Title: PSY 4600
1PSY 4600
- Unit 8
- Credentialing in Behavior Analysis
- Ethics
Schedule Tuesday and Thursday Lecture Tuesday
Exam
Special thanks to Dr. R. Wayne Fuqua for his
contributions to this material
2End of semester schedule
- Thursday, 12/10
- Return of E8
- Special grade sheet
- Can you benefit from taking ME2?
- If so, how many points do you need for the next
highest grade? - ME2 study objectives
- No lecture Good day to do course evaluations
during class time - Thursday, 12/17 Make-up Exam 2, 1230-230
- Units 5-8
- Room 1728
- Be here at 1230
- Remember you cannot start the exam after a
student has left the room with the answers you
will receive a zero
3Unit materials
- Credentialing in behavior analysis
- Dickinson article (2015)
- Ethics
- Martin Pear (2015), Chapter 30, Ethics
- Van Houten et al. (1988), Right to effective
behavioral treatment - Skinner (1978), The ethics of helping people
- Hanley et al. (2005), On the effectiveness of and
preference for punishment and extinction
components of function-based interventions - OPTIONAL Wolf, Risley, Mees (1964),
Application of operant conditioning procedures to
the behavior problems of an autistic child
4Credentialing in BA, intro
- Purpose of Credentialing
- Protect the public from individuals representing
themselves as competent in a field, when they are
not - Two Types of Credentialing in Behavior Analysis
- Certification
- Licensing
- Who is covered by certification and licensing
- Applied behavior analysts who work with at-risk
populations - If you work in human services, you need to be
certified and, if relevant for the state you work
in, licensed - In a few states, all behavior analysts who work
in applied settings with humans are required to
be licensed
(at this point in time, 20 states have license
laws, in a moment, laws do vary from state to
state not EAB regardless of whether your work
involves humans or nonhumans)
5SO1 Two differences Certification vs. Licensing
- Organizations that oversee credentialing
- Certification Behavior Analysis Certification
Board (BACB) - Nonprofit international organization (separate
from ABAI) - Licensing Individual states
- Two differences between certification and
licensing - Certification is voluntary, licensing is legally
required - Requirements for certification are the same from
state to state and globally, requirements for
licensing vary from state to state
6Requirements for certification and licensing are
similar why?
- Certification predated licensing
- National certification began 1998, licensing
began 2009 - BACB anticipated licensing and developed and
posted a model license law on its web site to
assist states - States why re-invent the wheel when a
professional organization had already developed
standards and an exam? - Certified behavior analysts were typically the
ones who advocated for license laws and
spearheaded their adoption, thus brought the
model license law to the attention of the
legislators
(In almost all states, the requirements for
licensing are the same or similar to requirements
for certification some states, identical in a
few you must be certified to be licensed any
event, similar. )
7Four levels of Certification
- Registered Behavior Technician (new 2014)
- Front-line staff who implement behavior plans
- Because it is new, most human service agencies do
not yet require staff to be certified - I anticipate that in the future, they may require
staff to become certified, probably within a
certain time period after hire - Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analyst BCaBA
- Board Certified Behavior Analyst BCBA
- Board Certified Behavior Analyst-Doctoral BCBA-D
(most relevant to you at this point, BCaBA and
BCBA)
8SO2 Four categories of requirements for BCaBA
BCBA
- Educational degree from an accredited university
- Specific number of course hours in behavior
analysis - Specific number of supervised hours by a BCBA
- Passage of the relevant certification exam
(details change rather frequently as BACB
upgrades requirements so no details, visit web
site)
9SO3 Educational Requirements for BCABA and BCBA
- BCaBA
- Bachelors degree from an accredited university
- Does not have to be in behavior analysis or
psychology - BCBA
- Masters degree from an accredited university (a)
in behavior analysis, psychology, or education,
or (b) from a program with an approved BACB
course sequence
(move onto licensing)
10Why license laws?
