Title: The Judicial Branch
1The Judicial Branch
2GPS SSGC 16
- Students will demonstrate knowledge of the
operation of the federal judiciary. - Explain the jurisdiction of the federal courts
and state courts. - Explain how John Marshall established the Supreme
Court as an independent coequal branch of
government through his opinion in Marbury v.
Madison ( Judicial Review). - Describe how the Supreme Court decides cases.
- Compare the philosophies of judicial activism and
judicial restraint.
3Jurisdiction of the Courts
- The United States has a dual court system of
state and federal courts. - The authority to hear certain cases is called the
courts jurisdiction. - States courts have jurisdiction over cases
involving state laws. - Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases
involving United States laws, foreign treaties,
and interpretation of the Constitution.
4Jurisdiction of the Courts
- Federal courts also have jurisdiction if certain
parties or persons are involved - Ambassadors and representatives of foreign
governments - Two or more state governments
- The United States government or one of its
offices or agencies - Citizens who are residents of different states
- Citizens who are residents of the same state but
claim lands under grants of different states.
5Jurisdiction of the Courts
- In some cases federal and state courts have
concurrent jurisdiction, shared. - In the federal court system, the district court
in which a case is originally tried is a trial
court. It has original jurisdiction. - Federal courts of appeals have only appellate
jurisdiction, or authority to hear cases appealed
from district courts.
6Jurisdiction of the Courts
7Developing Supreme Court Power
- The Supreme Court has become the most powerful
court in the world its power developed from
custom, usage, and history. - No federal court, including the Supreme Court,
may initiate action. The courts must wait for
litigants, people engaged in law suits, to come
to them.
8Judicial Review
- The Supreme Court gained much power as a result
of the case of Marbury v. Madison. - This case established the precedent of Judicial
Review, the right of the Supreme Court to declare
an act of Congress unconstitutional.
9Constitutional Courts
- Courts established by Congress under the
provisions of Article III are Constitutional
Courts. - These include the federal district courts, the
federal courts of appeals, and the United States
Court of International Trade. - The federal district courts were created by
Congress as trial courts for both civil and
criminal cases.
10Constitutional Courts
- District Courts use two types of juries in
criminal cases. - A Grand Jury hears charges against a person. If
they believe there is sufficient evidence, they
issue and indictment, a formal accusation
charging a person with a crime. - A Petit Jury, or trial jury, weighs the evidence
presented at a trial. - District courts carry the main burden in federal
cases and in most cases render the final decision.
11Constitutional Courts
- The 13 courts of appeals ease the appellate
workload of the Supreme Court. - There are 12 judicial circuits, or regions, with
one appellate court in each circuit. The 13th
court is a special appeals court with national
jurisdiction. - The courts of appeals may decide to uphold the
original decision, reverse the decision, or send
the case back to the original court to be tried
again.
12Constitutional Courts
13Selection of Federal Judges
- According to the Constitution, the president has
the power to appoint all federal judges, with the
approval of the Senate. - Presidents often appoint judges who share their
own points of view on key issues. - Thurgood Marshall was the 1st Black Justice on
the Supreme Court. Sandra Day OConnor was the
1st woman Justice on the Supreme Court.
14 Marshall OConnor
15The Supreme Court
16The Supreme Court
17The Supreme Court
- Only one person has held the two highest offices
in the land, serving as president of the United
States and later as chief justice of the Supreme
Court. William Howard Taft served as
twenty-seventh president of the United States
from 1908 to 1913 President Warren G. Harding
later appointed Taft chief justice of the Supreme
Court, a position he held from 1921 until his
death in 1930.
18William Howard Taft
19The Supreme Court
- The Court has original jurisdiction over two
types of cases those involving representatives
of foreign governments, and those in which a
state is a party.
20Supreme Court Justices
- Congress sets the number of Supreme Court
justices. It has been nine since 1869 - The Court consists of eight associate justices
and one chief justice. - Congress sets the salary of the justices and may
not reduce it. - Congress may remove justices by impeachment for
treason, bribery, or other high crimes and
misdemeanors. - The justices duties are not defined in the
Constitution but have evolved from laws and
through tradition, according to the needs of the
nation.
21Supreme Court Justices
- The justices main duty is to hear and rule on
cases. - The justices also have limited duties related to
the 12 federal judicial circuits on occasion
they may serve on high-level commissions
22Supreme Court Justices
- Most justices have been federal or state judges
or have held other legal positions such as
attorney general most have considerable legal
experience, are in their 50s or 60s, and come
from upper socioeconomic levels.
