CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact

Description:

Title: Kein Folientitel Author: Gast Last modified by: britz Created Date: 3/3/1999 10:45:26 AM Document presentation format: Bildschirmpr sentation – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Gast152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact


1
CAPRICommon Agricultural Policy Regional Impact
Farm Type ModelsFor CAPRI - Wolfgang Britz,
IAP, Bonn -
2
Content
  • Background
  • Why farm type models ?
  • Data sources
  • Integration in the data base
  • Integration in the modeling system
  • Exploitation
  • Unresolved issues

3
Background
  • Positive external evaluation of CAPRI,context
    study on quantitative tools initiated by DG-ENV
  • Project for DG-ENV (01/2001-3/2003)
  • co-ordinated by John Helming, LEI, The Hague
  • partner LEI Bonn Montpellier
  • Aims
  • improved environmental indicators (N-mass flow
    model, water balances, plant protection)
  • farm types
  • scenario analysis

4
Why farm type models
  • Farm specialization matters
  • regarding environmental impacts(stocking
    densities etc.)
  • regarding policy impacts (farm specific ceilings)
  • regarding model behaviorltgt linkages between
    activities, especially fodder crops and
    animals

5
Data Sources
  • Farm Accounting Data Network (FADN)
  • single farm records covering revenues and costs,
    production program and certain yields, premiums
  • but no input allocation
  • not always clear link to administrative NUTS
    regions(instead own FADN regions)
  • differences in activity/product
    breakdowncompared to CAPRI
  • restricted access due to confidentiality issues

6
Integration in the data base
  • In a first step, farms were assigned to NUTS II
    regionsfinding in parallel optimal correction
    factors for yields and activities
  • The five most frequent types by specialization
    were selected, and the remaining farms aggregated
  • 5 to 6 farm types break downconsistently one
    NUTS II region ex post
  • each farm type features an own production
    program,own I/O coefficients and thus own
    costs/revenues

7
Integration FADN in the data base
8
Integration in the modeling system
  • Each farm type is treated like a NUTS III
    region
  • No change in the structure of the supply models
  • Consequently, now about 1050 regional aggregate
    modelson the supply side
  • aggregation to NUTS II/Member State/EUfor
    premium and market modules

9
Exploitation
HTMLtables
CAPRIResultData Base
DAOUT
10
Unresolved Issues
  • Continuous access to FADN data
  • Farm specific constraints ?
  • Farm specific policy ceilingse.g. stocking
    density restrictions
  • tremendous increase in memory allocationand
    solution time of complete modelling system
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com