Title: Introduction to FallProofTM Balance Tests
1Introduction toFallProofTM Balance Tests
- Debbie Rose, Ph.D.
- Co-Director, Center for Successful Aging
- California State University, Fullerton
2FallProofTM Screening and Assessment Tools
- Fall Risk
- 8 Foot Up and Go
- Functional Limitations
- Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale
- Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
- 50 Foot Walk at Preferred and Fast Speed
- Walkie-Talkie Test
3FallProofTM Screening and Assessment Tools
- Sensory Impairments
- Modified version of the Clinical Test of Sensory
Interaction in Balance (M-CTSIB) - Motor Impairments
- Multidirectional Reach Test
4FallProofTM Screening and Assessment Tools
- Physical Impairments
- Senior Fitness Test Items Chair Stand Arm
Curl Chair Sit-and-Reach Scratch Test 2-Minute
Step - Fear-of-Falling
- Health/Activity Questionnaire
- Balance Efficacy Scale (Optional)
5Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
- Developed by Rose Lucchese (2003).
- Test demonstrates high test-retest reliability
(.95) - Inter-rater reliability is also high, ranging
from .94 to .97 when administered by experienced
clinicians. - Scale is comprised of 10 items designed to
measure multiple dimensions of balance. - Recommended for use with higher functioning
community-dwelling older adults only.
6Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
- Test requires little equipment
- Can be administered within 8 to 10 minutes
- Has operational definitions by which to score
each test item - Assesses more dimensions of balance when compared
to the Berg Balance Scale - Expect to be less prone to ceiling effects
7Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
- Test Items include
- Standing with feet together, eyes closed
- Reaching forward to grasp object
- Turn 360 degrees
- Stepping over an obstacle
- Walking with feet in tandem position
- Standing on one foot
8Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale
- Test Items include
- Standing on foam, eyes closed.
- Two-footed Jump for Distance
- Walk with Head Turns
- Backward Perturbation
- Total Score Possible 40 Points
9Balance Dimensions
- Sensory reception and integration
- Items 1 3 7 9
- Motor coordination
- Items 2 4 5 6 8 10
- Musculoskeletal Integrity
- Items 4 5 6 7 8
10Interpretation of Item Scores
- Possible underlying Impairments?
- Item 1- Standing with feet together and
- eyes closed.
- Weak hip abductor/adductor
- muscles
- Poor use of somatosensory Cues
- Poor Center of Gravity Control
11Interpretation of Item Scores
- Possible underlying Impairments?
- Item 8 Two-footed jump for distance.
- Lower body muscle weakness
- Poor Center of Gravity Control
- Poor upper and lower body
- coordination
12Interpretation of Item Scores
- Possible underlying Impairments?
- Item 9- Walk with Head Turns
- Possible vestibular
- impairment?
- Poor use of vision
- Poor dynamic COG control
13Interpretation of Item Scores
- Possible underlying Impairments?
- Item 10 Unexpected Backward Release
- Absent or ineffective use of step
- strategy
- Lower body weakness
- (reduced power)
- Poor Center of Gravity Control
-
14Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
- Developed by Berg in 1989
- Test comprised of 14 performance items
- High validity, test-retest and rater reliability
- Requires approximately 15 to 20 minutes to
administer - Prone to ceiling effects when used with
community-dwelling older adults.
15Berg Balance Scale
- Test Items Include
- Rising from a chair
- Standing independently for two minutes
- Seated balance (if unable to stand independently)
- Sitting down in a chair
- Transfers between chairs
- Standing with eyes closed
16Berg Balance Scale
- Test Items Include
- Standing with feet together
- Leaning forward
- Picking object up from floor
- Turn to look over shoulders
- 360 degree turn
- Dynamic toe touching
- Tandem Stance
- Standing on one leg
17Modified Version of BBS
- In modified version of the test, the first 5 test
items are deleted (Daschle et al., 1987) - High reliability and validity retained with
modified version. - Total score reduced from 56 to 36 points
-
18Interpretation of Item Scores
- Possible impairments associated with low Scores
- Item 1 lower and upper body weakness poor
dynamic COG control Abnormal weight
distribution. - Item 2 Poor gaze stabilization lower body
weakness abnormal weight distribution in
standing. - Item 6 Poor use of somatosensory inputs Visual
dependency and/or fear-of-falling Lower body
weakness.