Epistemology: How do we know - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Epistemology: How do we know

Description:

Excerpted from Dallas Roark's Introduction to Philosophy, 1982. Epistemology: How do we know? ... Knowledge equals opinions that one has a duty to accept ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:240
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: badg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Epistemology: How do we know


1
Epistemology How do we know?
  • Excerpted Dallas Roarks Introduction to
    Philosophy, 1982
  • By Steve Badger

2
What is knowledge?
  • Opinion plus evidence equals knowledge
  • Opinion plus probability equals knowledge
  • Observation equals knowledge
  • Knowledge equals opinions that one has a duty to
    accept
  • Knowledge is equated with the right to be sure
  • Opinion requires no plus to be knowledge

3
What is knowledge?
  • To know means that a person accepts a true
    proposition to be right or correct for the best
    of reasons. (10)
  • The man who knows must not be guessing, he must
    not hit on the truth by chance, he must not relly
    on bad reasons if he relied on reasons at all.
    (10)

4
What is knowledge?
  • Knowing involves two different kinds of
    experiences (1) direct experience, sometimes
    called the directly evident, and (2) reason
    processes, sometimes called the indirectly
    evident. (10)
  • Is knowledge possible?

5
Ways to Knowledge
  • Testimony (authority)
  • The physical senses
  • Reason
  • Phenomenology (essences)
  • Self-revelation
  • Intuition
  • Apprenticeship (pp.9-22)

6
Verification Principle
  • A J Ayer (1910-1970)
  • For a statement to be meaningful (true) it must
    be either 1) purely definitional or else 2)
    verifiable by onor of more of the five senses.
    All other statements (ethical, theological,
    metaphysical) are nonsense or meaningless.
  • Logical Positivism
  • Self-refuting

7
Falsification Principle
  • Anthony Flew and Karl Popper
  • Any statement or proposition is meaningless
    unless it is subject to falsification (at least
    in principle)
  • Flew used it to challenge a belief in God
  • Self-refuting
  • But Flew recently changed his mind
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com