Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton Source - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton Source

Description:

Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton Source Paul Derwent Beams Division/Pbar/CDF* – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: BDM66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton Source


1
Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton
Source
  • Paul Derwent
  • Beams Division/Pbar/CDFSaturday, March 04, 2017

2
Stochastic Cooling
From Websters Collegiate Dictionary
  • Main Entry stochastic
  • Pronunciation st-'kas-tik, stO-
  • Function adjective
  • Etymology Greek stochastikos
    skillful in aiming, from
  • stochazesthai to aim at, guess at,
    from stochos target,
  • aim, guess -- more at STING
  • Date 1923
  • 1 RANDOM specifically
    involving a random variable
  • lta stochastic processgt
  • 2 involving chance or
    probability PROBABILISTIC lta
  • stochastic model of
    radiation-induced mutationgt
  • - stochastically /-ti-k(-)lE/
    adverb

Main Entry 2cool Date before
12th century intransitive senses
1 to become cool lose heat or
warmth ltplaced the pie in the
window to coolgt -- sometimes used with off or
down 2 to lose ardor
or passion lthis anger cooledgt
transitive senses 1 to make cool
impart a feeling of coolness to
ltcooled the room with a fangt -- often used with
off or down lta swim cooled us off
a littlegt 2 a to moderate the
heat, excitement, or force of
CALM ltcooled her growing angergt b to slow or
lessen the growth or activity of
-- usually used with off or down
ltwants to cool off the economy without freezing
it -- Newsweekgt -
cool it to calm down go easy ltthe word went
out to the young to cool it -- W.
M. Younggt - cool one's heels to
wait or be kept waiting for a long
time especially from or as if from disdain or
discourtesy
3
Why an Antiproton source?
  • p pbar physics with one ring
  • Dense, intense beams for high luminosity

4
Luminosity HistoryCollider Run I
Its all in the pbars!
5
Making Anti-protons
  • 120 GeV protons off metal target
  • Collect some fraction of anti-protons which are
    created
  • Within collection lens aperture
  • Momentum 8 GeV (2)

6
Why an Anti-proton source?
  • Collect 2 x 10-5 pbars/proton on target
  • 5e12 protons on target
  • 1e8 pbars per cycle
  • 0.67 Hz
  • Large Energy Spread Emittance
  • Run II Goals
  • 36 bunches of 3 x 1010 pbars
  • Small energy spread
  • Small transverse dimensions

11,000 cycles Store and cool in the process!
7
Pbar Longitudinal Distribution
8
Overview Information
  • Frequency Spectrum
  • Time Domain ???(tnT0) at pickup
  • Frequency Domainharmonics of revolution
    frequency f0 1/T0
  • AccumulatorT01.6 ?sec (1e10 pbar 1 mA)f0
    (core) 628890 Hz
  • 127th Harmonic 79 MHz

9
Idea Behind Stochastic Cooling
  • Phase Space Compression
  • Dynamic Aperture Area where particles can orbit
  • Liouvilles Theorem
  • Local Phase Space Density for conservative
    system is conserved
  • J. Liouville, Sur la Théorie de la Variation
    des Constantes arbitraires, Journal de
    Mathematiques Pures et Appliquées, p. 342, 3
    (1838)
  • WANT TO INCREASE PHASE SPACE DENSITY!

10
Idea Behind Stochastic Cooling
  • Principle of Stochastic cooling
  • Applied to horizontal btron oscillation
  • A little more difficult in practice.
  • Used in Debuncher and Accumulator to cool
    horizontal, vertical, and momentum distributions
  • COOLING? Temperature ltKinetic Energygtminimize
    transverse KE minimize DE longitudinally

11
Why more difficult in practice?
  • Standard Debuncher Operation
  • 108 particles, uniformly distributed
  • Central revolution frequency 590035 Hz
  • Resolve 10-14 seconds to see individual
    particles!
  • 100 THz antennas l 3 µm!
  • pickups, kickers, electronics in this frequency
    range ?
  • Sample Ns particles -gt Stochastic process
  • Ns N/2TW where T is revolution time and W
    bandwidth
  • Measure ltxgt deviations for Ns particles
  • Higher bandwidth the better the cooling

12
Simple Betatron Cooling
  • With correction gltxgt, where g is related to
    gain of system
  • New position x - gltxgt
  • Emittance Reduction RMS of kth particle

13
Stochastic Nature?
  • Result depends upon independence of the measured
    centroid ltxgt in each sample
  • In case where have no frequency spread in beam,
    cannot cool with this technique!
  • Some number of turns M to completely generate
    independent sample
  • But
  • Where is randomization occurring?
  • WANT kicker to pickup GOOD MIXING
  • ALSO HAVE pickup to kicker BAD MIXING

14
Cooling Time
  • Electronic Noise
  • Random correction applied to each sample
  • More likely to heat than cool
  • Noise/Signal Ratio U
  • High Bandwidth
  • Low Noise
  • Optimum Gain (in correction g) goes down as N
    goes up!

