Title: EAP Outcomes Demonstrate Value EASNA Conference May 2004
1EAP Outcomes Demonstrate ValueEASNA
Conference May 2004
- Rick Selvik, LICSW, MBA, CEAP
- Diane Stephenson, Ph.D., CEAP
- Federal Occupational Health, Program Support
Center, - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
2Presentation Abstract
- Outcome Data from 60,000 EAP clients
- During a 3 Year Period
- With Federal Occupational Health EAP
- During pre- and post- clinical process
- Results show client improvement
- Large number and consistent findings
- Support productivity benefits of EAP
3Presentation Issues
- Cost-effective methods to document value
- Demonstrate value by more than anecdotes
- Outcome measures assure quality service and
demonstrate value - Keep the customer informed of EAP services and
impact on health and productivity
4Learning Objectives
- How to collect outcome measures
- How to interpret the results
- How to assess EAP impact on key workplace
indicators - How to use results to evaluate program
initiatives such as telephone counseling
5Traditional EAP Value Measures
- Utilization
- Demographics
- Presented and Assessed Problems
- Client satisfaction
6New EAP Value Measures
- Problem Improvement
- Risk Management Results
- Reduced Absenteeism
- Productivity Improvement
7U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, PSC,
Federal Occupational Health (FOH)
- EAP for 1.4 million Federal employees
- Serving over 400 Federal agencies
- Have over 150 counselors onsite nationwide
- Nationwide affiliate network
- Heavy demand for information and quarterly
reports of activity
8The Typical EAP Client (1)
- Between 45 and 54 years of age (35)
- Married (50)
- Caucasian (67), African American (20), and
Hispanic (10) - Males (50), Females (50)
- Worked for Organization 6 to 15 Years
9The Typical EAP Client (2)
- Self-Referred to EAP (60), Management Referred
(15), Union Referred (2) - Three to Four Sessions on Average
- Address Problem in EAP (80)
- Others referred to community resources
- Follow-up for up to a year
- Four of five clients resolve in EAP
10Reported Work Problems
11Assessed Problems
12(No Transcript)
13Health Status Questions
- Health Outcomes Institute and InterStudy
- John Ware of Johns Hopkins
- Different versions SF36 and HQ12
- We selected four of the questions
- Asked at case opening and case closing
14Outcome Measures Used
- Productivity impacted by emotional problems,
- Productivity impacted by physical health,
- Improved work and social relationships,
- Health status,
- Job attendance/tardiness, and
- Global assessment of functioning (GAF).
15Question Productivity As Affected by
Emotional Problems
- During the past 4 weeks, to what extent have you
accomplished less than you would like in your
work or other daily activities as a result of
emotional problems (such as feeling depressed or
anxious)? - The response options were None at all (1),
Slightly (2), Moderately (3), Quite a bit (4) and
Extremely (5) - 73 reduction in cases in lowest two categories
16Productivity As Affected by Emotional Problems
Results show shift towards no or fewer
productivity problems after EAP services.
17Question Productivity As Affected by Physical
Health
- During the past 4 weeks, how much difficulty did
you have doing your work or other regular daily
activities as a result of your physical
health)? - The response options were None at all (1), A
little bit (2), Moderately (3), Quite a bit (4)
and Could not do daily work (5) - 66 reduction in cases in lowest two categories
18Productivity As Affected by Physical Health
Results show shift towards no or fewer
productivity problems after EAP services.
19Question Improved Work and Social Relationships
- During the past 4 weeks, to what extent has your
physical or emotional problems interfered with
your normal social activities with family,
friends, neighbors, or groups? - The response options were None at all (1),
Slightly (2), Moderately (3), Quite a bit (4) and
Extremely (5) - 77 reduction in cases in lowest two categories
20Work and Social Relationships
Results show shift towards no or fewer
relationship problems after EAP services.
21Question Health Status
- In general, would you say your health is
- The response options were Excellent (1), Very
Good (2), Good (3), Fair (4) and Poor (5) - 31 reduction in cases in lowest two categories
22Health Status
Results show shift towards improved health status
after EAP services.
23Question Attendance/Tardiness
- How many days have you been unexpectedly absent
or tardy in the past 30 days? - 62 drop in average lost time away from work for
clients after using the EAP
24Attendance/Tardiness
Results show dramatic change in unscheduled
attendance/tardiness occurrences after EAP
services.
25Question Global Assessment of Functioning
- The counselors assessed a clients level of
functioning using the Global Assessment of
Functioning (GAF) Scale (American Psychiatric
Association, 2000). - GAF scores can range from 1 to 100, with higher
scores indicating better functioning. - 10 average improvement for clients, moving from
a range of mild symptoms and difficulty in
functioning to transient, slight symptoms and
impairment levels
26Global Assessment of Functioning
Results show change in average GAF scores at case
closing.
