Title: Differentiated Product Marketing
1Differentiated Product Marketing
2SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Government-Mandated Traceability
- Motivations
- Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
safety - Enhance consumer information about food safety
and quality - Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
unfair competition - Protect domestic producers
- Voluntary Traceability
- Motivations
- Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
undetectable quality attributes - Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
- Improve supply-side management
3SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
- Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
undetectable quality attributes - Credence attributes Characteristics that
consumers cannot discern even after consumption - Content attributes Affect actual physical
properties of product, but difficult for
consumers to perceive - Process attributes Concerned with production
process, usually cannot be detected even with
specialized testing equipment
4SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
- Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
undetectable quality attributes - Firms sometimes resort to third-party entities to
validate claims about quality attributes - Examples
- Good Housekeeping Institute
- American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
- Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
- Council of Better Business Bureaus
- International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) - Government inspectors
5SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
- Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
undetectable quality attributes - Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
- Traceability helps producers reduce time to
identify and remove contaminated foods from
production lines and/or from market, before food
item reaches consumers
6SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Voluntary Traceability
- Differentiate and market foods with subtle or
undetectable quality attributes - Facilitate traceback for food safety and quality
- Improve supply-side management
- Traceability helps manage product flows and track
retail activity
7SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Mandatory Traceability
- Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
safety - Mandatory traceability enables authorities to
identify sources of food contamination/hazards
and contain risks faster
8SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations for Mandatory Traceability
- Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
safety - Enhance consumer information about food safety
and quality - If producers are not providing as much
information about safety/quality as consumers
desire, mandated traceability may allow consumers
to choose food products better matching their
preferences
9SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations of Mandatory Traceability
- Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
safety - Enhance consumer information about food safety
and quality - Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
unfair competition - By enforcing traceability, the government may
assure consumers and competitors that firms
claiming to sell products with credence
attributes can substantiate their claims
10SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Motivations of Mandatory Traceability
- Facilitate and monitor traceback to enhance food
safety - Enhance consumer information about food safety
and quality - Protect consumers from fraud and producers from
unfair competition - Protect domestic producers
- Mandatory traceability to identify domestically
produced vs. imported foods may allow domestic
producers to command a premium
11SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Examples of Mandatory Traceability
- Certified Organic
- Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
- Age verification for Japan
- Grass-fed beef
- Naturally raised livestock
12SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Examples of Mandatory Traceability
- Certified Organic Products
- Products grown and processed according to USDAs
national organic standards and certified by
USDA-accredited State and private certification
organizations - Organic Foods Act of 1990 established national
standards for organically produced commodities - Organic growers must have to be certified under
USDAs National Organic Program - A person may sell or label an agricultural
product as organically produced only if product
has been produced and handled in accordance with
National Organic Program
13SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Examples of Mandatory Traceability
- Certified Organic Products
14SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Examples of Mandatory Traceability
- Certified Organic Products
15SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
- 2002 Farm Act
- Retailers must ensure verifiable audit trail
- COOL not required for foods that are ingredients
of processed food items - Foodservice establishments exempt from COOL
- Unknown origin label not allowed
- 2002 Farm Act
- Was to become mandatory Sept 30, 2004
- Delayed until Sept 30, 2006
- Delayed again until Sept 30, 2008
16SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL)
- Disagreement on how to implement
- Presumed US
- Make importers label
- Anything not labeled is presumed to be US
- Verifiable audit trail
- Move the product with a signed affidavit
- Keep records to back up claim if audited
- Regardless of cost at farm level there is a cost
beyond the farm gate to segregate and document
17NAIS is NOT COOL
- COOL is an amendment to the 1946 Agricultural
Marketing Act - Retailers inform all consumers
- Sec of Ag cannot implement traceback
- NAIS (National Animal Identification System)
- Animal health surveillance
- Confidential system, only federal veterinarians
18The Proposed NAIS System
19SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- ISO, Greek for equal
- International standard for quality systems
- In a nutshell
- Say what you do
- Do what you say
- Document it with records
20SYSTEMS OF PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION
- Age verification for Japan
- Japan will accept 20 months or less
- Two methods to confirm age
- Physiological maturity A40
- Production records
- Need records to export variety meat
- Based on ISO principles
21Age verification for Japan
- Signed affidavits alone are not sufficient to
qualify cattle for the EV Program for Japan. - Cattle must be approved either through an
approved USDA Process Verified Program or QSA
Program. These Programs require supplier
evaluations and re-evaluations.
22Age verification for JapanQuality Management
System
- A written management system that must address
- Documentation Requirements
- Management Responsibility
- Resource Management
- Production of Product
- Measurement, Analysis and Improvement
- Record Requirements
23Age verification for JapanProducer Requirements
- Records to validate age
- Procedures Farm or Ranch Plan
- Written management plan
- Records to validate activities
- Must be repeatable
- Producer is evaluated by company and/or USDA to
verify conformance.
24Age verification for JapanManagement Plan
- Describe operation/farm
- Define practice
- What is done
- Who does it and how are they trained
- How is it recorded
- Where are the records
25(No Transcript)
26Product v. Process Certification
- Tighter product specification
- Sorted by processor
- Process specification
- How it is produced
- Role of and return to producer????
27Commodity v. Product
- Commodity
- Undifferentiated
- Perfectly competitive markets
- Products
- Differentiated
- Monopoly - Workable competition
- Niche Market, branded, labeled, etc
28Motivation
- Commodity market
- Price takers
- Cost driven
- Long-run Pminimum ATC
- Product markets
- Price makers
- Costs not as important
- Potential for sustained higher profit margins
29Commodity system
- Extremely efficient
- Challenges
- Co-mingling from many sources
- Consumers signals not transmitted
- Little incentive to improve because benefits not
passed through to producer - Expand to capture economies of size
30Product system
- How to differentiate?
- Managed supply chain
- Allows traceback to producer
- Restricts production
- Focus on quality
31Procedures
- Why is the product different?
- How it is produced
- Where it is produced
- What is produced
- What it includes
- What it doesnt include
- Develop marketing around the difference
32Procedures
- Limit production and access to control supply
- Cant look like price fixing to regulators
- Geographical restrictions
- Swiss cheese
- Champaign
- Trade secret
- Emphasis on quality
- Traceability to verify
33Farmer-Owned BrandsHayes and Lence
- Parma Ham
- Restricts area where ham can be cured
- Claim unique climate and winds
- Restricts breeds and regions where hogs can be
produced - Italian hog prices averaged 7.44 more than
German hogs 1999-2001
34Farmer-Owned BrandsHayes and Lence
- Vidalia Onions
- Selected region in south Georgia
- Used existing state law to restrict area
- State-owned trademark
- Premiums of .30-.34 per pound
- First spring sales are 30-50 higher
35Iowa 80 Beef
- Minimum Certification Requirements
- Verified to be sired by a 100 Angus bull.
- Source verified to the farm of birth using an
identification system - Fed in an Iowa feedlot for a minimum of 180 days.
- Fed a high-concentrate ration that totals at
least 75 percent corn or corn co-products over
the feeding period. - Age verified and processed at 18 months of age or
less. - USDA grades upper one-third Choice or Prime.
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Commodity v. Product
- Commodity
- Minimum requirements
- Anonymous
- No product or price differentiation
- Profits tied to low cost of production
- Product
- Product specifications
- Traceback and accountable
- Product and price differentiation
- Profit tied to costs and ability to protect
higher prices