15
Momentum Cooling
  • Time evolution of the particle density function,
    Y(E) ?N/?E
  • Fokker-Planck Equation -- c. 1914 first used to
    describe Brownian motion
  • Two Pieces
  • Coherent self force through pickup, amplifier,
    kicker
  • Directed motion of the particle
  • Random kicks from other particles and electronic
    noise
  • Diffusive flux from high density to low density

16
Simple Example
Simulation!
  • Linear Restoring Force with Constant Diffusive
    Term (Electronic noise)
  • Gaussian Distribution
  • Inject at Egt E0
  • Coherent force dominates --- collected into
    core!

17
Types of Momentum Cooling
  • Filter Cooling
  • Use Momentum - Frequency map
  • Notch Filters for Gain Shaping
  • Debuncher
  • Recycler
  • Stack tail (as correction)

18
Types of Momentum Cooling
  • Palmer Cooling
  • Use Momentum - Position Map in regions of
    Dispersion
  • Pickup Response vs Position to do Gain Shaping
  • Accumulator Core Signal(A) - Signal(B)
  • Accumulator Stacktail (described in coming
    slides)

19
Momentum Stacking
  • Van der Meers solution desire constant flux
    past energy point
  • static solution !

20
Van der Meers Solution
To build constant flux, build voltage profile
which is exponential in shape and results in
density distribution which is exponential in
shape!
21
  • Exponential Density Distribution generated by
    Exponential Gain Distribution
  • Max Flux (W2hEd)/(f0p ln(2))

22
Implementation in Accumulator
  • How do we build an exponential gain distribution?
  • Beam Pickups
  • Charged Particles E B fields generate image
    currents in beam pipe
  • Pickup disrupts image currents, inducing a
    voltage signal
  • Octave Bandwidth (1-2, 2-4,4-8 GHz)
  • Output is combined using binary combiner boards
    to make a phased antenna array

23
Beam Pickups
  • At ACurrent induced by voltage across
    junction splits in two, 1/2 goes out, 1/2 travels
    with image current

24
Beam Pickups
  • At BCurrent splits in two paths, now with
    OPPOSITE sign
  • Into load resistor 0 current
  • Two current pulses out signal line

25
Current Intercepted by Pickup
Use Method of Images
  • In areas of momentum dispersion D
  • Placement of pickups to give proper gain
    distribution

26
Accumulator Pickups
  • Placement
  • number of pickups
  • amplification
  • used to build gain shape
  • Also use Notch filters to zero signal at core

27
Accumulator Stacktail
  • Not quite as simple
  • -Real part of gain cools beam
  • frequency depends on momentumDf/f -hDp/p
    (higher f at lower p)
  • Position depends on momentumDx DDp/p
  • Particles at different positions have different
    flight times
  • Cooling system delay constant
  • OUT OF PHASE WITH COOLING SYSTEM AS MOMENTUM
    CHANGES

28
Accumulator Stacktail
Use two sets of pickups at different Energies to
create exponential Distribution with desired
phase Characteristics
Stacktail Design Goal For Run II Ed 7
MeV Flux 35 mA/hour Show simulation!
29
Performance Measurements
  • Fit to exponential in region of stacktail
    (845-875 in these units)
  • Calculate Maximum Flux for fitted gain shape
  • Different beam currents
  • Independent of Stack Size
  • Max Flux 30 mA/hour

30
Performance Measurements
  • Engineering Run Iia Best Achieved
  • Run Goal
  • Protons on Target 3.8e12 5e12 5e12
  • Cycle Time (sec) 3.2 1.5 2.2
  • Production Efficiency 10 20 15
  • (pbars/106protons)
  • Stacking Rate 4 18 10.3
  • (1e10 per hour)
  • Stacking rate limited by input flux and cycle
    time
  • Which we limit because of core-stacktail coupling
    problems

31
Performance Measurements
  • Best Performance
  • 39.9 mA in 4 hours
  • Restricted by core-stacktail couplings

32
Stacktail - Core Coupling
  • Coupling in regions where frequency bands overlap
  • 2-4 GHz ! much larger than previous overlap
  • Two phenomena
  • Coherent beam feedback
  • Stacktail kicks beam and coherent motion is seen
    at core
  • Misalignment gives transverse - longitudinal
    coupling
  • Try to correct with D kickers

Beam
Since beam does not decohere, Carry information
back to pickup Feedback!
Stacktail
Pickup
Kicker
Schottky
Core
33
Stacktail Schottky Signals
Core
Stacktail Leg1
Freshly injected beam
Later in cycle
34
Core 2-4 Schottky Signals
Core
Stacktail Leg1
Freshly injected beam
Later in cycle
35
Pbar Longitudinal Distribution
36
Antiprotons the Collider
  • From the H- source, Linac, booster, Main
    Injector
  • 120 GeV protons on the target
  • From the target
  • 8 GeV antiprotons through the Debuncher
    Accumulator
  • Send them off to the Tevatron D0 CDF
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com