Title: Thermodynamics of Protein Unfolding
1Thermodynamics of Protein (Un)folding
- Free energy balance, energetics of protein
structure, dominant forces in protein folding
Episode 1 Introduction, Thermal unfolding
http//www.biochem.oulu.fi/juffer/
2Introduction (1)
- Folding is a thermodynamically driven process.
- Unique native structure represent the energetic
balance of various types of interactions between - Protein groups.
- Solvent (water, ions).
- Details of energetic balance has led to strong
oscillations between different extreme opinions.
3Introduction (2)
- Accepted point of view
- Hydrophobic interaction is the main driving force
for folding. - But if protein folding results from an overall
increase in entropy, why do proteins denaturate
at high temperature?
4Introduction (3)
- Understanding of protein structure requires more
than structural information only. - Advance in understanding came by the acceptance
of - Calorimetric methods.
- Computational/theoretical methods.
5Introduction (4)
- Calorimetric measurements have established that
- Proteins are thermodynamically macroscopic
systems. - Measured enthalpies, entropies and free energies
are thermodynamic state functions. - Heat capacity as a function of temperature leads
directly to the partition function of
macromolecules. - Denaturated state may be regarded
thermodynamically as the unfolded state - interactions between protein groups are
energetically insignificant. - Free energy of folding is about equal to the free
energy of denaturation.
6Introduction (5)
- Role of solvent
- Essential
- Quantitative evaluation of hydration energies is
difficult - Depends on analysis of transfer free energies of
small organic molecules to water. - Is the contribution of different protein groups
to the proteins total hydration energy additive?
7Protein in a solvent
pH effects
8Stability of protein structure
- Proteins are only marginally stable under the
best of conditions. - Protein structure can easily be disrupted by
change in environmental conditions - Temperature
- Variation in pH
- Increase of pressure
- Addition denaturants
Protein is denaturated
Denaturation is usually reversible
9pH unfolding of staphylococcal nuclease A
Stability depends on pH
10Temperature-induced unfolding of bovine
ribonuclease A
Thermal unfolding
11Thermodynamic equilibrium
N native state U unfolded state
a average fraction of unfolding
Free energy of folding (f) the work that is
required to assemble the folded state.
12Thermodynamics characteristics of proteins
- Denaturation experiments
- Reversible?
- Cooperative?
- Complete?
- Reliable?
- Temperature-induced unfolding is the best
method
13Thermal unfolding
Heat supplied to raise T
DCp? const?
Creighton, Proteins, structure and molecular
properties, Freeman, New York, 1993
14Enthalpy and entropy of protein unfolding (1)
Gibbs free energy of unfolding (u) at temperature
T
At constant pressure
Heat capacity
15Enthalpy and entropy of protein unfolding (2)
Assume DCp(T) ? Constant
TR is a reference temperature.
16Enthalpy and entropy of protein unfolding (3)
With melting temperature Tm for TR
Generally referred to as the Modified
Gibbs-Helmholtz Equation
Experimental values for -RTlnKu as a function of
T can be fitted to obtain Tm, DHm and DCp.
Full characterisation of thermodynamics of
thermal unfolding
17Enthalpy and entropy of protein unfolding (4)
Robertson and Murphy, Chemical Reviews, 97,
2151-1267, 1997
18Enthalpy and entropy of protein unfolding (5)
19Specific DCp(T) heat capacity increment
- It is always positive (larger for the unfolded
state) - Contains both effects due to configurational
entropy and water accessibility (hydration). - It is curved function having a slope that
decreases with increasing T ? Not really
constant! - It correlates with surface area.
20Heat capacity increment versus surface area
Nres (number of residues) correlates with surface
area.
Robertson and Murphy, Chemical Reviews, 97,
2151-1267, 1997
21Free energy of unfolding
22Enthalpy of unfolding
23Entropy of unfolding
24Heat capacity of unfolding
Not constant, likely to vanish above 1500C.
25First conclusions
- The stability of very different proteins does not
differ significantly 20-60 kJ/mol. - This stability does not correlate with molecular
weight. - The stability is not great near physiological
conditions - Stability has a certain biological sense, perhaps
important aspect of their evolution.