Forces Involved
  • Technological Change
  • Convergence
  • Technological platforms digital transmission
  • Cluster market economies of scope
  • Services voice, data video all provided via
    different networks
  • Markets no longer coincide with industry
  • Network economics
  • Consumption externalities
  • Very large proportion of fixed and sunk costs
  • Regulation
  • Open entry elimination of license restrictions
  • Enhance demand substitutability e.g. number
    portability
  • BUT some legacy carryover
  • Required use of infrastructure for some operators
    at regulated prices
  • Exemption from charges for some services
  • Spectrum use highly regulated

3
Inter-relation
  • Technological change
  • Changes economics of entry
  • Bundling of services over a common network
  • Requires adaptation of regulatory model
  • Pricing of essential facilities
  • Equivalent treatment of substitute services
  • Permitted use of radio spectrum
  • BUT, in turn, regulation affects
    entry/competitive conditions

4
History
  • FCC licensing segmented markets by type of
    service and technology employed e.g. voice, data
    (enhanced services), video, etc
  • Facilitated by specialized technology
  • Result largely oligopolistic market structure
    and high degree of regulation, even market
    management.

5
History continued
  • Technology began to break down licensing
    distinctions so that role of FCC was to
    restrict/limit entry into previously protected
    markets.
  • Criterion was abuse of dominance
  • Well beyond margin squeeze/predatory pricing
  • Rules for terms of availability for access to
    essential facilities and even social compact
  • Access to local loop
  • Expenditure for universal service

6
Last continuation
  • At the same time, new competitors wanted to
    retain various exemptions from prior regulatory
    regime
  • Exemption from access charges for enhanced
    service providers
  • Ensured resale profit margins for resellers
  • Reciprocity in provision of international services

7
Current market structure
  • Narrowband services voice, dial-up data
  • Landline
  • Local monopoly/duopoly
  • Long distance oligopoly
  • VoIP (internet telephony) competitive
    resellers
  • Mobile 2G
  • Oligopoly
  • Joint ownership with landline horizontal
    integration
  • Issues Universal Service
  • VoIP access charge exemption
  • Sunk Costs
  • Product bundles
  • New technology handsets will eliminate
    landline/mobile distinction

8
Current Market Structure
  • Broadband services
  • Landline (quasi- broadband)
  • Duopoly (ADSL cable modem)
  • Mobile ?
  • Mobile 3G
  • Monopoly/oligopoly
  • Joint ownership migration strategy technology
    dependent
  • Wireless
  • Unlicensed WiFi (intra-building) WiMax (loops
    future mobile)
  • Issues Competition
  • New Investment
  • Spectrum Policy

9
FCC Policy
  • Narrowband
  • Open entry
  • Limited price regulation
  • But failure on essential facilities
  • TELRIC, especially UNE-P
  • Access charge exemption for VoIP
  • Adequate spectrum
  • Supply substitutability
  • Enhanced demand substitutability
  • Mobile/mobile fixed/mobile portability
  • Issues Prices beginning to increase
  • Universal service charges

10
FCC Policy
  • Broadband
  • Carry-over from narrowband essential facilities
  • Low level of landline upgrade of PSTN
  • Concern for spectrum interference from unlicensed
    operators
  • Unlicensed operators pay no spectrum fees
  • Inflexible spectrum use and inadequate allocation
  • FCC spectrum demand is going forever to
    outstrip supply

11
Indicators
  • Europe
  • Ratio of ADSL to cable is 21 reverse ratio
    from US
  • Europe didnt employ TELRIC
  • Asia
  • Greater technological advance than US
  • Maximum consumer data rate more than 3X that in
    US
  • Lower prices per unit of throughput
  • From 50 to 15 of US price

12
The way forward
  • FCC immediately terminate TELRIC rules
  • FCC apply (revised) Universal Service Charges to
    all equivalent services
  • FCC eliminate service rules for spectrum use and
    permit unrestricted secondary markets for all
    spectrum commercial and military
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com