Diagnostic%20testing%20that%20just%20might%20make%20a%20difference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnostic%20testing%20that%20just%20might%20make%20a%20difference

Description:

Title: Presentation Title Author: ecwylie Last modified by: Dylan Wiliam Created Date: 1/12/2006 3:48:28 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: ecw69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnostic%20testing%20that%20just%20might%20make%20a%20difference


1
Diagnostic testing that just might make a
difference
  • Dylan Wiliam
  • Institute of Education, University of London

www.dylanwiliam.net
2
Diagnostic Items in Mathematics and Science
Project rationale
  • Traditional testing deals with individuals, but
    teachers mostly deal with groups
  • Data-Push vs. Decision-Pull
  • Data-push
  • Quality control at end of an instructional
    sequence
  • Monitoring assessment
  • Identifies that remediation is required, but not
    what
  • Requires new routines to utilize the information
  • Decision-Pull
  • Starts with the decisions teacher make daily
  • Supports teachers on-the-fly decisions
  • If a 30-item test provides useful information on
    an individual, then responses from 30 individuals
    on a single item might provide useful information
    on a class

3
Premises of the DIMS project
  • Single, well-developed, questions provide a
    reasonably strong basis for real-time
    instructional decision-making
  • Questions with principled and interpretable
    incorrect answers can be used to elicit evidence
    of student thinking
  • Such questions, when used with all-student
    response systems, and when followed with
    discussion, can advance student learning
  • Such questions can deepen teacher knowledge (both
    content and content-pedagogical)

4
The DIMS project in practice
  • Focuses on 4th 8th grade, mathematics science
  • Includes a bank of approximately 150 diagnostic
    questions per subject/grade level
  • Question bank is a complementary resource for any
    curriculum, not a curriculum replacement
  • Items to be used one at a time, within the flow
    of day-to-day lessons
  • Focuses on collecting evidence about student
    learning in order to adapt instruction to meet
    the learning needs of students in real time

5
Item development
  • Review of state standards
  • Review of relevant literature on student
    conceptions
  • Identification of significant (mis-)conceptions
  • Item construction
  • appears to be very difficult for many
    item-writers
  • a distractor-stem-key approach worked for some
  • Item review and editing
  • Expert review
  • Piloting
  • Final review and editing

6
DIMS meets traditional psychometrics
  • Concept-based distractors increase difficulty
  • Most IRT models assume
  • Monotonicity
  • Equivalence of incorrect responses
  • Need for analysis of single items makes most
    theories difficult to apply, or irrelevant

7
Semi-dense items(Bart, Post, Lesh Behr, 1994)
  • Five properties
  • Response interpretability
  • Response discrimination
  • Rule discrimination
  • Exhaustive set usage
  • Semi-density

8
Response interpretability
Each response interpretable by at least one
cognitive rule
9
Response discrimination
Each response interpretable by exactly one
cognitive rule
10
Rule discrimination I
Response discrimination uniqueness of cognitive
rules that interpret a response
11
Exhaustive rule set usage
Response discrimination every cognitive rule
interprets at least one response to the item.
12
Semi-density
Exactly one cognitive rule interprets each
response to the item and each cognitive rule
interprets exactly one response
13
Discriminating incorrect cognitive rules (Hart,
1981)
  • Version 1
  • If ef  8, then efg  
  • 9
  • 12
  • 15
  • 8g
  • Version 2
  • If fg  8, then fgh  
  • 9
  • 12
  • 15
  • 16
  • 8h

14
Discriminating correct cognitive rules (Bart et
al., 1994)
Ann and Kathy each bought the same kind of bubble
gum at the same store. Ann bought two pieces of
gum for six cents. If Kathy bought eight pieces
of gum, how much did she pay?
  • Version 1
  • 12
  • 24
  • Version 2
  • 24 cents, because 8324 or 8 pieces 3 cents
    per piece24 cents.
  • 24 cents, because 4624.
  • 24 cents, because 2/68/x and 2x48 for which
    x24.
  • 24 cents, because 2/68/x and 2/6x4/48/24.
  • 24 cents, because 2/64/126/188/24.
  • 24 cents, became 2/64/128/24.
  • 12 cents, because 246 implies that 8412

15
Discriminating between incorrect and correct
cognitive rules
  • Version 1
  • There are two flights per day from Newtown to
    Oldtown. The first flight leaves Newtown each day
    at 920 and arrives in Oldtown at 1055. The
    second flight from Newtown leaves at 215. At
    what time does the second flight arrive in
    Oldtown? Show your work.
  • Version 2
  • There are two flights per day from Newtown to
    Oldtown. The first flight leaves Newtown each day
    at 905 and arrives in Oldtown at 1055. The
    second flight from Newtown leaves at 215. At
    what time does the second flight arrive in
    Oldtown? Show your work.

16
Discriminating between incorrect and correct
cognitive rules (2)
17
Conclusion
Correct
Incorrect
18
Conclusion (2)
  • For an item to support instructional
    decision-making, the key requirement is that in
    no case do incorrect and correct cognitive rules
    map on to the same response.
  • If this property is met, then the semi-density
    properties are less important.
  • If this property is not met, then the
    semi-density properties are irrelevant.
  • The discovery of new incorrect cognitive rules
    that interpret item keys leads to item improvement

19
Conclusion (3)
  • Data on impact on student achievement not yet
    available
  • Evidence of impact on
  • Teachers practice
  • Student engagement
  • Student affect

20
Questions?Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com