Proximal Humerus Fractures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Description:

Proximal Humerus Fractures – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:6861
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Shir175
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proximal Humerus Fractures


1
Proximal Humerus Fractures
  • 2008 Southeastern Fracture Symposium
  • Charleston, South Carolina

Cay M Mierisch, MD Cesar J. Bravo, MD Cassandra
Mierisch, MD Hand and Upper Extremity
Division Carilion Clinic Bone And Joint Center
2
Proximal Humerus Fractures
  • Common injuries
  • 4-6 of all fractures
  • 2/3 female
  • Prevalence increases with age
  • Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Injury 2006
  • Significant functional impairment
  • Large number of treatment options available
  • No accepted standard

3
Anatomy
  • Neck shaft angle 130
  • Retroversion 19-22
  • Greater tuberosity 7-10 mm below highest point of
    the articular surface
  • Consider muscle forces
  • Blood supply
  • Anterior humeral circumflex artery

4
Classfication
  • Neer Classification
  • Number of fragments
  • Displacement gt 1cm
  • Angulation gt 45
  • AO/OTA
  • morphologic
  • Surgical neck
  • impaction, angulation, translation
  • Hertel
  • Predictors of ischemia
  • Medial hinge disruption gt 2mm
  • Metaphyseal head extension lt 8mm
  • J shoulder and elbow surg. 2004

5
Classification
  • Poor reproducibility and reliability
  • Radiographic displacement difficult to determine
  • Biological factors not considered
  • Age
  • Bone quality

6
Imaging
  • Shoulder AP
  • Scapular AP
  • Axillary view
  • Scapular Y
  • CT scan
  • 3 D
  • Improved assessment of displacement
  • Involvement of articular surface
  • MRI
  • Assess rotator cuff

7
Treatment
  • Non-operative
  • Indication
  • Minimal displacement
  • Surgical neck may tolerated a lot of displacement
  • Tuberosity displacement not well tolerated (lt5mm)
  • 2 part fractures
  • Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Injury 2006
  • Early mobilization
  • Follow closely with x-rays
  • Complications
  • Stiffness
  • Malunion/nonunion
  • Posttraumatic arthritis
  • Persistent nerve injury

8
Treatment
  • Operative treatment
  • Indications
  • Tuberosity displacement gt 5mm
  • Shaft displacement gt 2/3
  • Angulation greater 45
  • 3-4 part fx

9
Options
  • IM nailing
  • Closed reduction percutaneous pinning
  • Open reduction and internal fixation
  • Conventional plates
  • Transosseous sutures
  • Locking plates
  • Arthroplasty

10
Considerations
  • Fracture pattern
  • Bone quality
  • Combined cortical thickness gt 4mm required to
    support plate fixation
  • Associated injuries
  • Nerve injury
  • RTC
  • Preexisting RTC disease

Tingart MS et al J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003
11
IM nailing
  • Less soft tissue dissection
  • Antegrade
  • Cuff problems
  • Retrograde
  • Only 2-part fx
  • Not widely used

12
Closed reduction and Percutaneous pinning
  • Minimizes surgical dissection
  • Requires good bone quality for cortical purchase
  • 0.62 terminally threaded K-wires or cannulated
    screws
  • Successfully used in 2-, 3-, and 4-part fractures
  • Resch H et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997
  • 3 and 4 part fractures 90 good and
    excellent
  • Complications 11 AVN in 4 parts
  • Chen CY et al. J Trauma 1998
  • 2 and 3-part fractures
  • 85 good and excellent
  • Calvo E et al. J Shoulder and Elbow Surg 2007
  • 2-4 part fractures
  • Recommend pinning only for 2 part fractures
  • Pediatric proximal humerus fx

13
Open Reduction and Internal fixation
  • Transosseous suture
  • Poor bone quality
  • Older patients
  • Park MC et al. J Orthop Trauma 2003
  • 2-3 part fractures
  • 78 excellent, 11 satisfactory
  • Less commonly used after advent of locking plates

14
Open reduction and internal fixation
  • Conventional plate fixation
  • High failure rate
  • Factors
  • Age
  • Poor bone quality
  • Metaphyseal comminution

15
Open reduction and internal fixation
  • Locking plate
  • Fixed angle device
  • improved stability
  • Combine with bone graft materials
  • Clinical experience limited
  • Agudelo J. et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2007
    Nov-Dec21(10)676-81
  • Varus malreduction may lead to construct failure
  • Dietrich et al. Chirurg. 2007 Nov 28 German.
  • 52 patient 3-4 part fx . PHLP better than HA
  • Fankhauser F et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005
    430 176-181.
  • 29 patient Type A 2 Type B 15 type C 9
  • 1 year FU constant score of 75
  • Strohm et al. Techniques in Shoulder Elbow
    Surgery 2005 6 8-13.
  • 64 very good and good results

16
Locking Plate2 part fracture
17
Locking Plate
18
Locking Plate3-4 part fractures
19
Locking Plate
20
Arthroplasty
  • Indications
  • Head splitting fracture
  • Fracture dislocations
  • 3-4 part fracture
  • If stable fixation cannot be accomplished
  • Poor bone stock
  • Impression fractures
  • gt 40 involvement of articular surface
  • Avoids complication of AVN

21
Implant choices
  • Hemiarthroplasty with fracture stem
  • Reverse Total shoulder replacement
  • Total shoulder replacement

22
Hemiarthroplasty
  • Outcomes
  • Pain relief most predictable 61-97
  • Function inconsistently reported
  • Only 50 use hand above shoulder level
  • Prognostic factors
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Female worse
  • Time to surgery
  • Nerve injury
  • GT Tuberosity malunion/nonunion

23
Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty
24
Reverse Total shoulder
  • Indications still evolving
  • Pre-existing RTC disease
  • Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty
  • Older patients with poor bone quality
  • Poor outcome of HA in female gt 75
  • Boileau P et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  • Tuberosity displacement
  • Tanner MW et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res
  • Bufquin T et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007
  • 43 cases
  • 97 degrees of abduction
  • Tuberosity healing did not affect outcome

25
Reverse Total Shoulder
  • 78 y female
  • Ground level fall
  • Ipsilateral IT hip fx

26
Reverse Total Shoulder
27
Reverse Total Shoulder
  • 70 y male rheumatoid
  • Pre-existing shoulder problems

28
Reverse Total Shoulder
29
Total Shoulder for locked posterior dislocation
30
Summary
  • PHF on the rise
  • Older patient
  • More complex patterns
  • No accepted standard for treatment
  • Locking plates may allow ORIF in older patients
  • bone graft materials
  • Successful tuberosity union for improved outcomes
  • Role of reverse total shoulder evolving

31
Thank You
32
Greater Tuberosity
  • Younger patients
  • Anterior shoulder dislocations or direct impact
  • Treatment
  • Non-surgical for minimally and non-displaced fx
  • Surgical for displacement gt 5mm
  • ORIF
  • arthroscopic
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com