COHABITATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

COHABITATION

Description:

Practice marriage to test compatibility. Types of Cohabitors (2001) Reasons Behind Cohabitation ... Test of compatibility. Expectation of a future relationship ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1029
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: CSL4
Learn more at: http://people.uncw.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COHABITATION


1
COHABITATION
  • Presented by
  • Christin Ingold
  • Kim Inman
  • Laurie Jachym
  • Crystle Johnson
  • Rachael Jones

2
Definition
  • Unmarried persons living together (with sexual
    relations assumed)
  • Hyde (2003)

3
Cohabitation in the Past
  • Prior to 1970, cohabitation was illegal in most
    states
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • In 1960, there were 90 married couples per one
    cohabitating couple
  • A Few Facts on Cohabitation (2001)
  • The anti-marriage sentiment of the 1960s and
    1970s can be used to explain the small numbers of
    cohabitating couples during that time period
  • The Problem of Cohabitation (2001)

4
Cohabitation Today
  • The majority of young people believe that it is a
    good idea to live with a person before marriage
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • A quarter of unmarried women between 25 and 39
    are currently cohabitating
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Today there are 12 married couples per one
    cohabitating couple
  • A Few Facts on Cohabitation (2001)
  • In the U.S., cohabitating couples account for 5.5
    million households
  • A Few Facts on Cohabitation (2001)
  • Cohabitating couples today are anti-divorce and
    believe that a trial-marriage will protect them
    from divorce
  • The Problem of Cohabitation (2001)

5
Types of Cohabitation
  • Linus Blanket Relationships
  • Characterized by
  • Need to be loved
  • Fear of being alone
  • Emancipation Relationships
  • Characterized by
  • Attempt to prove freedom to others
  • Poor communication/conflict resolution skills
  • Convenience Relationships
  • Characterized by
  • Splitting of expenses 50/50
  • Females generally contribute 70 of the income
  • Convenient for the male involved
  • Testing Relationships
  • Characterized by
  • Commitment to relationship
  • Practice marriage to test compatibility
  • Types of Cohabitors (2001)

6
Reasons Behind Cohabitation
  • Many prenuptial, senior, and retired couples
    cohabit instead of marrying for financial reasons
  • Popenoe 1999
  • People are more likely to cohabit if their
    parents have been divorced
  • The Problem of Cohabitation 2001
  • Cohabitation has become a lifestyle for people
    who are less committed to marriage
  • The Problem of Cohabitation 2001
  • American society is becoming individualistic and
    people are less willing to make sacrifices for
    others
  • The Problem of Cohabitation 2001

7
Reasons Continued
  • Anti-marriage sentiments
  • Avoidance of divorce
  • Fear of commitment
  • Test of compatibility
  • Expectation of a future relationship
  • Independence
  • Stability
  • Value change
  • Decline in the influence of religion
  • Conformity
  • Financial reasons
  • Rebellion
  • Explanations for Cohabitating (2001)

8
Positive Aspects of Cohabitation
  • Share expenses
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Learn about each other
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Avoid responsibility of partners debt
  • The Problem of Cohabitation (2001)
  • No legal entanglements
  • The Problem of Cohabitation (2001)
  • Easy to leave relationship
  • The Problem of Cohabitation (2001)

9
Negative Aspects of Cohabitation
  • Lower levels of happiness, sexual enjoyment, and
    well-being than married couples
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Cohabitation may lead to marital failure
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Cohabiters are nine times more likely to split up
    than married couples
  • The Problem of Cohabitation 2001
  • Cohabitation (lack of stability) is harmful for
    children
  • Popenoe (1999)
  • Living together is not necessarily a transition
    period that leads to marriage
  • Grabmeier (2004)
  • 42 of cohabiters disagree on the future of their
    relationship
  • Grabmeier (2004)

10
Myths About Cohabitation
  • Everybodys Doing It
  • 30-40 of college students cohabit
  • Economically Its Worth It To Live Together
  • It is cheaper for two to live together
  • Compromise moral standards
  • Majority break up and finance is not a factor at
    that point
  • Cohabitation Increases Chances of a Happier
    Marriage
  • Divorce rate is sky rocketing and so is
    cohabitation (there is a correlation between the
    two)
  • Doing It Wont Hurt Anyone
  • Friends/family are affected
  • Its Nobodys Business
  • There are birth, health, and disease issues
    associated with cohabitation that affect others
  • Myths About Cohabitation (2001)

