Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans

Description:

Learn how this bacterium is so resistant to DNA damage ... cyctochrome biogenesis. Correctly identified nearly all known sigH promoters ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:315
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: RobertB139
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans


1
Genome of the week - Deinococcus radiodurans
  • Highly resistant to DNA damage
  • Most radiation resistant organism known
  • Multiple genetic elements
  • 2 chromosomes, 2 plasmids
  • Why call one a chromosome vs. plasmid?

2
Why sequence D. radiodurans?
  • Learn how this bacterium is so resistant to DNA
    damage
  • This bacterium has nearly all known mechanisms
    for repairing DNA damage.
  • Redundancy of some DNA damage repair mechanisms.
  • Use this organism in bioremediation.
  • Sites contaminated with high levels of
    radioactivity
  • DOE (Department of Energy) sequences many
    microbial genomes - JGI

3
Data normalization
  • Why do we need to normalize microarray data?
  • Correct for experimental errors
  • Northern blot example
  • Microbial microarrays
  • Assume the expression of most genes dont change
  • We know every gene - sum the intensity in both
    channels and make the equal.
  • Many other ways of normalizing data - not one
    standard way. Area of active research.

4
Data Distribution Before and After Normalization
1200
cy3
1000
cy5
800
600
400
200
0
2
5
8
11
3.5
6.5
9.5
2.75
4.25
5.75
7.25
8.75
10.3
Number of clones
1400
cy3
1200
cy5
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
1
2
3
-3
-2
-1
0.5
1.5
2.5
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
Log of Intensities
5
Experimental design
  • Very important - often overlooked.
  • Bacteria are easier to work with than more
    complex systems.
  • Two types we will discuss in broad terms
  • Direct comparison
  • Reference design
  • Also loop design (ANOVA)

6
Yang and Speed, 2002
7
Direct comparison
  • Directly comparing all samples against each
    other.
  • Best choice - lowest amount of variation in the
    experiment.
  • Not the best design
  • Many samples are to be compared.
  • RNA is not easy to obtain (often not a problem
    for microbial systems.
  • If microarrays are limiting.

8
Reference design (indirect)
  • Compare all samples to a common reference.
  • Usually a pool of all samples of RNA or genomic
    DNA
  • Useful in comparing many samples.
  • Drawbacks
  • 1/2 of the measurements are not biologically
    relevant
  • Each gene is expressed as a ratio/ratio.
    Variation in the ratios will be higher.

9
More complicated situations
  • Multifactorial designs

10
Examples of applications
  • Gene expression
  • Defining a regulon - targets of a transcription
    factor.
  • Functional annotation
  • Identifying regions of DNA bound by a DNA binding
    protein
  • Genome content
  • Disease diagnosis

11
Characterization of the stationary phase sigma
factor regulon (sH) in Bacillus subtilis
12
What is a sigma factor?
  • Directs RNA polymerase to promoter sequences
  • Bacteria use many sigma factors to turn on
    regulatory networks at different times.
  • Sporulation
  • Stress responses
  • Virulence

Wosten, 1998
13
Alternative sigma factors in B. subtilis
sporulation
Kroos and Yu, 2000
14
The stationary phase sigma factor sH
  • ? most active at the transition from exponential
    growth to stationary phase
  • ? mutants are blocked at stage 0 of sporulation
  • Many known sigH promoters previously identified
  • Array validation

15
Experimental approach
  • Compare expression profiles of wt and ?sigH
    mutant at times when sigH is active.
  • Artificially induce the expression of sigH during
    exponential growth.
  • When Sigma-H is normally not active.
  • Might miss genes that depend additional factors
    other than Sigma-H.
  • Identify potential promoters using computer
    searches.

16
?sigH
wild-type
17
wild type (Cy5) vs. sigH mutant (Cy3)
Hour -1
Hour 0
Hour 1
18
(No Transcript)
19
Data from a microarray are expressed as ratios
  • Cy3/Cy5 or Cy5/Cy3
  • Measuring differences in two samples, not
    absolute expression levels
  • Ratios are often log2 transformed before analysis

20
Genes whose transcription is influenced by sH
  • 433 genes were altered when comparing wt vs.
    ?sigH.
  • 160 genes were altered when sigH overexpressed.
  • Which genes are directly regulated by Sigma-H?

21
Identifying sigH promoters
  • Two bioinformatics approaches
  • Hidden Markov Model database
  • HMMER 2.2 (hmm.wustl.edu)
  • Pattern searches (SubtiList)
  • Identify 100s of potential promoters

22
Correlate potential sigH promoters with genes
identified with microarray data.
  • Genes positively regulated by Sigma-H in a
    microarray experiment that have a putative
    promoter within 500bp of the gene.

23
Directly controlled sigH genes
  • 26 new sigH promoters controlling 54 genes
  • Genes involved in key processes associated with
    the transition to stationary phase
  • generation of new food sources (ie. proteases)
  • transport of nutrients
  • cell wall metabolism
  • cyctochrome biogenesis
  • Correctly identified nearly all known sigH
    promoters
  • Complete sigH regulon
  • 49 promoters controlling 87 genes.

24
  • Identification of DNA regions bound by proteins.

Iyer et al. 2001 Nature, 409533-538
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com