Title: Kopier inn et forsidebilde her
1Kopier inn et forsidebilde her
CO2 capture and storage from an environmental
perspective Eivind Hoff Bellona Europa 9
February 2009
- \\felles\malfiler\powerpoint\forsider.ppt
2CCS from environmental perspective
- Contents
- The role for CCS in combating climate change
- Norwegian experience
- How do we deploy CCS?
3CCS from environmental perspective
- Contents
- The role for CCS in combating climate change
- Norwegian experience
- How do we deploy CCS?
4CCS from environmental perspective
The proper role for CCS (I) Bridge to the
renewable economy
5CCS from environmental perspective
The proper role for CCS (II) Absorbing CO2 from
the air
6Foredrag og dato 00.00.00
7CCS from environmental perspective
- Contents
- The role for CCS in combating climate change
- Norwegian experience
- How do we deploy CCS?
8CCS from environmental perspective
- Sleipner
- Since 1996, 1 million tonnes CO2/year stored from
gas field - CO2 behaves according to models
9CCS from environmental perspective
- The Norwegian Apollo project
- Fossil-fuel fired power plants without CCS banned
in practice - Gassnova State-owned public limited company
- Test Centre Mongstad 80 Gassnova (will try
dilute), 20 StatoilHydro - New gas plant 280MW power350MW heat, 1.8mt CO2
- Existing oil refinery (gas from cracker coal
flue gas) - Kårstø (gas power 420MW, 1.2mt CO2) 100
Gassnova - Full capture and storage by 2014
- Both state aid schemes accepted by EFTA
Surveillance Authority - Norwegian recovery package Funding for Gassnova
increased
10CCS from environmental perspective
- Contents
- The role for CCS in combating climate change
- Norwegian experience
- How do we deploy CCS?
11CCS from environmental perspective
- How do we deploy CCS?
- Regulation of storage (done)
- Make CCS commercially viable (not done)
?
10-12 plants
100 plants
12CCS from environmental perspective
- EU emission allowance price volatility
13CCS from environmental perspective
- Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) not enough
- Lord Adair Turner (Chairman of the UKs
Committtee on Climate Change) We have to almost
totally decarbonise the power sector by 2030,
well before 2050. - 1 Dec report of the Committee EU ETS needs to be
'buttressed' by other policies and measures
because there is a risk the ETS alone will not
ensure coal is abated. - A policy is needed now that guarantees all coal
plants ('new' and 'old') have either full CCS in
the early 2020s (by the latest 2025) or are
closed. - What will be UK government response?
- What about Hunterston?
14CCS from environmental perspective
- A regulatory roadmap to ban fossil fuel power
generation without CCS - Emission limit values for SO2 (acid rain) have
massively reduced pollution - California introduced 2007 an emission
performance standard equivalent to max 498g CO2
per kWh generated - 500g/kWh supported by EP environment committee 7
October 2008 - Supported by Netherlands and Denmark in Council
- New directive for industrial emissions (IPPC
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control)
why not emission limit value for our most
dangerous pollutant? - Roadmap needed towards 150g CO2 per kWh
- New permits must contain clause on respecting an
emission limit value (cf US Climate Action
Partnership) at a given date in future
15CCS from environmental perspective
16EUs klima- og energipakke
- Thank you for your attention!
- eivind_at_bellona.org
www.bellona.org/ccs