Classification of removable partial denture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Classification of removable partial denture

Description:

Classification of removable partial denture Dr Balendra Pratap singh BDS, MDS, MAMS, FISDR, FPFA, FAAMP, ICMR-IF Assistant professor Department of Prosthodontics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:894
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: VS5
Learn more at: http://www.kgmu.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Classification of removable partial denture


1
Classification of removable partial denture
Dr Balendra Pratap singh BDS, MDS, MAMS, FISDR,
FPFA, FAAMP, ICMR-IF Assistant professor Departmen
t of Prosthodontics
2
CONTENTS
  • Need for Classification
  • Requirements of an acceptable method of
    classification.
  • Various types of Classification.
  • Critical evaluation
  • Summary
  • Conclusion
  • References

3
NEED FOR CLASSIFICATION
  • Ease of communication between dentist and
    laboratory personal.
  • Facilitates case history recording and immediate
    visualization of the edentulous arches
  • Formulate a good treatment plan
  • Formulate basic design principles which might be
    applied to similar situations.
  • Anticipate the difficulties commonly to occur for
    that particular design.

4
REQUIREMENTS OF AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF
CLASSIFICATION
  • Allow visualization of the type of partially
    edentulous arch
  • Permit immediate differentiation between the
    tooth-supported and the tooth and tissue
    supported removable partial denture
  • Universally accepted
  • A guide to the type of design to be used

5
Various Types of Classification
  • Cummers Classification. 1920
  • Kennedys Classification. 1925
  • Bailyns Classification. 1928
  • Neurohrs Classification. 1939
  • Mauks Classification. 1941
  • Wilds Classification. 1949
  • Godfreys Classification. 1951
  • Friedmans Classification. 1953
  • Becketts Classification. 1953
  • Craddocks Classification. 1954

6
  • Austin-Lidge Classification. 1957
  • Skinners Classification. 1957
  • Wilsons Classification.1960
  • Watts Classification. 1958
  • Applegate Classification. 1960
  • Avants Classification. 1960
  • Swensons Classification. 1963
  • Fiset,s Classification. 1973
  • Costas Classification. 1974
  • Osborne Classification. 1979
  • ACP Classification. 2002

7
Kennedys classification
  • In 1925 Dr. Edward Kennedy of New York.. This
    system is based on the relationship of the
    edentulous spaces to the abutment teeth. It is a
    positional or anatomical classification.

8
  • Class I Bilateral edentulous areas located
    posterior to the remaining natural teeth. Highest
    incidence in mandible
  • Class II A unilateral edentulous area located
    posterior to the remaining natural teeth

9
Recognize the Classification?
10
  • Class III A unilateral edentulous area bounded
    anteriorly and posteriorly by remaining teeth
  • Class IV An edentulous area located anterior to
    the remaining natural teeth. A single but
    bilateral (crossing the midline) edentulous area

11
Recognize the classification?
12
Modifications
  • They were indicated according to the number of
    such areas not by their extent, like Class III
    mod 2

13
  • Advantages
  • It permits immediate visualization of the
    partially edentulous arches.
  • It permits a logical approach to the problems of
    design.
  • It gives a definite treatment plan.
  • Differentiates between bounded saddle and free
    end saddle.
  • Simplicity.

14
  • Disadvantages
  • Did not explain the length of the edentulous span
    or number of missing teeth- only provide number
    of modification spaces.
  • Not enough consideration about the condition of
    teeth and the remaining supporting structures.
  • No distinction between modification spaces which
    occur in the anterior segment to those of
    posterior segment.

15
Applegates classification
  • Oliver C. Applegate 1960, provide a modification
    of Kennedys system.
  • This system is based on the number, location and
    condition of abutment teeth or manner of
    achieving support.

16
  • Class V Teeth bound the edentulous area
    anteriorly and posteriorly but anterior bounding
    tooth is not suitable as abutment. (not strong
    enough for rest, direct retainer) (as the lateral
    incisor). It is basically a class III situation
    where anterior abutment cannot be used for any
    support.

17
  • Class VI An edentulous situation in which the
    boundary teeth are capable of total support of
    the required prosthesis. This situation hardly
    requires any tissue support. The abutments are
    capable of providing total support.
  • Additional edentulous areas are designated by
    letter A and P.
  • A Anterior segment of the arch.
  • P Posterior segment of the arch is bounded by
    remaining teeth.

