Section 1: Dividing Government Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Section 1: Dividing Government Power

Description:

Section 1: Dividing Government Power Section 2: American Federalism: Conflict and Change Section 3: Federalism Today Debating the Issue Section 1: Dividing Government ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:499
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: Information457
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Section 1: Dividing Government Power


1
(No Transcript)
2
Chapter 4 Federalism
  • Section 1 Dividing Government Power
  • Section 2 American Federalism Conflict and
    Change
  • Section 3 Federalism Today

3
Section 1 at a Glance
  • Dividing Government Power
  • After much debate, the Framers designed a federal
    system that they hoped would strengthen the
    national government and protect states rights.
  • The Constitution divides power between two levels
    of government national and state governments.
  • The Constitution delegates certain powers to the
    national government.

4
Section 1 at a Glance (contd.)
  • Dividing Government Power (contd.)
  • The powers granted to state governments are
    called reserved powers.
  • Concurrent powers may be exercised by the
    national and state governments.
  • States must give full faith and credit to the
    laws of other states.

5
Dividing Government Power
Main Idea The Framers of the Constitution
established a federal system that divides powers
and responsibility between the national and state
governments.
  • Reading Focus
  • Why did the Framers choose federalism?
  • What powers does the national government have?
  • What powers do state governments have?

6
Dividing Government Power
  • Reading Focus (contd.)
  • What powers are shared by both the national
    government and the state governments?
  • How does the Constitution limit the powers of the
    state and national governments?
  • How does the Constitution guide the relationships
    between the nation and the 50 states?

7
Federalism in Action
8
Why Federalism?
American federalism was invented in Philadelphia
in 1787. When delegates to the Constitutional
Convention met to consider strengthening the
national government, federalism was an obvious
choice.
  • New nation struggled to function as confederation
  • Without power to raise funds, national government
    not strong enough to deliver stability or
    economic unity
  • Unitary ruleall power held by strong central
    authorityout of the question
  • Founders suspicious of powerful central
    government, like British monarchy
  • Framers sought to forge republic
  • Relied on philosophers who advocated self-rule
    and limited governmentHobbes, Rousseau, Smith

9
(No Transcript)
10
Why Federalism (contd.)
  • 1748 Spirit of the Laws, Baron de Montesquieu
  • Dividing power best way to defend peoples
    freedom from too powerful government
  • Framers thoroughly absorbed this idea
  • Framers faced difficult balancing act
  • National government addresses needs of nation
  • Preserve states rights
  • Ensure republican government
  • Framers devised plan with authority balanced
    between nation and states
  • Carefully divided power between two levels of
    governmentstate, national
  • All powers dealing with states common
    interestsnational defense, control over
    currencyassigned to national government
  • All other powers remained with states

11
(No Transcript)
12
Identifying Supporting Details Why did the
Framers choose federalism?
Answer(s) to establish a stronger national
government without removing too much power from
the states
13
National Powers
The Constitution outlined a federal system that
would provide strong national government and
protect states rights. In the U.S. federal
system, some powers belong to the national
government, others are reserved for the states,
and still others are shared by both.
14
  • Implied Powers
  • Implied powers not specifically listed but
    logical extensions of expressed powers
  • Article I, Section 8necessary and proper clause
  • Also referred to as elastic clause used to
    stretch powers of Congress
  • Building highways, regulating food, mechanism for
    collecting taxes
  • Inherent Powers
  • Inherent powers historically recognized as
    naturally belonging to all governments that
    conduct business of sovereign nation
  • U.S. government has inherent powers simply
    because it is a national government
  • Power not specifically granted by Constitution
    power to acquire new territory, conduct foreign
    affairs

15
Contrasting How do expressed, implied, and
inherent powers differ from one another?
Answer(s) Expressed powers are enumerated in the
Constitution. Implied powers are not enumerated,
but are logically suggested by expressed powers.
Inherent powers have been recognized as belonging
to all sovereign nations
16
  • State Powers
  • Constitution has less to say about state powers
  • James Madison national powers few and defined,
    state powers numerous and indefinite
  • 1791 Bill of Rights reserved powers
    clausepowers not delegated to the United
    Statesreserved to the States respectively
  • Reserved powers belong to states because they are
    not delegated to national government, nor
    prohibited from states
  • Regulate health, public safety, morals, general
    welfare of state citizens
  • Other reserved state powers ability to regulate
    marriage, form local governments, control public
    school systems, establish and enforce laws
  • Power to regulate businesses operating within
    borders, issue licenses to doctors, lawyers,
    barbers, hairdressers

