Title: Apicomplexan host cell invasion II
1Apicomplexan host cell invasion II
2Different parasites use different mechanisms to
invade cells
- Trypansoma cruzi -- recruits endosomes and later
escapes into the cytoplasm - Leishmania -- induces phagocytosis and thrives in
a mature lysosomal compartment - Mycobacterium tuberculosis -- induces
phagocytosis and blocks lysosomal maturation - Toxoplasma -- resides in a specialized
parasitophorous vacuole, how does it get in there
and does this involve phagocytosis by the host
cell?
3The parasitophorous vacuole is not fusing with
lysosomes
- Macrophages were incubated with life (A/B) and
heat killed (C/D) parasites - Note that only vacuoles containing heat killed
parasites show staining for a lysosomal marker
protein. - Dead parasites go in by phagocytosis, living
parasites enter differently
Joiner et al., Science 249641-6
4Invasion depends on parasite not host cell actin
Salmonella
- Host cell invasion by Salmonella and Toxoplasma
can be inhibited by cytochalasin D, a drug that
prevents actin polymerization - In Salmonella, which is taken up by phagocytosis,
invasion can be rescued by using a drug resistant
host cell mutant (Cyt1) - Toxoplasma invasion remains inhibited in the drug
resistant host cell. - (black bars drug resistant, white bars drug
sensitive host cell) - Generating a drug resistant parasite rescues
invasion
Toxoplasma
Dobrowolski JM, Sibley LD. Cell. 1996 84(6)933-9.
5Invasion depends on parasite not host cell actin
- Cytochalasin treatment does not to appear to
inhibit attachment (bar graph in c shows number
of parasites bound to cells at different drug
doses) - CytD inhibits the movement of the parasite into
the host cell. - A parasitophorous vacuole (PV) is still set up,
however the parasite can not move in, and the
moving junction remains at the apical tip of the
parasite
Dobrowolski JM, Sibley LD. Cell. 1996 84(6)933-9.
6Apicomplexan host cell invasion
Movies Dr. Gary Ward, Univ. of Vermont http//www.
uvm.edu/mmg1/videos_ward.php?id23
7Apicomplexan host cell invasion
8Invasion depends on sequential protein secretion
from three organelles
- Micronemes (Mn) secretion of micronemes brings
protein to the parasite surface that provide
traction - Microneme proteins are required for gliding
invasion, the cleanest example is the Plasmodium
sporozoite protein TRAP (Mic2 is a T. gondii
homolog that is functionally equivalent in the
tachyzoite) - Microneme proteins can bind to a variety of
carbohydrates found on the surface of cells and
other biological materials - Microneme proteins are assembled into complexes
in the ER, mature by proteolysis, are stored in
micronemes and are secreted at the apical tip of
the parasite upon stimmulation - How does this help moving and how are they linked
to the internal actin-based engine?
Sultan et al, Cell 90 511-522
9The conveyor-belt model of gliding motility
- Gregarines are a group of primitive
apicomplexans which parasitize invertebrates - In comparison ot Toxoplasma or the malaria
parasite these are fairly large cells which makes
them easier to study
Movies by Dr. C. King (University College, London)
10The conveyor-belt model of gliding motility
- Beads attached to the surface of gregarines are
treadmilled to the end of the parasite cells - This suggests that the gliding machine moves
microneme proteins over the surface from the
apical to the basal end of the parasite
11Circles, helices twirls
12Gliding parasites deposit proteins and lipid
trails
- Similar to a slug the parasite leaves behind a
trail of surface proteins and lipids - A protease cleaves microneme proteins at the end
of the cell to detach and allow for propulsion
(sheddase) - What is the force driving microneme proteins --
actin polymerisation or an actin/myosin motor?
13A special myosin is required to move microneme
proteins over the surface
Normal myosin
- Toxoplasma and other Apicomplexa have a parasite
specific myosin (MyoA) - This myosin is localized right under the surface
membrane of the parasite - Using genetic engineering a mutant parasite was
constructed in which this myosin can be
suppressed - Suppression of myosin result in loss of parasite
motility (as seen for actin loss of motility also
causes loss of host cell invasion) - What are the gears that connect this motor to
the Mic tires and which part is anchored in the
parasite?
