The quantum well states in MgObased magnetic tunneling junctions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

The quantum well states in MgObased magnetic tunneling junctions

Description:

The quantum well states in MgO-based magnetic tunneling junctions. Zhong-Yi LU ... Quantum wells in single MgO barrier MTJs; Quantum wells in double MgO-barrier MTJs; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: zln
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The quantum well states in MgObased magnetic tunneling junctions


1
The quantum well states in MgO-based magnetic
tunneling junctions

Zhong-Yi LU
Institute of Theoretical Physics
Chinese Academy of
Sciences
Beijing 100080, China
and Department
of Physics, Renmin University of China
Beijing 100872,
China
2
In collaboration with X.-G. Zhang S.T.
Pantelides Oak Ridge National Laboratory and
Vanderbilt University Yan Wang Xiufeng
Han Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of
Sciences Beijing, China
3
Outline
  • Magnetic tunnel junctions based on MgO
  • Quantum wells in single MgO barrier MTJs
  • Quantum wells in double MgO-barrier MTJs
  • Summary

4
Magnetic Tunnel Junctions
T. Miyazaki and N.J. Tezuka J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 139, L231 (1995) J.S. Moodera, et al.
PRL 74, 3273 (1995). smooth and pinhole-free
Al2O3 deposition technique (TMR of 3050)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Motivation
  • TMR GMR read-head
  • Capacity of MRAM DEMO
  • Spin Transistor
  • Magneto-Logic Devices

MRAM DEMO
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Antiparallel alignment
Parallel alignment
10
TMR is intrinsic property of the two leads in the
model
11
  • Jullieres model indicates increasing P will
    increase TMR
  • The fact is spin polarization P for ferromagnetic
    metals and alloys experimentally no more than 0.6
    at low temperatures, thus
  • TMR 100 ( low temperatures)
  • 70 (room
    temperature)
  • Half-metallic electrodes with P1
  • A new approach MgO as barrier layer, then
    effectively P close to 1 with new mechanism.

12
Coherent Tunneling through Magnetic Junctions
Fe(001)
MgO(001)
Fe(001)
TMR could be over 1000, predicted by W.H.
Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. Schulthess, J. Maclaren,
PRB 63, 054416 (2001) J. Mathon
and A. Umerski, PRB 63, 220403 (2001).
13
Coherent tunnling with MgO barriers in
Experiments I
S. Yuasa et. al., Nature Materials 3, 868
(2004). TMR180 of the single-crystal
Fe/MgO/Fe MTJ at room temperature.
14
Coherent tunnling with MgO barriers in
Experiments II
S.S Parkin et. al., Nature Materials 3, 862
(2004). TMR220 of the polycrystalline
CoFe/MgO/CoFe MTJ at room temperature.
15
(No Transcript)
16
Symmetry of the tunnel barrier
The crystalline MgO is a filter, only allowing
?1states pass, which makes the electrodes behave
as half-metals.
17
(No Transcript)
18
Quantum Well States Formed within the Junction
bcc(001) Fe/MgO/Fe/Cr
Fe
MgO
Fe
Cr
Lu, Zhang, and Pantelides, PRL 94,207210 (2005)
19
Minority
Majority
bcc Fe
bcc Cr
20
(No Transcript)
21
An effective free electron model for majority sp
electrons at k//0
MgO
EF
Cr
Fe
22
KKR method for electronic structure in solids
  • Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method
  • Spherical potential around each atom, electron
    wave function in this region expanded in
    spherical waves
  • Constant (zero) potential between the spheres,
    electron wave function in this region expanded in
    plane waves
  • Multiple scattering theory used to connect the
    wave function in all spheres
  • Direct calculation of the Greens function
  • Implemented under density functional theory (LDA
    and LSDA)

23
Layer KKR for surfaces and interfaces
Surface
Interface
  • No need for periodic boundary conditions
  • No need for slabs
  • Arbitrary number of inhomogeneous layers
  • 2d periodicity and epitaxial structure required

