Title: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS
1PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MECHANICS
2The Franchise 1789
- Under the original constitution, who had the
right to vote? - for U.S. House?
- for U.S. Senate?
- for Presidential electors?
- for state and local officials?
3The Franchise 1789 (cont.)
- Voter qualifications (including for U.S. House
and Presidential electors) were set entirely by
state law - Proviso The House of Representatives shall be
composed of members chosen every second year by
the people of the several states, and the
electors in each state shall have the
qualifica-tions requisite for electors of the
most numerous branch of the state legislature.
Article 1, Section 2 - Property-owning/tax-paying qualifications were
common, and - often scaled to level of office
- Perhaps 50 of adult white males were eligible to
vote in early elections, - plus some free blacks (and even some women) were
eligible to vote in some elections in some states.
4The Franchise 1830s
- Jacksonian Revolution
- Almost all adult white males got the right to
vote - All Presidential electors were popularly elected
(except in SC) - Voter mobilization campaigns by competing
(Democratic and Whig) political parties greatly
increased voting turnout, i.e., - the proportion of eligible voters who actually
cast votes. - But non-whites (and most or all women) lost the
right to vote (in so far as they previously had
that right).
514th Amendment
- Section 1. No state shall make or enforce any law
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
of citizens of the United States ... nor deny
to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws. - Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned
among the several states according to their
respective numbers, counting the whole number of
persons in each state, excluding Indians not
taxed. But when the right to vote at any election
for the choice of electors for President and Vice
President of the United States, Representatives
in Congress, the executive and judicial officers
of a state, or the members of the legislature
thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants
of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and
citizens of the United States, or in any way
abridged, except for participation in rebellion,
or other crime, the basis of representation
therein shall be reduced in the proportion which
the number of such male citizens shall bear to
the whole number of male citizens twenty-one
years of age in such state. IMPLICATION FOR
ELECTORAL COLLEGE
615th Amendment
- Section 1. The right of citizens of the United
States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
the United States or by any state on account of
race, color, or previous condition of servitude. - Section 2. The Congress shall have power to
enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
7The Franchise Turn of the 20th Century
- The Jim Crow regime was established in the
South. - Jim Crow had two main elements
- de jure segregation and
- de facto disenfranchisement (poll tax, literacy
test, grandfather clause, white primary,
intimidation) - Blacks remain enfranchised outside the South (but
relatively few lived outside the South until WWI
and WWII) - Women gained the right to vote in some states
(especially in the West) in late 19th/early 20th
centuries. - Caused dramatic apportionment effects in
Electoral College - E.g., 1916 State Electoral Vote Popular Vote
- IL 29 2,192,707
- NY 45 1,706,305
- PA 38 1,297,189
- 19th Amendment (1920)
- The right of citizens of the United States to
vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any state on account of sex.
8The Franchise 20th Century
- 23rd Amendment (1963)
- The District constituting the seat of government
of the United States shall appoint in such manner
as the Congress may direct a number of electors
of President and Vice President equal to the
whole number of Senators and Representatives in
Congress to which the District would be entitled
if it were a state, but in no event more than the
least populous state they shall be in addition
to those appointed by the states, but they shall
be considered, for the purposes of the election
of President and Vice President, to be electors
appointed by a state and they shall meet in the
District and perform such duties as provided by
the twelfth article of amendment. - 24th Amendment (1964)
- The right of citizens of the United States to
vote in any primary or other election for
President or Vice President, for electors for
President or Vice President, or for Senator or
Representative in Congress, shall not be denied
or abridged by the United States or any state by
reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other
tax. - Voting Rights Act (1965)
- 26th Amendment (1971)
- The right of citizens of the United States, who
are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not
be denied or abridged by the United States or any
state on account of age.
9The Franchise Continuing Issues
- Failed 27th Amendment
- Section 1. For purposes of representation in the
Congress, election of the President and Vice
President, and article V of this Constitution,
the District constituting the seat of government
of the United States shall be treated as though
it were a State. - Felon disenfranchisement
- State laws vary
- Voter ID laws, etc.
- Presumably the franchise should be uniform across
all states and DC if the Electoral College were
replaced by a direct national popular vote
through a constitutional amendment. - Apportionment of electoral votes is based on
total population, - including non-citizens and illegal immigrants (in
so far as counted by census)
10Voter Registration
- Prior to the late 19th century, only informal
voter registration systems exists - probably a lot of fraudulent voting
- vote early and vote often
- States adopted voter registration laws in the
late 19th century, - which produced an evident decline in total
turnout. - Voter registration systems undoubtedly
- reduced fraudulent voting, but also
- may have had the effect of vote suppression.
