Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites

Description:

Hot plate -Magnetic stir rod -Blue M oven -Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) ... Hot Plate. 610.00. Floating Stir Bar (250 ml) 125.00. Oven (small) 1300. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2950
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: georginahi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer Nanocomposites


1
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Polymer
Nanocomposites
  • December 7, 2001
  • Georgina B. Higginbotham
  • Dr. Richard Chung, Advisor

2
OVERVIEW
  • Introduction
  • Statement of Problem
  • Project Objectives
  • Methodology
  • Experiments
  • Time Table
  • Safety Concerns
  • Impact
  • Cost Analysis
  • Conclusion

3
INTRODUCTION
  • Nanocomposites are one of the rapid growing areas
    in nanotechnology fields
  • Nanocomposite - defines as a two-phase material
    in which one of the phases has a dimension in the
    nanometer range
  • Nanomaterials differ from their identical
    chemically conventional counterparts because of a
    breakdown of scaling laws

4
INTRODUCTION (contd)
  • Key Terms
  • Montmorillonite is a crystalline layered
  • clay mineral
  • Exfoliated structures consist of well separated
    clay layers and that are individually dispersed
    in the polymer matrix
  • Intercalated structures consist of limited
    dispersion of polymer chain within in the clay
    layers

5
INTRODUCTION (contd)
  • Nanocomposites are made of inorganic particles
    dispersed in a polymer matrix

Kornmann, Xavier, Polymer-layered silicate
nanocomposites, www..instmat.co.ulc/iom/organisat
ions/escm/nanocomposites.pdf
6
INTRODUCTION (contd)
  • Inorganic particles can significantly improve
    properties of original material
  • Manipulation of a material at the nano-scale
    creates new design opportunities for material
    properties

Kornmann, Xavier, Polymer-layered silicate
nanocomposites, www.instmat.co.ulc/iom/organisati
ons/escm/nanocomposites.pdf
7
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
  • Operating conditions of processes are proprietary
  • Limited resources available
  • Provide a working manufacturing process to
    produce a polymer nanocomposite that can be
    utilized as a platform for further development

8
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
  • Conduct an extensive study on existing
    manufacturing processes
  • Simulate two processes using thermosetting epoxy
    matrix and thermoplastic polypropylene matrix
  • Optimize a process by which thermoset and
    thermoplastic nanocomposites can be produced
  • Evaluate material properties such as
    decomposition temperature, chemical composition,
    glass transition (Tg), hardness and toughness

9
METHODOLOGY
  • Four methods are currently used
  • - solution polymerization dissolving both
    polymer
  • and inorganic particles in solvent
  • - in-situ polymerization polar monomer
    solution,
  • clay particles swell in monomer
  • - melt intercalation blends molten
    thermoplastic
  • and inorganic particles, shear force used
    to
  • maximize interactions
  • - in-situ formation hydrothermal
    crystallization of
  • silicate layers in an aqueous polymer gel

10
METHODOLOGY (contd)
  • Two methods were chosen for study based on
    literature review and available equipment at
    SJSU laboratories
  • -melt intercalation
  • -in-situ polymerization
  • Two phases will be conducted during this study

11
PHASE I
  • Tasks Accomplished
  • - Completed literature review on manufacturing
  • processes
  • - Ordered materials
  • Tasks In Progress
  • - Experimentally simulating the two processes
  • Tasks To Be Accomplished
  • - Optimize a manufacturing process
  • - Produce samples
  • - Measure material properties

12
PHASE II
  • Evaluation of properties
  • - Hardness
  • - Glass transition temperature
  • - Decomposition temperature
  • - Chemical composition
  • - Toughness
  • Data collection
  • Analysis
  • - Weight percent
  • - Type of matrix
  • - Manufacturing parameters

13
EXPERIMENTS
  • Materials
  • Inorganic Clays
  • - Nanocor I.30.E modified montmorillonite
  • on the scale of 1.5 nm
  • - Cloisite 15A natural montmorillonite
    modified with
  • a quaternary ammonium salt on the scale of
    3.2nm
  • Polymers
  • - EPON 862 resin Bisphenol F
  • - EPICURE W curing agent
  • - Polypropylene

14
EXPERIMENTS (contd)
  • Coupling Agent
  • -Polybond 3150 aids in bonding between
  • non-compatible components
  • Equipment
  • -Single screw extruder
  • -Hot plate
  • -Magnetic stir rod
  • -Blue M oven
  • -Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC)

15
EXPERIMENTAL PROCESSES
Thermoset Epoxy Nanocomposite
Nanocor I.30E
Mix at 40-60oC Add Curing Agent W
EPON 860 Epoxy
Cast
Heat to121oC over 30 min Hold 2hrs
Cool from 177oC to Ambient over 2hrs
Heat to177oC over 30 min Hold 2hrs
16
EXPERIMENTAL PROCESSES (contd)
Thermoplastic Polypropylene Nanocomposite
Melt PP beads at 175oC
Mix in Inorganic Particles
Place in Extruder
Verify Dispersion
17
TIME TABLE
  • Time frame for Phase I has been extended
  • Process simulation and sample production have
    been extended into the winter session

18
TIME TABLE (contd)
19
SAFETY CONCERNS
  • SJSU Laboratory Production
  • Chemicals used to produce epoxy
  • Fine inorganic particles
  • Respirator will be necessary
  • Full Scale Production
  • Exothermic reaction from epoxy
  • Fine particles- ventilation considerations
  • Extruder operator safety

20
IMPACT
  • Stepping-stone for further understanding
    creating of new polymer nanocomposites
  • Provide a working manufacturing process that will
    be used to develop a polymer nanocomposite
  • To be used as a platform for further development

21
COST ANALYSIS
Costs for full scale operation would be much
greater Equipment costs would need to be
considered
22
CONCLUSION
  • Simulation Optimization of a manufacturing
    process for evaluation of polymer nanocomposite
    materials is feasible
  • Adjustments had to be made to schedule
  • Progress has been made in Phase I
  • Literature review conducted
  • Materials ordered
  • Parameters determined for processes
  • Process simulation started
  • Phase II will determine if Phase I is successful

23
THANK YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com