Critical what?-- discovering CDA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical what?-- discovering CDA

Description:

Critical what?-- discovering CDA Alwin C. Aguirre alwin.aguirre_at_aut.ac.nz Institute of Culture, Discourse and Communication Auckland University of Technology – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:356
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: themi155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical what?-- discovering CDA


1
Critical what?-- discovering CDA
  • Alwin C. Aguirre
  • alwin.aguirre_at_aut.ac.nz
  • Institute of Culture, Discourse and Communication
  • Auckland University of Technology

2
A blog
Taking It Like a Man
  • Sohail Karmani forwards the following question
    (from some person named tom nagy) to a newsgroup
    interested in Critical Discourse Analysis
  • "Is discourse analysis at the primative level of
    medicine 100 years ago when it could diagnose but
    not intervene successfully? If this is so, it
    would be critical to be aware of this dismal
    state of affairs.

tom nagy
3
A blog
Karmani
  • and he continues with his own point
  • This is precisely the problem I have with CDA. As
    I see it, the whole thing is based on the
    self-serving assumption that society desperately
    needs a vanguard class of experts who can unravel
    the encoded messages in a given text that elude
    the dumb and stupid massesOf course the whole
    thing (like other specializations in academia) is
    a total fraud! All you need all is a modicum of
    intelligence and a bit of critical awareness and
    anyone can unravel the "deep meanings" that
    reside in texts. The bottom line (as I see it) is
    CDA is embarrassingly straightforward stuff
    dressed up in layers and layers of self-serving
    unintelligible jargon.

Critical Discourse Analysis and why I fucking
despise it Blog of Revelation
4
What is CDA?
  • is discourse analysis with an attitude (van
    Dijk, 2001)

awareness of the seen and unseen connection of
structures of power to discursive or
communicative activities/events
hermeneutic-reconstructive and critical-dialectica
l theoretical foundation
5
Where did CDA come from?
  • Marxism ideology, hegemony
  • Foucault discourse, discursive formation, power
  • Critical linguistics linguistic meaning is
    inseparable from ideology (Fowler Kress 1979)
  • CDA as a label established in 1995 by
    Faircloughs Critical Discourse Analysis The
    critical study of language (Billig 2007)

6
What does CDA actually do?
  • Pioneers
  • Norman Fairclough Three dimensions of a
    communicative event
  • Ruth Wodak Discourse-historical approach
  • Teun van Dijk Sociocognitive approach

7
What does CDA actually do?
  • Norman Fairclough
  • Communicative Events and Order of Discourse
  • Communicative events (the particular)
  • text
  • discourse practice
  • sociocultural practice
  • The order of discourse (the general)
  • interdiscursivity

8
What does CDA actually do?
  • Sample analysis

power in new media/Internet
blogging as confession
Critical Discourse Analysis and why I fucking
despise it
lexical choice
9
Why despise CDA?
  • The critical dilemma in CDA
  • On the human critical instinct (Chilton 2005)
  • On CDA becoming itself an institution (Billig
    2007, 2008)
  • An established brand critical orthodoxy
  • Language of CDA practice elitist
  • CDA, alone, cannot change the world.

10
Where now for CDA?
  • A participatory framework?
  • Focus on the other side of relations of power
    resistance
  • CDA and an activist linguistics
  • calling for researchers to remain connected to
    the communities in which they research, returning
    to those settings to apply the knowledge they
    have generated for the good of the community and
    to deepen the research through expansion or
    focus (OConnor 2007)

11
References
  • Billig, M. (2007). Critical discourse analysis
    and the rhetoric of critique. In G. Weiss R.
    Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis Theory
    and Interdisciplinartiy. New York, NY Palgrave
    Macmillan.
  • Billig, M. (2008a). The language of critical
    discourse analysis The case of nominalization.
    Discourse and Society, 19, 783-800. doi
    10.1177/0957926508095894
  • Billig, M. (2008b). Nominalizing and
    de-nominalizing A reply. Discourse and Society,
    19, 829-841. doi 10.1177/0957926508095898
  • Chilton, P. (2005). Missing links in mainstream
    CDA Modules, blends and the critical instinct.
    In R.
  • Wodak P. Chilton (Eds.), A New Agenda in
    (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam, The
    Netherlands John Benjamins Publishing Co.
  • Critical Discourse Analysis and why I fucking
    despise it. (2009, March 16). Retrieved from
    http//blog-of-revelation.blogspot.com/2009/03/cri
    tical-discourse-analysis-and-why-i.html
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London
    Edward Arnold.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of Knowledge.
    London Tavistock Publications.
  • Fowler, R. Kress, G. (1979). Critical
    linguistics. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress,
    T. Trew. Language and Control. London Routledge
    Kegan Paul Ltd.
  • OConnor, P. (2007). Activist sociolinguistics in
    a critical discourse analyst perspective. In G.
    Weiss R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse
    Analysis Theory and Interdisciplinartiy. New
    York, NY Palgrave Macmillan.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com