- To legally protect at risk-individuals seeking
behavior analytic clinical services - To accompany autism insurance laws that have
recently been passed, specifying and regulating
the individuals who could receive insurance
reimbursement - Some behavior analysts believe that we will not
achieve the same status as other professionals
(doctors, licensed clinical psychologists) unless
we are licensed - Some behavior analysts believe license laws
should protect all consumers, not just at-risk
individuals (also protecting the field in
general)
(certification is voluntary licensing rqd
first two are the main ones some states use
certification as standard Employees, athletes,
college students, etc.because of these differing
views, two broad category of laws)
11SO4 Two types of laws
- Restrictive laws
- Only behavior analysts who provide clinical
services to individuals need to be licensed, for
example - Those who work with children diagnosed with
autism - Those who work with individuals with
developmental and intellectual disabilities - Those who work with seniors with dementia
- Broad title and practice laws
- You cannot call yourself a behavior analyst
(title) or practice behavior analysis (practice)
unless you are licensed
(in general, two types of laws, although one
state has a title law first type relates to
the first 2 reasons on the previous slide, the
last type relates to all four reasons last two
most laws include mental health parity for other
relevant professionals who are credentialed in
their specialization see the article)
12States that have each type (according to Dr. D)
- Restrictive laws 15 states
- Alabama, Alaska, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland,
Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, and
Virginia - Michigan has a restrictive law pending (it is in
the legislature) - Broad title and practice laws 5 states
- Arizona, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Missouri,
Wisconsin - Eleven laws were passed last year all were
restrictive - Due to revision of the BACB model license law in
2012, including wording for the potential
exclusion of applied behavior analysts who
provide non-clinical services, and explicitly OBM
practitioners and applied animal trainers - Seems to be the trend (although again I could be
wrong)
(I could very well be wrong it is hard to
interpret the laws talk more about this in the
article)
13Implications for you
- If you are planning on a career in human services
- You need to be certified
- You need to be licensed in states that have
license laws - If you are planning on a career in other applied
behavior analysis areas - You do not need to be certified
- If you work/move to a state that has broad title
and practice law, you need to check with the
licensing board in that state to determine if you
need to be licensed
(Questions?)
14Two Assumptions of systematic applications of
behavioral principles
- Behavior can be controlled
- Science of behavior can be used to help humanity
- Science of behavior can be used to harm humanity
- It is desirable to control behavior to achieve
certain objectives
(Martin Pears chapter on ethics why we need
ethical guidelines and monitoring of the use of
this very powerful science and technology of
behavior)
15SO7 Define ethics from a behavioral perspective
- Certain standards of behavior that a culture
develops to promote the survival of that culture - Example
- Respect for the possessions of others is
reinforced - Stealing is punished
- In prehistoric cultures, stealing may have
resulted in so much in-fighting, members of a
culture became vulnerable to invasions by other
cultures - Members may have killed each other off or
defected to other groups so that the culture did
not survive. - On the other hand, cultures that reinforced
respect for the possessions of others survived.
(Skinner, 1953, 1971, Science Human Behavior
Beyond Freedom and Dignity sometimes
codified Into legal contingencies, sometimes
religious principles, back up a bit and explain)
16NFE Behavior analysis Is it relevant to ethics?
- Many sciences claim no expertise on ethical/moral
issues about use of their science and related
technology - Today genetic engineering
17NFE Behavior analysis - Is it relevant to ethics?
- Ethics are about values (what is reinforcing,
Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity) and behavior - Behavior Analysis has contributed to our
understanding of how we acquire new behavior and
motivate already acquired behavior - No reason why ethics should be excluded
18NFE Development of Ethics and Values
- Ethics and values statements of what is good in
a culture - Beneficence and non-maleficence (not doing harm
or evil) - Integrity
- Fidelity and responsibility
- Justice
- Respect for persons
- Commitment of excellence
- Obviously stimuli associated with these are
acquired reinforcers, not unconditioned
reinforcers - Are these arbitrary cultural inventions?
- Why do so many of these values cut across so many
cultures?
(not arbitrary from a behavioral perspective)
19NFE cultural selection of ethics and values
- Variation and natural selection operate at three
levels - Shaping of operant behavior
- Biological evolution morphological features and
innate behavioral tendencies - Selection of cultural practicessome increase (or
decrease) the survival of that culture and are
transmitted culturally - Ethics and values
20NFE How are Ethics and values acquired?
- Direct instruction (parents, schools), modeling
(media), religious and secular rules and laws
21RELigious codification
- Jewish and Christian, Ten Commandments
- Thou shalt not kill
- Thou shalt not commit adultery
- Thou shalt not steal
- Thou shalt not bear false witness
- Thou shalt not covet neighbors wife, house,
animals, etc. - Buddhism, Five Precepts (basic morality)
- Refrain from taking life
- Refrain from taking that which is not given (not
stealing) - Refrain from sensual (including sexual)
misconduct - Refrain from lying
- Refrain from intoxicants which lead to loss of
mindfulness
(not a coincidence that many of these resemble
each other no matter what the culture,
violation leads to problems in the culture/group
that can decrease its survival cultural
anthropology Marvin Harris)
22SO8 Is all control unethical?
