- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

In My Humble Opinion : Assessing L2 Writing in the First Year Writing Classroom Amanda Athon Bowling Green State University aathon_at_bgsu.edu CCCC Position ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Amanda409
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
In My Humble OpinionAssessing L2 Writing in
the First Year Writing Classroom
  • Amanda Athon
  • Bowling Green State University
  • aathon_at_bgsu.edu

2
CCCC Position Statement
  • In 1972, the Conference on College Composition
    and Communication passed the resolution
    Students Rights to Their Own Language
  • We affirm the students' right to their own
    patterns and varieties of language -- the
    dialects of their nurture or whatever dialects
    in which they find their own identity and
    style. (SRTOL).

3
What is Basic Writing and Who are Basic Writers?
  • Courses typically offer no credit (Trimmer)
  • May emphasize grammar (Trimmer Rose)
  • Students struggle with issues of
    conceptualization (Adler-Kassner)
  • More distance between their dialects and
    traditional academic dialects(Bizzell)

4
Research Participants
  • Two sections of First-Year Writing 1100 at
    Midwestern University
  • One section enrolls international nonnative
    speakers of English both sections enrolled
    nonnative speakers
  • Higher percentage of nonstandard dialects in
    basic writing courses (Bizzell)
  • Instructor Participant Kay self-identifies as
    nonnative speaker of English
  • Instructor Participant May a graduate
    instructor in the English department

5
Methodologies
  • Largely influenced by feminisms recognizing of
    the personal narrative and ethic of care toward
    research participants
  • Value on the experiences of participants rather
    than just the researchers observations
  • Development of a research website to share
    findings and provide updates on visits

6
(No Transcript)
7
Research Questions
  • ? What are heuristics for designing
    classroom-based assessment practices for
    nonnative speakers of English or speakers of
    dialects?
  • ? How can we design assessment practices that are
    culturally sensitive to speakers of nonstandard
    English?
  • ? How do students with diverse language
    backgrounds experience the assessment process?

8
Data Results
  • Students model their views of good writing
    based on the language of the program rubric.
  • Instructors and students tend to think of error
    as referring to sentence-level mistakes.
  • Students desired more language diverse writing
    models and assessments that specified how writing
    had progressed.

9
Error Patterns in Student Writing
  • May noted that students struggle with writing
    words as they hear them Geoffrey Pullum calls
    these eggcorns.
  • Kays international students struggled with verb
    issues and syntax errors due to structural
    differences between home languages and English.
  • What may appear to be a mistake may actually be
    due to language difference.

10
Influence of Program Rubrics
  • Although students, instructors, as well as the
    program guidebook, expressed that instructor
    feedback was the most valuable form of
    assessment, the language of the rubric was the
    most influential to students.
  • Balester categorizes writing rubrics as
    acculturationaism, those which count errors to
    determine correctness accomodationism, which
    make some attempt to accommodate second-language
    writers and multiculturalism, which incorporate
    principles of the CCCC position statement on
    language diversity through the emphasis of
    writerly agency (72).

11
Rubrics that Foster Language Diversity
  • University of Southern Florida First Year Writing
    Rubric

12
Questions or Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com