Title: Classification of removable partial denture
1Classification of removable partial denture
Dr Balendra Pratap singh BDS, MDS, MAMS, FISDR,
FPFA, FAAMP, ICMR-IF Assistant professor Departmen
t of Prosthodontics
2CONTENTS
- Need for Classification
- Requirements of an acceptable method of
classification. - Various types of Classification.
- Critical evaluation
- Summary
- Conclusion
- References
3NEED FOR CLASSIFICATION
- Ease of communication between dentist and
laboratory personal. - Facilitates case history recording and immediate
visualization of the edentulous arches - Formulate a good treatment plan
- Formulate basic design principles which might be
applied to similar situations. - Anticipate the difficulties commonly to occur for
that particular design.
4REQUIREMENTS OF AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF
CLASSIFICATION
- Allow visualization of the type of partially
edentulous arch - Permit immediate differentiation between the
tooth-supported and the tooth and tissue
supported removable partial denture - Universally accepted
- A guide to the type of design to be used
5Various Types of Classification
- Cummers Classification. 1920
- Kennedys Classification. 1925
- Bailyns Classification. 1928
- Neurohrs Classification. 1939
- Mauks Classification. 1941
- Wilds Classification. 1949
- Godfreys Classification. 1951
- Friedmans Classification. 1953
- Becketts Classification. 1953
- Craddocks Classification. 1954
6- Austin-Lidge Classification. 1957
- Skinners Classification. 1957
- Wilsons Classification.1960
- Watts Classification. 1958
- Applegate Classification. 1960
- Avants Classification. 1960
- Swensons Classification. 1963
- Fiset,s Classification. 1973
- Costas Classification. 1974
- Osborne Classification. 1979
- ACP Classification. 2002
7Kennedys classification
- In 1925 Dr. Edward Kennedy of New York.. This
system is based on the relationship of the
edentulous spaces to the abutment teeth. It is a
positional or anatomical classification.
8- Class I Bilateral edentulous areas located
posterior to the remaining natural teeth. Highest
incidence in mandible - Class II A unilateral edentulous area located
posterior to the remaining natural teeth
9Recognize the Classification?
10- Class III A unilateral edentulous area bounded
anteriorly and posteriorly by remaining teeth - Class IV An edentulous area located anterior to
the remaining natural teeth. A single but
bilateral (crossing the midline) edentulous area
11Recognize the classification?
12Modifications
- They were indicated according to the number of
such areas not by their extent, like Class III
mod 2
13- Advantages
- It permits immediate visualization of the
partially edentulous arches. - It permits a logical approach to the problems of
design. - It gives a definite treatment plan.
- Differentiates between bounded saddle and free
end saddle. - Simplicity.
14- Disadvantages
- Did not explain the length of the edentulous span
or number of missing teeth- only provide number
of modification spaces. - Not enough consideration about the condition of
teeth and the remaining supporting structures. - No distinction between modification spaces which
occur in the anterior segment to those of
posterior segment.
15Applegates classification
- Oliver C. Applegate 1960, provide a modification
of Kennedys system. - This system is based on the number, location and
condition of abutment teeth or manner of
achieving support.
16- Class V Teeth bound the edentulous area
anteriorly and posteriorly but anterior bounding
tooth is not suitable as abutment. (not strong
enough for rest, direct retainer) (as the lateral
incisor). It is basically a class III situation
where anterior abutment cannot be used for any
support.
17- Class VI An edentulous situation in which the
boundary teeth are capable of total support of
the required prosthesis. This situation hardly
requires any tissue support. The abutments are
capable of providing total support. - Additional edentulous areas are designated by
letter A and P. - A Anterior segment of the arch.
- P Posterior segment of the arch is bounded by
remaining teeth.
18- Applegates rules
- Rule One Classification should follow rather
than precede extractions that might alter the
original classification. - Rule Two If the third molar is missing and not
to be replaced, it is not considered in the
classification. - Rule Three If the third molar is present and is
to be used as an abutment, it is considered in
the classification. - Rule Four If the second molar is missing and is
not be replaced, it is not considered in the
classification.
19- Rule Five The most posterior edentulous area or
areas always determine the classification. - Rule Six Edentulous areas other than those,
which determine the classification, are referred
to as modification spaces and are designated by
their number.
20- Rule Seven The extent of the modification is not
considered, only the number of additional
edentulous areas are considered. - Rule Eight There can be no modification areas in
class IV. Because any additional edentulous space
will definitely be posterior to it and will
determine the classification.
21References
- Applegate O.C. Essentials of Removable partial
denture prosthesis. 1st edition, 1965. - Avant W.E. The universal classification for
removable partial denture situations. J.
Prosthet. Dent. 1966 16 533-540. - Davenport J.C., Basker R.M., Heath J.R. and Ralph
J.P. A color atlas of removable partial
dentures. 1st edition, 1988. - David M. Watt and A. Roy MacGregor Designing
partial dentures. - Eugene Costa A simplified system for identifying
partially edentulous dental arches. JPD, 1974,
639-645. - Friedman J. The ABC classification of partial
denture segments. JPD, 1953, 517-524.
22- Kratochvil F.J. Partial removable
prosthodontics. 1st edition, 1988. - McGivney G.P., Carr A.B. McCrackens Removable
partial prosthodontics. 10th edition, 2001. - Miller E.L. System for classifying the
partially edentulous arch. J. Prosthet. Dent.
1970 24 25-40. - Skinner C.N. A classification of removable
partial denture based upon the principles of
anatomy and physiology. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1959
9 240-45. - Stewart K.L., Rudd K.D. and Kuebker W.A.
Clinical Removable partial prosthodontics. 2nd
edition, 2001. - Thomas J. McGarry Classification system for
partial edentulism, Journal of Prosthodontics,
2002 Sep11(3)181-93.
23Q1. If tooth number 47 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
- Class 1 2.
class 2 - 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4
class 2 mod 2
24Q2. If tooth number 48 in below mentioned cast is
NOT part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
- Class 1 2.
class 2 - 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4.
class 2 mod 2
25Q3. If tooth number 18 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
- Class 1 2.
class 2 - 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4.
class 2 mod 2
26Q4. If tooth number 28 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
- Class 2 mod. 2 2. class
2 mod. 1 - 3. Class 3 mod. 1 4.
class 3 mod. 2
27Q5. According to Kennedy, all partially
edentulous arches are classified into
- 1. 6 types
- 2. 4 types
- 3. 2 types
- 4. 3 types
28Q6. Keeping in mind that all teeth are healthy,
how do classify this?
- Class 4 2.
class 3 mod. 1 - 3. Class 4 mod. 1 4.
class 3 mod. 2
29 Q7. This RPD is classified as
- Class 1 mod 1 2.
class 2 mod. 2 - 3. Class 1 mod. 2 4.
class 2 mod. 1
30Q8. If you need some adjustment in this RPD,
which type of RPD you tell to Lab?
- Class 1 2. class
3 - 3. Class 2 4.
class 1 mod. 1
31Q9. You have found this RPD in clinic, how do you
describe it?
- Class 2 mod 2 2. class 3 mod
2 - 3. Class 4 mod 3 4. class 1
mod. 2
32Q10. This RPD is classified as
- Class 4 mod 2 2. class 3 mod
2 - 3. Class 4 mod 1 4. class 2
mod. 2
33THANK YOU