Title: Driving and Visual Impairment
1Driving and Visual Impairment
- Lori L. Grover, O.D., F.A.A.O.
- Assistant Professor
- Chief, Low Vision Rehabilitation Service
- Southern California College Of Optometry
2Introduction
- For most people, driving is a very important
privilege and a necessary part of maintaining
independent living - When vision is lost as a result of disease,
trauma or congenital condition, specific visual
requirements needed for driving may be
compromised - Results in an inability to meet requirements for
legal driving, and restriction or loss of
licensure
3Learning Objectives
- Understand importance of accessibility to, and
involvement in, the bioptic driving process - Understand licensure options and national driving
standards - Recognize patient populations where driving is a
critical factor - Identify the optometric role in driving-related
issues - Advocate driving privileges based on clinical
findings
4Clinical Care Objectives
- Promote comprehensive clinical rehabilitation to
include treatment options and patient/family
counseling for driving-related issues - Advocate the privilege of gaining and/or
maintaining safe and legal drivers licensure for
low vision patients of driving age - Provide clinical leadership and expertise through
direct or referral services
5Twentieth Century Demographics
- Americans 65 and older more than tripled
- 4.1 in 1900 vs. 12.7 in 1997
- Older Americans have more than tripled
- 3.1 million to 34.1 million
- By 2030 it is projected that there will be 70
million 65 or more living in U.S.A. - Americans 65 and over 12 of population 33 of
national health care expenditures
6Not only growing, but AGING!
- Number of people 85 or older is 31 times greater
than that in 1900 - Sixteen fold increase in 75-84 age group
- Eight fold increase in 65-74 age group
CONCLUSION Older persons need comprehensive
optometric care, including driving-related
issues, to maintain a self-reliant, independent
and enhanced life style!
7Driving and the Low Vision Rehabilitation Practice
- Within our field, remains area of frustration
- Modern society demands independence and freedom
of mobility - Inability to drive often results in limitations
in vocational and avocational options - Realistic goals of financial and social
independence depend upon drivers licensure
8Non-Driver Fallout for Youth...
- Psychological studies have shown young adults
with visual impairment have strongly linked
conflicts between transportation problems and
dependence/emergence of independence - Results in major negative impact on emerging
self-concept
9and for the Mature Patient
- Adults who lose driving privileges due to
acquired vision loss experience decreased
self-esteem, declining social status and
increased isolation - Results in negative impact on relationships with
friends and family as well as employment-related
issues
10Did you know
- It is estimated that 59 of those people ages
65-69 earn regular wages? - And
- 95 of all 40 year olds have at least one living
parent - 80 of all 50 year olds have at least one living
parent - 25 of all female caregivers have been forced to
take time off from a job to care for aging
parents - 12 of these women have had to leave employment
to render elder-care services
11Is There Licensure Discrimination?
- Licensure issued to wide range of physically
challenged individuals - Individuals with VI frequently denied due to
inability to meet high visual standards developed
by regulatory agencies throughout the nation - Denial occurs in spite of consistent data showing
favorable ranking of VI drivers
12Example Texas MAB
- Comparison of accident ratios per hundred
drivers - 8.50 neurological impairments
- 5.63 cardiovascular impairments
- 4.86 visual impairments
13and do WE contribute?
- Thorough understanding of state licensure
requirements and law - Issues related to driving vision routinely
discussed with patients and family members - Provision of appropriate low vision
rehabilitation care OR referral to colleagues for
LVR, bioptic driving evaluation, etc.
