Milwaukee Homicide Review Commission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Milwaukee Homicide Review Commission

Description:

... Crisis Response Unit Milwaukee County Courts Community Service Division ICE DEA Community Prosecutors Medical Examiner HIDTA FBI US Attorney s Office US Marshal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: DSD82
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Milwaukee Homicide Review Commission


1
Milwaukee Homicide Review Commission December
10, 2014
2
Criminal Justice Model
3
  • SCANNING
  • ANALYSIS
  • RESPONSE
  • ASSESSMENT
  • SARA

4
Homicides are preventable.
5
Homicide Reviews
  • A systematic process used to examine the
    underlying cause of homicides in real time and
    problem solve.
  • The homicide review team is made up of an
    interdisciplinary group of practitioners that
    meet regularly to discuss the cause of a recent
    homicide and ways to prevent similar homicides
    from happening in the future.
  • Homicide reviews are similar to other reviews
    such as crime incident case reviews, child death
    reviews, and domestic violence (DV) fatality
    reviews

6
  • Homicide Reviews are practiced within a larger
    initiative administered by the Milwaukee Homicide
    Review Commission (MHRC)
  • MHRC is the force responsible for sustaining the
    homicide review process in Milwaukee and the
    continued success of the recommendations stemming
    from the reviews

7
  • Started in 2005 in 3 of 7 police districts, now
    covers the whole city and conducts homicide and
    nonfatal shooting reviews
  • Developed in partnership with
  • Milwaukee Police Department
  • Mayor Tom Barretts Office
  • Milwaukee County District Attorneys Office

8
  • GOALS
  • To better understand the nature of homicide
    through comprehensive information sharing
  • To develop innovative, proactive responses
  • To strategically focus limited enforcement and
    intervention activities on identifiable risks

9
  • A multi-level, multi-agency homicide review
    process
  • Focused on addressing Milwaukees ongoing problem
    with lethal violence
  • Draws on both the criminal justice model of crime
    incident review and the public health model of
    death review

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Criminal Justice Review (CJR)
  • Criminal Justice professionals
  • Develop a detailed, real-time description of
    homicide
  • Develop innovative violence prevention responses
  • Monthly review of previous months homicides
  • Monthly reviews allow
  • - Tracking the performance of implemented
    responses, adjusting as necessary
  • - Guiding the application of responses to
    particular violent groups and violent areas
  • - Communication between agencies

13
Criminal Justice Review
14
AGENCIES
District Captains Community Liaison
Officers Anti-Gang Unit Intel Fusion
Center Organized Crime Division Probation/Parole A
TF Crisis Response Unit Milwaukee County
Courts Community Service Division ICE DCI
DEA Community Prosecutors Medical
Examiner HIDTA FBI US Attorneys Office US
Marshal MPS District Attorney Housing
Authority City Attorneys Office
15
Criminal Justice Review Partners
  • Milwaukee Police Department
  • City Attorneys Office
  • District Attorneys Office
  • Medical Examiners Office
  • High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Program
  • Milwaukee Housing Authority
  • Milwaukee Public Schools Public Safety Division
  • Delinquency and Court Services Division
  • FBI
  • Office of the Chief Judge
  • US Marshal Service
  • WI Department of Corrections (Adult and Juvenile)
  • US Attorneys Office
  • US Drug Enforcement Agency
  • Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
    Explosives
  • US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement
  • WI Department of Justice, Division of Criminal
    Investigation

16
Information Shared
  • Victim
  • Associates of the victim and if the victim is
    part of a group of active offenders
  • Social history
  • Suspect(s) / offender(s)
  • Associates of suspect(s) / offender(s) and if the
    suspect(s) is part of a group of active offenders
  • Social history
  • Relationship between victim and suspect(s) /
    offender(s)
  • Location of the event and community factors
  • Drug or gang involvement, and relationship to
    other crimes
  • Motive

17
(No Transcript)
18
Community Service Provider Review
19
Community Service Partners
  • Peace Learning Center
  • Project Ujima
  • RISE
  • Running Rebels
  • Safe Schools Initiative (w/ Marquette)
  • Safe and Sound Community Partners
  • Sherman Park Association
  • Social Development Commission
  • Southside Organizing Committee
  • Sojourner Family Peace Center
  • State Office of Minority Health
  • Urban Underground
  • Violence Prevention Initiative (w/MCW)
  • Wisconsin Community Services
  • WI Anti-Violence Effort (WAVE)
  • YMCA
  • Center for Urban Population Health
  • Community Advocates
  • Counseling Center of Milwaukee
  • Crime Victim's Services through the Wisconsin
    Department of Justice
  • Department of Neighborhood Services
  • FORGE
  • Hope House
  • Journey House
  • Justice 2000
  • League of Young Voters
  • Metcalf Park Neighborhood Services
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • National Alliance of Mental Illness
  • New Hope Project/YWCA

