Bottom Up Parsing

1
Bottom Up Parsing
2
Parsing Techniques

• Top-down parsers (LL(1), recursive descent)
• Start at the root of the parse tree from the
  start symbol and grow toward leaves (similar to a
  derivation)
• Pick a production and try to match the input
• Bad pick ? may need to backtrack
• Some grammars are backtrack-free (predictive
  parsing)
• Bottom-up parsers (LR(1), operator
  precedence)
• Start at the leaves and grow toward root
• We can think of the process as reducing the input
  string to the start symbol
• At each reduction step a particular substring
  matching the right-side of a production is
  replaced by the symbol on the left-side of the
  production
• Bottom-up parsers handle a large class of grammars

3
Bottom-up Parsing

• A general style of bottom-up syntax analysis,
  known as shift-reduce parsing.
• Bottom-up parsing is also known as shift-reduce
  parsing because its two main actions are shift
  and reduce.
• At each shift action, the current symbol in the
  input string is pushed to a stack.
• At each reduction step, the symbols at the top of
  the stack (this symbol sequence is the right side
  of a production) will replaced by the
  non-terminal at the left side of that production.
• There are also two more actions accept and
  error.

4
Shift-Reduce Parsing

• A shift-reduce parser tries to reduce the given
  input string into the starting symbol.
• a string ? the starting symbol
• reduced to
• At each reduction step, a substring of the input
  matching to the right side of a production rule
  is replaced by the non-terminal at the left side
  of that production rule.
• If the substring is chosen correctly, the right
  most derivation of that string is created in the
  reverse order.
• Rightmost Derivation S ? ?
• Shift-Reduce Parser finds ? ? ... ? S

5
Bottom Up Parsing

• Shift-Reduce Parsing
• Reduce a string to the start symbol of the
  grammar.
• At every step a particular sub-string is matched
  (in left-to-right fashion) to the right side of
  some production and then it is substituted by the
  non-terminal in the left hand side of the
  production.

Reverse order
abbcde aAbcde aAde aABe S
Consider S ? aABe A
? Abc b B ? d
Rightmost Derivation S ? aABe ? aAde ? aAbcde
? abbcde
6
Handles

• Handle of a string Substring that matches the
  RHS of some production AND whose reduction to the
  non-terminal on the LHS is a step along the
  reverse of some rightmost derivation.
• A handle of a right sentential form ?? (? ???)
  is a production rule A ? ? and a position of ?
• where the string ? may be found and replaced by
  A to produce the previous right-sentential form
  in a rightmost derivation of ?.
• S ? ?A? ? ???
• i.e. A ? ? is a handle of ??? at the location
  immediately after the end of ?,
• If the grammar is unambiguous, then every
  right-sentential form of the grammar has exactly
  one handle.
• ? is a string of terminals

7
Example
Consider S ? aABe A
? Abc b B ? d
S ? aABe ? aAde ? aAbcde ? abbcde
It follows thatS ? aABe is a handle of aABe in
location 1. B ? d is a handle of aAde in location
3. A ? Abc is a handle of aAbcde in location 2. A
? b is a handle of abbcde in location 2.
8
Handle Pruning

• A rightmost derivation in reverse can be obtained
  by handle-pruning.
• Apply this to the previous example.

S ? aABe A ? Abc b B ? d abbcde Find the
handle b at loc. 2 aAbcde b at loc. 3 is not a
handle aAAcde ... blocked.
9
Handle-pruning, Bottom-up Parsers

• The process of discovering a handle reducing it
  to the
• appropriate left-hand side is called handle
  pruning.
• Handle pruning forms the basis for a bottom-up
  parsing method.
• To construct a rightmost derivation
• S?0 ? ?1 ? ?2 ? ... ? ?n-1 ? ?n ?
• input string
• Apply the following simple algorithm
• Start from ?n, find a handle An??n in ?n,
  and
  replace ?n by An to get ?n-1.
• Then find a handle An-1??n-1 in ?n-1,
  and
  replace ?n-1 by An-1 to get ?n-2.
• Repeat this, until we reach S.