14Vision And Driving
- Most states require best corrected VA of 20/40 or
better but.no standardization - Recommendation from a 1925 report by American
Medical Associations Section on Ophthalmology - Lack of standardization for non-restricted
licensure as well
15Vision and Driving
- 20/40 vs. 20/200 (Fonda, Weiss)
- Arbitrary standard based on signage at 20/40, not
actual visual demands - Maintained that person with 20/200 at 40 mph can
drive safely - Static vs. Dynamic Acuity (Burg)
- Accident rates have a 10 times higher correlation
with dynamic acuity than static acuity - Peripheral Image Quality (Feinbloom)
- 12 fully sighted drivers fogged to 20/200 with
3.00D - Interesting for central vs. overall loss
16Drivers Licensure Options
- Standard Licensure
- 20/40 20/70 varies greatly between states may
require VF, phoria, color vision minimums - Restricted Licensure
- 20/50 20/200 may have VF component and can
include time of day geographical area no
freeways side mirrors driving skills exam
highway restriction TS use - Commercial Licensure
- conservative may require VF, color vision,
stereopsis
17Variations in VA Requirements
- Louisiana
- 20/40 best eye without lenses full driving
- 20/50 daylight only
- 20/60 20/70 daytime within 25 mile radius of
residence
- West Virginia
- 20/40 no restrictions monocular or binocular,
with or without lenses - 20/100 minimum or better for licensure
18Visual Field and Driving
- There is an even greater disparity between states
with regards to visual field requirements - One of the most important functions of peripheral
vision when driving is motion detection - Objects 3-10 times smaller than those resolved by
the fovea can be detected in the periphery
through motion, therefore intact peripheral field
is critical
19Variations in VF Requirements
- Louisiana
- 150 degree fields measured with a 10 mm white
test object at 330mm without corrective lenses in
the horizontal meridian no restrictions - 140 but at least 110 degrees restriction for
outside mirrors and license must display an
active VF impairment sticker
- West Virginia Â
- 20 degree minimum field required from center of
at least one eye for licensure - 70 degree field required for non- restricted
licensureÂ
20Current Licensure Regulations
- 18 states have no visual field requirements
21A Look to the Past
- Statement On The Use Of Bioptic Telescopes For
Driving AOA Low Vision Section September, 1994 - Articles reports on driving and telescopes
visual field/acuity deficits role of vision in
driving bioptic drivers training model
programs visual performance and accident
records driving skills diseases and driving,
22A Look to the Past
- cognitive function and driving psychosocial
issues restrictions and limitations on driving
safe and legal driving color perception,
contrast sensitivity, glare recovery,
photosensitivity, oculomotor skills and driving - Independent state regulations and requirements
- La Resistance - those who advocate no driving
with visual loss under any circumstances
23Thank you Dr. Feinbloom!
- First developed bioptic telescopic spectacle to
allow full-time use of telescope
24Korb - 1969
- First used bioptics (32 out of 67 patients with
low vision in Massachusetts) - 26 ultimately received licensure
- Compiled 32 person-years of automobile operation
without any incidents
25Bioptic Driving in 1982
- 13 states permitted bioptic driving licensure
- 13 states considered bioptic licensure on an
individual basis - 34 states did not allow bioptic driving
- (Janke, Journal of Safety Research, 1983)Â
26Bioptic Driving In 1995
- 17 states permitted bioptic driving
- 8 states permitted bioptic licensure on an
individual basis - 25 states did not permit bioptic driving
-
(Fishbaugh, 1995 Appel et al., 1990)
27Bioptic Driving In 2000
- 34 states allow bioptic driving
- 14 states do not allow bioptic driving
- 5 states allow bioptic telescope use
after passing DMV evaluation
Note District Of Columbia included Note
TS use OK but no bioptic licensure in two states
(Grover, Barnes, 2000)
28Bioptic Driving In The U.S.A.
Bioptic Driving Allowed Bioptic Can Be Used
Bioptic Driving Not Allowed
(Grover Barnes, 2000)
29AOA Statement on Bioptic Driving (1994)
- The AOA acknowledges driving is not a right but
a privilegepublic safety issues are a primary
concernaccess to driving privilege should not be
categorically denied to individuals who have
reduced acuity
30AOA LVS Statement
- The Driving Population
- What Are Bioptic Telescopes
- How Bioptic Telescopes Are Used
- Vision Criteria
- Other Factors Influencing Driving
- Driving Research
31AOA LVS Statement
- How ODs Can Help To Clarify Issues Related To
Bioptic Drivers - Provide OR refer for comprehensive evaluations
encompassing factors related to driving - Know traditional and new TS design technology
- Contribute to related research studies
- Provide expertise to DMV Advisory Committees
32Potential Problems
- Restricted field and ring scotomas
- Jack-in-the-Box effect
- Inconsistencies with acuity when in motion
- Lack of instruction and training
- Other factors
33The Bioptic Driving Population
- 670 California
- 4-6 Idaho
- 345 (96), 296 (97), 137 (98) Illinois
- 236 (as of 5/99) Ohio
- 1259 Nevada
- 7-8 Wyoming
34Additional Notes
- All data are as of 2000 - more recent information
has shown additional states allowing driving with
visual loss and/or bioptic TS since 2000 - AOA Vision and Driving Symposium to be held at
the AOA Mid Year Planning Meeting 1-26-03 (I
will update after mtg.)
35Summary of Clinical Care
- Promote comprehensive rehabilitation to include
treatment options and patient/family counseling
for driving-related issues - Advocate the privilege of gaining and/or
maintaining safe and legal drivers licensure for
low vision patients of driving age - Provide clinical leadership and expertise through
direct or referral services - Also see http//www.biopticdriving.org/