Partial List
20
Working Group and Executive Committee
  • Criminal justice and social service
    administrators meet monthly to guide and monitor
    MHRC progress
  • Executive Committee includes
  • Mayor FBI
  • Chief of Police US Attorney
  • District Attorney City Attorney
  • Secretary of DOC Chief Judge
  • Commissioner of Health Attorney General
  • Commissioner of DNS ATF
  • School Superintendent EDs
  • Child Welfare

21
  • Functions
  • Convene homicide, shooting, and non fatal DV
    reviews
  • Analyze and disseminate crime/violence data
  • - Maintain database
  • Provide technical assistance in program
    development and evaluation
  • Field building

22
  • Keys to Success
  • Building trust and information sharing between
    agencies.
  • Providing opportunities to network and work
    together (multi-agency collaboration).
  • Acting on recommendations, having results.
  • Valuing and drawing on expertise from various
    disciplines and perspectives.
  • Providing timely data on violent crimes.

23
Prosecution
  • Imari Brown 2011
  • Shooting Review
  • Shooting victim, uncooperative, MVP D5
  • Prosecutor suggest threat assessment
  • Information from treat assessment presented to
    judge at sentencing
  • Strong sentence
  • Working on protocol in collaboration with PD,
    DAs, Corrections, Judges

24
  • M4564 M4565
  • HOMICIDE 47 48
  • District 3


Saturday June 30, 2007 1030 pm 1234 N. 50th
St.
25
SCENE PHOTOS
V 2 located 1234 /50 N. 50th St.
V 1 located 1235 N. 50th St.
Recovered (23) - .40 cal casings
26
SCENE PHOTOS
(3) Vehicles struck
1238 N. 50th St. Struck
Several fireworks recovered
27
HOMICIDE VICTIMS
  • Victims were passengers in Rileys (witness)
    vehicle.
  • Victims and Riley observed a subject known as
    DL.
  • DL and the suspect were shooting off
    fireworks.
  • Victims and Riley approached and argued with
    DL.
  • Victims and Riley punched and beat DL.
  • Suspect approached the fight and fired first at
    Jones and then White as he attempted to flee.
  • David White
  • B/M 05/03/88 (19)
  • 2713 N. 46th St.
  • GSW multiple/body


Lee Jones B/M 12/26/84 (22) 5430 N. 57th St. GSW
multiple/body
28
WITNESSES
Robert Smith AKA DL B/M, DOB 7/4/84
(23) Subject shooting off fireworks / punched by
Riley and the victims.
Riley Johnson B/M, DOB 9/7/1982
(24) Rapper Drove victims to the location and
punched Robert
29
SUSPECT

  • Suspect stated witnesses DL and Risco got
    into a verbal argument.
  • Stated he considered DL his cousin because
    they grew up together.
  • Stated prior to the argument he went to
    7-mile fair with DL and purchased fireworks.
  • Stated he left the neighborhood with
    his girlfriend and went to the hotel to get
    away.
  • Suspect denied shooting the victim and
    requested a lawyer.
  • Several witnesses identified the suspect as the
    shooter.
  • Suspects girlfriend could not confirm suspects
    alibi.
  • Charged with 2 counts of 1st Degree
    Intentional Homicide
  • Plead guilty to both counts and sentenced to
    45 years 30 incarcerated/15 years extended
    supervision.


Mark Morris B/M, DOB 1/12/87 (20) 6836 W.
Appleton Ave.

30
What do you know about this case?
HOMICIDE VICTIMS
  • Victim
  • Associates of the victim
  • Victim part of a group of active offenders?
  • Social history
  • Suspect(s) / offender(s)
  • Associates of suspect(s) / offender(s)
  • Suspect(s) part of a group of active offenders?
  • Social history
  • Relationship between victim and suspect(s) /
    offender(s)
  • Location of the event
  • Drug or gang involvement
  • Relationship to other crimes
  • Motive

Lee Davis
David Brown
SUSPECT
Mark Moore
31
AGENCIES
District Captains Community Liaison
Officers Anti-Gang Unit Vice Control Intelligence
Division Probation/Parole ATF Crisis Response
Unit Milwaukee County Courts Community Service
Division ICE
DEA Community Prosecutors Medical
Examiner HIDTA FBI US Attorneys Office US
Marshal MPS District Attorney Housing
Authority City Attorneys Office
32
SERVICES
  • What services were provided to the
  • Victim
  • Suspects
  • Families
  • Neighbors
  • Neighborhoods
  • Prior to and after the death

33
PREVENTION
  • Do we have all of the information we need?
  • What placed the victim/suspects at risk?
  • Were there gaps or barriers in investigations
    or service delivery?

34
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Improved investigations/service delivery
  • Changes in agency policy/practice
  • Local ordinance or state legislation
  • Community prevention initiatives

35
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com