Suppressed myosin
Meissner et al., Science. 298837-40
14The gliding machinery is anchored in the inner
membrane complex
15The gliding machinery is anchored in the inner
membrane complex
- Biochemical studies aimed at identifying pellicle
proteins let to the discovery of GAP45 a protein
associated with outer face of the IMC - GAP45 was associated with the IMC despite the
fact that is primary sequence suggested that this
should be a soluble protein
http//www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/165/3/383
16GAP45 is part of a complex including GAP50, MyoA
MLC
http//www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/165/3/383
17The apicomplexan engine - the glideosome
18The treadmilling model of apicomplexan gliding
motility
Soldati et al., Trends in Parasitology 20
567-574
19The conveyor-belt model
- Motility depends of parasite actin/myosin (MyoA)
- Myosin is anchored into the outer IMC membrane
(GAP45/50, MyoA, MLC) - Short actin filaments form and are moved towards
the posterior end of the parasite by the myosin
power stroke - The short actin filaments are linked to microneme
proteins by an adaptor (aldolase) -- movement of
actin filaments results in movement of microneme
proteins - Microneme proteins are shed at the back end
(rhomboid proteases are the best candidates for
this activity) - The parasite glides over the substrate
20Formation of the PV moving junction
21Formation of the PV moving junction
22Invasion of the red blood cell by the malaria
parasite
- Although there are significant differences in the
host cells which are invaded by different
apicomplexa the mechanism seems conserved - Here the Plasmodium merozoite/red blood cell
example
23Invasion of the red blood cell by the malaria
parasite
- A moving junction is formed tightly opposing
parasite and host cell membrane and separating
parasitophorous vacuole lumen and outside medium
24Invasion of the red blood cell by the malaria
parasite
25Secretion of the rhoptries is associated with PV
formation
- Rhoptries (Rh) secretion of rhoptries is
required for the formation of the parasitophorous
vacuole - Like micronemes rhoptries are secreted at the
apical tip of the parasite - Some rhoptry proteins make up (part) of the
moving junction (they are stored in the neck
portion of the organelles and called RONs) - Other rhoptry proteins a found throughout the
membrane of the parasitophorous vacuole after
secretion and are stored in the bulbous part
(ROPs) - A third group of very interesting rhoptry
proteins is injected into the host cell and
manipulates gene expression in the host nucleus
-- kiss and spit (check out review on the class
web site)
26Kiss spit (thank John Boothroyd for the term)
- It appears that a variety of rhoptry proteins are
directly injected into the host cell and that
this is involved in the formation of the
parasitophorous vacuole - Note that staining for the rhoptry protein ROP1
highlights the parasitophorous vacuole (arrow) as
well as numerous vesicles (arrowheads) formed at
the invasion site within the host cell cytoplasm - Does the parasite inject the PV membrane?
27Where does the membrane for the parasitophorous
vacuole come from?
- The PV membrane is derived from the host cell
plasma membrane - The PV is provided by the parasite (e.g. by
secretion from the rhoptries) - Both contribute to the PV
28Where does the membrane for the PV come from?
- Patch clamp cells and follow invasion by video
microscopy - Certain electric properties of the cell (their
capacitance) can be used as a measure of their
total surface membrane - If membrane is parasite derived the surface area
should grow during invasion if it is derived from
the host cell surface the area should stay
constant
29There is no significant change of host cell
surface during invasion
30Host cell surface area decreases after PV pinches
off
- Cell surface area remains constant over invasion
- When the parasitophorous vacuole pinches off the
cell surface area drops - The parasitophorous vacuole is derived from the
membrane of the host cell
31The moving junction
32Rhoptry proteins organize the moving junction
- The parasite protein Ron4 (red) localizes exactly
to the moving junction during invasion - Note that other parasite surface proteins (green)
do not enter the parasitophorous vacuole but are
shed at the moving junction - In non invading parasites Ron4 is stored in the
rhoptry (necks, green, compare to micronemes red)
33Rhoptry proteins have multiple functions in
vacuole formation
- Several RON proteins (2/4/5) assemble into a
complex in the rhoptry neck - The complex is secreted and inserts into the host
membrane (this is not fully defined yet but might
parallel E. colis insertion of its own receptor) - AMA1 is a special microneme protein that engages
the RON complex and serves as a specialized
invasion ligant - ROPs are secreted into the cytoplasm and fuse
back to the PV
34The moving junction skims proteins out of the
