PQI Project Quality Index

1
PQIProject Quality Index

• November, 2003
• Presented by
• H.J. Stockenberger

2
Objectives

• Background History
• Overview Structure
• Scoring Criteria
• Implementation
• Conclusion

3
Background History

• Started in December 1999
• Field tested and revised in 2000
• Implemented in April 2001
• Project Size gt 2 million
• Currently more than 60 projects
• Subjective scoring criteria
• Not focused on quality of the Work
• Not Focused on Prevention

4
Overview and Structure

• Design Procurement Quality Index
• Construction Quality Index
• Monthly Summary of Quality Index

5
Overview and Structure

• PQI Summary reflects scores for
• Documentation Submittal
• Quality System Implementation
• Quality of Material Construction Work
• 40/60 weighting for Procurement/Construction

6
Overview and Structure

• Procurement Summary

7
Overview and Structure

• Construction Summary

8
Overview and Structure

• Document submittal - Procurement

9
Overview and Structure

• Quality System Implementation - Procurement

10
Overview and Structure

• Quality of Material

11
Overview and Structure

• Document submittal - Construction

12
Overview and Structure

• Quality System Implementation - Construction

13
Overview and Structure

• Quality System Implementation Construction
  cont

14
Overview and Structure

• Quality of Construction Work

15
Overview and Structure

• Quality of Construction Work cont

16
Scoring Criteria

• Document Submittals
• Submitted on time - 2
• Submitted late 0
• Quality of Document Submittals
• Accepted - 4
• Accepted with comments - 3
• Conditional Approval - 2
• Correct and resubmit - 1
• Not reviewed, incomplete - 0

17
Scoring Criteria cont

• Always complies - 4 (gt91-100)
• Mostly complies - 3 (gt61-90)
• Frequently complies - 2 (gt41-60)
• Occasionally complies - 1 (gt11-40)
• Seldom or never complies - 0 (0-10)

18
Scoring Criteria cont

• As Scheduled - 4
• Within one Week - 3
• Within two Weeks - 2
• Within three weeks - 1
• More than three weeks late - 0

19
Scoring Criteria cont

• No Repeat Violation - 4
• 1 Repeat Violation - 3
• 2 Repeat Violations - 2
• 3 Repeat Violations - 1
• More than 3 Repeat Violations - 0

20
Scoring Criteria cont

• No violations - 4
• Violations corrected during inspection - 3
• Re-inspection required - 2
• Aramco NCR - 1
• Repeat NCR - 0

21
Implementation

• Score criteria based on past months activities
• Review scoring with PMT and contractor
• Provide explanation for low scores (less than 3)
• Submit to Dhahran as instructed

22
Conclusion

• Focus on prevention and quality of work
• Results are quantifiable
• Objective measure of project quality

23

• Thank you