MacLaren, Crampin, Vvedensky, and Pendry PRB
40,12164 (1989)
24
Layer KKR for transport at a finite bias
Zhang, et al. PRB 69,134406 (2004)
Layer KKR further parallelized in 2005 at ITP, CAS
25
(No Transcript)
26
Quantum Well States Formed within the Junction
bcc(001) Fe/MgO/Fe/Cr
Fe
MgO
Fe
Cr
Lu, Zhang, and Pantelides, PRL 94,207210 (2005)
27
Majority s-resolved partial DOS at k//0 for the
Junction Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
28
Minority s-resolved partial DOS at k//0 for the
Junction Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
29
I-V for Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
30
TMR versus bias for Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
31
Spin-dependent resonant tunneling through
metallic QW states in MgO MTJs
Majority s-resolved partial DOS at k//0 for the
Junction Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
Lu, Zhang, and Pantelides, PRL 94,207210 (2005)
32
Co/MgO/9Fe/Cr
Fe/MgO/FeO/8Fe/Cr
The oxidized interface severely damages TMR
33
Quantum Well States Formed within the double MTJ
Fe/MgO/Fe/MgO/Fe
Fe
MgO
Fe
MgO
Fe
Wang, Lu, Zhang, and Han, PRL 97, 087210 (2006)
34
First observation of the quantum size effect in
MgO-DBMTJ
T. Nozaki, et al. PRL 96, 027208 (2006)
35
  • s-partial DOS at k//0 for the middle Fe film
    in Fe/MgO/9Fe/MgO/Fe DBMTJs

majority spin QW states
Wang, Lu, Zhang, and Han, PRL 97, 087210 (2006)
36
QW state resonances (from layer-KKR calculations)
compared with experimental resonant voltages
VQW ? VEXP ! Why? Coulomb blockade effect in
the middle Fe layer (island)! a capacitance
model VCB Ec/e e/C 2e/CFe-MgO 2e/eMgOe0
(dMgO/A). VCB ? dMgO/D2 e0
electrical permittivity constant eMgO
dielectric constant of MgO dMgO thickness of
the MgO barrier A area of the Fe island D
diameter of Fe island
37
Coulomb blockade effect the primary source of
smearing at low temperatures
linear fit y x 0.013.
38
An effective free electron model for sp electrons
in majority-spin channel
parameters 1. Effective mass m 2. Barrier
height V
39
Middle Fe film thickness dependence of QW state
energies in DBMTJs
phase accumulation model (PAM)
phase shift on reflection at two Fe/MgO interface
additional phase shift
m 4.0 V_barrier 4.7 eV
40
Summary for Single-MgO barrier
  • Large resonant tunneling through metallic QW
    states predicted in Fe/MgO/FeO/Fe/Cr and
    Co/MgO/Fe/Cr
  • TMR decreases quickly with biases
  • Tunneling current from QW states above Fermi
    energy much greater than from QW states below
    Fermi energy
  • Majority spin QW states contribute to a large
    positive TMR, minority spin QW states contribute
    to a large negative TMR
  • The oxidation at the interface severely reduces
    TMR
  • Due to long MFP of minority spin electrons,
    resonant tunneling through minority spin QW
    states may be easier to observe, but requires
    larger bias windows and thicker films

41
Perspectives and conclusions
  • Spin-dependent resonant tunneling through MgO
    DBMTJ
  • Reduce the effect of Coulomb blockade
  • continuous and smooth middle Fe layer
  • The significance of utilizing the
    first-principles electronic structure and
    electronic transport calculations on studying TMR
    nanostructures

42
Thanks!
43
Brief History of MTJ
  • 1974, M. Julliere (a graduate student) published
    an experiment article which claimed 14 TMR in
    Fe/Ge/Fe trilayers. A simple model was proposed
    (the paper became a sleeping giant).
  • 1982, IBM reported 2 TMR on Ni/AlO/Ni.
  • 1995, Moodera (MIT) and Miyazaki (Japan) reported
    10 TMR for Co/AlO/Co.
  • 1998, DARPA launched MRAM solicitation
  • 1999, Motorolas 128kB MRAM demo
  • 2003, IBM, Motolora, 4Mb MRAM chip demo
  • More than 10 startup MRAM companies formed.
  • MRAM becomes internationally recognized future
    technology

44
Why DBMTJ?
  • The reduction of the TMR with increasing the
    bias voltage, a decrease of the
    sensitivity
  • The annealing temperature dependence of the MR
    ratio because standard backend technology for
    metallization of CMOS circuits requires
    annealing at 400450 C
  • Recent theoretical works show that a DBMTJ
    yields higher TMR than SMTJ
  • TMR of DBMTJ decreases more slowly than that of
    SMTJ as a function of a bias voltage.

J. S. Moodera, et al,PRL74, 3273(1995). Sheng,
et al, PRB 59, 480(1999) X. Zhang,et al, PRB 56,
5484(1997) K. Inomata, JAP 87, 6064(2000).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com