- It is sometimes argued that all control is
unethical. Why, upon a little reflection, doesnt
this argument make sense? - The goal of any helping professional can only be
achieved by exerting control over behavior - Teachers can only teach children to read by
changing their behavior - Drug addiction counselors can only get addicts
clean by changing their behavior - Behavior analysts can only get autistic children
to successfully interact with the world and learn
new skills by changing their behavior - Sports psychologists can only get athletes to
improve their skills by changing their behavior - OBM practitioners can only get mangers to be
better managers by changing their behavior
(go on to make the point that control is
ubiquitous, and when left to chance
sometimes things go horribly wrong look at all
the problems in our society, even with our legal
system)
23SO10 Countercontrol
- From a behavioral perspective, countercontrol is
the most fundamental and effective safeguard to
ensure individuals and groups are treated
ethically. - Countercontrol is the reciprocal of control
influence the controllee has on the controller by
having access to suitable reinforcers (and
punishers) - Citizens vote politicians out of office
- Workers unionize
- A client stops seeing a therapist
24SO10 Countercontrol
- When individuals lack meaningful forms of
countercontrol, the culture/group creates
safeguards (arranges contingencies) to ensure
ethical treatment - Ethical guidelines for behavior analysts working
with at-risk individuals (monitored by the BACB
and profession) - Loss/suspension of certification
- Loss/suspension of license
- Ombudsman and Office of Student Conduct at WMU
- Students can complain to the ombudsman about a
faculty member without retaliation - Students can only be charged with academic
dishonesty after a hearing with an unbiased panel
overseen by the OSC
25NFE When Effective counterconrol doesnt exist
options
Manage by decreasing reinforcement and increase
response effort and risk of detection and
punishment
Increase by providing clear guidelines/rules and
supplemental social contingencies
(on to Van Houten article any questions?)
26SO13 Right to effective treatment and
restrictiveness
- An individual is entitled to effective and
scientifically validated treatment - Selection of treatment should be consistent with
the philosophy of the least restrictive but
effective treatment (both italicized terms are
critical) - It is unacceptable to expose an individual to a
restrictive procedure unless it can be shown that
such a procedure is necessary to produce safe and
clinically significant behavior - It is equally unacceptable to expose an
individual to a nonrestrictive procedure if
assessment results or research indicate that
other procedures would be more effective
(one of the first set of ethical guidelines for
behavior analysts generated by controversy
surrounding the use of punishment one of the
most important things in this article, statement
with respect to what determines the overall
restrictiveness of a procedure)
27Slow-acting nonrestrictive procedures
- Slow-acting nonrestrictive procedures could be
considered highly restrictive if prolonged
treatment - Increases risk
- An autistic childs head banging can lead to very
serious injury - A child with pica can swallow a life-threatening
object/liquid - A child that bites can hurt himself, his
siblings, his parents
For samples of severe self-injurious behaviors,
see youtube.com The videos are very disturbing
and emotionally distressing.
(may not have thought about this, but you must
consider all of the effects of alternatives SR
may Be more restrictive than SP he ethicalnature
of a decision/treatment cannot be judged in
isolation increased physical risk is the one
that people think of most often, but there are
othersnext slide)
28Slow-acting nonrestrictive procedures
- Slow-acting nonrestrictive procedures could be
considered highly restrictive if prolonged
treatment not only increases risks, but - Inhibits or prevents participation in needed
training programs (aggressive behaviors toward
others) - Delays entry into a more optimal social or living
environment (hospitalization vs. a group home or
living at home) - Leads to a adaptation to the treatment and
eventual use of a more restrictive procedure
29SO14 What determines overall restrictiveness?
- Absolute level of restrictiveness
- Antecedents vs. consequences, reinforcement vs.
extinction vs. punishment, restraints, medication - Amount of time required to produce an acceptable
outcome - Consequences associated with interventions that
have delayed effects
(to summarize questions, comments, on to Skinner)
30SO16 Ethics
- Give a man a fish and you feed him for the day.
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a
lifetime. -
- By giving too much help, we postpone the
acquisition of effective behavior and perpetuate
the need for help.
