WERAP in Eastern Ontario - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

WERAP in Eastern Ontario

Description:

Trudeau, VL (Langlois, V; Duarte, P) - Levels and effects of endocrine disruptors ... Provide CA managers with key components to the water budget. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: academic
Category:
Tags: werap | eastern | ontario

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WERAP in Eastern Ontario


1
WERAP in Eastern Ontario
Watershed Environmental Resource Assessment
Project
A Holistic Assessment of the Factors Important
for the Maintenance and Restoration of Rivers in
Agricultural Watersheds
  • November 24, 2005
  • Kananaskis Researcher Retreat

Michel J.L. Robin
2
(No Transcript)
3
Overall Goal
  • Evaluate state of Raisin River watershed
  • Physical science perspectives
  • Ecology
  • Ecotoxicology impacts on indicator species
  • Contaminant hydrology mass loading
  • Physical hydrogeology water budget components
  • Social-science perspective
  • Evaluation of incentive programs
  • Identify Barriers Society vs Institutions vs
    Science
  • Develop strategies to balance human vs ecological
    demands
  • Strategies to reduce contaminant loading
  • Prescriptions for actions and reducing barriers

4
Research Team
  • University of Ottawa
  • Clark, ID (Suchy, M Henry, C) -
    Agro-contaminant transport in the subsurface
  • Lean, DRS (Maharaj,S, Hines, E) - Methyl mercury
    cont. endocrine disruptors
  • Needham, RD (Bérubé, D, Mannella, M, Robin,
    MJ) - Human Geography
  • Pick, FR (Woods, L Holsworth, J) - River
    productivity and impact of nutrients
  • Robin, MJL (Bustros-Lussier, E Woods, L
    Craiovan, E) - Groundwater/surface water
    interaction
  • Trudeau, VL (Langlois, V Duarte, P) - Levels
    and effects of endocrine disruptors
  • University of Waterloo
  • Conant Jr, B (McGuinty, D) - Cont. transport at
    GW/SW interface
  • Rudolph, DL - Groundwater/surface water
    interaction
  • Queens University / St-Lawrence River Inst.
  • Ridal, JJ (MacLean, CMc Donald, L) - surface
    water quality/contaminant loading
  • Raisin Region Conservation Authority
  • Critoph, C - Public policy and governance
  • Canadian Wildlife Service
  • Pauli, B - Levels and effects of endocrine
    disruptors
  • Thompson Rosemount Group Industrial partner
  • St-Marseille, J - Contaminant loading

5
Key Challenges/Goals
  • Improve capability of rural and remote
    communities to provide safe drinking water and
    manage waste discharges
  • Ensure focus on priorities for safe water based
    on evidence despite competing interests
  • Integrate factors affecting water quality to
    advance conceptual models for decision making
  • Balance human and ecosystem demands for water
  • Develop water management strategies for local
    watershed scale applications
  • Develop a tool kit for use in this and other
    watersheds

6
Relevant State-of-The-Research
  • Most watershed studies are limited in scope
    and/or in geographical extent.
  • Our study
  • Multidisciplinary framework
  • Phased approach to identify critical areas
  • Holistic examination of entire watershed,
    including
  • Agricultural, rural, urban, and forested settings
  • hard sciences (biology, hydrogeology)
  • harder sciences (human geography)

7
Approach
  • State of the watershed
  • Ecology ecotoxicology
  • Strategic sampling and indicator parameter
    mapping
  • Impacts of agro-contaminants (e.g. atrazine) on
    indicator species (Rana pipiens)
  • Groundwater surface water interactions
  • Identify and quantify groundwater
    discharge/recharge areas
  • Locate contaminant loading areas (ECT survey)
  • Quantify groundwater recharge and nitrate loading
    at selected locations
  • Determine basin water budget and contaminant
    loading
  • Social sciences
  • Evaluate incentive programs and societal
    interactions
  • Long interview method for identifying social
    barriers
  • Integration of Information
  • GIS data base
  • Information transfer- monthly meetings and web
    site
  • Agricultural community outreach

