Vision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 62
About This Presentation
Title:

Vision

Description:

Vision - UCSD Cognitive Science ... Vision – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: Kathlee299
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vision


1
Vision
2
Vision 1 Filling-in, Color, Motion, Form
  • Visual Paths
  • Filling-In
  • Perceptual Completion
  • Conceptual Completion
  • Color
  • Motion
  • Form
  • Agnosia
  • Prosopagnosia

3
(No Transcript)
4
Filling-In
  • Usually, function of a brain area is deduced from
    deficits correlated with damage to that area
  • In the case of filling-in, brain function is
    deduced from intact abilities (perceptions) in
    the absence of sensory input

5
Filling-In Perceptual Completion
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Perceptual Completion in Normals
  • Probably due to excitatory horizontal connections
    in V1

11
Filling-In Resulting From V1 Damage
  • From scotomas (hole in V1)
  • Hemianopias
  • DIGITAL VIDEO Hemianopia

12
Perceptual Filling-In
  • Ramachandran patient
  • Filled in texture/surfaces but not objects
  • Filled in numbers but looked like
    hieroglyphics/couldnt identify
  • Filling in occurs at different speeds for
    different perceptual attributes
  • Couldnt fill in faces

13
Lessons From Filling In Perceptual Completion
  1. Brain uses statistical regularities to fill in.
  2. This act of interpolation saves an enormous
    amount of computation.
  3. Perhaps due to lateral horizontal connections in
    cortical areas higher than V1?

14
Conceptual Completion
  • Additional parietal damage

15
Charles Bonnet Syndrome
16
Patients Know Hallucinations Arent Real Because
  • Others correct them
  • Fade after a few seconds
  • Highly improbably
  • Something odd about the images (too vivid,
    cartoonish, etc.)

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Lessons From Filling-InConceptual Completion
  • Parietal Damage?
  • Back-Projections?

20
(No Transcript)
21
Disorders of Color Processing
22
Central Achromatopsia
  • Deficit in color perception caused by an acquired
    cerebral lesion

23
Tested With
  • Color plate test
  • (e.g., Ishihara Color Plate Test)
  • Color arrangement test
  • (e.g., Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test)
  • Pass color chips across the visual field

24
Central Achromatopsia Disorder of Color
Perception
  •  Nature of the impairment uncertain
  • Reduced hue discrimination
  • Deficient color constancy
  • Co-occurs often with alexia or visual agnosia
  • V4 damage most likely site
  • Lingual gyrus, fusiform gyrus, or white matter
    between the regions

25
V4 Damage
26
Disorder of Color Imagery
  • Seems that defective color perception invariably
    results in defective color imagery
  • Imagining an objects color (e.g., a yellow
    banana) requires an least some of the neural
    representations required to perceive color
  • Patient cannot remember the color of items that
    need to be imagined

27
Color Agnosia Disorder Of Color Recognition
  • Perform fine on color matching tasks
  • Exhibit errors in matching colors to objects
  • May still have semantic knowledge about colors
  • Not yet well-distinguished from color perception
    disorder
  • Behavioral manifestations
  • Site of damage

28
Cerebral AkinetopsiaMotion Blindness
29
Cerebral Akinetopsia Motion Blindness
  • Deficit of motion processing caused by acquired
    cerebral lesions
  • Because motion cues serve many purposes, a range
    of deficits can result
  • E.g., Difficulty using motion to find objects
    (structure for motion or kinetic depth)
  • Pursuit eye movements impaired

30
L.M. Case Description
  • Could see slowly moving targets
  • Faster ones materialized at successive positions
    with no movement in between
  • Did not perceive apparent motion
  • Reduced perception of motion after-effects
  • Saw changes in position not depth for objects
    moved towards her
  • Motion after-effect illusion for demo

31
L.M. Case Description
  • Good static visual acuity perception
  • Perception of tactile and acoustic motion
  • Accurate localization of visual targets by
    saccadic eye movements
  • No visual field defect for form
  • No neglect of visual targets flashed
    simultaneously in both hemi field
  • Relative preservation of face and object
    recognition, reading, and color vision

