Title: Dinggang Shen
1Development and Dissemination of Robust Brain MRI
Measurement Tools (1R01EB006733)
Department of Radiology and BRIC UNC-Chapel Hill
2Team
- UNC-Chapel Hill
- - Dinggang Shen
- - Guorong Wu (postdoc)
- - Minjeong Kim (postdoc)
- GE
- - Jim Miller
- - Xiaodong Tao
3Goal of this project
- To further develop HAMMER registration and white
matter lesion (WML) segmentation algorithms, for
improving their robustness and performance. - To design separate software modules for these two
algorithms and incorporate them into the 3D
Slicer.
4Progress of HAMMER in 2009
- Successfully implemented HAMMER in ITK.
- (Over 2,000 lines of code)
- Integrated HAMMER into Slicer3
- Verified and tested its performance in Slicer3
5Progress of HAMMER in 2009
Typical Registration Result of HAMMER in Slicer3
Template
Average of 18 aligned images
Subject
Registration result
6Progress of HAMMER in 2009
RABBIT To speed up our HAMMER registration
algorithm (1.5 hours)
e2
1215 minutes
Template
e1
(1.5 hours)
Subject
- Tang et. al., RABBIT Rapid Alignment of Brains
by Building Intermediate Templates. Neuroimage,
47(4)1277-87, Oct 1 2009.
7Progress of HAMMER in 2009
e2
e1
1215 mins
Subject
- Tang et. al., RABBIT Rapid Alignment of Brains
by Building Intermediate Templates. Neuroimage,
47(4)1277-87, Oct 1 2009.
8Progress of HAMMER in 2009
TPS-HAMMER
- Use soft correspondence detection to robustly
establish correspondences for the driving voxels - Use Thin Plate Splines (TPS) to effectively
interpolate deformation fields, based on those
estimated at the driving voxels
- Wu et. al., TPS-HAMMER Improving HAMMER
Registration Algorithm by Soft Correspondence
Matching and Thin-Plate Splines Based Deformation
Interpolation. Neuroimage, 49(3)2225-2233, Feb
2010.
9Work Plan of HAMMER in 2010
- Further improve HAMMER in Slicer3
- Implement RABBIT to speedup the registration
- Implement TPS-HAMMER in ITK
- Implement intensity-HAMMER in ITK
- Serve HAMMER user community
- To provide training and tutorial
- To provide technical support
- To develop user-friendly interface to the end user
10WML Segmentation
- Attribute vector for each point v
FLAIR
PD
T2
T1
Neighborhood O (5x5x5mm)
- SVM ? To train a WML segmentation
classifier. - Adaboost ? To adaptively weight the training
samples and improve the generalization of WML
segmentation method.
- Lao, Shen, et al "Computer-Assisted
Segmentation of White Matter Lesions in 3D MR
images Using Support Vector Machine", Academic
Radiology, 15(3)300-313, March 2008.
11Progress in 2009
- We have implemented all WML segmentation
components in ITK
Manual Segmentation
Co-registration
Skull-stripping
Training SVM model via training sample and
Adaboost
Intensity normalization
Pre-processing
Training
Voxel-wise evaluation segmentation
False positive elimination
Testing
Post-processing
12Progress in 2009
- Have incorporated it into Slicer3
- Developer Tools gtgt White Matter Lesion
Segmentation
13Progress in 2009
- User interface of WML segmentation in Slicer3
Training
Segmentation
- Input T1, T2, PD, FLAIR images and lesion
ROI of n training subjects - Output SVM model
- Input T1, T2, PD, FLAIR images of test
subject(s) and trained SVM model - Output segmented lesion ROI
14Progress in 2009
- A typical segmentation result
Our result
Ground truth
FLAIR
15Plan of 2010
- Further development of WML segmentation algorithm
- Improve the robustness of multi-modality image
registration (for T1/T2/PD/FLAIR) by using a
novel quantitative and qualitative measurement
for mutual information - Design region-adaptive classifiers, in order to
allow each classifier for capturing relative
simple WML intensity pattern in each region - Develop a WML atlas for guiding the WML
segmentation - Upgrade of WML lesion segmentation module in
Slicer3
16Conclusion
- Further develop HAMMER registration and WML
segmentation algorithms ? improve their
robustness and performance -
17Thank you!
http//bric.unc.edu/IDEAgroup/
http//www.med.unc.edu/dgshen/