- Typically, people who are eligible to vote have
to take some initiative to get themselves
registered. - Moreover, registration list were periodically
purged of non-voters. - Mid to latter part of 20th century, general
liberalization of registration laws (by states,
by courts, and by Congress) - Motor Voter Act (1993)
- Help America Vote Act (2002) provisional
ballots - Voter registration evidently remains something of
a mess in many states and localities. - deadwood problem
- There is uncertainty (and passionate academic
dispute) concerning the typical turnout rate
among registered voters.
11Voting Turnout
- Total actual vote/ Total potential vote
- In the U.S., voting turnout in Presidential
elections is usually calculated as - total recorded vote for President,
- divided by the census estimate of the voting age
population (VAP) - However, such turnout is often (mistakenly)
characterized as the percent of eligible (or even
registered) voters who actually voted. - Election workers who report high turnout on
election night are looking at the number of
voters who showed up as a percent of registered
voters on their lists.
12Problems with PV / VAP
- Numerator misses
- spoiled ballots
- Presidential abstentions
- Denominator
- includes
- (legal and illegal) immigrants
- institutionalized population (generally
ineligible or unlikely to vote) - felons perhaps not eligible to vote
- but excludes eligible voters overseas.
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16Some Reasons for National Differences in Turnout
- Some countries have compulsory voting.
- Some countries make election day a holiday.
- Most countries have (national) voter enrollment
(vs. state voter registration) systems, - in which case, about 90-95 of eligible voters
are enrolled, and - turnout denominator is (usually) the number of
enrolled voters not VAP. - U.S has unusually frequent elections with many
offices/propositions at stake in each
(long-ballot) - federal/state/local offices
- separate executive and legislative (and often
judicial) elections (sometimes with runoffs) - referendums
- plus primaries (sometimes with runoffs)
17TURNOUT IN SELECTED COUNTRIES, 1960-2005
18TURNOUT DECLINE IN ALL OEDC COUNTRIES (1960-2000)
19- Ballot Types and Ballot Access
- Early voting was informal, perhaps oral,
otherwise voters had to create own ballots,
hardly secret - Mass party competition (1830s on) led to party
ballots - printed by parties
- listing only party candidates
- distribution to party supporters
- hardly secret (differently colored paper)
- Implications
- No ballot access problem
- Hard for voters to split ticket
- Enhanced influence of party leaders
- Easy to arrange (even on election eve) fusion
between (major or minor) parties
20Australian Ballot Reform (1890)
- Government election authority prints ballots
- all voters receive same ballot at polling place
- ballots list all candidates for all offices
- secures secret ballot
- Implications
- Ballot access must be regulated
- filing fee, deposit, petition, etc.
- It becomes much easier for voters to cast split
ticket ballots. - It reduces the influence of party leaders and
organizations. - It becomes harder to fuse party tickets.
- In fact, fusion may be prohibited.
- Partisan vs. non-partisan Australian ballots
- U.K. vs. U.S. example
- what information listed for each candidate?
21Fundamental Implication of a Partisan Australian
Ballot
- Which candidate is entitled to be listed on the
ballot under a given party label? - This produces government in U.S., state
government regulation of party organization and
nominating procedures, - in particular, in the U.S. it led to primary
elections, - by which a candidate is entitled to be identified
on the ballot as a party nominee by virtue of
winning a government-run election.
22Two Formats for U.S. Australian Ballots
Party-Column/Line Ballot vs. Office Block Ballot
- This distinction is relevant only if
- the ballot is partisan, and
- two or more offices are at stake in a single
election and - it is especially relevant if many offices are at
stake long ballot - Party-Column/Line Ballot
- Such a ballot is set up so that all candidates of
a given party appear in the same column or line. - In effect, it is several party ballots placed
together on the same page. - It encourages straight ticket voting.
- It may provide for a straight party vote.
- It raises the question of party order on the
ballot. - Office-Block Ballot
- Such a ballot groups together all candidates for
a given office. - It encourages split ticket voting,
- though it can (but usually does not) provide a
straight party vote. - It raises the question of candidate order in each
block.
23- A Party-
- Column
- Ballot
- (Indiana, 1956)
24An Office-Block Ballot (Massachusetts 1956)
25- An Office Block Ballot
- With a Straight Party Option
- Missouri
26The Notorious Butterfly Ballot
27(No Transcript)
28Presidential Election Ballots
- Does the ballot make any reference to
Presidential electors? Today, usually but not
always - Does ballot list Presidential elector candidates
individually? Today, usually not - Does ballot allow or require voters to vote for
electors individually? Today, never - If voters are required to vote for electors
individually, does the ballot indicate the
candidates to whom the elector candidates are
pledged? Today, not relevant - Does state law allow fusion of elector
candidate slates? NY does
29 30Vermont 1960 vs. 2012
31New York (1960) allows fusion
32 33Alabama (1960)
34- Maryland (Baltimore Co.)
- 2008
- No mention
- of electors
- But they actually exist gt
35(No Transcript)