Necrotizing Pancreatitis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Description:

obstructing stone at ampulla allows bile to reflux into the pancreatic duct. obstructing stone at ampulla produces pancreatic duct hypertension. Presentation and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2281
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: donald69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Necrotizing Pancreatitis


1
Necrotizing Pancreatitis
  • Donald Baril
  • Department of Surgery Grand Rounds
  • Elmhurst Hospital Center
  • February 25, 2004

2
Epidemiology
  • ? 185,000 cases of acute pancreatitis/year in
    U.S.
  • ? Gallstone pancreatitis accounts for 40-80 of
    cases
  • ? Necrosis present in 20-30 of all cases
  • ? Most common between the ages of 50 and 70
  • ? Presence of necrosis increases morbidity and
    mortality rates from 23 to 82 and lt1 to 10
    respectively

3
Etiology
  • ? Gallstones
  • ? Alcohol abuse
  • ? Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • ? Hyperlipidemia
  • ? Drugs
  • ? Pancreas divisum
  • ? Abdominal trauma

4
Pathophysiology
  • ? Disruption in the normal separation of
    lysosomal and pancreatic enzymes which leads to
    the exposure of pancreatic proenzymes to
    lysosomal enzymes leading to pancreatic
    autodigestion
  • ? Biliary pancreatitis
  • ? obstructing stone at ampulla allows bile to
    reflux into the pancreatic duct
  • ? obstructing stone at ampulla produces
    pancreatic duct hypertension

5
Presentation and Diagnosis
  • ? History Epigastric pain, nausea/vomiting,
    fever
  • ? Physical exam fever, tachycardia, epigastric
    tenderness,
  • Grey-Turners sign, Cullens sign
  • ? Laboratory values elevated amylase and lipase,
    leukocytosis,
  • elevated liver function tests

6
Radiographic studies
  • ? Abdominal x-ray
  • ? typically nonspecific
  • ? may exclude other causes of abdominal pain
  • ? may show a sentinel loop or a colon cutoff
    sign
  • ? Ultrasound
  • ? typically shows a diffusely enlarged,
    hypoechoic pancreas
  • ? sensitivity of 67 and near 99 specificity
    in
  • the diagnosis of acute
    pancreatitis
  • ? MRCP

7
Colon cutoff sign
8
Radiographic studies CT scan
  • ? CT (contrast-enhanced)
  • ? gold standard for the noninvasive diagnosis
    of necrotizing pancreatitis
  • ? affected portions fail to enhance secondary
    to disruption of the normal pancreatic
    microcirulation
  • ? accuracy of gt 90 when at least 30
    glandular necrosis is present

9
Severity of pancreatitis based on CT findings
10
(No Transcript)
11
CT findings of necrotizing pancreatitis
12
CT findings of necrotizing pancreatitis
13
CT findings of necrotizing pancreatitis
14
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • ? Gold standard to diagnose choledocholithiasis
  • ? Should be used in combination with
    sphincterotomy for patients with severe gallstone
    pancreatitis and suspected persistent biliary
    obstruction
  • ? Carries inherent risks of exacerbating the
    ongoing pancreatitis and introducing infection
    into sterile necrosis

15
Management aims
  • ? Two phases of acute pancreatitis
  • ? Initial 14 days characterized by the systemic
    inflammatory
  • response syndrome (SIRS)
  • ? intensive medical support
  • ? prevention of infection
  • ? Infection of pancreatic necrosis which occurs
    in the second
  • and third week following the onset of
    symptoms
  • ? treatment of local infectious complications
  • and debridement

16
Infected necrosis
  • ? 30-70 of patients with acute necrotizing
    pancreatitis develop local pancreatic infection
  • ? Mortality triples in the presence of infection
    from 10 to 30
  • ? Risk of infection increases with the amount of
    necrosis and the time from onset of pancreatitis
  • ? 24 of pts have bacterial contamination at
    1week
  • ? 71 of pts have bacterial contamination at
    3weeks
  • ? greatest risk in pts with gt50 necrosis

17
Infected necrosis
  • ? Sources of infection include bacterial
    translocation from the colon, hematogenous
    spread, descending infection via the biliary duct
    system, or ascending via the duodenum
  • ? Organisms
  • ? Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella,
    Enterococcus, Proteus, Bacteroides
  • ? Streptococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus
    aureus
  • ? Candida species

18
Prevention of bacterial infection
  • ? Enteral feeding
  • ? avoids central line-related infections
  • ? maintains gut barrier integrity
  • ? decreases bacterial translocations
  • ? Selective decontamination of the gut with
    non-absorbable antibiotics
  • ? Prophylactic systemic antibiotics
  • ? Imipenem remains the antibiotic of choice
  • ? Quinolones in combination with Metronidazole
    are the
  • second-line agents

19
Determination of infected necrosis
  • ? CT or ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration
    of pancreatic necrosis is performed in patients
    with known necrosis who develop clinical signs of
    sepsis
  • ? sensitivity of 96 and specificity of 99
  • ? complications include risk of secondary
    infection, bleeding, and aggravation of
    acute pancreatitis

20
Indications and timing of surgery
  • ? Benefit of surgery in patients with sterile
    necrosis remains unproven but should be pursued
    in cases with MSOF unresponsive to medical
    treatment
  • ? Infected necrosis is a clear indication for
    surgery
  • ? Surgical intervention should be postponed as
    long as possible
  • ? demarcation between viable and necrotic
    tissue is
  • more clearly defined
  • ? decreases the bleeding risk
  • ? minimizes surgery-related loss of vital
    tissue

21
Goals of Surgical Interventions
  • 1) Removal of pancreatogenic exudate from the
    peritoneal cavity and lesser sac
  • 2) Removal of infected, necrotic pancreatic and
    peripancreatic tissue
  • 3) Preservation of viable pancreatic tissue
  • 4) Postoperative evacuation of remaining debris
    and exudate

22
Surgical Interventions
  • 1) Necrosectomy with open packing
  • ? mortality of 15-17
  • ? pancreatic fistula rate of 26-46
  • 2) Necrosectomy with closed packing
  • ? mortality of 6.2
  • ? pancreatic fistula rate of 9
  • 3) Necrosectomy with closed continuous lavage of
    the retroperitoneum
  • ? mortality of 21
  • ? pancreatic fistula rate of 19

23
Percutaneous drainage
  • ? Generally fails to be curative but may be
    beneficial in stabilizing septic patients
  • ? Single study utilizing large bore drainage
    catheters (28 French) avoided surgery in 47 of
    pts (16/34) with infected pancreatic necrosis

24
Complications of necrotizing pancreatitis
  • ? Persistent or recurrent infection
  • ? Postoperative hemorrhage
  • ? Pancreaticocutaneous fistula
  • ? Enterocutaneous fistula
  • ? Duodenal obstruction
  • ? Pancreatic insufficiency

25
Conclusions
  • ? Necrotizing pancreatitis continues to have
    significant morbidity and mortality despite
    advances in medical therapy
  • ? Patients with necrotizing pancreatitis should
    all receive antibiotic prophylaxis
  • ? Surgery should be delayed as long as possible
    and has no proven role in sterile necrosis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com