Microbial Insecticides - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Microbial Insecticides

Description:

Microbial Insecticides Ziad W Jaradat The gene for the juvenile estrase was purified from the insect Heliothis virescens ( tobacco budworm) and the coding sequence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4243
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: WW965
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Microbial Insecticides


1
  • Microbial Insecticides
  • Ziad W Jaradat

2
  • Microbial Insecticides
  •  
  • Insects are the most abundant group of organisms
    on Earth, and they negatively affect humans in a
    variety of ways
  • They cause massive crop damage,
  • They act as vectors of both human and animal
    diseases.

3
  • History of insecticides
  • During the 1940s, a number of chemical
    insecticides were developed as a means of
    controlling the proliferation of noxious insect
    populations.
  • One of these was the chlorinated hydrocarbon DDT
    (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane). DDT proved
    to be exceptionally effective in killing and
    controlling many species of pests by attacking
    the nervous system and muscle tissue of insects.
  • Other chlorinated hydrocarbons such as dieldrin,
    aldrin, chlordane, lindane, and toxophene have
    since been synthesized and applied on a massive
    scale.

4
  • Another class of chemical insecticides is called
    organophosphates and includes malathion,
    parathion, and diazinon.
  • The first generation of organophosphates were
    developed as chemical warfare agents. Now they
    are used to control insect populations by
    inhibiting the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which
    hydrolyzes the nerve transmitter acetylcholine.
    These insecticides disrupt the functioning of
    motor and brain neurons of the insect.

5
  • By early 1960s, over 100 million acres of U.S.
    agricultural land were being treated annually
    with chemical insecticides. However, at a latter
    time, researchers realized that chlorinated
    hydrocarbon insecticide and organophosphate
    insecticides had dramatic effects on animals,
    ecosystems, and humans.
  • DDT, was found to persist in the environment for
    15 to 20 years and accumulates in increasing
    concentrations through food chains.
  • This bioaccumulation in fatty tissues was having
    a significant biological impact on many
    organisms.
  • For example, in North America, many species of
    birds including peregrine falcons, sparrow hawks,
    bald eagles, brown pelicans, and double-crested
    cormorants were severely depopulated.

6
  • Drawbacks of chemical insecticides
  • Targeted insect pest populations be increasingly
    resistant to treatment with many chemical
    insecticides
  • Chemical insecticides were found to lack
    specificity consequently, beneficial insects
    were being killed along with those that were
    considered to be pests.
  • Some times the natural enemies of the insect pest
    species were killed more efficiently than the
    target organisms.
  • Given all the drawbacks associated with the use
    of chemical inseciticides, alternative means of
    controlling harmful insects have been sought over
    the past 20 years.

7
  • Using insecticides that are produced naturally by
    either microorganisms or plants was an obvious
    choice, Why?
  • Highly specific for a target insect species
    Biodegradable, Slow to select for resistance.
  • Researchers can manipulate genes that encode
    insect pathogenic agents and introduce them in
    target microbes that can infect these insects.

8
  • Insecticidal Toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis
  • A microbial insecticide can be an organism that
    either produces a toxic substance that kills an
    insect species or has the capability of fatally
    infecting a specific target insect.
  • The most studied, most effective, most often
    utilized microbial insecticides are the toxins
    synthesized by Bacillus thuringiensis.
  • This bacterium comprises a number of different
    strains each of which produces a different toxin
    that can kill certain specific insects, for
    example

9
  • B. thuringiensis kurstaki is toxic to
    lepidopteran larvae including moths, butterflies,
    skippers, cabbage worm, and spruce budworm.
  • B. thuringiensis israelensis kills diptera such
    as mosquitoes and black flies.
  • B. thuringiensis tenebrionis is effective
    against coleoptera (beetles) such as the potato
    beetle and the boll weevil.
  • Other B. thuringiensis strains with different
    toxins that are specific toward certain insects.

