AssemblyDisassembly Planning and Sequencing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Title: AssemblyDisassembly Planning and Sequencing


1
Assembly/Disassembly Planning and Sequencing
Based on
Disassembly Sequencing Using a Motion Planning
Approach Sundaram, Remmler, Amato (2001)
Geometric Reasoning about Mechanical
Assembly Wilson, Latombe (1994)
2
Assembly/Disassembly Problem
-Sandia National Labs
3
Ground Rules

• Assemblies are composed of component parts that
  can be divided into subassemblies
• Assembly and disassembly are related
• Assembled products have more constraints
• Assembly can be derived from disassembly
• Disregard tools and robotic manipulators
• Implementation of algorithm is separate problem
• Treat each part of assembly as free-moving robot
• All contact between components is Edge-Edge

4
Assembly Planning Basics

• Problem is of two interrelated parts
• Motion planning for subassemblies
• Sequencing of motions
• Early Attempt
• computer performs generate-and-test assembly
  sequencing
• Brute force subassembly decomposition
• Exponential time in the number of parts

5
Motion Planning Approach

• Treat each component of assembly as a robot
• Use PRM to plan path and sequence (AssemblyPRM)
• Handles high-dimensional C-space well
• Suffers from extremely narrow passages

Zero clearance
6
Directional Sampling

• Determine best direction for sampling
• Use geometry of components

Sampling Cones
7
Determine Direction

• Simple approach
• Use normal to adjacent faces
• Doesnt always work
• Only normals are considered in AssemblyPRM
• Requires face normal to narrow passage

Blocked Motion
Valid Motion
8
Directional Blocking Graph -Wilson, Latombe

• Properties of DBG
• Based on internal structure of assembly
• Shows how components block each other
• One graph for each direction
• Translations only

9
Non-Directional Blocking Graph

• Describe translations in directions
• Translations represented within unit circle
• Circle is divided into regions
• Regions correspond to translations of parts
• DBG is constant within each region

10
Using Translation Cone

• NDBG translations are represented by unit circle
• Diameters of circle are drawn parallel to contact
  edges
• Regions represent a range of translations with
  common DBG

11
Using Translation Cone

• Heres another example

12
Find Blocking Relations

• Sample random vectors
• One vector v per region
• Dot Product of v and edge normal
• Blocking condition if strictly positive

R1
R2
R4
R3
13
Find Blocking Relations

• Sample random vectors
• One vector v per region
• Dot Product of v and edge normal
• Blocking condition if strictly positive

R1
R2
R4
R3
14
Find Blocking Relations

• Sample random vectors
• One vector v per region
• Dot Product of v and edge normal
• Blocking condition if strictly positive

v1
v1
R1 v1 N1 lt 0 v1 N2 lt 0
R1
N1
N2
R2
R4
R3
15
Find Blocking Relations

• Sample random vectors
• One vector v per region
• Dot Product of v and edge normal
• Blocking condition if strictly positive

v1
v1
R1 v1 N1 lt 0 v1 N2 lt 0
R1
N1
N2
R2
R4
R2 v2 N1 lt 0 v2 N2 gt 0
N1
N2
R3
v2
v2
16
Using NDBG

• Given NDBG G
• Region R
• Direction d
• Part P
• Pi is free to translate in direction d if node Pi
  in G(R,d) contains no arcs

17
3D NDBG

• Translation directions are represented in unit
  sphere
• Plane-plane contacts are represented as arcs of
  circles
• Resultant regions are of dimensions 2, 1, and 0
  (corresponding to faces, edges, and vertices)

18
NDBG with Rotations

• Attach Cartesian frame to each part
• 3D vector describes motion
• Motion is from one frame to another
• D (dx, dy, ? )
• Jacobian matrix gives blocking relations

19
Back to AssemblyPRM

• Model assembly as stack S of configurations
• Loop until disassembled
• Pop configurations from S
• Sample new configurations - Expand()
• Push configurations on S
• Add configurations to roadmap
• Component parts are at pre-determined distance
  from each other

20
Expand Function

• Determine direction for sampling
• Amatos group used face normals
• Might be able to use NDBG
• Sample nodes
• How many? More than one but the paper doesnt
  specify
• Check for collision
• Return set of sampled configurations

21
Additions to AssemblyPRM

• Subassemblies
• Treat groups of component parts as one unit
• Simultaneous Disassembly
• Multiple parts must be moved in a coordinated
  fashion
• Rotations

22
Simultaneous Disassembly

• More than one part must be moved at a time
• In algorithm
• First try to find a serial disassembly sequence
• If step 1 fails, try two parts simultaneously
• Continue to increase until a sequence is found

-Latombe
23
Subassemblies

• Treat group of parts as single unit
• Plan disassembly
• Identify promising subassemblies
• Generate translation directions

24
Implementation/Assumptions

• Direction function uses contact edge normals to
  identify removal directions
• Algorithm will fail on assemblies that do not
  contain edges normal to the direction required
  for disassembly
• Paper does not discuss this limitation, or how it
  would fare with a more robust direction function

25
Experimental Results

• AssemblyPRM
• Face normals for direction
• Translations only
• Subassemblies not seen in results
• Paper doesnt specify if the algorithm uses
  subassemblies
• 3D models
• Some constrained to motions in 2D

26
Experimental Results Swap
Pure PRM (2 robots, 337 s)
AssemblyPRM (2 robots, 10 s)
27
Experimental Results Puzzle
AssemblyPRM (6 parts, 37 s)
28
Experimental Results Puzzle_Blocked
AssemblyPRM(6 parts, 91 s)
29
Experimental Results Puzzl3d
AssemblyPRM(10 parts, 211 s)
30
Experimental Results Pentomino
AssemblyPRM(12 parts, 1723 s)
31
Conclusions

• PRM techniques allow for disassembly planning
• AssemblyPRM works well on most experimental cases
• Experiment was limited
• No rotations
• No subassemblies
• Part selection not optimized, as seen in
  Pentomino puzzle
• Direction algorithm may be limited

32
Conclusions

• NDBG Provides method of describing translations
  in all directions
• Disassembly Planning is for small motions
• Implementation is not considered

33
Impact of Tools on Assembly
With Tools
Without Tools
34
Future work

• Integrate NDBG and AssemblyPRM
• Add rotation and subassembly planning to
  AssemblyPRM

35
References

• Sujay Sundaram, Ian Remmler, Nancy M. Amato,
  "Disassembly Sequencing Using a Motion Planning
  Approach", In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom.
  (ICRA), pp. 1475-1480, May 2001
• R.H. Wilson and J.C. Latombe. Geometric Reasoning
  About Assembly. Artificial Intelligence, 71(2),
  1994.