(Not Chinese proverb, if you give a man a fish he
is hungry again in an hour. If you teach him to
catch a fish you do him a good turn. Anne Ritchie
(1885) Skinners basic point and deprive him
of reinforcement, which defines/is responsible
for quality of life)
31So 17 18 Very important
- Three reasons why the behavior of some
individuals is not sufficiently reinforced - Others do things for them
- They have not learned to do things for themselves
- They are given things their behavior would
otherwise be reinforced by - When we refer to people as lacking initiative,
having weak wills, suffering from apathy and
boredom, what are they actually suffering from? - A world in which their behavior is not positively
reinforced
(animated slide)
32Hanley et al. Intro
- I included this article because of what it
indicates about (a) restrictiveness of
interventions and (b) that the selection of
treatments should not be based on personal
conviction about what is good or bad - We should not be using the Golden Rule to select
treatments, but the Platinum Rule - Golden Rule Treat others as we would like to be
treated - Platinum Rule Treat others as they would like to
be treated
(I am quoting Van Houten et al. here again)
33Hanley et al. summary
- Participants Two children
- Jay
- 5 years old, moderate retardation, autism,
seizure disorder - Self-injurious behaviors hitting and slapping
head with hands, hitting head with objects,
biting arms, and eye poking - Aggression hitting, kicking, pushing, pinching,
hair pulling, scratching, and head butting - Disruption throwing objects, breaking objects,
and knocking objects to the floor - Betty
- 8 years old, mild to moderate retardation, ADD,
and oppositional defiant disorder - Aggression hitting, kicking, pinching,
scratching, biting, pulling hair, and throwing
objects at people (behavior targets in the study) - Pica and self-injury (not treated in the current
study due to the fact that these were controlled
by different variables than her aggression)
34Hanley et al. summary
- IV
- Functional communication with extinction
- Functional communication with punishment
- Punishment only for inappropriate behavior
(control) - Functional Communication Training First
- Taught children to emit appropriate responses
that would result in adult attention
(inappropriate behaviors were being reinforced
with that attention) - Jay Handing a yellow card that had the word
play written on it to the therapist - Betty Taught her to say attention, please and
excuse me
35Hanley et al. summary
- IV
- Functional communication with extinction (FCT
only) - FCT Jay if he handed the card to the therapist,
20 seconds of praise/interaction with the
therapist - FCT Betty if she said, attention, please or
excuse me, 20 seconds of praise/interaction
with the therapist - Extinction for inappropriate behavior
- Functional communication with punishment
- FCT same as the above for Jay and Betty
- Punishment for inappropriate behavior Jay 30
seconds hand-down procedure (therapist stood
behind him and held his hands to his sides) - Punishment for inappropriate behavior Betty 30
seconds hand-down procedure plus vision screen
(therapist stood behind Betty, and placed one arm
around Bettys arms while placing the other hand
over Bettys eyes. - Punishment only for inappropriate behavior
(control) - Punishment only, same as above
36Hanley et al. summary
- DV Selection of treatment by Jay and Betty
- Pressed one of three different-colored switches,
each of which was paired with one of the
treatment conditions - After they pressed the switch, they were
- Immediately praised by the E regardless of which
switch they pressed - Were exposed to the corresponding treatment for 2
minutes
37Hanley et al. summarySO 31 33
- Results
- Both children strongly preferred functional
communication with punishment, rather than
functional communication with extinction - Possible reason
- Functional communication with punishment was more
effective in decreasing their inappropriate
behaviors - Because of that, a higher percentage of their
responses were reinforced - They preferred the condition in which they
received the highest rate of reinforcement
38Hanley et al. summarySO 31 33
- Back to Skinner and Van Houten et al.
- Skinner
- What they are suffering from is a world in which
their behavior is not positively reinforced - The good life is not a world in which they have
what they need it is one in which the things
they need figure as reinforcers in effective
contingencies - Van Houten et al.
- A procedures overall level of restrictiveness is
a combined function of its absolute level of
restrictiveness, the amount of time required to
produce a clinically acceptable outcome, and the
consequences associated with delayed outcomes - Selection of a specific treatment is not based on
personal conviction. Techniques are not
considered either good or bad according to
whether they involve the use of antecedent rather
than consequent stimuli or reinforcement versus
punishment.
(Onto Dicky)
39DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- One of the most famous articles in behavior
analysis - First written account of behavior analysts
working with an autistic child, 1964 - First use of time out
(Before I talk about this, I want to just briefly
review some earlier material so that will be
fresh)
40SO 21 Skinner, Behavior analysis vs. traditional
views of helping others, the conflict
- Why was it inevitable that there would be a
conflict between behavior modification and the
traditional views of helping others, particularly
those in institutional care? - In order to help individuals with complex
behavioral problems and provide a reinforcing
environment, we need to implement effective
contingencies of reinforcement. - The arrangement of effective contingencies of
reinforcement involves depriving individuals to
some extent of powerful reinforcers things that
have been traditionally viewed as guaranteed
rights and withholding them until the
habilitative behavior occurs.
41Van Houten et al.
One of the individuals rights stated in that
article
An individual has the right to the most effective
treatment procedures available.
