Title: COMPASS All-Hands Meeting,
1Accelerator Prototyping Through Multi-physics
Analysis
- Volkan Akcelik, Lie-Quan Lee, Ernesto Prudencio,
- Cho Ng, Zenghai Li, Kwok Ko
- Advanced Computations Department
- Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Work supported by DOE ASCR, BES HEP Divisions
under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515
2Multi-physics Analysis for Accelerator Components
- Virtual prototyping through computing
- Thermal and mechanical analysis as important as
EM analysis - EM heating, Thermal radiation, Lorentz force
detuning, Mechanical stress - Augmented by additional physics
- particle effects including emittance and
multipacting - Nonlinear and transit effects in superconducting
cavity design - Accurate and reliable multi-physics simulation
requires large-scale parallel computing TEM3P
3TEM3P Multi-Physics Analysis
- Finite element based with higher-order basis
functions - Natural choice FEM originated from structural
analysis! - Use the same software infrastructure as Omega3P
- Reuse solvers framework
- Mesh data structures and format
- Parallel
CAD Model
EM Analysis
Thermal Analysis
Mechanical Analysis
4TEM3P for LCLS RF Gun
CAD Model (courtesy of Eric Jongewaard)
Benchmark TEM3P against ANSYS
Thermal/Mechanical Domain
EM Domain
5RF Gun EM analysis
1st mode 2.8411 GHz
- The second mode is operating mode
- Its magnetic field on the cavity inner surface
generates heating!
2nd mode 2.8561 GHz
6Mesh for Thermal/Mechanical analysis
Mesh 0.6 million nodes. Materials Copper
Stainless steel Thermal analysis 7 cooling
channels
EM Heating
7Parameters for Thermal Analysis
- TEM3P cooling channels modelled as Robin BC
- 7 cooling channels
- specific temperatures and film coefficients
- Thermal load from EM power loss (4000 Watt)
- EM Heating BC
- Thermal conductivity for copper 391
- Thermal conductivity for stainless steel 16.2
- Other surfaces modelled as homogeneous Neumann BC
8Thermal Analysis loaded with EM Heating
Temperature Distribution
TEM3P
ANSYS
Maximal Temperature 49.82 C
Maximal Temperature 49.96 C
9Mechanical Analysis with Thermal Load
ANSYS
TEM3P
Maximal displacement 37.10 ?m
Maximal displacement 36.99 ?m
- Future work compute stress and shifted frequency
due to geometry change
10Multi-physics Analysis for SRF Cavities and
Cryomodules
- Thermal behaviors near superconducting region are
highly nonlinear - SRF Cavity wall is very thin
- Anisotropic high-order mesh will reduce
significant amount of computing - Working with RPI/ITAPS