Title: I see onethird of a nation illhoused, illclad, illnourished
1- I see one-third of a nation ill-housed,
ill-clad, ill-nourished -
- The test of our progress is not whether we add
more to the abundance of those who have much it
is whether we provide enough for those who have
too little. - Franklin Roosevelt's second inaugural speech,
from January 20, 1937
2Myth of the Golden Years Introducing an
Alternative to the Flawed Federal Poverty Line
- State Senate Subcommittee on Aging Long Term
Care - February 26, 2008
- Presentation organized by Susie Smith
- Director of California Elder Economic Security
Initiative, - Insight Center for Community Economic Development
(www.insightcced.org) ssmith_at_insightcced.org
(510) 251-2600 x108)
3Introduction
- Insight Center for Community Economic Development
is a national non-profit research, consulting and
legal organization - Established as a War on Poverty program in 1969
- Economic security issue focus since the mid-1990s
4What is the Myth of the Golden Years?
-
- I work hard, pay taxes, the system will
- take care of me in my
- older years
- Not true anymore!
5The CA Elder Economic Security Initiative program
- Statewide, data-driven coalition to raise
awareness and shape policy to help the elderly
make ends meet - Part of a national movement
- Builds on the work of the nationally acclaimed
Family Economic Self-Sufficiency Standard
Project, and the California arm of that
Californians For Economic Security - Guided by state and region steering committees
6Long Term Goals Strategy
- Close the gap between elders income and their
basic expenses - Paradigm shift in policy, advocacy and direct
services for the elderly - Strategy coalition-building, education,
advocacy and outreach using a new,
research-driven framework of income adequacy
7California Research Partner UCLA Center for
Health Policy Research
- To understand where we are, we need to understand
where weve come from
8No Hard Data on Poverty
I see one-third of a nation ill-housed,
ill-clad, and ill-nourished Franklin
Roosevelt's second inaugural speech, from
January 20, 1937 http//c250.columbia.edu/dkv/ex
tracts/0711_fdr_newdeal.html .
9War on Poverty required hard numbers
- To measure progress required a standard
methodology - The number calculated as poor had to be high
enough to make progress possible - But not so high as to look bad
10The Federal Poverty Line
- Developed in 1963-1964 by Mollie Orshansky of the
Social Security Administration - Department of Agriculture's 1955 Household Food
Consumption Survey 1/3 of after tax income
spent on food - Multiplied economy food plan (designed for
temporary or emergency use) x 3 poverty
11Federal Poverty Line, continued
- Varied by family size
- Same amount in every state
- Indexed in 1969 to the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
- Some additional fine tuning subsequently, but has
basically remained the same - See http//aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/papers/hptgssiv.ht
m
12Measure Now Widely Used
- To track trends
- Evaluate economic policy
- Discussed in presidential campaigns
13Eligibility
- Many public programs now use the poverty line for
eligibility - 135 FPL used by Medicare for low-income subsidy
of Part D - Some eligibility categories of Medi-Cal are tied
to FPL
14Funding Programs
- Older Americans Act requires priority to
greatest social and economic need areas many
states use FPL in formula
15Implicitly, as a Yardstick
- When evaluating policies, the poverty line is
often used as a reference standard - Elizabeth Hill recently recommended, reducing
the grants for SSI/SSP couples down to 125
percent of the federal poverty level.
16Why We Need to Change
- Based on 1950s consumption patterns
- Incorporates outdated and inadequate food measure
- Food plan was updated in 1975, 1995, and 2005 but
FPL does not reflect those changes - The food plan chosen was designed only for short
term use
17Why change, continued
- Does not account for regional differences in cost
of living - The inflation adjustment (CPI)
- Does not reflect costs experienced by elders
- Does not reflect increased standard of living
- Even Orshansky admitted that her measure
undercounted poverty
18Time to move to the 21st century
- Just because some of us learned to type on a
manual typewriter does not mean it is still an
adequate tool - We need to use current knowledge and adopt a
modern tool to measure income adequacy
19Elder Economic Security Standard Index
- Based on actual spending by older adults in this
century - Relies on credible publicly available data
- Is specific to retired older adults
- Provides a measure of income adequacy the
amount needed to cover basic needs - Developed by UMass-Boston Wider Opportunities
for Women, refined in collaboration with UCLA
CHPR
20Cost Components
- Housing, the largest cost for most
- Medical Care, a major cost for elders
- Food at home
- Transportation, local
- Miscellaneous, including telephone, clothing,
home repair
21High Housing Costs Threaten the Economic Security
of Seniors in California
Source Wider Opportunities for Women (2008),
Elders Living on the Edge The Impact of
California Support Programs When Income in
Retirement Falls Short Washington, DC. The Elder
Standard Index was tabulated by the UCLA Center
for Health Policy Research using the WOW-UMass
Gerontology Institute national methodology.
22Elder Economic Security Standard Index Santa
Clara and Humboldt Counties
23Income and Expenses Gaps in California
Elder Standard Indexes and Benchmark Annual
Incomes for Single Elders in Los Angeles County,
2007
Source Wider Opportunities for Women (2008),
Elders Living on the Edge The Impact of
California Support Programs When Income in
Retirement Falls Short Washington, DC. The Elder
Standard Index was tabulated by the UCLA Center
for Health Policy Research using the WOW-UMass
Gerontology Institute national methodology.
