Quick Quiz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Quick Quiz

Description:

Quick Quiz Religious Ethics Divine Command Theory Who was Socrates arguing with who first proposed the Divine Command Theory? Theatetus Alcebiades Isosocrates Plato ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Steve2085
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quick Quiz


1
Quick Quiz
  • Religious Ethics

2
Divine Command Theory
  • Who was Socrates arguing with who first proposed
    the Divine Command Theory?
  • Theatetus
  • Alcebiades
  • Isosocrates
  • Plato
  • Euthyphro

3
Divine Command Theory
  • The central problem of the Divine Command Theory
    is, it makes what is right and wrong, good and
    bad __________
  • too restrictive.
  • mysterious.
  • arbitrary.
  • unpleasant.
  • religious.

4
Aquinas
  • Aquinas identifies the end-directedness of nature
    that Aristotle recognized with
  • The light of nature that illumines morality
  • The love of nature that guides kindness
  • Gods purposes for human beings
  • Gods traits or perfections
  • The theistic concept of entelechies

5
Aquinas
  • The word natural in Natural Law refers to
  • Human Nature
  • Gods Nature
  • Our sinful nature
  • Our divine nature
  • Nature or Gods creation

6
Aquinas
  • The word law in Natural Law refers to
  • Gods commands
  • Mans rules
  • Physical regularities
  • Psychic regularities
  • The world system

7
Aquinas
  • We cannot pursue the good directly, according to
    Aquinas, because
  • It is unappealing to sinners
  • It is obscured by concern for happiness
  • It is abundant or everywhere equally
  • It is abstract or not findable in space and
    time
  • It is God, and no one can see God

8
The Problem of Evil
  • The problem of evil is
  • How can God prevent evil?
  • How can God permit us to do evil?
  • How can God exist given that evil exists?
  • How can God do evil?
  • How much evil will God allow?

9
The Problem of Evil
  • The conclusion of the argument from evil says
  • No God exists
  • No God is good
  • No God is powerful
  • No all-good, all-powerful God exists
  • No all-knowing God exists

10
The Problem of Evil
  • Why cant God just restrain evil-doers?
  • Because God is not that powerful
  • Because God cannot look on evil, and so cannot
    know who does evil
  • Because God promised everyone, including evil
    people, freedom
  • Because then no ones actions would be morally
    significant
  • Because restraining evil-doers is wrong

11
The Problem of Evil
  • The problem with claiming evil is just a lack of
    goodness is
  • Everyone knows evil exists
  • Evil is necessary for moral development
  • Fighting evil is the whole reason for religion
  • Lack of goodness works just as well in the
    argument
  • It is insulting to folks whove experienced evil

12
The Problem of Evil
  • The theistic response to the fact that there are
    possible worlds where creatures have free will
    but do right all the time is
  • That is not a fact
  • Those worlds are boring
  • If creatures dont sin, why would we need God?
  • God cant create those worlds, only creatures can
  • Freedom implies disobedience

13
The Problem of Evil
  • In the argument, unnecessary evils are those
    evils that
  • Are consequences of our free choices
  • We can easily do without
  • We call natural evils, like earthquakes and
    tornados
  • Arise from mistakes and misunderstandings
  • The devil and his demons produce

14
The Problem of Evil
  • The trouble with probabilistic arguments from
    evil is
  • All probability is subjective
  • We cant establish any associations between God
    and evil
  • Probability only results in opinion, not
    knowledge
  • Probability only works in mathematics, not
    religion
  • There is no trouble that is the argument that
    works

15
Answer Key
  • 2E, 3C, 4C, 5A, 6A, 7D, 8C, 9D, 10D, 11D, 12D,
    13C, 14B
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com