10
  •  
  • Mode of action
  • To kill an insect pest, B. thuringiensis must be
    ingested as the contact of the bacterium or the
    toxin with the surface of an insect has no effect
    on the target organism.
  • B. thuringiensis is generally applied by
    spraying, so it is usually formulated with insect
    attractants to increase the probability that the
    target insect will ingest the toxin.

11
  • Advantage
  • Because for the toxin to be effective it has to
    be ingested, this limits the susceptibility of
    none target insects and other animals to this
    insecticide.
  •  
  • Drawbacks
  • Insects that attack plant roots are less likely
    to ingest a B. thuringiensis toxin that has been
    sprayed on the surface of a host plant.
  • B. thuringiensis toxin can only kill a
    susceptible insect during a specific
    developmental stage.
  • It costs 1.5-3 times as much as chemical
    insecticides
  • Resistance of insects to the toxins produced by
    these bacteria might occur.

12
  • Example of using Bacterial insecticides
  • Bacillus thuringiensis sub specs. kurstaki was
    used as major means of controlling spruce budworm
    in Canada.
  • Its use was increased from 1 in 1979 to around
    74 in 1986 for treating spruce budworm in
    Canada
  • In other countries, B. thuringiensis kurstaki
    has been used against tent caterpillars, gypsy
    moths, cabbage worms, cabbage loopers, and
    tobacco hornworms.

13
  • How Does it Work
  • The insecticidal activity of B. thuringiensis
    kurstaki and other strains is contained within a
    very large structure called the parasporal
    crystal, which is synthesized during bacterial
    sporulation.
  • The crystal is an aggregate of one kind of
    protein that can be dissociated by mild alkali
    treatment to yield two subunits of 130 kDa each
    (Fig. 12.1).
  • The parasporal crystal is not the active form of
    the insecticide rather, it is a protoxin, a
    precursor of the active toxin.

14
  • When the parasporal crystal is ingested by a
    target insect, the protoxin is activated within
    its gut by the combination of alkaline pH (7.5 to
    8.0) and specific digestive proteases, which
    converts the protoxin into an active form with
    68 kDa (Fig. 12.1).
  • When the toxin changes to its active form, it
    inserts itself into the membrane of the gut
    epithelial cells of the insect and creates an ion
    channel through which excessive loss of cellular
    ATP occurs (Fig. 12.2). About 15 min after the
    channels forms cellular metabolism ceases, the
    insect stops feeding, becomes dehydrated, and
    eventually dies.

15
  • Two things make this process very specific
  • The need for an alkaline media
  • The need for specific proteases
  • B. thurigienis kurstaki is applied by spraying
    approximately
  • 1 .3 to 2.6 X 108 spores per square foot of the
    target area at the peak of the larval population
    of the target organism.
  • The crystal is short lived as it breaks down
    after exposure to sunlight so it is appropriate
    to spray it in cloudy days.

16
  • Toxin Gene Isolation
  • Isolate and characterize the protoxin gene(s).
  • determine whether the toxin genes are located on
    a plasmid or on the chromosomal DNA
  • Test for plasmid-borne toxin genes a toxin
    producing strain can be conjugated to a strain
    that lack the insecticidal activity. If the
    latter strain acquires the ability to synthesize
    the insecticidal toxin, then the toxin gene(s) is
    most likely present on a plasmid because the
    transfer of chromosomal DNA during conjugation is
    a rare event.

17
  • Isolation of the protoxin encoding DNA sequence
  • Total cellular DNA is isolated and separated into
    plasmid and chromosomal DNA using cesium chloride
    gradient centrifugation.
  • A clone bank is constructed from the chromosomal
    DNA
  • When toxin gene is plasmid encoded, the plasmid
    can be further fractionated by sucrose gradient
    to separate the plasmids to different sizes.
    Figure 12.3
  • Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki contains an
    insecticidal protoxin gene on one of 7 different
    plasmids (2, 7.4, 8.2, 14.4, 45 and 71 kb in
    length.

