PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS

Description:

Title: THE FRANCHISE, VOTER REGISTRATION, AND VOTING TURNOUT Author: umbc Last modified by: Windows User Created Date: 9/8/2006 9:36:56 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: umb123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS


1
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS
2
The Franchise 1789
  • Under the original constitution, who had the
    right to vote?
  • for U.S. House?
  • for U.S. Senate?
  • for Presidential electors?
  • for state and local officials?

3
The Franchise 1789 (cont.)
  • Voter qualifications (including for U.S. House
    and Presidential electors) were set entirely by
    state law
  • Proviso The House of Representatives shall be
    composed of members chosen every second year by
    the people of the several states, and the
    electors in each state shall have the
    qualifica-tions requisite for electors of the
    most numerous branch of the state legislature.
    Article 1, Section 2
  • Property-owning/tax-paying qualifications were
    common, and
  • often scaled to level of office
  • Perhaps 50 of adult white males were eligible to
    vote in early elections,
  • plus some free blacks (and even some women) were
    eligible to vote in some elections in some states.

4
The Franchise 1830s
  • Jacksonian Revolution
  • Almost all adult white males got the right to
    vote
  • All Presidential electors were popularly elected
    (except in SC)
  • Voter mobilization campaigns by competing
    (Democratic and Whig) political parties greatly
    increased voting turnout, i.e.,
  • the proportion of eligible voters who actually
    cast votes.
  • But non-whites (and most or all women) lost the
    right to vote (in so far as they previously had
    that right).

5
14th Amendment
  • Section 1. No state shall make or enforce any law
    which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
    of citizens of the United States ... nor deny
    to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
    protection of the laws.
  • Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned
    among the several states according to their
    respective numbers, counting the whole number of
    persons in each state, excluding Indians not
    taxed. But when the right to vote at any election
    for the choice of electors for President and Vice
    President of the United States, Representatives
    in Congress, the executive and judicial officers
    of a state, or the members of the legislature
    thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants
    of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and
    citizens of the United States, or in any way
    abridged, except for participation in rebellion,
    or other crime, the basis of representation
    therein shall be reduced in the proportion which
    the number of such male citizens shall bear to
    the whole number of male citizens twenty-one
    years of age in such state. IMPLICATION FOR
    ELECTORAL COLLEGE

6
15th Amendment
  • Section 1. The right of citizens of the United
    States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
    the United States or by any state on account of
    race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
  • Section 2. The Congress shall have power to
    enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

7
The Franchise Turn of the 20th Century
  • The Jim Crow regime was established in the
    South.
  • Jim Crow had two main elements
  • de jure segregation and
  • de facto disenfranchisement (poll tax, literacy
    test, grandfather clause, white primary,
    intimidation)
  • Blacks remain enfranchised outside the South (but
    relatively few lived outside the South until WWI
    and WWII)
  • Women gained the right to vote in some states
    (especially in the West) in late 19th/early 20th
    centuries.
  • Caused dramatic apportionment effects in
    Electoral College
  • E.g., 1916 State Electoral Vote Popular Vote
  • IL 29 2,192,707
  • NY 45 1,706,305
  • PA 38 1,297,189
  • 19th Amendment (1920)
  • The right of citizens of the United States to
    vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
    United States or by any state on account of sex.

8
The Franchise 20th Century
  • 23rd Amendment (1963)
  • The District constituting the seat of government
    of the United States shall appoint in such manner
    as the Congress may direct a number of electors
    of President and Vice President equal to the
    whole number of Senators and Representatives in
    Congress to which the District would be entitled
    if it were a state, but in no event more than the
    least populous state they shall be in addition
    to those appointed by the states, but they shall
    be considered, for the purposes of the election
    of President and Vice President, to be electors
    appointed by a state and they shall meet in the
    District and perform such duties as provided by
    the twelfth article of amendment.
  • 24th Amendment (1964)
  • The right of citizens of the United States to
    vote in any primary or other election for
    President or Vice President, for electors for
    President or Vice President, or for Senator or
    Representative in Congress, shall not be denied
    or abridged by the United States or any state by
    reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other
    tax.
  • Voting Rights Act (1965)
  • 26th Amendment (1971)
  • The right of citizens of the United States, who
    are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not
    be denied or abridged by the United States or any
    state on account of age.

9
The Franchise Continuing Issues
  • Failed 27th Amendment
  • Section 1. For purposes of representation in the
    Congress, election of the President and Vice
    President, and article V of this Constitution,
    the District constituting the seat of government
    of the United States shall be treated as though
    it were a State.
  • Felon disenfranchisement
  • State laws vary
  • Voter ID laws, etc.
  • Presumably the franchise should be uniform across
    all states and DC if the Electoral College were
    replaced by a direct national popular vote
    through a constitutional amendment.
  • Apportionment of electoral votes is based on
    total population,
  • including non-citizens and illegal immigrants (in
    so far as counted by census)

10
Voter Registration
  • Prior to the late 19th century, only informal
    voter registration systems exists
  • probably a lot of fraudulent voting
  • vote early and vote often
  • States adopted voter registration laws in the
    late 19th century,
  • which produced an evident decline in total
    turnout.
  • Voter registration systems undoubtedly
  • reduced fraudulent voting, but also
  • may have had the effect of vote suppression.
  • Typically, people who are eligible to vote have
    to take some initiative to get themselves
    registered.
  • Moreover, registration list were periodically
    purged of non-voters.
  • Mid to latter part of 20th century, general
    liberalization of registration laws (by states,
    by courts, and by Congress)
  • Motor Voter Act (1993)
  • Help America Vote Act (2002) provisional
    ballots
  • Voter registration evidently remains something of
    a mess in many states and localities.
  • deadwood problem
  • There is uncertainty (and passionate academic
    dispute) concerning the typical turnout rate
    among registered voters.