Their conclusion re restrictiveness of a procedure
In some cases, a clients right to effective
treatment may dictate the immediate use of
quicker acting, but temporarily more restrictive
procedures.
(How do we decide? How restrictive?, asked you in
abstract, is it OK to deprive Dicky I am going
to spend quite a bit of time on this because I do
believe it is important, even though I dont have
any sos over it a lot of benefit of the class
thinking about and considering this issue I am
not going to ask/require you to take a
particular viewpoint, but I do want you to think
about this)
42DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- Dicky was 3.5 years old
- Progressed normally until he was 9 months
- Cataracts were discovered in both eyes
- Severe temper tantrums and sleeping problems
developed - When two years old, he had a series of eye
operations which made wearing glasses necessary
if he didnt wear them it would result in
permanent loss of macular vision (central as
opposed to peripheral vision) - He was seen by a variety of specialists who
diagnosed him as - Mentally retarded, diffuse and locally
brain-damaged, psychotic (among other things) - It was recommended that he be placed in an
institution for the retarded because his
prognosis was so poor
43DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- Behavioral problems
- Did not eat normally, lacked social and verbal
repertoires, and engaged in self-injurious
behaviors such as head-banging, face-slapping,
hair-pulling, and face-scratching - Would not sleep at night, forcing one or both
parents to remain by his bed - His mom said that after a severe tantrum
- he was a mess, all black and blue and bleeding.
- Sedatives, tranquilizers, and restraints were
tried, without success
44DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- At three, he was admitted to a childrens
hospital with the diagnosis of schizophrenia
(subsequently released) - Wolf, Risley, Mees brought into consult
- They did readmit him to the hospital temporarily
until they could change his disruptive behaviors - They dealt with
- His temper tantrums (using time out), bedtime
problems, wearing his glasses, throwing his
glasses (which he began to do after he started
wearing them), verbal behavior, and eating
problems
(so thats where we start how many would like
this case? I am going to focus on his glasses
getting back to the ethical consideration raised
by Skinner the necessity to deprive individuals
of powerful reinforcers and conflicts with
traditional views of helping and the rights of
individuals.)
45DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- At three, he was admitted to a childrens
hospital with the diagnosis of schizophrenia - Wolf, Risley, Mees brought into consult
- They did readmit him to the hospital temporarily
until they could change his disruptive behaviors - They dealt with
- His temper tantrums (using time out), bedtime
problems, wearing his glasses, throwing his
glasses (which he began to do after he started
wearing them), verbal behavior, and eating
problems
(so thats where we start how many would like
this case? I am going to focus on his glasses
getting back to the ethical consideration raised
by Skinner the necessity to deprive individuals
of powerful reinforcers and conflicts with
traditional views of helping and the rights of
individuals.)
46DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- They conducted a session at breakfast, using food
as the reinforcer that didnt work - They conducted a session at lunch, using food as
the reinforcer that didnt work - They conducted a session at 200 that afternoon
Dicky had received very little to eat all day,
just a few pieces of dry cereal, and was most
interested in the ice cream we brought to the
session. At the beginning of the session it was
quite obvious that our reinforcers were much
powerful than earlier in the day.After this,
progress was rapid and he was soon wearing his
glasses continuously during the meal sessions in
his room.
Started with fruit candy modified the glasses
a number of times more wearable, less easy to
take off (they were not having much success
getting him to wear the glasses 5 weeks shaping
so the authors decided to get directly
involved. Quote from the article.., remember
permanent loss of vision one more slide on this)
47DickyWolf, Risley Mees
After wearing the glasses was established in
these sessions, it could be maintained with
other, less manipulable reinforcers. For
example, the attendant would tell Dicky, Put
your glasses on and lets go for a walk. Dicky
was usually required to wear the glasses (during
meals, snacks, automobile rides, walks, outdoor
play, etc.). If he removed the glasses, the
activity was terminated.
Fast forward a bit Dicky was released from the
hospital and according to his mom, six months
later Dicky had continued to wear his his
glasses, did not have any tantrums, had no
sleeping problems, was becoming increasingly
verbal, and was a new source of joy to the
members of his family.
(one more slide)
48DickyWolf, Risley Mees
- So, essentially, the authors
- Food deprived a 3.5 year-old autistic child for,
give or take, 7-8 hours (not counting overnight)
so food would function as an effective reinforcer
and - Punished him for removing his glasses by taking
away food and activities he enjoyed
Question
Were these procedures and interventions ethical
or were Dickys rights violated?
49Questions/Comments/discussion
- Exam Tuesday, 12/08
- Instructional assistance hours 12/07, 630-800
pm - Jessica will be there