Title: Leech%20Heart%20Half-Center%20Oscillator:
1Leech Heart Half-Center Oscillator
- Control of Burst Duration by Low-Voltage
Activated Calcium Current
Olypher A, et al. (2006) Hill J, et al. (2001)
Math 723 Mathematical Neuroscience Khaldoun
Hamade June 7, 2007
2(No Transcript)
3Introduction
- Half-center oscillators, also called central
pattern generators (CPG), drive rhythmic
behaviors - Burst Period Burst Duration Interburst
Interval - Burst period varies depending on functional
demand of activity (ex. Heart rate, breathing
rate, locomotion speed) - Bursting is maintained by slowly inactivating
inward currents
4Leech Heart CPG
- A pair of mutually inhibitory neurons
- Burst duration is controlled by both, the
bursting neuron itself and the opposite neuron - Each neuron on its own is capable of producing a
bursting pattern the inhibitory coupling adds - the alternating pattern
- control of burst termination by the opposite
neuron(IN-1s burst ends because IN-2 escapes
inhibition starts firing)
5Disinhibition
6Modeling of Leech Heart CPG (Hill et al. 2001)
- One compartment model
- Ionic currents
- INa fast Na
- IP persistent Na
- ICaF fast, low-threshold Ca2
- ICaS slow, low-threshold Ca2
- Ih hyperpolarization-activated cation current
- IK1 delayed rectifier K
- IK2 persistent K
- IKA fast, transient K
In
Out
7Burst duration
- The low-voltage-activated (LVA) calcium current
- ICaF (Fast) contributes to burst initiation
- ICaS (Slow) determines burst duration
- The inactivation time constant of ICaS (th,CaS)
determines the spike frequency decay rate - The spike frequency determines the amount of
inhibition the opposite neuron is receiving - Once the spike frequency (inhibition) falls below
a certain value (fFinal) the opposite neuron
escapes inhibition and begins to burst
8Burst duration (Continued)
- Spike frequency is maximum shortly after burst
initiation, and declines to fFinal at the end of
burst - Low th,CaS correspond to fast inactivation, fast
frequency decay, and shorter bursts - High th,CaS correspond to slow inactivation, slow
frequency decay, and longer bursts - Maximal value of gh can control the length of
the interburst duration a higher value allows
the neuron to escape inhibition earlier, when it
is still higher
9(Olypher et al. 2006)
10gCaS during bursting, with and without mutual
inhibition
Inhibition
No Inhibition
- Note
- Slope/decay of gCaS dependence on ?
- Difference in minimum value of gCaS during a
burst between inhibition and disinhibition
11Simulations
- th,CaS was varied unilaterally in mHNv (constant
in mHNc, ?1) by varying the scaling factor ?
between 0.25 4 - Period, burst duration, fFinal, and decay time
constants of gCaS and spike frequency were
recorded
12(No Transcript)
13Results
14Results
?-mHNv ?-mHNv 0.25 0.5 1 2 4
Period (s) Period (s) 6.14 6.6 7.55 12.44 19.26
Burst Duration (s) mHNv 1.67 2.196 3.82 9.83 16.41
Burst Duration (s) mHNc 4.5 3.71 3.87 2.61 2.78
F-final (Hz) mHNv 4.85 6.054 8.35 8.18 7.51
F-final (Hz) mHNc 6.38 7.49 8.01 7.11 6.69
15Results
(Olypher et al. 2006)
16Results
- Decay time constants for ICas, gCaS, hCaS were
measured for a representative burst (?1) - Decay time constants for ICas gCaS were found
to be equal, while that of hCaS was different
this was attributed to a voltage decline during
the burst - Decay time constant of gCaS was chosen as the
benchmark - For each simulation the decay time constants for
gCaS spike frequency were calculated and
compared
17Results
(Olypher et al. 2006)
- Note
- Time constant of gCaS decay in the varied neuron
scaled linearly with ?, on the other hand that of
the constant neuron remained unchanged - Time constant of frequency decay was strongly
correlated to that of gCaS in the varied neuron
(r20.99), whereas in the constant neuron it
wasnt (r20.21)
18Hybrid system
- The hybrid system was constructed from a model
neuron running in real time and a chemically
isolated living heart neuron, with inhibitory
coupling through a dynamic clamp - ICas time constant of inactivation was varied
unilaterally, once in the model neuron and once
in the living heart neuron - Results were similar to those obtained in the
model system
19Conclusion
- Burst duration is controlled by inactivation of
ICas - Scaling th,CaS through ?, scales the decay time
constant of gCaS ICas equally - Decay of gCaS is correlated with a parallel decay
in spike frequency - fFinal does not vary with (?xth,CaS)
- The escape point (from inhibition) of the
opposite neuron is not affected by th,CaS
20Conclusion (Continued)
- In living systems th,CaS is not usually modulated
- Varying maximal value of gCaS modifies the burst
duration, but also affect the output signal of
the premotor CPG (strength and spike frequency) - Modulation of the maximal value of gh varies the
period without affecting the signal output - gh is modulated in living systems
- So why should we care about the affect of th,CaS ?
21Conclusion (Continued)
- th,CaS sets the baseline period of the CPG
- th,CaS sets the dynamic range over which
modulation of gh max. can regulate the period of
the heart half-center oscillator - gh max sets fFinal (the escapable inhibition) and
thus the period - th,CaS sets how long it will take for a burst to
reach fFinal
22References
- Olypher A, Cymbalyuk G, Calabrese RL. Hybrid
systems analysis of the control of burst duration
by low-voltage-activated calcium current in leech
heart interneurons, J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec
96(6)2857-67 - Model
- Hill AA, Lu J, Masino MA, Olsen OH, Calabrese RL.
A model of a segmental oscillator in the leech
heartbeat neuronal network. J Comput Neurosci.
2001 May-Jun 10(3)281-302
23Questions?