membrane as the PV forms
- The surface membrane of the host cell was labeled
for protein (green) and lipid (red) prior to
infection with Toxoplasma (blue) - Note that while the lipids are clearly visible in
the vacuole the proteins are excluded
35Rhoptry proteins modify the function of the host
cell nucleus
- Several rhoptry proteins are injected into the
host cell cytoplasm during invasion - They accumulate in the host cell nucleus
- Interestingly, many of them are enzymes capable
of changing the phosphorylation state of proteins
(kinases phosphatases) - Their precise function remains to be determined
but it appears that they modulate gene expression
in the host cell and that their activity is
required for rapid growth and the ability to
cause disease (virulence)
36Rhoptry proteins have multiple functions in
vacuole formation host manipulation
Bradley Sibley, Current Opinion in
Microbiology 10 582-587
37Apicomplexan host cell invasion
38Invasion depends on sequential protein secretion
from three organelles
- Dense granules (DG) secretion of dense granules
occurs after the vacuole is fully formed and
continues throughout the intracellular growth of
the parasites - Dense granules are secreted from the basal end of
the parasites - Dense granule proteins likely play a role in
modification of the vacuole into an environment
supportive of parasite growth
39Dense granule proteins are secreted into the PV
- Certain dense granule proteins are soluble in the
lumen of the PV others integrate into the
membrane - These proteins are probably involved in modifying
the vacuole
40The PV is highly modified to suite the parasites
needs
- Tubular network increases surface (dense granule)
- Sieving pores give access to small nutrient
molecules in the host cell cytoplasm (probably
dense granule) - Specific host cell organelles are recruited close
to the PV membrane (rhoptry)
41Dense granules are involved in establishing the
intravacuolar network
42the parasitophorous vacuole contains a sieving
pore
43Host cell mitochondria and ER are recruited to
the PVM
44Apicomplexan invasion
- Active, parasite driven process
- Depends on parasite actin/myosin motility
(conveyor belt model) - Involves secretion of micronemes (attachment,
motility), rhoptries (PV MJ formation) and
dense granules (makes PV into a suitable home) - Sets up a parasitophorous vacuole which initially
is derived from the host cell cell-membrane - A moving junction is formed which screens out
host membrane proteins from the PV, the PV is
fusion incompetent and the parasite protected
45- Some additional detail on the gliding machine
46Microneme protein complexes interact with the the
host cell
- Micronemes contain a large set of proteins
containing protein and carbohydrate binding and
interaction domains - MIC proteins associate into complexes in the ER
and this association is critical for protein
targeting - Proteolytic processing is critical for complex
association, maturation and finally shedding
Dowse T et al. Host cell invasion by the
api...PMID 15358257
47Microneme protein complexes interact with the the
host cell
- The different roles of individual microneme
proteins has been studied using conditional KOs
in Toxoplasma (also see TRAP study by Sultan in
Plasmodium) - MIC 2 is required for gliding and invasion (no
full block of invasion) - AMA1 is critical for invasion yet dispensable for
gliding motility - This could suggest different sets of tires for
locomotory motility and invasion motility -- both
depending on the actin/myosin engine
http//www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/content/full/16/9/4
341 doi10.1371/journal.ppat.0020084
48How to let go - rhomboid proteases in Toxoplasma
Plasmodium
- Sequencing of shed soluble adhesins suggest
cleavage within the transmembrane region - Most characterized apicomplexan adhesins show
conserved amino acids in this region which are
similar to those demonstrated to be critical for
rhomboid proteases in Drosophila - Rhomboids are transmembrane proteins and act as
proteases cleaving the target with in the TM
region
http//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/11/4146 h
ttp//www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/174/7/1023 Dows
e TJ et al. Rhomboid-like proteins in
Api...PMID 15922242
49How to let go - rhomboid proteases in Toxoplasma
Plasmodium
- Several rhomboids are encoded by apicomplexan
genomes and they are differentially expressed
over the life cycle - TgROM5 in T. gondii localizes to the surface,
its distribution is patchy and often at the
posterior in gliding parasites. - TgROM5 (but not other ROMs) is capable of
shedding MIC2 - Similar work in Plasmodium confirms the rhomboid
model
http//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/11/4146 h
ttp//www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/174/7/1023 Dows
e TJ et al. Rhomboid-like proteins in
Api...PMID 15922242
50The constriction is a result of the moving
junction