DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES

Description:

DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES IN CENTRAL SIBERIA D.J. McRae1, S.G. Conard2, G.A. Ivanova3, S.P. Baker4, A.I. Sukhinin3 , W.M. Hao4 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Dougl346
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES


1
DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER
VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES IN CENTRAL SIBERIA D.J.
McRae1, S.G. Conard2, G.A. Ivanova3, S.P. Baker4,
A.I. Sukhinin3 , W.M. Hao4, and T.W. Blake1
AGU Fall Meeting 11 December 2007 Paper Number
GC23A-0999
RUSSIAN FIRE BEAR (Fire Effects in the Boreal
Eurasia Region) PROJECT A major goal of this
project is to provide fire data and models
required to estimate carbon emissions from
wildfires in central Siberia. Research is being
carried out in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and
larch (Larix sp.) forest types, which together
make up 58 of the forest area in the Asian
portion of Russia. The overall objective of this
research is to develop validated estimates of
fire areas, fire severity, emissions, and the
impact of fire on carbon balance for key forest
types of central Siberia. This project is
building on our past research efforts in Scots
pine forests (2000-2004), while initiating
similar research in larch forests by
  • FACTS
  • The Russian boreal forest contains up to 20 of
    the global terrestrial carbon storage.
  • Wildfires affect from 10-15 million ha annually
    in typical burning years.
  • Fires are projected to increase in both frequency
    and severity across Siberia under climate change.
  • Fire behavior and impacts are highly variable
    across this landscape. Information on fire
    severity and its effects on factors such as
    emissions, carbon storage, and ecosystem recovery
    are scarce.
  • Carbon emissions are roughly 45-50 of the fuel
    consumed during a fire, which can be modeled from
    fire data.
  • Quantifying and modeling effects of different
    severity fires on Scots pine sites to estimate
    effects of fire severity on carbon cycle, direct
    fire emissions, and forest dynamics.
  • Developing models relating fire behavior, fire
    weather, and fuel condition at the time of
    burning to carbon emissions, energy release, and
    other ecosystem impacts.
  • Evaluating the potential for estimating emissions
    directly from satellite infrared channels through
    relationships between the fires energy release
    and its emissions.

Results to date are
  • 20 experimental fires have been conducted in
    central Siberia.
  • Fire behavior (e.g., fire spread) models have
    been created.
  • Carbon emission (i.e., from fuel consumption
    data) models have been created.
  • Emissions sampling has quantified the composition
    of carbon and aerosols in the smoke.


Low-intensity surface fire burning in a Siberian
Scots pine forest. Eighty percent of fires in a
typical year burn as surface fires, which in many
cases will not cause any damage to the mature
trees.
APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING EMISSIONS
  • PROBLEMS
  • Changes in boreal fire regimes can be expected to
    lead to large changes in patterns of burn
    severity, with attendant effects on emissions per
    unit burned area and on postfire vegetation
    recovery. Developing accurate regional to
    continental estimates of carbon emissions from
    wildfires in Siberia requires the collection of
    data and creation of models that will enable us
    to accurately quantify not only the areas that
    are burned annually, but the emissions per unit
    of burned area for fires of widely varying
    characteristics.
  • Estimates of fire emissions must account for the
    heterogeneous nature of fire behavior. This is
    due to the constant changes in daily burning
    conditions (e.g., drought), topography, and
    wildland fuel types.
  • While remote sensing has been proven in
    estimating burn area, the direct estimate of
    carbon emissions from satellite images may not be
    possible as fuel consumption cannot be
    determined.

Carbon emissions 2.233 (0.554FWI) R2 0.82
15 June 2003
2. Creation of carbon emission models from
experimental fire results which documented fuel
consumption (50 carbon content).
1. Determination of burned area through
remote-sensing analysis. Red polygons indicate
areas that have burned between June 6-16, 2003.
Gray polygons indicate areas that have already
burned in the current fire season.
The ranges of emission factors (EF) for the major
carbon emission products for these fires were
correlated with the FWI for each fire. Higher EF
values for CO2 and modified combustion efficiency
(MCE) occurred with increasing FWI values. At the
same time, EF values for CO and CH4 were observed
to decrease.
Arrows show areas of saturation that
differentiate between crown fires and surface
fires. While satellite images can determine
specific fire types, they cannot determine actual
fuel consumption which is imperative in
estimating carbon emissions.
Satellite images provide an excellent means of
obtaining burned area estimates. Polygon outlines
represent burn areas with red shading showing
locations where active fires are burning.
  • TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
  • Remote-sensing, by itself, cannot be used to
    determine emissions.
  • Carbon emission models have been created for
    Russian Scots pine forest types.
  • A Russian fire danger database (1953-2007) has
    been created allowing us to use our model for
    estimating emissions for any year, provided we
    have fire size and location information.

QUESTION How can accurate estimates of carbon
emissions from biomass burning be made to better
understand the contribution of Russian fires to
greenhouse gases?
For more information contact 1 Canadian Forest
Service, 1219 Queen St. E., Sault Ste. Marie, ON.
P6A 2E5 Contact Douglas J. McRae, Telephone
705-541-5539 dmcrae_at_nrcan.gc.ca Tom W.
Blake, Telephone 705-541-5540
tblake_at_nrcan.gc.ca 2 USDA Forest Service, RPC-4,
1601 N. Kent St., Arlington, VA. 22209 Contact
Susan G. Conard, Telephone 703-605-5255
sconard_at_fs.fed.us 3 V.N. Sukachev Institute of
Forest Research, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk
660036 Russia. Contact Galina A. Ivanova,
Telephone 7-3912-49-4462 green_at_akadem.ru
Anatoly I. Sukhinin, Telephone
7-3912-49-4462 boss_at_ksc.krasn.ru 4 USDA Forest
Service, Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 US
Highway 10 West, Missoula, MT. 59808 Contact
Wei Min Hao, Telephone 406-329-4838
whao_at_fs.fed.us Steve P. Baker, Telephone
406-329-4860 sbaker03_at_fs.fed.us
3. Determination of the Canadian Fire Weather
Index (FWI) at target sites in central Siberia
coinciding with fires shown in Figure 1. Note how
the location of fire hot spots, depicted in
yellow from Figure 1, correlate well with the
high FWI values found in this region. Estimated
ranges in carbon emissions for fires burning at
the different FWI in the figure are based on data
from Figure 2.
NASAs Land Cover Land Use Change Program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com