PRBAB Update on Activities 1996 Feb 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

PRBAB Update on Activities 1996 Feb 2005

Description:

Turtle Mountain CD. Tiger Hills CD. Rm Of Rhineland. RM of ... Identification of Local Issues. Financial/Political Support. Information Dissemination to Locals ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: wesp2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PRBAB Update on Activities 1996 Feb 2005


1
PRBABUpdate on Activities - 1996 - Feb 2005
2
Partnerships
3
Presentation Outline
  • Who
  • Process
  • Goals
  • Partnerships

4
PRBAB
  • Started Talking 1996
  • ADVISORY
  • MissionWater Management

5
Pembina River Drainage Basin
Who
6
Who
Pembina River Drainage Basin
7
PRBAB Members
  • Pembina County
  • Cavalier County
  • Rollette County
  • Towner County
  • City of Pembina
  • City of Neche
  • City of Walhalla
  • Association of Twps.
  • Pembina Valley CD
  • Turtle Mountain CD
  • Tiger Hills CD
  • Rm Of Rhineland
  • RM of Stanley
  • RM of Montcalm
  • City of Gretna
  • Pembina Valley WC
  • MB Water Resources

8
PRBAB Executive Committee
  • Chair Murray Seymour Pembina Valley CD
  • V-Chair Doug Vosper City of Neche
  • US Rep Larry Wilwant City of Pembina
  • Ca Rep John Falk RM of Rhineland
  • At-large Kent Vesterso Towner County

9
Organizational Structure
Pembina River Basin Residents Stakeholders
Advisory Board Executive Committee
Pembina River Basin Advisory Board
Technical Committee
Red River Basin Commission
10
Process
  • 10 guiding principles of consensus building
  • (John Towle school of WS Planning)
  • MB ND Water Policies
  • RRBB Guiding Principles

11
Develop and help to implement a Pembina River
Watershed Management Plan
GOALS
  • Develop soil and water management measures that
    prevent economic losses and sustain agriculture.
  • Promote concept that water management is an issue
    of land management.
  • Enhance water quality
  • Promote watershed management education.
  • Ensure adequate water supply to meet in-stream
    flow needs, as well as domestic and agricultural
    use.
  • Collect hydrologic data and monitor flows.
  • Maintain and enhance wildlife habitat and
    diversity throughout the basin.
  • Enhance recreational opportunities, including
    eco-tourism and agri-tourism, and promote
    economic development of the region.

12
Partnerships
  • International Joint Commission
  • Red River Basin Commission
  • Red River Water Management Consortium
  • Educators U of M Red River Basin Institute
  • Federal, Provincial, State and Local Governments

13
IJC Partnership
Projects
  • Lower Basin DEM
  • Mike 11 hydrodynamic model
  • RRBDIN (Decision Support System)
  • Joint US/CAN Geospatial Data Framework

14
IJC Partnership
  • Big Picture
  • Resources - Tech Expertise
  • Federal Political Connection

IJC
PRBAB
  • Grassroots - Local Viewpoint, Issues

15
RRBC Partnership
Common Goal
  • Basin Water Management
  • Big Picture - Basin Vision
  • Advocacy, Guidance Resources

RRBC
PRBAB
  • Grassroots - Local Viewpoint, Issues
  • Information Dissemination
  • Planning Model

16
RRWMC Partnership
Energy Environmental Research Center
  • Information, Technical Expertise, Resources,
    Funding, Advocacy

PRBAB
RRWMC
  • Local Input
  • International Connection
  • Ident. Research Gaps

17
Red River Basin Institute
  • Educate Future Partners

18
Red River Basin Institute Partnership
  • Education Resources
  • Tech Resources
  • Access to Grant Opportunities
  • Useful Products

RRBI
PRBAB
  • Research Gaps
  • Audience of Local Decision Makers
  • Primary Schools

19
University of Manitoba Partnership
Project
  • Invertebrate Sampling, Interpretation and
    Analysis

U of M
  • Research Opportunity Partner
  • Expertise
  • Resources

PRBAB
20
Provincial State Partnership
  • Big Picture - Basin Vision
  • Advocacy, Guidance, Support Resources

PRBAB
ND MB
  • Grassroots - Local Viewpoint
  • Planning Model

21
(No Transcript)
22
WRAS Funding
  • Watershed Restoration Action Strategy
  • ND Dept of Health
  • Gather Baseline Data
  • Water Quality Riparian Assessment
  • Landuse Analysis Biological Assessment

23
  • Expertise

24
  • ND Dept of Health WRAS

25
LOCAL Partnerships
  • Soil Water Conservation Districts
  • RMS Counties Towns
  • Water Boards
  • Tri-Lakes - Specific to 3 large lakes
  • Sub Watershed Groups included more representation
    Fish Game Associations, Teachers, Interested
    landowners

26
Local Organizations
Advocacy for Local Initiatives Cost-share
Opportunities Technical and Political Resources A
Common Basin Vision and Voice
Management Jurisdiction/Responsibility
Identification of Local Issues Financial/Politica
l Support Information Dissemination to Locals
PRBAB
27
5 Sub Watershed Groups
28
Results of Watershed Workgroup Meetings
29
Brief History
  • June 1996 - First met to discuss issue
  • Sept 1998 - Formally created Board

30
(No Transcript)
31
  • Information Gathering
  • Continued Consensus Building
  • Framework Development
  • Lobby for Implementation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com