Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks

Description:

Data aggregation using multihop relay is suboptimal except for 4. TRC can improve network life time by an order of magnitude for low-duty cycle operations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1223
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: lis655
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks


1
Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Rong Zheng, Richard Barton
  • University of Houston

2
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)
  • A WSN typically consists of one or more sinks and
    many sensors acting as information sources
  • Data dissemination (sink ? sensors)
  • Data aggregation (sensors ? sink)
  • Key characteristics
  • Limited energy budget
  • Collective utility
  • Asymmetry

3
Synopsis
  • Question
  • What is the asymptotically achievable data
    aggregation rate at the sink in a wireless sensor
    network of n nodes in a fading environment?

4
Synopsis
  • Answer
  • Information theoretical tight bounds in low (2 lt
    ? lt 4) and high (? gt 4) attenuation regime are
    ?(log(n)) and ?(1), respectively
  • Order optimal throughput can be achieved using
    cooperative time-reversal communication (TRC) and
    a novel hierarchical network protocol
  • Data aggregation using multihop relay is
    suboptimal except for ? gt 4
  • TRC can improve network life time by an order of
    magnitude for low-duty cycle operations

5
Outline
  • Physical layer models
  • Clustering and routing
  • Results
  • Extensions

6
Physical Layer Models
  • Nodes follow Poisson point with unit density on
    , Pn P n B(n)
  • Node are maximum power constrained Pmax
  • Two modes of communication
  • Naive multihop relay
  • Cooperative time reversal communication

7
Naive Multihop Relay
  • Maximum rate for point-to-point communication
    from node i to j
  • Maximum rate for point-to-point communication
    from node i to receivers R
  • where

8
Background on TRCForward-Channel Impulse Response
9
Background on TRCTime-Reversed Channel Response
10
Background on TRCMultiple Receivers
11
Background on TRCCooperative Time-Reversal
12
Capacity of TRC Link
R
d
  • If R ltlt d, Pi P

13
Information-theoretical Bounds
  • The capacity of m-user Gaussian multiple access
    channel with CSIR is characterized by

14
A Tighter Bound for High Attenuation Regime
  • Let P be a Poisson point process of unit density
    over R2. For any rate ? gt 0, the fraction of
    nodes that can receive data from all other nodes
    at that rate is at most w.h.p., where
  • and I is defined as
  • Theorem The total information-theoretic data
    aggregation rate ? of an extended network of unit
    density in B(n) is characterized as
  • For the path loss exponent a 4, ? O(logn),
    and
  • For the path loss exponent a gt 4, ? O(1).

15
Data Aggregation Using Native Multihop Relay
  • Proof (sketch)
  • Upper bound in extended network, nearest
    neighbor to the sink is at distance ?(1)
  • Lower bound Using argument of percolation
    theory, if the sink is part of largest connected
    component then ?(1) is achievable otherwise

16
Sink tree Routing
17
Data Aggregation Using TRC
18
Data Aggregation Using TRC
19
Questions to be Addressed
  • Which set of nodes should be clustered together
    in a TRC link?
  • How should routing be done?
  • How to schedule transmissions from different
    clusters?

20
Network Organization
  • Area I, nodes are too far from sink to use TRC
    directly
  • Area III, nodes are too close to benefit from TRC
  • Area I, III both use naïve multihop routing
  • Area II use TRC to sink directly

Sink
Area I
Area II
Area III
21
Routing on Random Networks (1)
  • Partition the network into cells Vi of side
    length
  • Designate a cell head hi
  • Data from node u to sink O are first forward to
    cell head and then routed among cell heads whose
    cells intersect with line LuO

22
Routing on Random Networks (2)
23
Routing on Random Networks (3)
24
Achievable Rates
  • Area I, III
  • Leaf nodes
  • Non-leaf nodes
  • Area II, using TDMA among clusters
  • where m and M are size and number of clusters
    respectively

25
Finally
  • When ? lt 4
  • we have
  • When ? 4, let ? ? 0
  • we have

26
Conclusion
  • TRC provides an efficient way to communicate over
    long distance
  • To unleash the power of TRC in a network setting,
    cross-layer design of routing, scheduling and
    communication protocols are required
    cooperation, cooperation, cooperation!

27
Questions Comments?
  • Visit us at http//coco.cs.uh.edu

28
Backup Slides
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com