8
Stage of Research
First season (instrumentation, id target areas
processes)
  • River ecology
  • 50 sites (pools and riffle zones)
  • Physical/chemical parameters velocity,
    discharge, water residence time, light
    penetration, DO, conductivity, DOC, turbidity,
    nutrients
  • Biological variables suspended vs attached algal
    biomass, clams
  • Ecotoxicology
  • 20 sites for water quality parameters pH, EC,
    DO, BOD, TSS, N,P, DOC, Major ions, total and
    Methyl Hg, Fecal coliforms and E. coli
  • Conducted controlled Atrazine exposure
    experiments on Northern Leopard Frogs sampled
    frogs at key locations in Raisin R.
  • Investigating histology of frog gonads

9
  • Groundwater surface water interactions
  • ECT survey of all three branches of the Raisin
  • Processing data to identify hot spots for
    further investigation
  • Recharge through farm fields
  • Instrumented 3 farms next to River
  • Initiated year round sampling for
  • NH4, NO3 with d15N and d18O
  • DOC, DIC with d13C,
  • P, major ions, TDS, d18O/dD
  • Social dynamics
  • Review of government programs and policies
    completed
  • 47 interviews with agricultural stake holders
    completed interviews ongoing with regional land
    owners associations
  • Diagnostic field study and workshop held in a
    control county

10
Key Expectations and Linkages
  • Ecology of rivers in agricultural landscapes
  • To determine role of nutrients vs flow in algal
    growth and incidences of blooms/scum, and
    groundwater seepage.
  • To establish links between O2 dynamics and algal
    biomass and potential role/impact of
    herbicides/pesticides.
  • Lead to possible management options (e.g.
    nutrient control versus flow regulation, BMPs)

11
Key Expectations and Linkages
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Estimate and link river assimilation capacity to
  • nutrient concentrations
  • organic loading and BOD water budget and
    contaminant loading
  • Impacts on sentinel species Rana pipiens
  • Links between low level exposure and sexual
    development of R. pipiens
  • Links with human health

12
Key Expectations and Linkages
  • Groundwater surface water interactions
  • Map ECT anomalies in Raisin R. and identify
    conductance loading groundwater discharge
    areas.
  • Confirm discharge flux and contaminant hot
    spots with seepage meters, streambed temperature
    surveys and sampling
  • Provide CA managers with key components to the
    water budget.
  • Geographically correlate these areas with
    biological indicators.

13
Key Expectations and Linkages
  • Groundwater recharge through farm fields
  • Determine pathways and transformations for
    agro-contaminants to water supply aquifer and
    river using nutrient analyses and environmental
    isotopes.
  • Quantify attenuation processes during recharge.
  • Monthly monitoring throughout year to
    characterize seasonal variations in
    biogeochemical reactions.
  • Provide in-situ measurements of contaminant and
    nutrient loading.

14
Key Expectations and Linkages
  • Social dynamics
  • Identification of
  • participation rates in water quality improvement
    initiatives
  • facilitators or barriers to active participation
  • Inducements rewards needed
  • Congruency test of perceptions, attitudes
    values of society members, resource managers, and
    scientists
  • Competing water resource demands
  • Conflict resolution mechanisms (communications
    instruments)
  • Other contextual stresses realities (e.g.
    commodity pricing new on-farm regulations)

15
Insights on Knowledge Transfer
  • Interactions with Agricultural Community
  • Tremendous cooperation on an individual basis
    (frog catching)
  • Some feel under siege by environmental
    regulations
  • Enthusiastic and volunteered participation in
    interview process
  • Participation of land owners is difficult during
    the field season.
  • Conservation authority (CA) staff
  • Directly integrated into science team
  • Value outcomes and are enthusiastic and eager to
    participate.
  • Direct participation in the State of the river
    report
  • Synergy between researchers and local expertise
  • Eastern Ontario Water Resources Committee EOWRC
  • Partnership is extremely positive
  • Used 1/3 of their budget to cover funding
    shortfall.

16
Opportunities
  • Influence the Application of Legislation
  • Source Water Protection in Ontario
  • Nutrient Management Act and implementation of
    BMPs
  • Technology Transfer
  • Application of methodology to other CA
    territories
  • Design and testing of communication instruments

17
Future challenges and Interests
  • include additional disciplines on the team
  • Agronomy
  • Hydrology
  • Risk assessment
  • Health science
  • Law governance
  • Better utilize expertise from the CWN e.g.
    groundwater/surface water modeling.
  • Public and political participation
  • Public access to watershed information at an
    interactive sustainable watershed bulletin
    board website through a program like
    geoConnections.

18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com