17
(No Transcript)
18
Summarizing What powers does the Tenth Amendment
give to the states?
Answer(s) It gives states those powers that are
neither given to the United States nor prohibited
to the states.
19
Shared Powers
In addition to their reserved powers, states may
also share powers with the national government.
If the Constitution does not specifically state
that a power belongs exclusively to the national
government, then the states may exercise that
power, too.
  • Power to collect taxes is a concurrent power
    power held by national government, state
    governments at same time
  • Both levels of government can establish courts,
    make and enforce laws, build roads, provide
    education, borrow and spend money
  • Citizens subject to two levels of authority must
    follow state and national laws
  • Framers considered situation where national,
    state laws come into conflict
  • Article VI supremacy clause national laws and
    treaties form the supreme law of the land
  • Judges have to obey Constitution even if it
    contradicts state laws

20
(No Transcript)
21
Identifying Supporting Details Name three powers
that are held by both the national government and
the state governments.
Answer(s) possible answerany three of the
following collect taxes, establish court
systems, make and enforce laws, build roads,
provide education, borrow and spend money
22
The Limits of Power
  • U.S. Constitution denies certain powers to
    national, state governments
  • Framers believed strongly in limited government
  • Placed limits to prevent tyranny and protect
    individual liberties
  • Limits on National Government
  • Article I, Section 9 government cannot deny
    right to trial by jury, grant titles of nobility,
    tax exports between states
  • May not exercise powers reserved to states or
    limit basic freedoms
  • Limits on State Governments
  • Article I, Section 10 denies specific powers to
    state governmentsto coin money and to tax
    imports and exports from other states
  • States may not have own armies, engage in wars,
    enter into treaties
  • Powers Denied to Both Levels
  • Neither can deny people accused of crimes right
    to trial by jury or grant titles of nobility
  • Neither can pass ex post facto laws

23
Summarizing What limits did the Framers place
on state governments?
Answer(s) States may not coin money, tax
imports/exports, have armies, or enter into
treaties.
24
Nation and State Relations
  • The Nation and the Fifty States
  • Constitution divides government power, describes
    responsibilities of national and state
    governments to each other
  • Article IV, Section 4 national government only
    officially recognize representative state
    governments
  • National government responsible for protecting
    states from foreign invasion and domestic
    uprisings
  • The Nation and the Fifty States
  • National government responded to terrorist attack
    in New York on 9/11
  • Constitution ensures states be treated as equals
    by national government
  • States must have equal representation in Senate
  • Nation cannot tax people of one state more than
    another

National government can admit new states, but it
cannot split up states that already exist, or
change state boundaries in any way.
25
Relations between the States
  • Constitution gives states right to manage affairs
    within borders
  • Encourages cooperation between states
  • States required to extradite persons charged with
    crime to state where offense committed
  • Article IV full faith and credit clause
  • Requires states give full faith and credit to
    public acts, official records, judicial
    proceedings of every other state
  • Contract signed in one state honored by officials
    in another state
  • Article IV, Section 2 privileges and immunities
    clause
  • Citizens of each state receive all privileges
    and immunities of any state
  • New Yorker visiting North Carolina will enjoy
    same police protection as North Carolinians
  • Many exceptions, including in-state college
    tuition to residents and lower fees for services
    funded by taxes

26
  • What about Local Government
  • Creating local governments is a power reserved to
    the states.
  • Relationship between state and local government
    different from that of national and state
    governments
  • State government has power to reorganize local
    government at any time to better address state
    needs
  • Native American Sovereignty
  • Article I, Section 8 national government has
    power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes
    used power to make treaties with Native American
    nations
  • In most cases treaties resulted in loss of land,
    sovereignty, and individual rights for native
    peoples
  • Native Americans not granted full citizenship
    until 1924

27
Summarizing How does the full faith and credit
clause affect relations among states?
Answer(s) It compels each state to recognize
public acts, official records, and judicial
proceedings of other states..
28
Section 2 at a Glance
  • American Federalism Conflict and Change
  • Federalism has changed over time to meet new
    political needs.
  • The Supreme Court acts as a referee in the
    division of power between the national and state
    governments.
  • Before the Civil War, American federalism was
    guided by the principle of dual federalism, or
    the idea that the national and state governments
    were equal in authority.
  • Over the course of U.S. history, American
    federalism has experienced a steady expansion in
    national power.
  • In recent years, a trend in American federalism
    called devolution has attempted to return power
    to the states.