23The Justices
24Chief Justice
John Roberts Jr. Appointed September 29, 2005
251st Chief Justice
John Jay
26Supreme Court Decision Making
27How Cases Reach the Supreme Court
- The majority of cases concern appeals.
- Most appeals concern cases in which a lower state
or federal court has ruled laws unconstitutional.
Cases the Court chooses not to hear are
dismissed, and the ruling of the lower court
becomes final. - Most cases reach the Court by writ of certiorari,
in which either side petitions that a lower
courts decision involved an error raising a
serious constitutional issue.
28How Cases Reach the Court
- The chief justice puts certiorari cases on a list
for discussion two thirds never make the list.
If four of the nine justices agree, a case is
accepted. - Some cases are decided by a brief, unsigned
statement of the Courts decision called a per
curium opinion the rest are given the Courts
full consideration.
29Steps in Deciding Major Cases
- Each side submits a brief, a written statement
detailing legal arguments, facts, and precedents.
- Parties not directly involved but with an
interest in the case may submit amicus curiae,
friend of the court briefs. - Lawyers for each side make arguments during which
justices ask questions.
30Steps in Deciding Major Cases
- The justices debate each case. Each justice has
one vote a majority vote is needed to decide a
case. - The justices may issue four kinds of opinions a
unanimous opinion, a majority opinion, a
concurring opinion, or a dissenting opinion. - Justices written decisions, opinions interpret
the law and help shape public policy.
31Steps in Deciding Major Cases
- Unanimous Opinion All agree.
- Majority Opinion Most agree.
- Concurring Opinion Agree with the majority but
for a different legal reason - Dissenting Opinion Disagrees with the majority.
32Did You Know?
- The Constitution sets no basic requirements for
Supreme Court justices, not even age limits or
citizenship. Neither a law degree nor prior
experience as a judge is mandatory.
33Shaping Public Policy
- The Court determines policy in three ways
- 1. using judicial review
- 2. interpreting laws
- 3. overruling or reversing its previous
decisions - Judicial Review is the authority of the Supreme
Court to declare a law unconstitutional.
34Shaping Public Policy
- The Courts rulings become precedents, or models,
on which to base other, similar decisions. - Since times change, the Court may overturn or
reverse its earlier decisions. - Some decisions create social change.
35Judicial Review
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court who wrote the majority opinion in
the Marbury v. Madison decision.
36Judicial Review
- There are two areas of thought on how the court
should use its power to influence society. - Judicial Restraint the court should avoid
taking the initiative on social and political
questions. - Judicial Activism the court should play a role
in shaping national policies.
37Limits on the Supreme Court
- Generally, the Courts decisions have dealt
largely with civil liberties, economic issues,
federal laws and regulations, due process, and
suits against government officials. - Civil liberties cases make up the largest number
of Court cases appeals from prisoners comprise
about one-fourth of its cases.
38Limits on the Supreme Court
- The Court hears only cases where its decision
will make a difference. Plaintiffs must have
suffered real harm, or cases must involve a
federal question. The Court avoids political
issues. - The Court may never initiate an action.
39Limits on the Supreme Court
- The Courts power to shape public policy also is
limited by its own limited ability to enforce its
decisions. Noncompliance by other courts also is
difficult to monitor. - Ex The Court could not enforce its decision that
the Indian Removal Act was unconstitutional.
40Basing Decisions on the Law
- Justices must base their opinions on the law, not
on personal opinions. - The Court must relate their interpretations to
the Constitution itself, relevant statutes, and
legal precedents. - This means that they have to back up their
decision with the law.
41Balancing the Courts Power, Checks and Balances
- The power of presidents to fill vacancies on the
Court, as every full-term president but Carter
has done, gives presidents influence over the
Court. - The president is responsible for enforcing the
Courts decisions, but he or she may do so
vigorously or with little enthusiasm. - Congress has the power to limit the Courts
ability to hear certain cases may propose a
constitutional amendment to overturn a decision
may set, but not reduce, the justices salaries
and uses its confirmation power to shape the
Courts position on social issues.
42Major Supreme Court Decisions
- Marbury v. Madison established Judicial Review.
- Miranda v. Arizona established that police must
inform a person of his or her rights upon arrest.
- Plessey v. Ferguson established that separate
but equal was constitutional. - Brown v. BOE of Topeka over turned Plessey v.
Ferguson. - Gideon v. Wainwright poor defendants in
criminal cases have the right to a state paid
attorney. - Roe v. Wade no states can pass laws restricting
a womans right to an abortion.