18
  • To determine which B. thuringiensis kurstaki
    plasmid carries the protoxin gene, following
    sucrose gradient centrifugation, the plasmid DNA
    sample is divided into three fractions
  • Small (2.0 kb)
  • Medium (7.4, 7.8, 8.2, and 14.4 kb)
  • Large (45 and 71 kb)
  • The fraction with the small plasmid (2.0 kb) is
    discarded, because this plasmid is too small to
    encode a protein equivalent to the 130-kDa
    protoxin.

19
  • The medium and large plasmid fractions are each
    partially digested with the restriction enzyme
    Sau3AI and then ligated into the BamHI site of
    plasmid pBR322.
  • These clone banks were transformed into E. coli
    and then screened immunologically using the
    following procedure
  • Colonies are transferred from agar plates to a
    nitrocellulose membrane.
  • The transferred colonies are partially lysed
    with organic solvents.

20
  • All available sites on the membrane to which
    primary and secondary antibodies could bind are
    blocked by treating the membrane with bovine
    serum albumin.
  • The bovine serum albumin-treated membranes are
    treated with rabbit antiserum that contains
    antibodies against the insecticidal toxin.
  • The membranes are washed to remove unbound
    antibodies and then treated with 251-labeled S.
    aureus protein A, which binds to the Fc portion
    of the bound antibodies.
  • Spots on the membrane corresponding to colonies
    that actively synthesize the insecticidal toxin
    are visualized by autoradiography.

21
  • Using the protoxin gene, the 71-kb plasmid of B.
    thuringiensis. kurstaki was found by DNA
    hybridization to encode the toxin gene.

22
  • Genetic Engineering of B. thuringiensis Strains
  • First step is to isolate and sequence the toxin
    gene, then to obtain the amino acid sequence of
    toxin.
  • When the amino acid sequence was compared for
    other toxins they all showed a common toxin
    domain.
  • It was found that the whole gene is not necessary
    for the toxin to have its insecticidal activity,
    rather a portion, a chemically synthesized
    coding sequence or of course the whole gene can
    be used for further genetic manipulation

23
  • The B. thuringiensis protoxin protein is only
    synthesized during the sporulation phase of
    growth therefore,
  • It might therefore be advantageous to have the
    toxin gene transcribed and translated during
    vegetative growth.
  • This would permit the toxin to be synthesized by
    a continues fermentation process which decreases
    the cost of toxin production
  •  

24
  • However, when a continuously active
    (constitutive) promoter form tetracycline
    resistant gene was introduced into B.
    thuringiensis the active toxin protein was
    produced continuously through out the whole
    growth cycle ( spore and vegetative phases)
  • Figure 12.4, and even the toxin synthesis
    occurred in B. thuringiensis defective in
    sporulation gene.

25
  • Therefore, under these conditions the toxin will
    be produced in high quantities.
  • Many crops might be attacked by different insect
    species, therefore, it would be advantageous if
    we could create microbial insecticides with broad
    spectrum of target insects. This could be done
    by
  • Transferring a gene against one insect into a B.
    thuringiensis that already produced another toxin
    against another insect
  • Fusing portions of two different species-specific
    toxin genes to one another so that a unique
    hybrid toxin is produced and is effective against
    these to different insects.

26
  • Testing whether the insect target can be widened
  • Toxin genes were taken from B. thuringiensis
    subspecies aizawai and tenebrionis and used to
    make one construct (vector)
  • The vector was introduced onto B. thuringiensis
    subspecies aizawai, tenebrioinis, kurstaki,
    israelensis
  • All the transformed strains were tested for their
    toxicity toward three different larvae.
  • Table 1 shows the results of this experiment.

