Title: Which countries were European Union members as of 2003?
1Which countries were European Union members as of
2003?
- France
- Belgium
- Netherlands
- Luxembourg
- Italy
- Spain
- Portugal
- Greece
- United Kingdom
- Ireland
- Denmark
- Sweden
- Norway
- Finland
- Germany
- Switzerland
- Austria
- Cyprus
- Turkey
2Which countries became EU members in 2004?
- Turkey
- Cyprus
- Malta
- Hungary
- Poland
- Czech Republic
- Slovakia
- Romania
- Latvia
- Estonia
- Lithuania
- Bulgaria
- Slovenia
3Forms of Economic Integration
- free trade area - free movement of goods and
services between member countries - Example NAFTA
- customs union free trade area common external
trade barriers - Example Mercosur (Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay,
Uruguay) - common market customs union free movement of
labor and capital - Example European Union after Single Market
Program - economic union common market common currency
( common monetary policy and coordinated
fiscal policies) - Example European Union after Maastricht Treaty
4Forms of Economic Integration
- free trade area - free movement of goods and
services between member countries - Example NAFTA
- customs union free trade area common external
trade barriers - Example Mercosur (Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay,
Uruguay) - common market customs union free movement of
labor and capital - Example European Union after Single Market
Program - economic union common market common currency
( common monetary policy and coordinated
fiscal policies) - Example European Union after Maastricht Treaty
5Chronology of European Integration
- 2 problems after WWII
- Economic reconstruction
- History of German-French hostility
- Technical cooperation European Coal Steel
Community (1951) - Free trade area Treaties of Rome (1957)
- Customs Union (1967)
6Legacy of segmented markets (pre-Single Market
Program)
- Markets segmented by protection - technical,
physical and fiscal barriers - leading to - Pattern of national champions
- Lack of economies of scale (high unit costs)
- Overcapacity, overstaffing
- Low incentive to innovate, invest
- Unresponsive to customers market changes
- Not globally competitive, so seek protection
- A vicious cycle...
- that can be broken by
- the dynamic benefits of economic integration
7Common market the Single Market Program
- Eurosclerosis of early 1980s
- Lack of global competitiveness
- Lack of progress towards higher level of
integration - Euro-standards mentality
- 1987 Single European Act
- Mutual recognition
- 1992 target date
- Philosophy dynamic benefits
- Economies of scale
- More competition?cut costs, innovate,
- respond to market
Result increased global competitiveness
8Broadening of membership
- Original Six France, Germany, Italy, Belgium,
Netherlands, Luxembourg - 1973 - U.K., Ireland, Denmark
- 1981 - Greece
- 1986 - Spain, Portugal
- 1995 - Austria, Sweden, Finland
- 2004 10 new members from Eastern Europe and the
Mediterranean
Note geographic alternation between richer
(northern) and poorer (southern, eastern)
countries
9Rationale for a single currency in Europe
- Logical extension of the 1992 Single Market
Program - Exchange rate fluctuations as barriers to a
single market - Growing percentages of intra-Community trade
- Further increase global competitiveness by
reducing costs faced by European firms
10Background post-WWII European exchange rate
arrangements
- Bretton Woods gold-dollar fixed exchange rate
system - Werner Report (1970)
- Breakdown of Bretton Woods System
- Snake (1974)
- snake in the tunnel
- snake in the lake
11EMS - European Monetary System (1979)
- Fixed exchange rate system
- Components of EMS
- European Currency Unit (ECU)
- Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM)
- Intervention funds
- EMS track record
- Realignments (devaluations and revaluations)
- Macroeconomic convergence
12Rationale for a single currency (contd)
- Apparent success of EMS stable exchange rates,
converging economic performance - Fixed exchange rates w/o capital controls are
vulnerable to speculation - Public enthusiasm for Single Market
- Politics - bind unified Germany to western Europe
13Maastricht plan for EMU (Economic and Monetary
Union)
- 1991 Maastricht Treaty criteria
- Government deficit ??3 of GDP
- Government debt ??60 of GDP
- Inflation ??3 per year
- Convergence of long term interest rates
- Everyone in ERM, no realignments for 2 years
- Original timetable for single currency
- All countries meeting the criteria join in 1997
- All other countries join in 1999
14Exchange rate crises
- September, 1992 crisis
- Precipitating factors French referendum on
Maastricht, high German interest rates - Outcome UK, Italy left ERM
- July-August, 1993 crisis
- Precipitating factors European recession, high
German interest rates - Outcome bands of fluctuation widened from
?2.25 to ?15 - Lesson EMS vulnerable w/o capital controls
15Revised timetable for EMU
- 1992, 1993 currency crises pushed back timetable
- 1998 conference to determine which countries
qualified, set conversion rates - Creation of European Central Bank (ECB)
- Choice of head of ECB Wim Duisenberg
- France preferred Jean-Claude Trichet
- January 1, 1999 - start of EMU C
- Exchange rates with euro irrevocably fixed
- Euro is introduced and co-exists with legacy
currencies - Jan. 1, 2002 - euro notes and coins circulate
- Early 2002 - national currencies disappear
16Euro-zone whos in, whos out
- Countries that are in
- Austria
- Belgium
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands
- Portugal
- Spain
- Countries that are out
- Denmark
- Sweden
- U.K.