24Our National Partner Wider Opportunities for
Women (WOW)
-
- A national non-profit advocacy organization
celebrating over 40 years of helping women and
their families achieve economic independence and
equality of opportunity. www.wowonline.org - Directs the National Elder Economic Security
Initiative program - Expanding across the country w/natl database
25Who comprises the National Advisory Board?
- National Research Partner Gerontology Institute
at UMass Boston - State EESI partners
- AARP
- National Council on the Aging
- The Urban Institute Income Benefit and Policy
Center - National Committee to Preserve Social Security
and Medicare - Women's Institute for a Secure Retirement
- Health Policy Institute at Georgetown Public
Policy Institute - Institute for Womens Policy Research
- ACCRA-the Council for Community and Economic
Research - The National Council of La Raza
- The National Caucus and Center on Black Aged,
Inc. - The Pension Rights Center
- National Academy of Social Insurance
26Where is the Elder Economic Security Initiative?
Blue Current State Partners Green Potential
Targets for Future State Partners
27What is happening in other states?
- Massachusetts
- Raised asset limits on Medicaid from 2,000 to
10,000 - Governor to reawaken the statewide LTC commission
- Outreach to seniors Its not your fault!
- Undersecretary of Elder Affairs has agreed to
formally encourage service providers to use Elder
Standard Index in planning and evaluation
28Other states, continued
- Illinois
- Support home/community-based LTC programs
- Pennsylvania
- Spend down on Medicaid
- Director of the Interagency Council on LTC
- Merge aging and LTC state offices
- Use the Elder Standard Index in Area Agency on
Aging strategic plans - Wisconsin
- Senior Care Program prescription drug
28
29Long Term National Policy Goals
- Shift the national, state, and local dialogue
from one the that focuses on elder poverty to a
discussion on elder economic security. - Promote equitable and rational policy by using
the Index in evaluating existing policies and
developing new policies for older adults.
30National Policy Agenda
- Income and Health Security for All
- Support employer-based retirement savings
programs including pensions - Social Security leveling the playing field
between men and women crediting caregiving - Revise asset limits and income eligibility levels
to reflect the findings of the Elder Standard
Index (e.g. FS, LIS, HEAP) - Support the creation of affordable housing for
seniors and housing supports - Support traditional Medicare
31National Policy Agenda, continued
- 2) Home and Community-based Long-term care
- Universal social long-term care insurance
- of home and community-based
LTC services - 3) Supporting Older Workers
- Eliminate penalties to working
longer at fewer hours - Support Medicare as first payer for workers 65
- Support workplace accommodations for older
workers - Create education and training opportunities for
older workers
32California Policy RecommendationsShort-term
- 1) Encourage local and statewide use of Elder
Standard Index by other policymakers, CDA, public
agencies, non-profit organizations, and
foundations - 2) Promote savings and asset accumulation
opportunities for younger workers - 3) Allocate funds to support the annual
update of the Elder Economic
Security Standard Index - 4) Support and expand outreach efforts
33Benefit Cliffs The Result of Outdated Policies
Source Wider Opportunities for Women (2008),
Elders Living on the Edge The Impact of
California Support Programs When Income in
Retirement Falls Short Washington, DC.
34Policy Recommendations, Long-term
- 1) Adopt the Elder Economic Security Standard to
evaluate the impact of existing policies and
measure economic needs of older adults California - 2) Pass a resolution to urge the federal
government to recognize the flaws of FPL adopt
the Elder Standard as a new, improved way to
measure and address income adequacy for older
adults - 3) Expand the allocation of low-income housing
tax credits for elders and increase the supply of
affordable, supportive housing
35When Retirement Income Falls Short The Impact of
California Support Programs
Source Wider Opportunities for Women (2008),
Elders Living on the Edge The Impact of
California Support Programs When Income in
Retirement Falls Short Washington, DC
36Building the Movement Californians For Economic
Security
- Expand local and statewide coalitions
- Unite family and elder economic security
coalitions - Expand research
- 4. Convene leaders in housing, food, health, and
aging to develop next set of policy proposals
37Contact Information
- For more information on Cal-EESI, contact
- Susie Smith, Director California Elder Economic
Security Initiative - Insight Center for Community Economic Development
- Oakland, CA
- ssmith_at_Insightcced.org (510) 251-2600 x108
- For more information on the National EESI
Program, contact - Ramsey Alwin, Director of the National Elder
Economic Security Initiative program - Wider Opportunities for Women
- Washington, DC
- ralwin_at_wowonline.org (202) 464-1596 x107
- For more information on the methodology, contact
Steve Wallace - Steve Wallace, Professor and Associate Director
Center for Health Policy Research - UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
- Los Angeles, CA
- swallace_at_ucla.edu (310) 794-0910
- Statewide average and county-specific Elder
Economic Security Standard Index can found at
38Acknowledgements
- Insight Center for Community Economic
Development would like to thank the California
Elder Economic Security Initiative Steering
Committee for their tireless support of older
adults in California - The California Elder Economic Security
Initiative is funded through the generous support
of the following organizations - Area Agency on Aging of the County of Los
Angeles, The California Endowment, California
Community Foundation, California Policy Research
Center, The California Wellness Foundation, City
of Los Angeles Department of Aging, Council on
Aging - Silicon Valley, Health Trust, Wider
Opportunities for Women, UC-Program on Access to
Care, United Way of the Bay Area, and Y H Soda
Foundation. - The national project is funded with generous
support from the Retirement Research Foundation
and The Atlantic Philanthropies.