27How to Present the Results to the Customer
- Charts
- Percent Improvement
- Quarterly Reports
- Trends
28EAP Impact In the Workplace
Outcome Area Percentage of Improvement in Lowest Two Categories
Productivity impacted by emotional problems, 73
Productivity impacted by physical health, 66
Improved work and social relationships, 74
Health status, 31
29EAP Impact In the Workplace
Outcome Area Percentage of Improvement for All Clients
Job attendance/tardiness 62
Global assessment of functioning (GAF) improvement 10
30Outcomes for Different Types of Clients
- By Assessed Problem Type
- When Alcohol/Drug is the Primary Problem
- By Gender
- For Telephone Counseling Clients
31Improved Outcomes by Assessed Problem
32Clients with Alcohol/Drug Problems
33Improved Outcomes by Gender
N11,746
34- Evaluation of
- Telephone Counseling in an EAP
- Criteria
- Outcomes
35Telephone Applications in Behavioral Health
- Crisis counseling
- Initial contact - information/education
- Screening
- Appointment scheduling
- Management consultation
36Telephone Applications in Behavioral Health
- Assessment
- Counseling
- Support between face-to-face
- Case management
- Supervision
- Follow-up
- Evaluation
37Other TC Outcomes Study Results
- Texas AM Study (Reese, 2000)
- Clients report same level of relationship with
counselor (telephone face-to-face) - Convenience, cost, anonymity, control
- U of IL Study (Schneider, 2000)
- Telephone, face-to-face, videoteleconference, no
treatment - Audio (telephone) video provide similar outcome
levels to face-to-face - Any modality better than no treatment
- Comfort with audio video increase over time
38FOH Guidelines for Counseling by Telephone
- Assessing Client Appropriateness
- Client Request for Counseling by Telephone
- Environment
- Conducting the Initial Assessment
- Conducting the Counseling
- Documentation
- Statement of Understanding Issues
- Counselor State Licensed
39Contraindications to Counseling by Telephone
- Alcohol or other drug abuse
- Management referrals
- Risk of violence
- Suicidal or homicidal
- Marital, family, child
- Serious psychopathology
40FOH TC Evaluation Components (1)
- Number of telephone cases
- Length of counseling sessions
- Rates of case assignment to affiliate counselors
- Client satisfaction ratings on access to care
- Client satisfaction ratings on services received
41FOH TC Evaluation Components (2)
- Outcomes ratings on productivity and absenteeism
- Clinical outcome (GAF score)
- Structured counselor feedback on their telephone
cases - Anecdotal case information from counselors
42Comparison Time Frame Analyses
- Implementation Period 6 months immediately
after issuance of the structured TC guidelines - Comparison Period the same 6 month period the
year before
43Outcomes s Using Telephone Counseling
- Generally the same number of telephone cases and
telephone sessions during the implementation
period as compared with the comparison period.
44Telephone and Face-to-Face Counseling Groups
- Face-to-face counseling analyses
- TC sessions were fewer than 50 of the total
- Cases with no telephone sessions
- Telephone counseling analyses
- TC session were 50 or more of the total
- Cases with any telephone sessions
45Outcomes Length of Sessions
- Average length of telephonic session 32.2
minutes - Average length of face-to-face session 59.8
minutes
46Outcomes Affiliate Assignment
- Reduction of 5.6 in affiliate case assignment
47Outcomes Client Satisfaction Access To Care
- Same outcome results for telephonic and
face-to-face cases on client satisfaction with
access to care
48Outcomes Client Satisfaction Quality Of
Services Received
- Same outcome results for telephonic and
face-to-face cases on client satisfaction with
quality of services received
49Outcomes Absenteeism Productivity
- Similar outcomes for telephonic and face-to-face
cases on - Pre/post absenteeism/tardiness rates
- Pre/post productivity measures
50Outcomes Clinical Functioning
- Cases with any telephonic sessions showed a
greater average improvement in GAF scores from
the opening to the closing of the case (p.05)
compared with the face-to-face cases
51Outcomes Counselor Feedback
- 3.7 level of counselors experience with
telephone counseling - 4.0 level of comfort providing TC with this
case - 4.2 perception of clients TC comfort
- 3.8 perception of cnslr/client alliance
- 5 point scale 1low 3moderate 5high
52Outcomes Counselor Feedback (2)
- 3.7 extent to which goals were met
- 4.0 (5not at all) If goals not met, extent
that counseling by telephone contributed - 4.5 (5not at all) Extent to which a TC session
was interrupted - .93 (0no and 1yes) If the client had privacy
during the TC
53Outcomes Counselor Anecdotal Information
- Categories where telephonic counseling may be
appropriate and beneficial - Stigma
- Medical mobility problems
- Mental health mobility problems
- Scheduling problems
- Clients with multiple no shows
54Telephone Counseling Summary
- Appropriate clients appropriate method
- Use a multifaceted evaluation model for
evaluating service delivery through technological
modalities
55Client Satisfaction Dimensions
- Service Satisfaction
- Accessibility and Convenience
- Productivity Improvement
- Improve productivity at work
- Improve work relationships
- Client Improvement
- EAPs effect on problem resolution
- Strengthening the clients job effectiveness
- Ability to cope with stress
56How to Use this DataFor Client Service Delivery
- Improve Health and Productivity Outcomes
- Daily operational management
- Continuous quality improvement
- Activity based management
- Enable core processes
- Monthly Supervisor/Counselor Report
- Developing Internal Benchmarks
57How to Use this DataFor the Consultation to the
Organization
- Show Health and Productivity Outcomes
- Custom reports for customers
- Senior management briefings
- Quarterly reports
- Annual activity summary
58EAP Value Dimensions
59Summary and Discussion
- EAP services lead to improved outcomes in six
areas of functioning - Results consistent over a 3 year period
- Involved almost 60,000 EAP clients with a variety
of presented problems - Include in clinical process
- Supports health and productivity value and
benefits of EAPs
60Thanks to
- Chris Plaza, MS, Brian Sugden, PhD, Dennis Derr,
MA, Christopher Ross, PhD, David Bingaman, LCSW,
Fran Wence, MA - The authors give special recognition to the
counselors, counselor supervisors, clinical
directors, and FOH EAP consultants for their work
on the development/implementation of this
initiative and their significant contributions to
the health and productivity of the workforce. - Questions 312-886-4215 Rselvik_at_psc.gov
www.foh.dhhs.gov/outcomes.asp