Rejected euro in 2000 referendum polls show
support but no new referendum yet
Referendum in September 2003 Nos won
Joined 1/1/01
5 tests show UK not ready future referendum in
doubt
17Technically, the launch of the euro was a great
success
- European Central Bank
- Contracts
- Stock and bond markets
- Public acceptance
18But the euro lost a lot of value in the first 2 ½
years
19Explanations for the euros fall
- Rates of return in US vs. euro-zone
- Interest rates
- Stock markets
- Rates of economic growth and productivity
- Central bank credibility
20Then the euro reversed direction
Sep 2004
21Explanations for the rise in the euro
- Rates of return in US vs. euro-zone
- Interest rates
- Stock markets
- Rates of economic growth and productivity
- Central bank credibility
22Source Datastream
23Monetary policy Euro-zone and US compared
- Who makes monetary policy decisions?
- How are these decisions communicated?
- What is the central banks mandate?
- How are monetary and fiscal policy coordinated?
24ECBs policy challenges
- Balancing European and national economic needs
- Divergent economic performance
- Have seen higher inflation in peripheral
countries like Ireland and Spain since euro
launch - Growth has been slow in core countries like
Germany - Critics over-emphasis on fighting inflation
neglects economic growth effects of monetary
policy - Consensus decision-making
- Critics decisions are made too slowly
- ECB we dont fine-tune as much as US we realize
policy takes a long time to have an effect
25ECBs policy challenges (2)
- Communicating monetary policy getting the
code right - Credibility
- Consistency
- Transparency
- Critics too secretive, should publish minutes
- ECB we do not want policy to be interpreted as
politically motivated
26ECBs policy challenges (3)
- ECB Succession Jean-Claude Trichet took over
November 1, 2003 - Cleared in Credit Lyonnais scandal
- Will Trichet make a difference?
- Trichet a more forceful personality
- May be better communicator
- Duisenberg too blunt, Trichet chooses his
words more carefully - Analysts disagree about whether Trichet will
alter strategy of 2 inflation target - He was tough on inflation at Banque de France
- Well-connected with central bankers who believe
best practice is to support economic growth
fight inflation
27Fiscal policy in the euro-zone
- Fiscal policy governed by Stability Pact
- Fiscal policy coordination necessary in order to
have a single monetary policy - Pact budget deficits cannot exceed 3 of GDP
- Punishment for violations public reprimand,
fines (of up to 0.5 of GDP) - Exceptions in cases of recession
- Germany was biggest supporter of pact
28Stability Pact in practice
- Expected that smaller, weak currency countries
would have most trouble with the stability pact - But its France and Germany whose budget deficits
have been too big the last few years - France has resisted deficit reduction, citing
slow growth - Undermines credibility of Stability Pact
- Looks like big countries are treated differently
- When Portugal breached limit in 2001, it was
forced to reduce its deficit
29Stability Pact in practice (2)
- European Commission and ECB urged Stability Pact
compliance for France Germany - Nov 2003 finance ministers agreed France
Germany could cut less than Commission wanted - Gave France, Germany until 2005 to meet 3 limit
- Effectively suspended Stability Pact
- Ministers were split Spain, Austria, Finland,
Netherlands opposed agreement
30Stability Pact in practice (3)
- Commission challenged ministers agreement in
court - In July 2004 European Court of Justice ruled
- Council of Ministers may not suspend the Pact
- However, Council may reject Commissions
recommendations and interpret the Pact its own
way - 6 countries likely to go over deficit limit in
2004 - Germany says its likely to breach limit in 2005,
too (4th consecutive year) - Looks like Pact will be revised Commission has
proposed some ideas (see below)
31Revising the Stability Pact
- General principle
- Cannot reduce fiscal policy to a single variable
(budget deficit) and a single number (3) - Ideas proposed by Commission in Sept. 2004
- Relate rules to business cycle can run bigger
deficits in recession but must run surpluses
during expansion - Look at medium/long term debt sustainability
- Relate to economic growth, future pension
liabilities, etc. - Rely more on consultation, peer pressure than
rules - Differences of opinion
- Germany opposes weakening pact, sees fiscal
prudence as necessary to avoid inflation - ECB opposes changing pact