32
V5 Damage
33
Motion BlindnessNeuroanatomical Locus
  • Damage
  • Parietal-temporo-occipital, near angular gyrus
  • Parieto-occipital
  • As part of a more pervasive disturbance
  • (Balint's syndrome or Alzheimer's disease)
  • L M and others superior temporoparietal
  • Includes the cortical areas of 19 and 37, which
    are adjacent (may resemble monkeys area MT / V5)
  • The homologies between motion processing areas in
    monkey and human may not be as close as they once
    appeared.
  • Severe deficits of motion perception can also
    occur with lesions in parietal insula and midline
    cerebellum

34
WHAT, WHERE, HOW SYSTEMS
35
What, Where, How Systems
36
What
37
Visual Agnosia
38
Visual Object Agnosia
  • Apperceptive
  • Associative

39
Apperceptive Agnosia
  • Intact vision
  • Acuity, brightness discrimination, color vision,
    other elementary visual capabilities
  • Sometimes preserved shape from motion
  • Deficits
  • Abnormal shape perception (pictures, letters,
    simple shapes)
  • Grouping process deficit (that operates over an
    array of local features representing contour,
    color, depth, etc.)

40
Apperceptive Agnosia
  • VIDEO Apperceptive Agnosia, impaired triangle
    recognition, subject 1
  • VIDEO Apperceptive Agnosia, impaired object
    recognition, subject 1
  • VIDEO Object Agnosia 2 Impaired Visual but not
    tactile identification (naming), subject 2
  • VIDEO Object Agnosia 3 Intact visual movement
    identification, subject 2
  • VIDEO Object Agnosia 1 Impaired Visual
    identification (subject given name array of
    objects), cant see objects

41
Associative Agnosia
  • Associative Agnosia
  • Cannot recognize objects by sight alone
  • Intact general knowledge of objects
  • Can recognize objects by touch or definition
  • Visual perception better than in apperceptive
    agnosia
  • Not a naming deficit
  • (cannot indicate recognition by nonverbal means)

42
Theories of Associative Agnosia
  1. Disconnection between visual representations and
    language areas
  2. Disconnection between visual representations and
    memory areas
  3. Stored visual memories have been damaged
  4. A perceptual and memory problem, and the two are
    inseparable

43
Intertwined Perception Memory
  • Some visual problems
  • Copying drawings on line by line
  • On matching tasks, they rely on slow, sequential
    featured-by-feature checking
  • In the PDP system, the memory of the stimulus
    would consist of a pattern of connections
    strengths among a number of neuron like units.
    The " perceptual" representation resulting from
    presentation of the stimulus will depend upon the
    pattern of connection strengths among the units
    directly or indirectly activated by the stimulus.
    Thus, if a memory is altered by damaging the
    network, perception will be altered as well.
    Thus, Associative Agnosia may not be the results
    of an impairment to perception or to memory
    rather, the two are in principle inseparable, and
    the impairment is better described as a loss of
    high level visual perceptual representations that
    were shaped by, and embody the memory of, visual
    experience.

44
ApperceptiveLocalization of Damage
  • Diffuse brain damage, often from carbon monoxide
    poisoning

45
Apperceptive Associative
46
Associative Agnosia
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
Prosopagnosia
51
Prosopagnosia
  • Compensate by relying on nonfacial cues (voice,
    gait, clothing..)
  • With a few exceptions, they can discriminate a
    faces gender, ethnicity, approximate age, and
    emotion conveyed.
  • Patients who do not have problems recognizing
    faces may have difficulty recognizing the
    emotion.

52
Matching Faces Task
53
Test of Famous Faces
54
Skin Conductance Response (SCR)
55
Farah Ch. 7 Are Faces Really Unique?
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
Types Of Agnosia
  • Face
  • Object
  • Printed Word
  • Face, or face and object -- right or bilateral
  • Word, or word and object left
  • Maximum overlap in left inferior medial region
    (including parahippocampal, fusiform, and lingual
    gyri)

61
(No Transcript)
62
Capgras
  • Patients have both left and right hemisphere
    damage
  • Possible Damage Sites
  • Disconnection between IT amygdala (limbic
    system, emotion)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com