COMPARISON OF RITTER-GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL MODEL RTX - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

COMPARISON OF RITTER-GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL MODEL RTX

Description:

7th COSMO General Meeting 20-23 september 2005, Zurich (CH) COMPARISON OF RITTER-GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL MODEL RTX PRELIMINARY RESULTS Alessio Bozzo ADGB Phys ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: xxx4232
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMPARISON OF RITTER-GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL MODEL RTX


1
COMPARISON OF RITTER-GELEYN RADIATON CODE TO LBL
MODEL RTX
7th COSMO General Meeting 20-23 september 2005,
Zurich (CH)
  • PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Alessio Bozzo ADGB Phys. dep. Univ. of Bologna
ARPA-SIM
2
MOTIVATIONS
  • test the fast d-two stream radiation code GRAALS
    with the LbL-multiple scattering model RTX
  • particolar attention is paid to the comparison
    between the treatement of gases, clouds and
    aerosols optical properties

3
MODELS OVERVIEW RTX
  • Benchmark model RTX
  • LbL radiation code.
  • Spectroscopic database based on HITRAN2000 from
    FIR to 0.4 mm
  • cirrus cloud single scattering optical properties
    for spherical, hexagonal and aggregate crystals
  • exact multiple scattering computation of cloud
    and Rayleigh layers via adding-and-doubling
    method

4
MODELS OVERVIEWGRAALS
  • GRAALS (General Radiative Algorithm Adapted to
    Linear-type Solutions, Ritter/Geleyn 1991)
  • fast d-two stream radiation code with treatement
    of partial cloudiness
  • optical properties of clouds and gases
    parameterized over 8 wide spectral intervals from
    VIS (0.2mm) to FIR (104.5mm) based on AFGL 84
    database

5
COMPARISON SETTINGS
  • Surface type Lambertian
  • Gaseous absorption CO2, H2O, O3, N2O, O2, CO,
    CH4 for both models. RTX consider also trace
    gases as CFCs (F11, F12, CCl4), NO, NO2, SO2, N2.
  • Monocromatic RTX fluxes grouped in GRAALS bands.
    Spectroscopic database of RTX extend from FIR to
    0.4mm. In solar region the comparison covers only
    2 of the 3 GRAALS solar bands (i.e. the VIS range
    0.2-0.7mm is not taken into account for now)

6
SCENARIO-1 CLEAR
  • standard tropical profile
  • solar zenith angles 0, 45, 60

H2O mixing ratio (g/kg)
O3 mixing ratio (g/kg)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Solar spectrum in GRAALS is all distributed from
0.2 to 4.5mm
O3
H2O
CO2
CO2,H2O
9
Sun zenith angle60
10
TOA and SURFACE NET Fluxes RTX-GRAALS ()
11
Contribute due to O3 band (9-10mm)
Contribute due to FIR H2O band (20-104mm)
Contribute due to CO2 band (12-20mm)
12
VIS and UV O3 band work in progress...
13
SCENARIO-2 CLOUDY
  • standard tropical profile with different cloud
    types at various heights (overcast homogeneus
    layers)
  • solar zenith angle 0, 45, 60
  • low-level thick water cloud
  • 850-715hPa (1500m thick) LWC0.5 g/m3, re9.3mm
  • medium-level water cloud
  • 672-633 hPa (500m thick) LWC0.129 g/m3,
    re5.2mm
  • high-level cloud
  • 266-247 hPa (500m thick) LWC0.013 g/m3, re4.1mm

14
Sun zenith angle60
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
FURTHER WORK
  • Improve the parameterization of ice clouds with
    the most advanced particle shapes (aggregate,
    columns, hex. plates) (collaboration with UK Met
    Office)
  • Re-compute the gaseous optical properties using
    the last HITRAN2004 spectroscopic database (work
    in progress by F.Geleyn)
  • Compare the treatement of aerosol in GRAALS with
    the latest OPAC database in RTX (Hess, Koepke,
    and Schult, 1998)

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com