27
  • Some times B. thuringiensis might not be the best
    bacteria to be sprayed to combat an insect, so
    the toxin genes must then be introduced into
    anther suitable vector such as Caulobacter
    crescentus or cyanobacteria.
  • Another example is that some insects attack the
    roots of the plants which makes them
    inaccessible to the B. thuringiensis based
    insecticidal therefore, it is possible to
    introduce the toxin gene from the Bacillus to a
    bacteria that colonizes close to the roots.
  • The engineered bacteria could be introduced into
    the soil so they

28
  • release the toxin close to the roots
  • Since they colonize the soil, they keep producing
    the toxin continuously thus obviating the need
    for continuous spraying.
  • Example the B. thuringiensis kurstaki
    insecticidal toxin was introduced into the
    chromosomal DNA of Pseudomonas fluorescens that
    colonize corn roots.
  •  

29
  • 1. A transposon Tn5 element that had been cloned
    into a plasmid was genetically modified by
    altering portions of its left and right borders
    and deleting its transposase. Such an altered Tn5
    element cannot be excised from the plasmid, even
    by exogenous transposase.
  •  
  • Transposes is an enzyme that is encoded by
    transposon gene and facilitates the insertion or
    excision of the transposon form a chromosomal
    site.
  •  
  • 2. An isolated B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki
    insecticidal toxin gene was spliced into the
    middle of the altered Tn5 element on the plasmid
    and placed under the control of a constitutive
    promoter.

30
  • 3. A wild-type Tn5 element was transposed into
    the chromosome of the root-colonizing strain of
    P. fluorescens.
  • 4. The plasmid carrying the altered Tn5 element
    with the insert toxin gene was introduced into
    the host bacterium that had the integrated
    wild-type Tn5 element.
  •  
  • 5. Homologous recombination by means of a double
    crossover between the nontransposable Tn5 element
    on the plasmid that carries the toxin gene and
    the chromosomally integrated wild-type Tn5 led
    the integration of the altered Tn5 with the toxin
    gene into the chromosomal DNA, with the
    concomitant loss of the wild-type Tn5 element.

31
  • This form of engineering controls two things
  • toxin gene is unlikely to be lost either during
    the large-scale laboratory growth or after
    release of the engineered microorganism to the
    environment.
  • Probability of transfer of the toxin gene to
    other microorganisms in the environment is very
    low.

32
  • Baculoviruses as Biocontrol Agents
  •  
  • Baculoviruses are rod-shaped, double-stranded DNA
    viruses can infect and kill a large number of
    different invertebrate organisms. Sub groups of
    this viral family are pathogenic to several
    classes of insects including Lepidoptera,
    Hymenoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Trichoptera
    Coleoptera, and Homoptera.
  • Therefore, some of the baculoviruses are
    important for the control of certain pests and
    thus are registered as pesticides.
  • Problems!!!
  • These viruses kill insects slowly within days or
    weeks.

33
  • Solution !!!
  • Enhance the virulence of the virus by introducing
    foreign genes that will severely impair or kill
    the target insect such using the gene that
    disrupts the cell cycle of the insect.
  • During the insect development, larva juvenile
    hormone is needed for the metamorphosis to
    happen, now this hormone is degraded by the
    action of the juvenile hormone estrase which is
    an enzyme that inactivate the juvenile hormone.
    Therefore, an increase in the production of this
    hormone will interrupt the insect life cycle and
    leads to its death.

34
  •  The gene for the juvenile estrase was purified
    from the insect Heliothis virescens ( tobacco
    budworm) and the coding sequence was isolated
    from the cDNA library and inserted into the
    genome of a baculovirus under the control of the
    baculovirus transcription signals.
  • When this virus was fed to target insects, the
    larva feeding and growth was severely limited
    relative to the control.

35
  • Problems of this method
  • This method is specific for the control of the
    insects at this larval stage only so it has a
    limited effect. Therefore, the incorporation of
    a toxin gene in the genome of the virus that will
    be transcribed and translated during the viral
    normal cycle in the insect would help in killing
    the insect any time regardless of its developing
    stage.
  • Example, the gene that encodes the insect
    specific neurotoxin produced by the North
    American scorpion was cloned into a baculovirus
    and was tested against target insects and found
    to decrease the damage to crops by 50 . The cost
    of propagating this virus is high

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com