11
Voting Turnout
  • Total actual vote/ Total potential vote
  • In the U.S., voting turnout in Presidential
    elections is usually calculated as
  • total recorded vote for President,
  • divided by the census estimate of the voting age
    population (VAP)
  • However, such turnout is often (mistakenly)
    characterized as the percent of eligible (or even
    registered) voters who actually voted.
  • Election workers who report high turnout on
    election night are looking at the number of
    voters who showed up as a percent of registered
    voters on their lists.

12
Problems with PV / VAP
  • Numerator misses
  • spoiled ballots
  • Presidential abstentions
  • Denominator
  • includes
  • (legal and illegal) immigrants
  • institutionalized population (generally
    ineligible or unlikely to vote)
  • felons perhaps not eligible to vote
  • but excludes eligible voters overseas.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Some Reasons for National Differences in Turnout
  • Some countries have compulsory voting.
  • Some countries make election day a holiday.
  • Most countries have (national) voter enrollment
    (vs. state voter registration) systems,
  • in which case, about 90-95 of eligible voters
    are enrolled, and
  • turnout denominator is (usually) the number of
    enrolled voters not VAP.
  • U.S has unusually frequent elections with many
    offices/propositions at stake in each
    (long-ballot)
  • federal/state/local offices
  • separate executive and legislative (and often
    judicial) elections (sometimes with runoffs)
  • referendums
  • plus primaries (sometimes with runoffs)

17
TURNOUT IN SELECTED COUNTRIES, 1960-2005
18
TURNOUT DECLINE IN ALL OEDC COUNTRIES (1960-2000)
19
  • Ballot Types and Ballot Access
  • Early voting was informal, perhaps oral,
    otherwise voters had to create own ballots,
    hardly secret
  • Mass party competition (1830s on) led to party
    ballots
  • printed by parties
  • listing only party candidates
  • distribution to party supporters
  • hardly secret (differently colored paper)
  • Implications
  • No ballot access problem
  • Hard for voters to split ticket
  • Enhanced influence of party leaders
  • Easy to arrange (even on election eve) fusion
    between (major or minor) parties

20
Australian Ballot Reform (1890)
  • Government election authority prints ballots
  • all voters receive same ballot at polling place
  • ballots list all candidates for all offices
  • secures secret ballot
  • Implications
  • Ballot access must be regulated
  • filing fee, deposit, petition, etc.
  • It becomes much easier for voters to cast split
    ticket ballots.
  • It reduces the influence of party leaders and
    organizations.
  • It becomes harder to fuse party tickets.
  • In fact, fusion may be prohibited.
  • Partisan vs. non-partisan Australian ballots
  • U.K. vs. U.S. example
  • what information listed for each candidate?

21
Fundamental Implication of a Partisan Australian
Ballot
  • Which candidate is entitled to be listed on the
    ballot under a given party label?
  • This produces government in U.S., state
    government regulation of party organization and
    nominating procedures,
  • in particular, in the U.S. it led to primary
    elections,
  • by which a candidate is entitled to be identified
    on the ballot as a party nominee by virtue of
    winning a government-run election.

22
Two Formats for U.S. Australian Ballots
Party-Column/Line Ballot vs. Office Block Ballot
  • This distinction is relevant only if
  • the ballot is partisan, and
  • two or more offices are at stake in a single
    election and
  • it is especially relevant if many offices are at
    stake long ballot
  • Party-Column/Line Ballot
  • Such a ballot is set up so that all candidates of
    a given party appear in the same column or line.
  • In effect, it is several party ballots placed
    together on the same page.
  • It encourages straight ticket voting.
  • It may provide for a straight party vote.
  • It raises the question of party order on the
    ballot.
  • Office-Block Ballot
  • Such a ballot groups together all candidates for
    a given office.
  • It encourages split ticket voting,
  • though it can (but usually does not) provide a
    straight party vote.
  • It raises the question of candidate order in each
    block.

23
  • A Party-
  • Column
  • Ballot
  • (Indiana, 1956)

24
An Office-Block Ballot (Massachusetts 1956)
25
  • An Office Block Ballot
  • With a Straight Party Option
  • Missouri

26
The Notorious Butterfly Ballot
27
(No Transcript)
28
Presidential Election Ballots
  • Does the ballot make any reference to
    Presidential electors? Today, usually but not
    always
  • Does ballot list Presidential elector candidates
    individually? Today, usually not
  • Does ballot allow or require voters to vote for
    electors individually? Today, never
  • If voters are required to vote for electors
    individually, does the ballot indicate the
    candidates to whom the elector candidates are
    pledged? Today, not relevant
  • Does state law allow fusion of elector
    candidate slates? NY does

29
  • Kansas
  • (1960)

30
Vermont 1960 vs. 2012
31
New York (1960) allows fusion
32
  • Hawaii
  • (1960)

33
Alabama (1960)
34
  • Maryland (Baltimore Co.)
  • 2008
  • No mention
  • of electors
  • But they actually exist gt

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com