18
  • Applegates rules
  • Rule One Classification should follow rather
    than precede extractions that might alter the
    original classification.
  • Rule Two If the third molar is missing and not
    to be replaced, it is not considered in the
    classification.
  • Rule Three If the third molar is present and is
    to be used as an abutment, it is considered in
    the classification.
  • Rule Four If the second molar is missing and is
    not be replaced, it is not considered in the
    classification.

19
  • Rule Five The most posterior edentulous area or
    areas always determine the classification.
  • Rule Six Edentulous areas other than those,
    which determine the classification, are referred
    to as modification spaces and are designated by
    their number.

20
  • Rule Seven The extent of the modification is not
    considered, only the number of additional
    edentulous areas are considered.
  • Rule Eight There can be no modification areas in
    class IV. Because any additional edentulous space
    will definitely be posterior to it and will
    determine the classification.

21
References
  • Applegate O.C. Essentials of Removable partial
    denture prosthesis. 1st edition, 1965.
  • Avant W.E. The universal classification for
    removable partial denture situations. J.
    Prosthet. Dent. 1966 16 533-540.
  • Davenport J.C., Basker R.M., Heath J.R. and Ralph
    J.P. A color atlas of removable partial
    dentures. 1st edition, 1988.
  • David M. Watt and A. Roy MacGregor Designing
    partial dentures.
  • Eugene Costa A simplified system for identifying
    partially edentulous dental arches. JPD, 1974,
    639-645.
  • Friedman J. The ABC classification of partial
    denture segments. JPD, 1953, 517-524.

22
  • Kratochvil F.J. Partial removable
    prosthodontics. 1st edition, 1988.
  • McGivney G.P., Carr A.B. McCrackens Removable
    partial prosthodontics. 10th edition, 2001.
  • Miller E.L. System for classifying the
    partially edentulous arch. J. Prosthet. Dent.
    1970 24 25-40.
  • Skinner C.N. A classification of removable
    partial denture based upon the principles of
    anatomy and physiology. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1959
    9 240-45.
  • Stewart K.L., Rudd K.D. and Kuebker W.A.
    Clinical Removable partial prosthodontics. 2nd
    edition, 2001.
  • Thomas J. McGarry Classification system for
    partial edentulism, Journal of Prosthodontics,
    2002 Sep11(3)181-93.

23
Q1. If tooth number 47 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
  • Class 1 2.
    class 2
  • 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4
    class 2 mod 2

24
Q2. If tooth number 48 in below mentioned cast is
NOT part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
  • Class 1 2.
    class 2
  • 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4.
    class 2 mod 2

25
Q3. If tooth number 18 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
  • Class 1 2.
    class 2
  • 3. Class 1 mod. 1 4.
    class 2 mod 2

26
Q4. If tooth number 28 in below mentioned cast is
part of Removable partial denture then this
condition of partial edentulous state is
classified as?
  • Class 2 mod. 2 2. class
    2 mod. 1
  • 3. Class 3 mod. 1 4.
    class 3 mod. 2

27
Q5. According to Kennedy, all partially
edentulous arches are classified into
  • 1. 6 types
  • 2. 4 types
  • 3. 2 types
  • 4. 3 types

28
Q6. Keeping in mind that all teeth are healthy,
how do classify this?
  • Class 4 2.
    class 3 mod. 1
  • 3. Class 4 mod. 1 4.
    class 3 mod. 2

29
Q7. This RPD is classified as
  • Class 1 mod 1 2.
    class 2 mod. 2
  • 3. Class 1 mod. 2 4.
    class 2 mod. 1

30
Q8. If you need some adjustment in this RPD,
which type of RPD you tell to Lab?
  • Class 1 2. class
    3
  • 3. Class 2 4.
    class 1 mod. 1

31
Q9. You have found this RPD in clinic, how do you
describe it?
  • Class 2 mod 2 2. class 3 mod
    2
  • 3. Class 4 mod 3 4. class 1
    mod. 2

32
Q10. This RPD is classified as
  • Class 4 mod 2 2. class 3 mod
    2
  • 3. Class 4 mod 1 4. class 2
    mod. 2

33
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com