29
American Federalism Conflict and Change
Main Idea Over the past 200 years, conflicts over
the balance of power between the national and
state governments have led to changes in American
federalism.
  • Reading Focus
  • What role does the Supreme Court play in American
    federalism?
  • How was government power divided in dual
    federalism?
  • What events caused the expansion of national
    power in the twentieth century?
  • What is new federalism?

30
Crisis at Fort Sumter
31
Role of the Supreme Court
Long before the Civil War, the Framers
anticipated the government they created might
lead to conflicts between the states and the
national government. How did they plan to resolve
such conflicts?
  • Gave Supreme Court power to resolve conflicts
    between nation and states
  • Article III gives judicial branch authority to
    hear cases involving Constitution, U.S. laws,
    disputes between states
  • Supreme Court acts as referee, sorting out
    conflicts between nation, states
  • Courts make decisions based on rules in
    Constitution
  • Article VI includes supremacy clause
    Constitution, national laws, treaties made by
    national government supreme law of the land
  • Courts rulings have gradually increased power of
    national government
  • American federalism continually changed to meet
    needs of new generations
  • Changes understood in four terms dual
    federalism, cooperative federalism, creative
    federalism, new federalism

32
Summarizing How does the Supreme Court serve as
a referee in the federal system?
Answer(s) by settling disputes between the
national government and the states
33
Dual Federalism
The first era of American federalism, dual
federalism, lasted from about 1789 to the 1930s.
Both state and national government were equal
authorities operating within their own spheres of
influence, as defined by a strict reading of the
Constitution.
  • The Great Debate
  • Nationalists advocates of strong, centralized
    national government
  • Proponents of states rights held national
    government should not unduly intrude in state
    affairs
  • Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton asked
    Congress to create national bank, argued
    government had constitutional power to regulate
    currency, therefore implied power to create bank
  • Congress refused to renew charter when it expired
    20 years later
  • 1816 dispute resurfaced with charter of Second
    Bank of the United States

34
Dual Federalism (contd.)
  • The Marshall Court
  • 1819, McCulloch v. Maryland bank dispute reached
    Supreme Court
  • Court ruled in favor of nations authority to
    start bank
  • Chief Justice John Marshall argued charter
    justified by Constitutions necessary and proper
    clause
  • Bank would help nation properly execute powers to
    regulate commerce and currency
  • A House Divided
  • U.S. became bitterly divided over issue of
    slavery
  • Debate wrapped up in arguments about states
    rights and national power
  • Southern slave states resisted national measures
    to outlaw slavery in new states and territories
  • Held states sovereign, could make decisions for
    themselves

35
  • A House Divided (contd.)
  • Doctrine of nullification some southern
    politicians believed states had right to nullify
    national laws that contradicted or clashed with
    state interests
  • According to doctrine, if state challenged
    national law, three-quarters of other states
    would have to ratify amendment allowing Congress
    to enact law
  • State could either choose to follow law or secede
    from Union
  • Doctrine of secession idea that states had right
    to separate from Union
  • 1860 Issue of sovereignty came to a head after
    election of Abraham Lincoln
  • Lincoln believed issue of slavery was divisive
  • South Carolina first to secede followed by 10
    other states
  • 1861 U.S. divided by Civil War, waged for 4
    years bloodiest war in U.S. history

36
  • After the Civil War
  • 1865 Confederacy surrendered Union restored
  • Defeat of Confederacy settled matter of slavery
  • War profoundly changed relationship between
    states, national government
  • War firmly established national supremacy
  • Put to rest most radical interpretations of state
    sovereignty
  • Led to expanded constitutional powers of national
    government
  • 13th, 14th, 15th Amendments (Reconstruction
    Amendments) passed
  • Abolished slavery, defined citizenship,
    prohibited states from denying citizens rights,
    extended voting rights to African American men
  • In time national government would use new
    constitutional powers to protect rights of
    African Americans, women, and others

