Title: The microtubule connection:
1The microtubule connection To Zebrafish spinal
neurons from Xenopus mitotic spindles
2Project aim
Develop and apply Zebrafish as a model to
address cell biological questions
concerning neuronal wiring of the organism
Six main wiring questions (temporally ordered)
3Majority of research surface ligand-receptor acti
n
Short-range
4GTP
5(No Transcript)
6(Tanaka and Kirschner, 1991)
710 nM Vinblastine
(Tanaka and Kirschner, 1995)
8Local change of MT polymerization
SCG10 and Stathmin/Op18, CRMP2 (neg.
regul.) (pos. reg.)
rac, cdc42
9Signal bound/diffusible
Premises
Interaction?
Actin is primed for turning but needs MTs to
deliver (motors/ dynamics) components required
for polar actin assembly
The area of primed actin positively promotes MT
stability (cortex (EB1-APC)/kinetochore analogy)
Primed actin and MTs positively promote each
others polar assembly leading to turning
(positive feedback)
10Which system?
11Why shift to Zebrafish? Genetics Transparent Genom
e sequence Vertebrate Room temperature More
reproducible Beautiful
12(No Transcript)
13Work in progress
M T Dynamics
- - Remove EB1 by Morpholino antisense technique
- Study growth and turning at a substrate boundary
- - Study MT polymerization (GFP-tubulin)
- - Any observable changes in vivo?
- ----------
- SCG10, Stathmin/Op18, CRMP2 (single, double)?
14Isolation of the spinal cord
1) Forceps (arrows) 2) Trypsin (15 min)
15Plated on Laminin coated glass (6 hours after
plating)
Look at bipolar neurons (DRG?) as consistently
growing
16Preparation of dissociated Zebrafish spinal
neuron cultures
Growth rate 35.8 µm/h18.2 µm/h (n22)
70 µm
(Methods in Cell Science, 2001)
17(No Transcript)
18Microtubule dynamics Microtubule polarity Local
stabilization
19global changes in microtubule dynamics
?
local regulation of microtubule dynamics
?
?
organization by microtubule-based motor proteins
20I
?
M
21Xenopus laevis egg extract system
collect cytoplasm
centrifuge
spindle assembly in vitro
Xenopus sperm nucleus
22(No Transcript)
23Frogs/Xenopus
24Purification of XMAP230/XMAP4
(JCB, 1994)
2514-18
0.5 µM
26Observing microtubule dynamics
27(No Transcript)
28Ac
2-D gel
2-D gel
Ac
XMAP230/XMAP4 is highly phospho. during mitosis
No MT binding in M phase ext.
29DNA
Tubulin
XMAP230
Binding to M phase MTs
Gradient
XMAP230 localization during the cell cycle
30Long distance effect of chromatin on
microtubule assembly (1996, JCB)
3110 kb DNA attached to beads No kinetochores or
centrosomes
32Bead spindle formation
10
20
60
33À distance effect of chromatin on microtubule
assembly (2003, CB)
30-40 µm
Molecular explanation?
34Stathmin/Op18 (18 kDa)
Idea Local inactivation of the MT destabilizer
Stathmin/ Op18 contributes to local MT
stabilization
Without chromatin beads, no differential
phosphorylation between I and M
Stathmin/Op18 has at least two isoforms in Xenopus
(Nature, 1997)
35Mitotic beads induce Stathmin/Op18 phosphorylation
36Phosphorylation of Stathmin/Op18 induced by
chromatin beads
37Okadaic Acid and Chromatin beads induce similar
phosphorylation of Stathmin/Op18
Mitotic extractOAgt stable MTs
OA PP2A inhibitor
38Okadaic Acid and Chromatin beads induce very
similar phosphorylation of Stathmin/Op18
suggesting same signaling pathway
39Depletion of Stathmin/Op18 accelerates MT assembly
40Spindles shorten in the presence of increasing
amounts of Stathmin/Op18
Stathmin/Op18 concentraction
control
L E N G T H (µm)
Time (min)
µg/ml
41To growth cone MT stabilization
(BioEssays, 1999)
42(Guidosome)
Signal bound/diffusible
Premises
Interaction?
Actin is primed for turning but needs MTs to
deliver (motors/ dynamics) components required
for polar actin assembly
The area of primed actin positively promotes MT
stability (cortex (EB1-APC)/kinetochore analogy)
Primed actin and MTs positively promote each
others polar assembly leading to turning
(positive feedback)
To appear in the Hypothesis section of
BioEssays (in press)
43(No Transcript)
44Acknowledgements
People at the EMBL Eric Karsenti Kai Simons Tony
Hyman Rebecca Heald (DNA Beads) Tony Ashford
(Op18/2D gels) James Endres (Zebrafish) James
Bamburg (Colorado) Many colleagues
45(No Transcript)
46Some questions to start with
- - Remove EB1 by Morpholino antisense technique
- Study growth and turning at a substrate boundary
- - Study MT polymerization (GFP-tubulin)
- - Any observable changes in vivo?
- ----------
- SCG10, Stathmin/Op18, CRMP2 (single, double)?
- ---------------------------------------------
M T Dynamics
--------------------------------------------- -
How does synapse formation in vivo correlate
with MT polymerization and these proteins
temporal localization/presence? - How does
functional synapse formation correlate with
this? ---------- Upon nerve regeneration how do
MTs reorganize?
47XMAP310
XMAP230/XMAP4
XMAP/XMAP215
Tubulin
48(No Transcript)
49(Arimura et al., 2004)
(Gordon-Weeks, 2004)
50(No Transcript)
51XMAP310 localization
(JCB, 1997)
52XMAP310 localization during metaphase
Tubulin
Overlay
XMAP310
53Soma
Myocyte
Bead
Bead diameter 10 µm
54Internalization of the TrkB receptor not required
55(No Transcript)
56(Saint-amant and Drapeau, 2003)
57?
MT
58Acknowledgements
Eric Karsenti Kai Simons Tony Hyman Rebecca
Heald (DNA Beads) Tony Ashford (Op18/2D
gels) Many people at the EMBL --) Mu-ming Poo
Xiaohui Zhang (BDNF beads) Jimmer Endres
(Zebrafish) Gong Tong (La Jolla) James Bamburg
(Colorado) Richard Reimer (Stanford/VGLUT1) Many
colleagues