10
A Shift-Reduce Parser

• E ? ET T Right-Most Derivation of
  ididid
• T ? TF F E ? ET ? ETF ? ETid ? EFid
• F ? (E) id ? Eidid ? Tidid ? Fidid
  ? ididid
• Right-Most Sentential Form Reducing Production
• ididid F ? id
• Fidid T ? F
• Tidid E ? T
• Eidid F ? id
• EFid T ? F
• ETid F ? id
• ETF T ? TF
• ET E ? ET
• E
• Handles are red and underlined in the
  right-sentential forms

11
A Stack Implementation of A Shift-Reduce Parser

• There are four possible actions of a shift-parser
  action
• Shift The next input symbol is shifted onto
  the top of the stack.
• Reduce Replace the handle on the top of the
  stack by the non-terminal.
• Accept Successful completion of parsing.
• Error Parser discovers a syntax error, and calls
  an error recovery routine.
• Initial stack just contains only the end-marker
  .
• The end of the input string is marked by the
  end-marker .

12
Shift Reduce Parsing with a Stack

• Two problems
• locate a handle and
• decide which production to use (if there are more
  than two candidate productions).
• General Construction using a stack
• shift input symbols into the stack until a
  handle is found on top of it.
• reduce the handle to the corresponding
  non-terminal.
• other operations
• accept when the input is consumed and only the
  start symbol is on the stack, also error

13
A Stack Implementation of A Shift-Reduce Parser

• Stack Input Action
• ididid shift
• id idid reduce by F ? id
• F idid reduce by T ? F
• T idid reduce by E ? T
• E idid shift
• E idid shift
• Eid id reduce by F ? id
• EF id reduce by T ? F
• ET id shift
• ET id shift
• ETid reduce by F ? id
• ETF reduce by T ? TF
• ET reduce by E ? ET
• E accept

14
Conflicts During Shift-Reduce Parsing

• There are context-free grammars for which
  shift-reduce parsers cannot be used.
• Stack contents and the next input symbol may not
  decide action
• shift/reduce conflict Whether make a shift
  operation or a reduction.
• reduce/reduce conflict The parser cannot decide
  which of several reductions to make.
• If a shift-reduce parser cannot be used for a
  grammar, that grammar is called as non-LR(k)
  grammar.
• left to right right-most k lookhead
• scanning derivation
• An ambiguous grammar can never be a LR grammar.

15
Shift-Reduce Parsers

• There are two main categories of shift-reduce
  parsers
• Operator-Precedence Parser
• simple, but only a small class of grammars.
• LR-Parsers
• covers wide range of grammars.
• SLR simple LR parser
• Canonical LR most general LR parser
• LALR intermediate LR parser (lookhead LR
  parser)
• SLR, Canonical LR and LALR work same, only their
  parsing tables are different.

16
Operator-Precedence Parser

• Operator grammar
• small, but an important class of grammars
• we may have an efficient operator precedence
  parser (a shift-reduce parser) for an operator
  grammar.
• In an operator grammar, no production rule can
  have
• ? at the right side
• two adjacent non-terminals at the right side.
• Ex
• E?AB E?EOE E?EE
• A?a E?id EE
• B?b O?/ E/E id
• not operator grammar not operator
  grammar operator grammar

17
Precedence Relations

• In operator-precedence parsing, we define three
  disjoint precedence relations between certain
  pairs of terminals.
• a lt. b b has higher precedence than a
• a b b has same precedence as a
• a .gt b b has lower precedence than a
• The determination of correct precedence relations
  between terminals are based on the traditional
  notions of associativity and precedence of
  operators. (Unary minus causes a problem).

18
Using Operator-Precedence Relations

• The intention of the precedence relations is to
  find the handle of a right-sentential form,
• lt. with marking the left end,
• appearing in the interior of the handle, and
• .gt marking the right hand.
• In our input string a1a2...an, we insert the
  precedence relation between the pairs of
  terminals (the precedence relation holds between
  the terminals in that pair).

19
Using Operator -Precedence Relations

• E ? EE E-E EE E/E EE (E)
  -E id
• The partial operator-precedence
• table for this grammar
• Then the input string ididid with the
  precedence relations inserted will be
• lt. id .gt lt. id .gt lt. id .gt

id
id .gt .gt .gt
lt. .gt lt. .gt
lt. .gt .gt .gt
lt. lt. lt.
20
To Find The Handles

• Scan the string from left end until the first .gt
  is encountered.
• Then scan backwards (to the left) over any
  until a lt. is encountered.
• The handle contains everything to left of the
  first .gt and to the right of the lt. is
  encountered.
• lt. id .gt lt. id .gt lt. id .gt E ? id id
  id id
• lt. lt. id .gt lt. id .gt E ? id E id
  id
• lt. lt. lt. id .gt E ? id E E id
  