37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
Identifying Cause and Effect How did the Civil
War resolve the issue of secession?
Answer(s) Union victory in the Civil War firmly
established national supremacy. States could no
longer claim the right to secede.
40
Landmark Supreme Court CasesMcCulloch v.
Maryland (1819)
Why It Matters In McCulloch v. Maryland the
Supreme Court had the first of many opportunities
to influence the division of power in the federal
system. The Courts decision led to the expansion
of national power.
41
Expanding National Power
The Civil War reinforced the supremacy of the
national government over the states. In the years
following the war, new challenges continued to
shift the balance of power in favor of the
national government.
  • Turn-of-the-Century Reforms
  • End of 19th to start of 20th century was time of
    tremendous change in U.S.
  • New technology railroads, telegraph, industrial
    machinery
  • Unprecedented growth population more than
    doubled from 1870 to 1916
  • Social and economic problems overcrowded cities,
    rising crime rates, dangerous working conditions
  • Corporations developed great economic influence
    at expense of working-class Americans
  • Difficult to address problems at state level

42
  • Turn-of-the-Century Reforms (contd.)
  • National government passed legislation to reform
    social, business conditions
  • 1887 Interstate Commerce Act regulated the
    railroad industry
  • Set restrictions on rates railroads could charge
  • 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act prevented monopolies
    exclusive control of a good or service in a
    particular market
  • Encourage fair competition in all industries
  • Early 1900s used to break up large monopolies
    such as American Tobacco
  • New laws expanded national governments power to
    regulate business
  • Court cases limited reach of national power
  • 1895, United States v. E. C. Knight Company
    sugar refining companies operated locally, could
    not be regulated by national government

43
(No Transcript)
44
The New Deal
  • 1929, stock market crashed, led to Great
    Depression
  • Poverty and unemployment widespread
  • Local organizations unable to respond adequately
  • 1933 President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced
    New Deal
  • Series of national programs to address needs of
    Americans
  • Some assisted unemployed, elderly
  • Others provided jobs
  • Major change in role of national government
  • National and state governments worked together to
    meet crisis
  • Federalism under New Deal known as cooperative
    federalism
  • Major shift caused court challenges
  • Opponents argued constitutional powers to tax and
    regulate commerce did not give power to enact
    many New Deal programs
  • Supreme Court upheld most New Deal legislation

45
(No Transcript)
46
The Great Society
  • 1960s President Lyndon Johnson expanded powers
    of national government
  • Great Society program initiatives aimed at
    eliminating poverty and social inequity
  • Creative federalism released federal funds to
    states to achieve national goals
  • 1965 Medicaid provides free health care for poor
  • If national government determines states not
    fully cooperating, funding withheld
  • Threat of losing money powerful tool
  • Grant system increased size, cost of national
    government
  • Urban renewal grants increased from 212 million
    (1964) to more than 1 billion (1970)

47
Summarizing How did New Deal and Great Society
programs change federalism?
Answer(s) They marked a major change in the role
of the national government, leading to
cooperative federalism, which encouraged the
national and state governments to work together
to provide services that had previously been
provided by state or local governments.
48
New Federalism
Throughout much of U.S. history, the powers of
the national government expanded. Beginning in
the 1980s, many political leaders worked to
reverse this trend by returning authority to
state governments. This era is known as new
federalism.
49
Identifying Supporting Details How did Ronald
Reagan attempt to reduce the influence of the
national government?
Answer(s) by cutting national grant money to
states and by working to define less specifically
how federal money could be used by states
50
Debating the Issue Federalism and Hurricane
Katrina
What roles should local, state, and national
governments play in responding to natural
disasters such as Hurricane Katrina? In August
2005 Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans,
Louisiana, and the Gulf Coast. As the storm
approached, officials at all levels of government
prepared. Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans ordered
a mandatory evacuation of the city. The governors
of Louisiana and Mississippi declared a state of
emergency. The national government authorized the
Federal Emergency Management Agency to respond to
the storm. On August 29, Katrina made landfall as
a strong Category 4 storm. The results were
catastrophic. Katrina and storm-related flooding
took more than 1,800 lives and caused an
estimated 81 billion in damages. In the storms
aftermath, there was widespread debate over
government response to the disaster.
51
Debating the Issue
52
Section 3 at a Glance
  • Federalism Today
  • Fiscal federalism is a system in which the
    national government uses grants and mandates to
    influence state policy to achieve national ends.
  • Grants-in-aid from the national government to the
    states have increased the influence of the
    national government.
  • Today American federalism continues to evolve in
    the face of new issues.