11
Myths Continued
  • Its Alright Because Were Really In Love
  • Love is the greatest reason to avoid premarital
    sexual relationships
  • But Were Going to be Married Anyway
  • There is often one person in the relationship
    that does not think the relationship is permanent
    or lifelong
  • Itll Enhance My Self-Esteem and Inner Security
  • People need to give all or nothing
  • If people only give pieces of themselves, then
    they will not be whole
  • Marriage is Only a Piece of Paper
  • Marriage is a commitment that is not there
    without the institution
  • Myths About Cohabitation (2001)

12
Facts About Cohabitation
  • Nearly 50 of people in their 20s and 30s cohabit
  • The average length of cohabitation is 1.3 years
  • Long-term cohabitating relationships in the U.S.
    are rarer than marriages
  • If couples abstain from sex before marriage, they
    are 29-47 more likely to enjoy sex during
    marriage
  • Most cohabitating couples marry or break up
    within two years
  • A Few Facts on Cohabitation (2001)

13
Facts Continued
  • 10-30 of cohabitors never plan to marry
  • Over 25 of unmarried mothers are cohabitating at
    the time of their childrens birth
  • 40 of cohabitating couples have children
  • Rates of depression are three times higher in
    cohabitating women
  • Cohabitating women are more irritable, anxious,
    worried, and unhappy
  • Assault is 62 times more likely among
    cohabitating couples
  • A Few Facts on Cohabitation (2001)

14
Facts Continued
  • Cohabiters experience more difficulty in their
    future marriages with adultery, alcohol, drugs,
    and independence than their non-cohabitating
    counterparts
  • Cohabiters are more violent than married couples
  • Cohabiters are more likely than married people to
    be depressed or have drinking problems
  • Married people are more financially stable than
    cohabiters
  • Staton (2003)

15
Facts Continued
  • Children living with their mothers and an
    unmarried partner display high levels of problem
    behavior at home and at school and also have low
    academic performance
  • Staton (2003)
  • The poverty rate for children is five times
    higher for children living with cohabitating
    parents than those living with intact families
  • Staton (2003)
  • Parents who cohabit break up at a higher rate
    than married parents and the children suffer
  • Popenoe (1999)

16
Facts Continued
  • Many cohabitating couples decide that they are
    satisfied in their current situations and do not
    get married
  • Grabmeier (2004)
  • 20 of cohabitating women say that they have had
    secondary sex partners while in that relationship
  • Harms (2000)
  • The 1992 National Health and Social Life Survey
    says that cohabitating couples have an average of
    one additional sexual act in a month more than
    married couples
  • Harms (2000)

17
Research
  • Expressed Attitudes of Adolescents Towards
    Marriage and Family Life
  • Martin, Specter, Martin, Martin (2003)
  • Examined survey responses from 200 9th-12th
    graders
  • Used the Marriage and Family Life Survey
  • The survey examines different dimensions of
    relationships
  • Sex, cohabitation, rule of religion, marriage
    status of parents, etc.
  • From the responses, they found that the
    adolescents view cohabitation as a means of
    increasing the chances of successful marriage
  • 50.4? held positive attitudes towards
    cohabitation
  • 27? held negative attitudes towards cohabitation
  • 22.6? held no opinion
  • 48.7? would want to live with someone before
    they marry
  • If they were exposed to divorce in their family,
    they may be looking for something to enhance
    their future relationships

18
Research Continued
  • Characteristics of College Students Who Cohabit
  • Knox, Zusman, Snell, Cooper (1999)
  • Used a questionnaire at ECU to survey 568
    students to identify characteristics of students
    who cohabit
  • Findings
  • The older the student, the more likely they
    reported having cohabitated
  • 20 year olds were more likely than 18-19 year
    olds to cohabit
  • Students with hedonistic values were more likely
    to cohabit
  • Hedonism is a belief of the sexual value of, If
    it feels good do it
  • Students who have dated someone of another race
    or would date someone of another race were more
    likely to cohabit

19
Research Continued
  • Cohabitation in the United States An Appraisal
    of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications
  • Smock (2000)
  • Cohabitation is a short-lived trend
  • 55 end up in marriage
  • 40 the relationship ends within 5 years of
    starting to cohabitate
  • Only about 1/6 of cohabitations last 3 years
  • Only about 1/10 last 5 years
  • Cohabitation usually involves children in the
    relationship
  • ½ of previously married cohabiters have children
    in the household
  • 35 of never-married cohabiters have children in
    the household
  • 70 of the children living in a cohabiting
    household are only from one of the partners
  • 40 of nonmarital births are from cohabitating
    households

20
Research Continued
  • Cohabitation in the United States An Appraisal
    of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications
  • Smock (2000)
  • Characteristics of Cohabiters
  • Low socioeconomic status
  • 60 are high school drop outs
  • 37 are college graduates
  • Have more liberal values
  • Less religious
  • More supportive of egalitarian gender roles
  • Its common in subgroups
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com