• lt. lt. .gt E ? EE E E .E
• lt. .gt E ? EE E E
• E

21
Operator-Precedence Parsing Algorithm

• The input string is w, the initial stack is
  and a table holds precedence relations between
  certain terminals
• Algorithm
• set p to point to the first symbol of w
• repeat forever
• if ( is on top of the stack and p points
  to ) then return
• else
• let a be the topmost terminal symbol on
  the stack and let b be the symbol pointed to by
  p
• if ( a lt. b or a b ) then /
  SHIFT /
• push b onto the stack
• advance p to the next input symbol
• else if ( a .gt b ) then / REDUCE /
• repeat pop stack
• until ( the top of stack terminal
  is related by lt. to the terminal most recently
  popped )
• else error()

22
Operator-Precedence Parsing Algorithm -- Example
id
id .gt .gt .gt
lt. .gt lt. .gt
lt. .gt .gt .gt
lt. lt. lt.

• stack input action
• ididid lt. id shift
• id idid id .gt reduceE ? id
• idid shift
• idid shift
• id id id .gt reduce E ? id
• id shift
• id shift
• id id .gt reduce E ? id
• .gt reduce E ? EE
• .gt reduce E ? EE
• accept

23
How to Create Operator-Precedence Relations

• We use associativity and precedence relations
  among operators.
• If operator ?1 has higher precedence than
  operator ? 2,
  ? ? 1 .gt ? 2 and ? 2 lt. ? 1
• If operator ? 1 and operator ? 2 have equal
  precedence,
  they are left-associative ? ? 1 .gt ? 2
  and ? 2 .gt ? 1
  they are
  right-associative ? ? 1 lt. ? 2 and ? 2 lt. ? 1
• For all operators ?, ? lt. id, id .gt ?, ? lt. (,
  (lt. ?, ? .gt ), ) .gt ?, ? .gt , and lt. ?
• Also, let
• () lt. ( id .gt ) ) .gt
• ( lt. ( lt. id id .gt ) .gt )
• ( lt. id

24
Operator-Precedence Relations
- / id ( )
.gt .gt lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. .gt .gt
- .gt .gt lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. .gt .gt
.gt .gt .gt .gt lt. lt. lt. .gt .gt
/ .gt .gt .gt .gt lt. lt. lt. .gt .gt
.gt .gt .gt .gt lt. lt. lt. .gt .gt
id .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt
( lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. lt.
) .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt .gt
lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. lt. lt.
25
Handling Unary Minus

• Operator-Precedence parsing cannot handle the
  unary minus when we also have the binary minus in
  our grammar.
• The best approach to solve this problem, let the
  lexical analyzer handle this problem.
• The lexical analyzer will return two different
  tokens for the unary minus and the binary minus.
• The lexical analyzer will need a lookhead to
  distinguish the binary minus from the unary
  minus.
• Then, we make
• ? lt. unary-minus for any operator
• unary-minus .gt ? if unary-minus has higher
  precedence than ?
• unary-minus lt. ? if unary-minus has lower (or
  equal) precedence than ?

26
Precedence Functions

• Compilers using operator precedence parsers do
  not need to store the table of precedence
  relations.
• The table can be encoded by two precedence
  functions f and g that map terminal symbols to
  integers.
• For symbols a and b.
• f(a) lt g(b) whenever a lt. b
• f(a) g(b) whenever a b
• f(a) gt g(b) whenever a .gt b

Algorithm 4.6 Constructing precedence functions
27
Constructing precedence functions

• Method
• Create symbols fa and gb for each a that is a
  terminal or .
• Partition the created symbols into as many groups
  as possible, in such a way that if a . b, then
  fa and gb are in the same group.
• Create a directed graph whose nodes are the
  groups found in (2). For any a and b, if a lt.b ,
  place an edge from the group of gb to the group
  of fa. Of a .gt b, place an edge from the group of
  fa to that of gb.
• If the graph constructed in (3) has a cycle, then
  no precedence functions exist. If there are no
  cycle, let f(a) be the length of the longest path
  beginning at the group of fa let g(a) be the
  length of the longest path beginning at the group
  of ga.

28
Example
Id
f 2 4 4 0
g 1 3 5 0
29
Disadvantages of Operator Precedence Parsing

• Disadvantages
• It cannot handle the unary minus (the lexical
  analyzer should handle the unary minus).
• Small class of grammars.
• Difficult to decide which language is recognized
  by the grammar.
• Advantages
• simple
• powerful enough for expressions in programming
  languages

30
The End