53
Federalism Today
Main Idea Today the balance of power between the
states and the national government is
characterized by a system of grants and mandates,
as well as by a number of key policy areas.
  • Reading Focus
  • What is fiscal federalism?
  • How does the national government use grants and
    mandates to influence state policies?
  • What issues most influence American federalism
    today?

54
A Need for National Power
55
Fiscal Federalism
The beginning of the twenty-first century
marked yet another shift in relations between the
states and the nation. In the wake of the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the need
for increased national security led to an
expansion in the powers of the government.
56
Making Inferences How might grants-in-aid
increase the national governments power?
Answer(s) When grants are issued with mandates
they are the national governments chief tool for
aiding and influencing states and communities.
57
Grants and Mandates
  • Categorical Grants
  • Most federal aid is distributed to states in form
    of categorical grants
  • Can only use for specific purpose, such as
    building new airport, crime-fighting in certain
    areas
  • Used to provide money to areas affected by
    natural disaster
  • Block Grants
  • Block grants federal grants given for more
    general purposes, broad policy areas
  • Welfare, public health, community development,
    education
  • States prefer block grants designed to allow
    state to spend money as it sees fit

In the 1980s, President Reagan used block grants
in an attempt to decrease the size and influence
of the national government.
58
Grants and Mandates (contd.)
Federal Mandates State and local governments are
usually pleased to receive money from the
national government, but the national government
often distributes money with strings attached.
  • Federal mandates demands on states to carry out
    certain policies as a condition of receiving
    grant money
  • Particularly important in enacting civil rights
    and environmental policies
  • School busing, desegregation, affirmative
    actionresults of federal mandates
  • Environmental regulations come from national
    government as well
  • Clean Air Act of 1970 national mandate requiring
    states to meet national air-quality levels
  • In exchange for grant money, states required to
    create programs to reduce pollution or risk
    losing federal funding

59
(No Transcript)
60
Making Generalizations What types of federal aid
do the states generally prefer? Why?
Answer(s) block grants, because they are
provided for general purposes
61
Issues in Federalism Today
New issues challenge American federalism.
Political debates over how to best address key
policy areas drive new changes in our federal
system.
  • Poverty
  • 1996 Congress passed welfare reform law, gave
    states authority to manage own systems
  • Since reforms, number of people on welfare has
    decreased
  • Some credit decrease to flexibility, creativity
    when handled by states
  • Others say decrease represents strong economy,
    question whether states will be able to continue
    to meet needs of poor
  • Homeland Security
  • Department of Homeland Security formed after 9/11
    terrorist attacks
  • Local and state governments worked alongside
    Homeland Security to respond to Hurricane Katrina
  • In aftermath of storm, some question whether
    better leadership and cooperation between levels
    of government might have saved more lives

62
Issues in Federalism Today (contd.)
  • Environment
  • Many reasons why efforts to protect environment
    seen as responsibility of national government
  • Congress has been asked to limit reach of EPA in
    favor of local efforts
  • Immigration
  • National government handles policies,
    citizenship, border protection
  • Several states have international borders and
    take immigration-related responsibilityeducation
    costs, health and social services, low-cost
    housing
  • Health Care
  • Americans turning to state, national governments
    for solutions to rising costs
  • Some think U.S. may be on the verge of health
    care crisis
  • Which level should take lead on issuesstate or
    national?

63
Making Inferences Why do you think some people
seek a federal solution to poverty?
Answer(s) possible answerThey dont think the
states will be able to continue to meet the needs
of the poor.
64
We the People The Citizen and the Constitution
  • Laboratories of Democracy
  • From health care to taxes and education, the
    states have a high degree of control over policy
    areas that affect the daily lives of their
    citizens. In American federalism, the states are
    often testing grounds for new approaches to
    meeting the needs of the people. Over time, many
    state policies have influenced national policy.
  • Why have the states been called laboratories
    of democracy?
  • What democratic methods have been tested in the
    states?
  • How have states experimented with innovative
    environmental policies?
  • How have the states contributed to health care
    initiatives?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com